Bail Fund pilot project for prisoners to be launched in WC
Image: File
OVER 2600 detainees have been granted bail of less than R1000 but cannot afford this amount. They are regarded as prisoners of poverty.
These were some of the findings when the Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services conducted visits to correctional facilities in South Africa, following concerns about overcrowding.
They found that some families do not want to pay bail for some juvenile offenders because of the mischief they would cause in the community, and they believe that they would be better off in detention centres awaiting trial.
The committee was also reacting to the Judicial Inspectorate for Correctional Services (JICS) progress report on the proposed Bail Fund for prisoners of poverty.
On Tuesday, the JICS explained to the committee that the fund is a resource outside state institutions to advance bail monies for deserving remand detainees.
Committee Chairperson Kgomotso Ramolobeng said that work still needs to be done, including an extensive public participation process to establish whether communities would be in favour of such a fund, which would allow offenders awaiting trial to be reintegrated into communities.
The committee heard that a pilot project will soon be launched, likely in the Western Cape, to test the functioning of the fund. Remandees accused of certain crimes (gender-based violence, for example) will likely be excluded.
The JICS held engagements with the Bertha Foundation, the Department of Correctional Services, the National Prosecuting Authority, and civil society to plan a way forward.
The meeting resulted in support for the launch of a pilot project, an institutional base for the pilot project – Africa Criminal Justice Reform at the University of the Western Cape, and an unsolicited offer of philanthropic funding covering nearly half of the cost of the pilot.
Ramolobeng said several committee members believed that communities feared accepting awaiting trial offenders back into communities due to the fear of re-offending.
'During recent oversight visits to correctional centres, we noted lots of awaiting trial detainees, including juveniles. They indicated families do not want to pay even these low amounts, believing that the youths cause mischief in their communities. Our impression was that if they were inside a detention centre, they were out of the family's hair,' she said.
Ramolobeng said the committee will engage JICS and other stakeholders once it has sight of a more comprehensive plan.
The committee found that correctional facilities are also releasing less offenders than what they are admitting due to the longer prison sentences imposed by the courts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Loaded for Bear — bans on entering the woods in eastern Canada are signs of the climate crisis
Beyond debates about government overreach, the bans are a sign of the severity of the unfolding climate crisis. The 2025 fire season is the second-worst on record in Canada, only topped so far by the inferno year of 2023. Growing up in the eastern Canadian province of Nova Scotia, I spent a lot of time in the woods. Fishing, hunting, camping or just rambling, I was drawn to the forest. About 75% of Nova Scotia is covered in forest, and about a quarter of that is 'crown land', meaning it is owned by the state. Public access to the woods is baked into the DNA of Nova Scotian culture. So it came as a shock on 5 August when the provincial government imposed a ban on entering the province's forests because of the high risk of fire. An eye-popping $25,000 (R442,000) fine is the penalty for violations. 'The province is restricting travel and activities in the woods because continued hot, dry conditions have greatly increased the risk of wildfires,' the government notice said. 'The restrictions, effective as of 4pm today, 5 August, include: hiking, camping, fishing and the use of vehicles in the woods are not permitted; trail systems through woods are off limits; camping is allowed only in campgrounds. These and other measures are in place on provincial crown and private land until 15 October or until conditions allow them to be lifted.' The neighbouring province of New Brunswick has followed suit and imposed similar restrictions. Social media is ablaze with anger as the measures have stirred sparks of resentment among the residents of both provinces. This is understandable – banning open fires and smoking in the woods would be sensible. But if you just walk in the bush for whatever reason you are unlikely to start a fire unless you do so with intent. Nova Scotians love to spend time in the woods and have never been prevented in such a heavy-handed way from doing so – until now. I asked Alan MacEachern, a noted historian of the region who has written an excellent book on a 19th-century forest fire in New Brunswick, if such measures were unprecedented in eastern Canada. And he replied that for Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, the bans are indeed without precedent. Beyond debates about government overreach, the bans are alarming smoke signals underscoring the severity of our unfolding climate crisis. The 2025 fire season is the second-worst on record in Canada, only topped so far by the inferno year of 2023 when 17,203,625 hectares burned, according to the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre (CIFFC). Thus far this season 7.8 million hectares of Canadian land has gone up in smoke, CIFFC data shows. As of 18 August, there were 4,573 recorded wildfires in 2025 and 651 active ones, of which 134 were out of control. Stark manifestation In June, the United Nations University in Shibuya, Japan, published an analysis of Canada's 2025 fire season, and it was unequivocal in its assessment of the cause. 'The fires are a stark manifestation of a warming climate,' the report says. 'Lengthening dry spells and rising temperatures associated with climate change further exacerbate wildfire risk by curating an abundance of dry, flammable fuels… Additionally, warming temperatures can expand the fire season, increasing the window of vulnerability for ignition and fire spread.' In late June, I was in northern British Columbia for a fly-fishing trip and the region was on fire. At the airport in Fort Nelson, I watched as a massive helicopter lifted off with a long cable attached to a rounded tank of water. It struck me as ironic that a chopper powered by fossil fuels was being dispatched to douse a blaze caused by fossil fuel consumption. Another disturbing trend of Canada's 2025 fire season is its regional reach. The fires raging in BC when I was there were sadly not unusual. But as a recent Guardian report notes: '… the blazes (in Canada) come with a twist: few are coming from the western provinces, the traditional centre of destruction. 'Instead, the worst of the fires have been concentrated in the prairie provinces and the Atlantic region, with bone-dry conditions upending how Canada responds to a threat that is only likely to grow as the climate warms.' In his searing 2023 book Fire Weather: A True Story from a Hotter World – which dissects a blaze that tore through the Alberta oil town of Fort McMurray in 2016 – John Vaillant suggests that 'there is a case to be made for a revised nomenclature' when it comes to the terminology for our species Homo sapiens. 'I propose Homo flagrans. Flagrans is Latin for 'ardent, fiery, passionate, outrageous'. In other words, 'burning man',' Vaillant writes. That sums it up. Certainly as a Nova Scotian – who recalls many a cool and wet summer from my youth – I find that term now is scorching my soul. Devastating hurricanes that were previously unheard of – a consequence of warming sea surface temperatures – have also left a trail of misery and destruction through the province over the past couple of decades. Dry, hot summers, ruinous fires and now a ban on entering the beloved forests of my home province? And to compound the misery, not being allowed to go fishing?! That is a spike driven into the heart of Nova Scotian culture. In the 1980s and 1990s, such a scenario would have been unthinkable, the stuff of dystopian fiction. But in the age of Homo flagrans, dystopia is the new normal as our planet burns. DM
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Case against driver who allegedly killed teen girl, 13, postponed
The case against a woman accused of ploughing into a group of teenage girls during a coming-of-age ceremony, killing one of them, has been postponed to September 26. Martha Christina, 67, briefly appeared in the Germiston magistrate's court on Wednesday. She faces a culpable homicide charge and is out on R5,000 bail. The state asked for further investigations into the death of Thando Pretty Mahlangu, 13.. Part of the information the state is to gather are photos and video footage of the incident. On 28 June, Christina allegedly drove into the crowd in Dinwiddie, Germiston, where girls had gathered for a traditional ceremony at the Khumalo home. Mahlangu's family said they had hoped Wednesday's court appearance would see the charges upgraded to murder. 'The pictures and video the state wants to retrieve were always part of the docket and were given to police,' said family spokesperson Mzwandile Soyaya . 'They also asked for the hospital report, postmortem and scene reconstruction, which were submitted. Why is this information still not before court? Is this a delay tactic or what?'
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Investec Witness Admits Contradictions in Rushil Singh Fraud Trial
During the ongoing fraud trial of Rushil Singh, a key Investec employee testifying for the State admitted under cross-examination that Singh was not directly involved in the alleged fraud. This acknowledgment challenges a central aspect of the prosecution's case, which is based on Singh's position as CEO of BIG and assumptions about his knowledge of the loan witness initially testified that the financial guarantee involved in the case was 'cash backed.' However, under questioning by the defense, he conceded that this was incorrect. 'The guarantee was not, in fact, cash backed,' the witness said. He further explained that no contractual agreement explicitly required the guarantee to be backed by cash. 'There was an assumption that the guarantee was cash backed, but there is no documentary proof to support this,' he added. This admission weakens the prosecution's argument that Singh knowingly engaged in fraudulent activity related to the guarantee. The witness also contradicted himself multiple times during cross-examination. When reminded that he was under oath, he responded, 'No man is infallible.' The defence highlighted these inconsistencies to question his credibility. Compounding these issues, the court heard that the original R20 million guarantee issued by Stanbic Bank was initially cash backed and included a conditional clause confirming this security. However, it was Investec that requested the removal of this clause, transforming the guarantee from a secured instrument to an unsecured one. 'The original Stanbic guarantee was secured, but Investec itself asked for the security to be removed,' the defence argued, raising concerns about Investec's internal oversight and defense further emphasized that Singh's involvement is based on presumption rather than evidence. 'The State's own witness conceded Rushil Singh was not directly involved,' the defence said. 'Singh's implication rests solely on the assumption that he must have known about a cash backing requirement, a notion without contractual or factual basis.'Adding to the scrutiny of Investec's role are allegations that several Investec employees received personal benefits from Nishani Singh, related to the loans. The Star has learnt of a new man on the story, referred to as Mr X reportedly received monthly payments of R19,000 through a shell company registered in his name from December 2020 to October 2021 — the period during which the loan agreements were being structured and finalized. Mr X. also received a lump sum payment of R70,000 in August 2020 and may have received a R2 million contribution towards his Pretoria home's construction. After resigning from Investec in June 2021, he joined BIG as a director with a reported monthly salary of R300, other bank employees were linked to questionable benefits. Mr X.2 received two Sandton City gift vouchers worth R10,000 each, given during active loan negotiations. Mr X.2 was given a fully paid Sun City trip in December 2016. The defence suggests these benefits breached banking ethics and could constitute inducements.
