A new artistic epoch or the collapse of meaning?
https://arab.news/gc6pz
Some revolutions begin with a manifesto. Ours began with a shark in sneakers, a gorilla made of bananas, and a bomber jacket-clad crocodile.
No, not a metaphor. Not a symbol. Just a digitally generated image of a shark wearing crisp blue Nikes, jogging through a neon jungle with a caption that read: 'Monday is a concept, Kevin.'
Not a painting, not a sculpture, but a digitally rendered, golden-hued banana gorilla — smiling, no less — circulating wildly on social media.
One minute, you are scrolling past wedding photos and baby updates; the next, you are face to face with a crocodile in a bomber jacket sipping tea at a Parisian cafe.
Welcome to the new Renaissance, apparently. Only this time, the artists have silicon brains, limitless imaginations, and no regard for the difference between Salvador Dali and a children's cereal ad.
The rise of AI-generated images has become the latest absurdity in our ongoing tango with ethical reason. Are we witnessing the dawn of a new artistic epoch — or the collapse of meaning as we know it?
Philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein once said: 'If a lion could speak, we could not understand him.'
One wonders what Wittgenstein would say about a lion generated by MidJourney, wearing glasses and riding a unicycle through Times Square while quoting Plato.
Is this communication, parody, prophecy — or simply pixels gone wild?
Let us not pretend we have not seen this before. The memeification of art has been underway for some time, from deepfakes to NFT apes. But this new wave, this deluge of digitally conjured, hyper-real absurdity, invites more than idle chuckles.
It raises deeply confusing and slightly horrifying ethical questions. Who owns an image that no human created? Who is responsible for its message — or its misunderstanding?
And just like that, the age of AI image-generation brain rot was born.
This term, now lovingly and ironically adopted by digital natives and reluctantly Googled by digital immigrants — describes the mental state induced by consuming endless streams of surreal, absurd, contextless AI-generated content.
You know the kind: a goose in a business suit negotiating peace between planets; a Victorian child made of waffles; a platypus holding a sign that says: 'Capitalism is soup and I am a fork.'
And yet we keep scrolling. We are enchanted.
Philosopher Theodor Adorno once said: 'Art is the social antithesis of society.' In Techville, AI generated imagery is the social antithesis of logic. It is the philosophical equivalent of an espresso martini at 4 a.m. — confusing, unwise, but oddly invigorating.
Let us take a moment to consider the rise of AI-generated nonsense. These are not merely strange pictures. They are surreal flashes of algorithmic creativity, trained on the deepest layers of the internet's subconscious.
And they come with short, cryptic phrases like: 'Let the ducks speak.' 'Reality is just poorly rendered soup.' 'He who controls the cheese, controls the skies.'
Somewhere, Franz Kafka is either applauding or suing.
A generation raised on surreal, algorithmic absurdity risks losing its appetite for clarity, coherence, or even causality.
Rafael Hernandez de Santiago
We are not just talking about art. We are talking about a cultural shift — where traditional storytelling collapses under the weight of its own earnestness and is replaced by AI-generated absurdity that says nothing and yet, somehow, feels like it says everything.
But what does this mean ethically? Who is responsible when an image of a bishop made entirely of spaghetti holding a flamingo whispering 'Free me, Deborah' goes viral and is mistaken for a political statement?
And more urgently: if the shark in sneakers gets invited to the Venice Biennale before any human artist from an emerging country, what does that say about the role of merit, meaning, and memory in the digital age?
Let us not pretend we are above it.
Even the most hardened ethicist has giggled at the image of a courtroom filled with sentient toasters. There is something irresistibly clever about the stupidity of it all. But cleverness is not meaning. And meaning, in this age, is in short supply.
Wittgenstein warned: 'Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.' But in the AI era, silence is drowned out by a relentless stream of images of owls wearing Beats headphones, standing on Mars, yelling: 'I miss the smell of Tuesdays.'
One might ask: is this art? Or is it something else entirely — a kind of digital dreaming, outsourced to machines, shared by humans, and celebrated not for depth but for derangement?
The concern is not the images themselves. It is the passivity they invite.
A generation raised on surreal, algorithmic absurdity risks losing its appetite for clarity, coherence, or even causality. Why analyze the 'Iliad' when you can generate an image of Achilles as a grumpy cat in a trench coat yelling at a holographic Helen?
And yet — ironically, tragically, wonderfully — some of these AI creations do resonate. Like dreams or parables, they bypass logic and tap into something weirder and older: our deep love of surprise, of nonsense, of fractured truth.
Kierkegaard, of all people, might understand. He once wrote: 'The most painful state of being is remembering the future, particularly the one you'll never have.'
Maybe that is what the AI duck in a spaceship is trying to tell us.
But we must not look away. Because behind every absurd AI image is a real question: who shapes our imagination? Who owns our attention? And what happens to a society that forgets how to ask why, as long as it keeps saying 'wow'?
It is tempting to laugh and move on. To repost the image of a minotaur doing taxes under a disco ball with the caption: 'He files, therefore he is.' But we are in dangerous waters. Or worse, dangerous milk. Because the cow now has laser eyes and speaks French. And it is trending.
In conclusion, though in this genre, conclusions are entirely optional, the AI brain-rot phenomenon is not just a meme. It is a mirror. A funhouse mirror, yes, one cracked and sprayed with digital nonsense, but a mirror nonetheless.
We must reflect, not only on the images but on ourselves. Why do we laugh at a shark in sneakers? Why does it stay with us? Why does it feel truer than the news?
Maybe that is the real concern. That meaning has been replaced by mood. That critique has been swallowed by consumption. That we are all just raccoons in suits, holding signs that read: 'Context is cancelled.'
• Rafael Hernandez de Santiago, viscount of Espes, is a Spanish national residing in Saudi Arabia and working at the Gulf Research Center.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
a day ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
‘The Institute': Stephen King's New TV Thriller Premieres in London
American writer Stephen King and director Jack Bender have joined forces again for a new TV thriller "The Institute", which premiered in London on Thursday. Based on King's best-selling 2019 novel by the same name, Bender said after working together on shows such as crime drama "Mr. Mercedes" and sci-fi show "Under the Dome" they were keen to find a new project. "This show is about the power of youth coming together to rectify the world that all of us adults have screwed up a little bit," Bender said. As well as directing, Bender, along with King has an executive producer credit on the show, as does Ben Cavell, who also wrote the small screen adaptation. Joe Freeman, in his first major role, stars as Luke Ellis, a teenager with unusual abilities, who is kidnapped and taken to "The Institution," a facility full of trapped kids with psychological powers. "He's never acted and he's remarkable .... The minute I saw him on tape, it was: 'Oh, my God, this kid is it. He's so real,'" Bender said of 19-year-old Freeman, the son of actor Martin Freeman. Asked if his dad, known for "The Hobbit" franchise and "Sherlock" had given him any advice, Joe Freeman said it was not to take anything for granted, as "the job (of an actor) is 99% rejection." Freeman stars alongside Emmy award winner Mary-Louise Parker as Ms. Sigsby, who runs the institution and Ben Barnes, who plays an ex-cop whose life becomes intertwined with the facility. "It's a sort of... a slow simmering sort of horrifying thriller rather than a horror," Barnes said. While the first series covers the book, there are plans to continue. "We certainly intend to tell much more story... if there's an appetite for it, we will absolutely continue this story because these characters, these actors, this crew... it all feels too good to leave behind," Cavell said.
Al Arabiya
2 days ago
- Al Arabiya
AI-generated Pope Leo sermons flood YouTube, TikTok
AI-generated videos and audios of Pope Leo XIV are rapidly proliferating online, racking up views as platforms struggle to police them. An AFP investigation identified dozens of YouTube and TikTok pages that have been churning out AI-generated messages delivered in the pope's voice or otherwise attributed to him since he took charge of the Catholic Church last month. The hundreds of fabricated sermons and speeches, in English and Spanish, underscore how easily hoaxes created using artificial intelligence can elude detection and dupe viewers. 'There's natural interest in what the new pope has to say, and people don't yet know his stance and style,' said University of Washington professor emeritus Oren Etzioni, founder of a nonprofit focused on fighting deepfakes. 'A perfect opportunity to sow mischief with AI-generated misinformation.' After AFP presented YouTube with 26 channels posting predominantly AI-generated pope content, the platform terminated 16 of them for violating its policies against spam, deceptive practices, and scams, and another for violating YouTube's terms of service. 'We terminated several channels flagged to us by AFP for violating our spam policies and Terms of Service,' spokesperson Jack Malon said. The company also booted an additional six pages from its partner program allowing creators to monetize their content. TikTok similarly removed 11 accounts that AFP pointed out—with over 1.3 million combined followers—citing the platform's policies against impersonation, harmful misinformation, and misleading AI-generated content of public figures. With names such as 'Pope Leo XIV Vision,' the social media pages portrayed the pontiff supposedly offering a flurry of warnings and lessons he never preached. But disclaimers annotating their use of AI were often hard to find—and sometimes nonexistent. On YouTube, a label demarcating 'altered or synthetic content' is required for material that makes someone appear to say something they did not. But such disclosures only show up toward the bottom of each video's click-to-open description. A YouTube spokesperson said the company has since applied a more prominent label to some videos on the channels flagged by AFP that were not found to have violated the platform's guidelines. TikTok also requires creators to label posts sharing realistic AI-generated content, though several pope-centric videos went unmarked. A TikTok spokesperson said the company proactively removes policy-violating content and uses verified badges to signal authentic accounts. Brian Patrick Green, director of technology ethics at Santa Clara University, said the moderation difficulties stem from rapid AI developments inspiring 'chaotic uses of the technology.' Many clips on the YouTube channels AFP identified amassed tens of thousands of views before being deactivated. On TikTok, one Spanish-language video received 9.6 million views while claiming to show Leo preaching about the value of supportive women. Another, which carried an AI label but still fooled viewers, was watched some 32.9 million times. No video on the pope's official Instagram page has more than 6 million views. Experts say even seemingly harmless fakes can be problematic, especially if used to farm engagement for accounts that might later sell their audiences or pivot to other misinformation. The AI-generated sermons not only 'corrode the pope's moral authority' and 'make whatever he actually says less believable,' Green said, but could be harnessed 'to build up trust around your channel before having the pope say something outrageous or politically expedient.' The pope himself has also warned about the risks of AI, while Vatican News called out a deepfake that purported to show Leo praising Burkina Faso leader Ibrahim Traoré, who seized power in a 2022 coup. AFP also debunked clips depicting the pope, who holds American and Peruvian citizenships, criticizing US Vice President JD Vance and Peru's President Dina Boluarte. 'There's a real crisis here,' Green said. 'We're going to have to figure out some way to know whether things are real or fake.'
Arab News
2 days ago
- Arab News
Playwright Caryl Churchill pulls out of theater project over Barclays' ties to Israel
LONDON: Acclaimed playwright Caryl Churchill has withdrawn from a project with a London theater over its sponsorship by Barclays and the bank's links to companies supplying arms to Israel. In a statement, Churchill, who is a long-time advocate for Palestinian rights, called on the Donmar Warehouse to cut ties with Barclays. 'Theaters used to say they couldn't manage without tobacco sponsorship, but they do. Now it's time they stopped helping advertise banks that support what Israel is doing to Palestinians,' she said. The project had not yet been publicly announced but would have marked Churchill's return to the Donmar for the first time since 'Far Away' in 2020. Her move has been backed by more than 300 artists and arts workers, including actors Harriet Walter, Juliet Stevenson, Alfred Enoch, Samuel West and Tim Crouch, who signed an open letter in support. Barclays has faced increasing pressure from arts and activist groups over its provision of financial services to defense companies operating in Israel. In 2023, the group Culture Workers Against Genocide published a letter condemning Barclays' sponsorship of Sadler's Wells, with signatories including Maxine Peake, an actress. Last year, the Bands Boycott Barclays campaign led to the bank being dropped as a sponsor by several UK music festivals, including Latitude and The Great Escape. Barclays declined to comment on Churchill's withdrawal but said on its website: 'While we provide financial services to these companies, we are not making investments for Barclays and Barclays is not a 'shareholder' or 'investor' in that sense in relation to these companies.' Barclays CEO C.S. Venkatakrishnan defended the bank's position in a 2023 Guardian article, writing: 'These companies are supported by our democratically elected governments for their role in protecting the UK and allies in Europe. We will not undermine our own national security by de-banking them.' Responding to Churchill's decision, Culture Workers Against Genocide said: 'Arts institutions have an ethical duty not to contribute to oppression and injustice. By continuing to accept sponsorship from Barclays, Donmar Warehouse is helping to launder the bank's reputation as it profits from Israel's genocide in Palestine.' The Donmar, which lost its £500,000 ($679,355) annual government grant in 2022, has increasingly relied on private support, including corporate sponsorships. It has been approached for comment. Churchill was previously stripped of a European lifetime achievement award in 2022 following criticism of her play 'Seven Jewish Children' and her public pro-Palestinian stance.
