Lithuania Prime Minister Gintautas Paluckas steps down after investigations and protests
Paluckas, a newly established leader of the center-left Social Democrats, ascended to the role late last year after a three-party coalition formed following parliamentary elections in October. His entire cabinet is now expected also to resign, potentially leaving the country without an effective government weeks before Russia holds joint military exercises with neighboring Belarus. Lithuanian foreign policy is unlikely to change as a result of the government shakeup. Nauseda, who was elected separately, is the country's face on the world stage and has been one of the most stalwart supporters of Ukraine in its fight against invading Russian forces.
Paluckas has recently been dogged by media investigations into his business and financial dealings. Several media outlets published investigations in July regarding Paluckas's past and present ventures and alleged mishandlings including ones more than a decade ago. The Baltic country's anti-corruption and law enforcement agencies subsequently launched their own probes. In a devastating blow to his reputation, the media also revealed that Paluckas never paid a significant part of a 16,500 euro fine (19,039) in connection with a 2012 criminal case dubbed the 'rat poison scandal.'
Paluckas was convicted of mishandling the bidding process for Vilnius rat extermination services while serving as the capital city's municipality administration director. Judges for the country's top court in 2012 ruled that he abused his official position by illegally granting privileges to the company that offered the highest price in the bid. He was also sentenced to two years behind bars, but the sentence was suspended for one year and he ultimately was never imprisoned. The Social Democratic party leader denied any wrongdoing regarding his business affairs, labeling the criticism as part of a coordinated attack by political opponents. He resigned before the opposition could formally launch impeachment proceedings. New coalition talks are expected to start shortly to form a new cabinet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
4 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Columbia University deal with Trump admin sets dangerous precedent, academics warn
Columbia University's $200 million agreement with President Donald Trump's administration marks the end of a months-long showdown, but academics warn it is just the first round of a government 'assault' on higher education. Academics from Columbia and beyond have expressed concerns that the deal -- which makes broad-ranging concessions and increases government oversight -- will become the blueprint for how Trump brings other universities to heel. The New York institution was the first to be targeted in Trump's war against elite universities, for what the US president claimed was its failure to tackle antisemitism on campus in the wake of pro-Palestinian protests. It was stripped of hundreds of millions of dollars of federal funding and lost its ability to apply for new research grants. Labs saw vital funding frozen, and dozens of researchers were laid off. But Columbia last week agreed to pay the government $200 million, and an additional $21 million to settle an investigation into antisemitism. According to Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education, the lack of due process -- with the government slashing funding before carrying out a formal investigation -- left Columbia in an 'untenable position.' Columbia law professor David Pozen agreed, saying the 'manner in which the deal was constructed has been unlawful and coercive from the start' and slamming the agreement as giving 'legal form to an extortion scheme.' Federal oversight The deal goes beyond addressing antisemitism and makes concessions on international student admissions, race and ethnicity considerations in admissions and single-sex spaces on campus, among other issues. Columbia also agreed to appoint an independent monitor to implement the deal, share ethnicity admissions data with the government and crack down on campus protests. Many of the provisions 'represent significant incursions onto Columbia's autonomy,' said Pozen. 'What's happened at Columbia is part of a broader authoritarian attack on civil society,' he said, pointing to similar pressures on law firms and media organizations to fall in line. According to the law professor, the deal 'signals the emergence of a new regulatory regime in which the Trump administration will periodically and unpredictably shake down other schools and demand concessions from them.' In the coming weeks, Pozen said he expected the 'administration will put a lot of pressure on Harvard and other schools to follow suit.' Harvard University has pushed back against the government, filing a lawsuit in a bid to reverse sweeping funding cuts. But Steven Levitsky, a professor of government at Harvard, said that 'in terms of academic freedom and in terms of democracy, the (Columbia) precedent is devastating.' 'First round' Education Secretary Linda McMahon said she hoped the Columbia deal would be a 'template for other universities around the country.' On Wednesday, McMahon announced a deal with Brown University to restore some federal funding and end ongoing investigations after the Ivy League school agreed to end race considerations in admissions and adopt a biological definition of gender. Brown President Christina Paxson admitted 'there are other aspects of the agreement that were not part of previous federal reviews of Brown policies' but were 'priorities of the federal administration.' Harvard is reportedly considering forking out $500 million to settle, according to the New York Times. Others have made smaller concessions to appease the government, with Trump's alma mater the University of Pennsylvania banning transgender women from competing in women's sports, and the University of Virginia's head resigning after scrutiny over its diversity programs. Brendan Cantwell, a professor at Michigan State University who researches the history and governance of higher education, said government interference in universities 'has not happened at scale like this, probably ever in American history.' While some university staff see striking an agreement as the quickest way to reopen the federal funding spigot, Cantwell warned that concessions such as sharing ethnicity data from admissions could be 'weaponized' and provide fodder for future probes. Levitsky agreed, saying: 'Extortionists don't stop at the first concession. Extortionists come back for more.' 'There's a very high likelihood that this is just the first round,' he said. Pozen noted that it will be harder for 'major research universities to hold the line' compared to smaller colleges which are less reliant on federal funding. But Levitsky still urged Harvard to stand its ground and 'fight back,' including in the courts. 'Fighting an authoritarian regime is costly, but that's what we have to do,' he said. 'This is an unprecedented assault, and universities need to work together.'
Al Arabiya
6 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Up to a million young Catholics expected for grand Pope Leo vigil
Up to a million young Catholics are expected to gather Saturday for a nighttime vigil led by Pope Leo XIV — the culmination of a weeklong pilgrimage marking a key event in the Jubilee holy year. The 'Jubilee of Youth,' an initiative by the Vatican inviting Catholics aged 18 to 35 to the heart of the global Church, has brought thousands of pilgrims from across the world to Rome. This year's gathering comes just under three months after 69-year-old Leo — the first American pope — assumed the papacy. Pilgrims waving flags and singing religious songs have packed the streets of the Italian capital all week in anticipation of his final address to the youth. 'I feel mainly curiosity, as we don't know him very well yet,' said Alice Berry, 21, a student from Paris. 'What does he have to say to us? What is his message for young people?' Uncertainty, anxiety Throughout the week, the Church has organized events across the city, including at Circus Maximus, where roughly 1,000 priests were available on Friday to hear confessions. About 200 white gazebos were set up at the ancient Roman chariot track, with priests offering guidance in 10 languages. Spanish was among the most commonly heard languages on Rome's streets. The pilgrimage unfolds at a time of rising economic uncertainty and climate anxiety among young people worldwide. Many pilgrims said they hoped the Vatican would address major global issues including the environment, economic inequality, and ongoing wars. Samarei Semos, 29, traveled three days from Belize to attend. 'We are still trying to understand his leadership,' she said of Pope Leo, adding she hopes he will speak out about challenges facing 'third world countries.' The gathering also comes amid widespread concern over the humanitarian crisis in Israel-blockaded Gaza, and more than three years into Russia's war in Ukraine. Night vigil The Vatican has praised youth from war-torn nations like Ukraine and Syria for making the journey, and Pope Leo has repeatedly urged participants to 'pray for peace.' Earlier this week, he told the assembled young people that their voices 'will be heard to the end of the earth.' According to the Vatican, youth from more than 146 countries are represented at the event. The climactic mass will be held in Rome's Tor Vergata district, where a large open-air space and new stage have been prepared. The area hosted the last youth jubilee 25 years ago, under Pope John Paul II. Over 4,300 volunteers and more than 1,000 police officers are involved in organizing and securing the event. In an unprecedented move, Pope Leo also held a special mass on Tuesday for Catholic social media influencers, signaling the Church's intent to engage digitally savvy youth. Rome authorities have tightened security throughout the city as a record influx of both tourists and pilgrims crowds the streets.
Arab News
15 hours ago
- Arab News
EU court rules against Italy on Albania migrant camps scheme
ROME/BRUSSELS: Europe's top court on Friday questioned the legitimacy of Italy's 'safe countries' list, which is used to send migrants to Albania and fast-track their asylum claims, in a fresh blow to a key plank of the government's migration policy. Conservative Giorgia Meloni's office, in a statement, called the court ruling 'surprising' and said it 'weakens policies to combat mass illegal immigration and defend national borders.' Dario Belluccio, a lawyer who represented one of the Bangladeshi asylum-seekers in the specific case brought before the European Court of Justice, said the Albanian migrant camps scheme had effectively been killed off. The detention facilities Italy set up in Albania have been empty for months, due to judicial obstacles. 'It will not be possible to continue with what the Italian government had envisioned before this decision ... Technically, it seems to me that the government's approach has been completely dismantled,' he told Reuters. Meloni had presented the offshoring of asylum-seekers to camps built in Albania as a cornerstone of her tough approach to immigration, and other European countries had looked to the idea as a possible model. However, the scheme stumbled on legal opposition almost as soon as it was launched last year, with Italian courts ordering the return to Italy of migrants picked up at sea and taken to Albania, citing issues with EU law. In a long-awaited judgment, the Luxembourg-based ECJ ruled that Italy is authorized to fast-track asylum rejections for nationals from countries on a 'safe' list — a principle at the heart of the Albania scheme. It also stated that Italy is free to decide which countries are 'safe,' but warned that such a designation should meet strict legal standards and allow applicants and courts to access and challenge the supporting evidence. In its statement, the ECJ said a Rome court had turned to EU judges, citing the impossibility of accessing such information and thus preventing it from 'challenging and reviewing the lawfulness of such a presumption of safety.' The ECJ also stated that a country may not be classified as 'safe' if it fails to provide adequate protection to its entire population, effectively agreeing with Italian judges who had raised this issue last year. Meloni's office complained that the EU judgment effectively allows national judges to dictate policy on migration, 'further reducing the already limited' capacity of parliament and government to take decisions on the matter. 'This is a development that should concern everybody,' it said. The case raised before the ECJ involved two Bangladeshi nationals who were rescued at sea by Italian authorities and taken to Albania, where their asylum claims were rejected based on Italy's classification of Bangladesh as a 'safe' country. The detention facilities Italy set up in Albania have been empty for months, due to judicial obstacles. Last week, a report found that their construction cost was seven times more than that of an equivalent center in Italy. Though the Albanian scheme is stuck in legal limbo, Italy's overall effort to curb undocumented migration by sea has been more successful. There have been 36,557 such migrant arrivals to date, slightly up from the same period in 2024, but far below the 89,165 recorded over the same time span in 2023.
