Windsor East Courtyard remains a problem
Read more: Small courtyards ideas for all seasons
Ward 98 councillor Beverley Jacobs has been escalating the issue, but faces problems getting it addressed. Several city officials have visited the hazardous and dangerous property, yet with no resolution.
She explained that the property has been a significant source of concern since before 2016. Despite numerous attempts to address the matter, the situation remains unresolved. 'The legislation has to be looked at again. At the moment every entity is saying that it's not their problem, including the owners, and this is what we are left with. My concern, however, is not only the lack of action and accountability from the entities, but also that this is a problem property in terms of the problem property by-law. No entity, despite having been made aware of this matter years ago, has made any attempt to declare it a problem property, and taken the necessary action in terms of penalisation.'
She added that the city, and residents, spent a substantial amount of money in cleaning up around the property. She confirmed that the property has been abandoned by its owners, many of whom are traceable, but have refused to take responsibility. Some units remain bank-owned, with no intervention or accountability shown by the financial institutions involved.
Also read: Region B CRUM continues with service delivery campaign around Randburg
'No municipal services have been paid,' Jacobs said. 'Including rates and taxes. Water and electricity were disconnected years ago. The premises is being used for illegal activities, including the operation of a scrap yard and serving as a drug den. The property is a source of rat infestation and ongoing public dissatisfaction. City resources are being repeatedly deployed to clean up this property, at the expense of other service needs.'
The building was a focal point in the recent clean-up by the City of Johannesburg's Citizen Relationship and Urban Management (CRUM) Region B and other city departments, during the high impact service delivery initiative.
CRUM regional director Sello Lemao explained that, in terms of the building control and by-laws, the building was condemned. 'To be able to demolish the building, on our side, we have to actually obtain the demolition order. That process that is led by Group Forensics and Investigation Service (GFIS). When I came in as regional director, I found that there had been an order, but that order was not executed, simply because GFIS had to do other due diligence as the building belonged to people. They have done a lot and have gone deeper to actually find the owners.'
He added now that he is director, he is following up on the new order. 'The new information that I've got is that everything is in place, and that the building, at some point, will be demolished. I want to demolish the building. I'm going to follow up to ensure that this time around, the building is demolished.'
GFIS were sent questions about the demolition order, but had not replied by the time of print.
Follow us on our Whatsapp channel, Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok for the latest updates and inspiration! Have a story idea? We'd love to hear from you – join our WhatsApp group and share your thoughts!
Related article: Windsor residents receive valuable information
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
3 days ago
- The Citizen
City accused of wasting money investigating its forensic investigators
GFIS was formed in 2016. It was meant to save the city from losing money through corruption and fraud. While the City of Johannesburg is facing financial challenges, it has spent R12 million investigating its own corruption-fighting unit, Group Forensic Investigation Services (GFIS). In a statement on Monday, ActionSA accused the City of Johannesburg of wasting money on investigating GFIS. GFIS has been accused of carrying out spying activities on some ANC councillors, but there has not been tangible evidence despite numerous investigations. 'We strongly encourage those seeking to continue this witch-hunt to instead demand answers as to why over R12 million has been squandered on it to date, with no preliminary report ever seeing the light of day and, after years of work, making no progress. 'This witch-hunt, set to cost residents a total of R40 million or more, simply cannot be justified and, given the city's dismal balance sheet, is an expenditure it cannot afford for what is nothing more than a vendetta-driven exercise that was rightly questioned and suspended pending a review,' said the party's Marcel Countriers. GFIS is one of Herman Mashaba's legacy projects in the City of Johannesburg. He launched this corruption-busting unit to fight the abuse of municipal funds. Mashaba's legacy project Countriers said the current administration in the city is trying to erase Mashaba's good work as mayor of Johannesburg. 'ActionSA will always stand firmly by the fight against corruption launched by Herman Mashaba during his tenure as mayor. 'To the deep displeasure of those who had been looting the city blind, the corruption-busting unit he established, namely the Group Forensic and Investigation Services (GFIS), investigated over 6 000 cases involving transactions worth R35 billion, marking one of the most decisive anti-corruption efforts in any municipality in South Africa's history,' said Countriers. Will GFIS close down? Critics said there seems to be a coordinated effort by the current administration to try to close down this corruption-fighting unit. 'Unsurprisingly, attempts to exacerbate the city's current regression have found eager champions in failed former mayor Thapelo Amad, who seems determined to accelerate the decline through unscrupulous demands for pointless witch-hunts. 'This is only aimed at distracting from the fight against corruption by unjustly targeting the very efforts that put an end to the large-scale corruption which brought Johannesburg to its knees,' he said. ALSO READ: '-Move Ramaphosa from Chiawelo to Houghton': Joburg ANC fight heats up Still no evidence of spying Mashaba has denied that GFIS has been used to spy on ANC councillors. This matter was also reported to State Security, but it also did not find any negative findings against GFIS. Last year, a GFIS forensic investigator was shot dead in Johannesburg. It is believed that he was investigating corruption involving members of the Johannesburg Metro Police Department (JMPD). At the time, the city had also proposed extra protection for their GFIS investigators. NOW READ: Morero given ultimatum over MMC's joy ride to KZN
Eyewitness News
6 days ago
- Eyewitness News
Liam Jacobs sworn in as councillor in City of Joburg Council
JOHANNESBURG - Patriotic Alliance (PA) member Liam Jacobs has been sworn in as a councillor in the Johannesburg City Council. The 24-year-old replaces the party's suspended deputy leader, Kenny Kunene, who resigned as a councillor and was recalled as Transport MMC last month. Kunene's political downfall came after he was found at the home of murder-accused businessman Katiso "KT" Molefe last month. Molefe is currently behind bars for allegedly orchestrating the murder of Oupa Sefoka, commonly known as DJ Sumbody. ALSO READ: PA taps Liam Jacobs as its mayoral candidate for Tshwane Jacobs recently resigned from the Democratic Alliance (DA) and left his seat in Parliament to join the PA, a move he announced on Facebook Live alongside PA leader Gayton McKenzie. The party initially deployed Jacobs to the City of Tshwane and named him as its mayoral candidate for next year's local government elections. However, after Kunene's latest scandal, Jacobs was reassigned to the City of Joburg Council as his replacement. It remains unclear whether Jacobs will also take up the role of MMC for Transport, a position left vacant after Kunene was recalled by his party. While Johannesburg Mayor Dada Morero made changes to his mayoral committee on Thursday, he made no mention of the transport portfolio.
The Citizen
07-08-2025
- The Citizen
High Court ruling affirms citizens' right to question police without fear of arrest
The Johannesburg High Court has ruled that South African citizens have the right to question and record police officers without being arrested or intimidated. This judgment followed a case brought by attorney Shaun Jacobs, who was unlawfully arrested during a police roadblock outside his home. Read more: Police boss plans to take back Johannesburg Jacobs approached officers at the scene to ask that the roadblock be moved due to the disturbance it was causing in the residential area. After his request was disregarded, he began recording the scene with his cell phone, a move that led to his arrest. Despite remaining calm and respectful throughout, Jacobs was detained overnight in harsh conditions. According to a document from the Southern African Legal Information Institute, Jacobs was handcuffed, taken away without any explanation, and later falsely accused of being aggressive and intoxicated, however, video evidence submitted to the court clearly showed Jacobs peacefully filming the police, and testimony from his wife confirmed his composed and sober demeanour. The judge who presided over the case dismissed the claims made by the arresting officer, and ruled that Jacobs' conduct in recording and questioning the police did not amount to any form of criminal offence or interference with police work. 'Citizens are entitled to ask questions and are entitled to explanations from the law enforcement officers in respect of their conduct. That cannot be regarded as interference with the execution of their lawful duties.' The court found the arrest, and subsequent 26-hour detention, unlawful. Jacobs was awarded R250 000 in damages, R100 000 from the minister of police for unlawful detention, and R150 000 from the metro police for the unlawful arrest. Legal experts have hailed the ruling as a crucial precedent that upholds the values of freedom, dignity, and accountability enshrined in South Africa's constitution. This ruling comes at a time of heightened public concern around police misconduct. Fourways Review reached out to police spokesperson Brigadier Athlenda Mathe, who indicated she would consult their legal team, and to Captain Mavela Masondo on August 4. Despite multiple follow-ups to both, no response was provided to the questions below, sent for further insight. The Johannesburg High Court recently ruled that citizens have the right to question and record police without fear of arrest. Is SAPS aware of this judgment, and what is the department's reaction to the ruling? In light of this case, where an attorney was awarded R250 000 after being wrongfully arrested for filming a roadblock, how does SAPS plan to ensure officers understand and respect the public's constitutional rights in similar situations? How does SAPS feel about the court's message, that asking questions or demanding explanations is not considered interference with police work? Does the service view this ruling as a need to relook at internal training or conduct at roadblocks? Follow us on our Whatsapp channel, Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok for the latest updates and inspiration!
