Trump must help Israel defeat Hamas to secure lasting peace
Israel's Security Cabinet has decided to take control of Gaza City, but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Aug. 10 that Israel will not attempt to "occupy Gaza."
The United States should support Israel's move. American interests require no less.
In 2005, the last time Israel left Gaza, the results were calamitous. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon devised a plan to withdrawal Israelis from the territory, which President George W. Bush lauded as 'a bold and historic initiative that can make an important contribution to peace.'
The reverse occurred. Hamas took power, purged its rival Fatah, immiserated the population, drove women indoors, tossed men from rooftops and terrorized Israel with rockets. Israel's pre-2005 occupation of Gaza, however flawed, was much preferable to the horror that followed.
Israeli control of Gaza City is the only way to defeat Hamas
Washington cannot let Hamas, which has American blood on its hands, stay in power. Designated as a foreign terrorist organization in 1997, Hamas butchered numerous Americans during the Second Intifada in Israel.
It then killed more than 40 Americans on Oct. 7, 2023, and took a dozen Americans captive. Hamas threatens not only Israel but also the United States.
Israeli control of Gaza City, a Hamas stronghold, is the only feasible way forward.
The 22 countries of the Arab League, which recently backed a resolution declaring that 'Hamas must end its rule in Gaza,' are unwilling to assume responsibility for the territory. They do not want to take refugees and provide little investment for the direct benefit of ordinary Gazans.
Only with Hamas destroyed and a new administration built can Gazans have a better future.
Your Turn: I saw coexistence every day in Israel. It's why I have hope. | Opinion Forum
Israel must be allowed to do the 'dirty work,' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's description of Israeli actions in Iran, that others would rather not.
Washington should extend political support for Israel's actions. It should also continue selling weapons to Jerusalem. It should let Israel finish the job without counterproductive interference.
Trump, US can't afford to restrain Israel
Only one man can stop the Israelis: President Donald Trump. He heads the only country on Earth with enough leverage to forestall Israel's expansion of the war.
Indeed, past American presidents have stopped Israeli military operations. Joe Biden forced a ceasefire on the Israelis amid their 2021 clashes with Hamas. In 2006, an exasperated George W. Bush urged Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to wrap up Israel's war in Lebanon after fighting dragged on for weeks. Ronald Reagan did the same to Prime Minister Menachem Begin when his invasion of the country foundered. This time, however, Trump should resist restraining the Israelis.
Trump certainly has the backbone to disregard the international outrage that is sure to ensue. Criticism from global elites has not deterred the president from implementing necessary changes in foreign policy. In his first term, he was mocked for insisting that NATO members meet their defense spending obligations and that Germany's dependence on Russian energy was geostrategic madness. Events vindicated Trump's position. The same regarding China, whose commercial depredations were tolerated before Trump denounced them.
The chattering classes at home and abroad will cry foul at the reoccupation of Gaza, but their vision would leave Hamas in power and precipitate another Oct. 7. Trump will brook none of this insanity.
Unlike many other Western leaders, Trump's Middle East strategy is premised on common sense. He knows that a friendly country like Israel cannot be expected to live cheek by jowl with maniacal jihadists who want to kill every Jew on the planet, including in the United States. Israeli control of Gaza will make the best of a terrible situation.
Opinion: Western nations want a Palestinian state. But Arab nations keep their distance.
Israel must win this war to bring lasting peace
Despite what his detractors allege, Trump is anti-war. He loathes bloodshed. Yet to secure the peace that Trump desires, Israel first needs to win this war.
Israel need not be in Gaza in perpetuity. After bringing their populations to their knees, America occupied both Germany and Japan before remaking them into responsible, self-governing countries. A similar outcome in Gaza is not out of the question.
Supporting Israel will pay dividends for Washington elsewhere. A Taiwan increasingly threatened by China will see that the United States stands by its friends, even when the going gets tough. Russia will see that it cannot subjugate all of Ukraine without paying an immense price.
'In war there is no substitute for victory,' said Gen. Douglas MacArthur, one of Trump's heroes. Today, anything less than full Israeli victory in Gaza will be a loss for the United States.
Daniel J. Samet, a Jeane Kirkpatrick Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, is the author of "U.S. Defense Policy toward Israel: A Cold War History."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
a few seconds ago
- Indianapolis Star
Gov. Mike Braun on Trump's redistricting pitch: 'I'm listening to the legislators'
Gov. Mike Braun says he will lean on the will of the legislature when it comes to President Donald Trump's push for mid-decade redistricting in Indiana. Already some of those legislators are making their ill feelings known. Vice President JD Vance made the pitch to Braun, House Speaker Todd Huston and Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray in a closed-door meeting at the Statehouse last week. The latter two said nothing after the meeting, only releasing vague statements that didn't mention redistricting. Braun said the meeting went "pretty good." It would be up to Braun to call a special session in order to redraw the congressional maps. He said Aug. 12 that Huston and Bray are consulting with their caucuses, and he is waiting to see what the legislature wants to do. "I think it's going to be a methodical process, and I think each leader is going to take his time on getting to that point where they say what they want to do," he said. He acknowledged that even if he called a special session, the legislature, if they are at odds with the idea, could very well just gavel in and gavel right out. "I'm listening to the legislators," he said. The political conundrum is this: Indiana leaders are facing the ultimate loyalty test to Trump while balancing the reality that carving up their very few Democratic congressional districts could make some incumbent Republicans' races tighter. Plus, redistricting for an overtly partisan purpose of giving Trump a more favorable midterm election in 2026 isn't a very popular idea with voters, some lawmakers are saying. More: Top Indiana Republicans met with VP on redistricting. Only Democrats are talking about it There's also the risk of diluting votes if new maps are drawn based on five-year-old Census data that won't account for any more recent population shifts. This is one point new state Rep. Danny Lopez, R-Carmel, made in a post on X Aug. 12. "We should stand by that work," he wrote, while also saying he is a "hard no" on mid-decade redistricting. Another "hard no" comes from Republican Rep. Jim Lucas of Seymour, who on Facebook called the idea "highly unusual and politically optically horrible." He also said Republicans shouldn't "stoop to the level of Democrats on this issue," which could be a reference to the criticism that Illinois Democrats' map is gerrymandered. "If there are seats that need targeted, we should do it the old fashioned way and campaign harder in those districts," Lucas wrote. Mooresville Rep. Craig Haggard, a Republican running for the 4th Congressional District, could very well be drawn out of that district. He told the Indiana Capital Chronicle that he's not hearing any "appetite" for redistricting right now. Sen. Jim Tomes, R-Wadesville, has also said he doesn't think redistricting is needed, WEHT reported. Rep. Becky Cash, R-Zionsville, responded to a voter's question on her Facebook page about redistricting and said that she does not support nor "know of any reason why Indiana should redistrict." The prospect of mid-decade redistricting drew at least 100 protestors to the Statehouse and to the governor's mansion last week, with those gathered characterizing the concept as "cheating."
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's BLS Pick Calls For Suspension Of Monthly Jobs Report: Data 'Needs To Be Fixed Immediately'
E.J. Antoni, the economist tapped by President Donald Trump to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics and an architect of the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, suggested the agency should suspend monthly jobs reports in a Tuesday television appearance. Antoni appeared on Fox Business Tuesday morning to discuss Trump's lack of confidence in the Bureau's monthly job data. 'How on earth are businesses supposed to plan – or how is the Fed supposed to conduct monetary policy – when they don't know how many jobs are being added or lost in our economy? It's a serious problem that needs to be fixed immediately,' Antoni told FOX Business. Suspending Job Reports: A Risky Proposition Trump nominated Antoni to the position after his unprecedented firing of former BLS Chief, Erika McEntarfer, on Aug. 1. The Bureau's July jobs report showed nonfarm payrolls rising by 73,000, far below economists' estimates of 110,000. The report also included a revision of May and June's tallies, down by over 100,000 each. Similar revisions were observed during the Biden Administration. 'Until it is corrected, the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly job reports but keep publishing the more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data,' Antoni added. 'Major decision-makers from Wall Street to D.C. rely on these numbers, and a lack of confidence in the data has far-reaching consequences.' Can Data Integrity Survive Political Pressure? Trump called the jobs report 'rigged' and 'fake' following his firing of McEntarfer. Top economists dismissed Trump and Antoni's insinuations and reiterated that attempts to erode the independence of reporting agencies could sow distrust in markets. '[Suspending monthly jobs reports] would [be] a serious mistake in my estimation. It would only fuel critiques of a politicization of job market data and likely result in volatility across asset classes,' RSM US chief economist Joe Brusuelas told Axios. Withholding or fabricating economic data is a common practice observed in many authoritarian regimes, such as the Soviet Union during the 1980s. The Dangers Of Distrust In Economic Data University of Michigan professor Justin Wolfers described Antoni as unqualified for the position in a post on X. 'Antoni finished grad school 5 years ago at Northern Illinois with no obvious distinction, his dissertation is meh, and involved no research on labor markets or data collection, he has never published a paper, and his life's work has earned 1 citation,' Wolfers said. 'This record would be insufficient to earn a job as a junior staffer at BLS.' Also Read:Photo: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Trump's BLS Pick Calls For Suspension Of Monthly Jobs Report: Data 'Needs To Be Fixed Immediately' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
CNN
27 minutes ago
- CNN
What to Make of Trump's DC Takeover - Amanpour - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
What to Make of Trump's DC Takeover Amanpour 55 mins The streets of Washington, DC will soon be patrolled by 800 National Guard troops, the city's police will be under federal control for the first time in their history, and homeless people will be forced to leave. According to President Trump, it's all necessary to tackle a purported wave of lawlessness. And while crime is certainly a problem in the capital, Trump's description of a public safety emergency told a slightly different story than the statistics. There's actually been a decrease in crime, with violent crime at a 30-year low. With Trump hinting that Washington is just the first city to face these measures, what does this say about his exertion of executive power? Andrew McCabe was the acting FBI Director in the first Trump administration, he joins the program to discuss. Also on today's show: Victoria Fontan, Rector of the American University of Malta & Mumtaz Islamzay, Afghan Student; David A. Graham, Staff writer, The Atlantic
