logo
Laura residents left wondering what comes next after Golden North moves to Murray Bridge

Laura residents left wondering what comes next after Golden North moves to Murray Bridge

A regional South Australian town has been left fearing the unknown after its largest employer announced it will leave after more than a century.
Ice cream manufacturer Golden North announced yesterday it will move its operations from the mid-north town of Laura to Murray Bridge.
Golden North managing director Dimi Kyriazis said the move to Murray Bridge, 275 kilometres away, was to be better connected to its milk suppliers.
The company first opened its Laura factory in 1923 and has about 80 staff at the site.
Meryl cafe and Laura Emporium owner Frank Bernhardt said Laura revolved around Golden North, and its exit would be a blow to locals.
"It hasn't been thought out very well, the way they've done it," Mr Bernhardt said.
"They should have talked to people in the town and let them know things aren't going well, rather than just dropping a bomb.
Laura is a township of around 750 people, located a half-hour drive from Port Pirie and a two-and-a-half-hour drive north of Adelaide.
Mr Bernhardt said his shop would survive the company's move, but it would take away a big tourism drawcard.
"We call ourselves the Golden North outlet in Laura; we have every flavour," he said.
"We try to give people a Golden North experience where they can watch a video, read about the history, and have a sample.
Golden North's move will be completed in 12 months, and the SA government announced it will provide $1 million to support the town's transition away from Golden North.
Northern Areas Council Mayor Sue Scarman was shocked when she heard the move was final.
"They have spoken about moving several times previously, so we started to get used to them talking about it, but this time they're going," Ms Scarman said.
"They are the furniture in the corner of our town, they've been here forever.
"There's a big hole. Laura and Golden North are synonymous, but that will disappear and become history."
Golden North will move into the former Beston Global Food premises in Murray Bridge.
Laura factory operations manager Rick Willis has lived in Laura for 18 years, and his wife also works at Golden North.
"There was obviously a sadness because of what it's going to do to Laura," Mr Willis said.
"But from a business point of view, there was really only one option.
"It's only getting harder to be located so far away from where all our ingredients come from, which is just the nature of where we are."
Golden North has said it would give priority to the workers at Laura if they wanted to make the move to Murray Bridge.
Murray Bridge dairy farmer Warren Doecke said the move was positive for the region's dairy industry during a tough period.
Mr Doecke lost about 25 per cent of his milk income with the collapse of Beston Global Food last year.
"We could have lived with Bestons if we'd have had a really good season, and we could have lived with drought if we got our money out of Bestons," he said.
"To have another processor in the town is certainly a positive move."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aussie Amazon workers lagging behind in re-training as tech giant continues global automation rollout
Aussie Amazon workers lagging behind in re-training as tech giant continues global automation rollout

News.com.au

time29 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Aussie Amazon workers lagging behind in re-training as tech giant continues global automation rollout

Staff at Amazon Australia are not a priority for the massive upskilling happening across the e-commerce behemoth's global network. At a conference this week in Japan, Amazon announced its one millionth warehouse robot was now in use across the planet. The company says globally, 700,000 Amazon workers have been formally 'upskilled' to keep up with this wave of automation - but Australians account for a tiny fraction of these workers. Only one of Amazon Australia's eight 'fulfilment centre' warehouses have the company's patented product-shifting, AI-operated robots; as Amazon accelerates its AI and robotics goals, the company argues relatively few job losses will result, contending people doing repetitive manual tasks will be retrained and 'upskilled'. Compared to Amazon's warehouses in comparable countries, Australian facilities are a step behind the company's newest technology, meaning retraining Australian workers to fix and maintain Amazon's robots is lagging. Information from Amazon says the company has created 700 new categories of jobs globally since introducing robots. A proposed highly-robotised Melbourne warehouse will create more than 2000 jobs, requiring entry-level workers up to engineers and operations managers. 'Australia is one of our last countries to have launched … we're in the process of scaling-up the program.'

Aussie screwed by ‘horrendous' practice to bring bills down
Aussie screwed by ‘horrendous' practice to bring bills down

News.com.au

time38 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Aussie screwed by ‘horrendous' practice to bring bills down

The promise of cheaper power bills and a greener footprint saw Christine Hirchfield jump at a chance to install new solar panels but instead she said the move 'blew up in her face'. More than a year since they were placed on her Victorian rooftop, the solar panels remain unconnected to the grid and Ms Hirchfield has been through a nightmare experience that has involved disputes and debt collectors. Now, the 73-year-old is sharing her experience with as consumer groups call for a national ban on an alarming issue. Ms Hirchfield responded to an advertisement on Facebook before a salesperson from a company called GC Perfect Solar turned up at her door. She claims she was promised a great deal including an interest-free payment plan, free cleaning of the panels for 10 years and a generous 15-cent feed-in tariff for every kilowatt sent back into the grid. She claims her later inquiries found a tariff return of just 4.9 cents. While she insisted she needed to digest the information before signing up to anything, she was then told she would receive a free battery after a year, she claims. Given she lost power quite often – this final freebie convinced her to sign on for the solar panels. The retiree also describes the original document from GC Perfect Solar as quite light on details and expected a more formal contract – but then a few days later she was handing over her bank details for direct debits, she claimed. 'I am sorry the day I let that person into my house because it has been a nightmare and rollercoaster,' she said. 'Smell a rat' Ms Hirchfield was actually excited when the solar panels were put on her regional home in March last year but when the finance contract with Brighte, a finance provider specialising in renewable energy, dropped the next day she was shocked. The agreement she had signed with GC Perfect Solar was to pay $88 a fortnight. But the finance contract had payments of $95 plus fees, which as a pensioner she could not afford. 'That's not what was discussed and it snowballed from there,' she said. 'I got straight on to the bank and I thought I smell a rat. I cancelled my bank card and that's when everything started to go downhill.' She lodged complaints with Brighte, GC Perfect Solar and Consumer Affairs Victoria. Brighte investigated the matter and months later released her from the finance agreement with no payments taken. But the nightmare did not end there. Ms Hirchfield received a letter of demand from a debt collection agency on behalf of GC Perfect Solar for $2200 in September last year. Then she claims it later demanded the full amount of the contract worth $11,8000. Meanwhile, she had requested that the company remove the solar panels from her house. Do you have a story? Contact That's when the Consumer Action Law Centre got involved, with the group claiming Ms Hirchfield was subject to unsolicited selling – a practice it wants to see completely banned in Australia. The centre's lawyers, in a letter sent to the debt collection agency, claimed Ms Hirchfield had been subject to misleading and deceptive conduct under Australian consumer law and denied she was liable for the debt. It also outlined that if she was to experience humiliation or distress due to prohibited debt collection by GC Perfect Solar or its agents, she could seek damages up to $10,000. Since then, Ms Hirchfield has heard nothing but she is concerned that the dispute is effectively ongoing. She said the experience had made her far less trusting. 'It would have blown people who aren't as switched on. It would have been so demeaning and overawing and if I can spare one person from the pain then I hope I can,' she said. 'I know what it did to me mentally – it really rocked my world – and what started as great idea and affordable all blew up in my face.' GC Perfect Solar did not respond to request for comment. Chased by debt collectors, court action and bankruptcy Now the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has announced it's conducting a review into unsolicited selling and lead generation, and whether harmful conduct is adequately addressed by current laws. The review comes in response to Consumer Action Law Centre's (CALC) designated complaint, which argues harmful unsolicited sales practices are commonplace across Australia and need to be stamped out. It also argued lead generation is a grey area but occurs when a customer is drawn to an advertisement on the web or social media and agrees to further contact. CALC is one of three groups granted the special power to make a complaint where they can report an urgent issue directly to the ACCC for attention. It outlined that door-to-door sales and cold calling are a widespread issue causing serious financial and personal harm to individuals, while the use of lead generation marketing on social media is rife, particularly in the rooftop solar industry. It warns that consumers are being faced with being chased by debt collectors, court action and bankruptcy and even risk losing their homes. Consumer Action Law Centre CEO Steph Tonkin said unsolicited selling and doorknocking has been a 'horrific problem for such a long period of time'. CALC has been campaigning against the practice for the past 20 years. 'It impacts vulnerable consumers such as people with language barriers who don't say no and more than half of our clients have serious mental health issues and acquired brain injuries,' Ms Tonkin told 'Generally it's backpackers that companies bus out to regional centres and they see someone who is not 100 per cent with it and they sign them up to $10,000 and $15,000 solar panel contracts and do it because of buy now, pay later. It's often a dodgy salesperson meets dodgy installer and it's a hot mess as people are paying off these solar panels when they can't afford it.' 'Horrendous stories' Vulnerable cohorts such as older people, people living in regional areas and those on low incomes, with disabilities or mental health issues, in particular fall victim, according to CALC's complaint which features 23 cases, including Christine Hirchfield, as examples. But it's not only the solar power industry that CALC alleges is problematic, but also the sales of things such as airconditioning units or vacuum cleaners, recliner chairs, roller shutters, photography packages and services like education courses. The ACCC is calling on the public to make submissions on their experiences of unsolicited selling by July 31. Ms Tonkin said the organisation had heard 'horrendous stories' about high pressure sales tactics applied to people who are often obviously mentally unwell, salespeople crossing out the legal 10 day cooling off period in a contract or walking past a person into their loungeroom even when asked to leave. 'The solar panels of today are the encyclopedias of yesterday,' she noted. 'But it's also recliner chairs that don't meet the description and don't work or education courses that don't exist. It's full businesses that are shut down and pop up again — it's this underbelly.' Spotlight on solar More than four million Australian households have installed rooftop solar and the use of unsolicited selling is likely to have made a proportion of these households aware of the availability of government subsidies and rebates, the ACCC found a report into the complaint. But the sectors interaction with government rebates, subsidies and loans is complex and consumers attempting to navigate this area may rely primarily on the information provided by salespeople, the watchdog added. The CALC complaint asserts that the use of unscrupulous unsolicited selling practices in the rooftop solar industry may have eroded trust and undermined the drive to Net Zero. A spokesperson for finance company Brighte said it is disappointing when a customer's experience of a third-party solar retailer does not meet its expectations. 'We expect all third-party solar retailers referring our finance products to uphold the highest standards of integrity and customer care,' they said. 'When concerns are raised with us, we act to protect customers, engage with the retailers and recommend customers contact their relevant state consumer protection authority if the issue cannot be resolved. 'In this case, after considering the customer's concerns, we took no payments from the customer and they have no further obligations to Brighte. We also ended our relationship with the sales agent.' Overall, the consumer watchdog notes there some protections for consumers when it comes to unsolicited selling, but CALC said they aren't enough to prevent the alarming practice. The ACCC has received approximately 250 consumer reports from January 2024 to March 2025 relating to unsolicited selling across a broad range of industries, although it acknowledged those impacted may not come forward. CALC also alleges that some businesses are circumventing the requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements by using lead generation tactics to obtain an invitation from consumers to come to their home, or to obtain consent from consumers to be contacted over the phone.

Australia's most expensive home sold for $142m
Australia's most expensive home sold for $142m

Daily Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Daily Telegraph

Australia's most expensive home sold for $142m

With no registered mortgage required, Chinese-born company director Yan Zhang paid $141.55m last week for Australia's most expensive penthouse overlooking Sydney Harbour at Barangaroo. Zhang now owns the top three floors of the One Sydney Harbour development, ending some of the mystery since its off-the-plan exchange in 2019 by Lendlease. The strata fees for the 1980sq m holding will be sky-high because the two-level penthouse has 4794 of the 100,000 unit entitlements and the secondary apartment has 2109. RELATED: $1.1bn bonanza, top sales of 2025 revealed The Sell's quick back-of-an envelope calculation puts the combined quarterly strata at a staggering $107,000 given the building's $6.2m annual levies. Little is known about 37-year-old Zhang, who recently set up shelf company Yry Family Pty Ltd, which gives its address as the 88/88 Barangaroo Ave penthouse. Zhang directs only one other company, Zicheng Australia, which was set up in 2007 and co-directed with Wei Ling Zhang, 63, who was born in Shanghai, China. MORE: Huge promise Hemsworths made about Byron Bay Both have given their address as the 52-floor Pitt St, Century Tower sub-penthouse that they bought mortgage-free for $1.33m in 2004 when Zhang was just 16. It was a good buy because it had previously sold for $1,443,000 in 1997. Lendlease will be hoping their One Sydney Harbour prices do not fall back. MORE: Wild reason Aussie has 300 homes In 2019 on its exchange, it was reported the mystery buyer of the three-level penthouse was a local Australian resident from mainland China so there no pesky Foreign Investment Review Board requirements. Construction of the 89-storey Renzo Piano-designed tower was initially scheduled for a late 2023 completion, with Lendlease registering the slightly-delayed strata plan in February last year. The highest previously registered purchase had been $38.95m to the Zhong family for the entire 76th floor that settled seamlessly in May last year. MORE: Aus pub's $500m collapse, staff owed $7m

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store