logo
US partially pulls embassy staff from Iraq as tensions rise

US partially pulls embassy staff from Iraq as tensions rise

Euronewsa day ago

The US has ordered the departure of non-essential embassy staff and their families from the Middle East over heightened security concerns in the region.
The decision comes amid an apparent impasse in US-Iran nuclear talks, with President Donald Trump saying he was "less confident" the pair would reach a deal.
The State Department on Wednesday announced it would be partially evacuating personnel from the US embassy in Baghdad in order to "keep Americans safe, both home and abroad."
The US embassy in Baghdad already operates at limited staffing over security risks, and the order will not affect a large number of personnel.
The department has also authorised the departure of non-essential personnel and family members from its embassies in Bahrain and Kuwait.
Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth authorised the 'voluntary departure of military dependents from locations' across the region, US Central Command said in a statement. The command 'is monitoring the developing tension in the Middle East.'
Earlier Wednesday, the UK's maritime agency issued a warning to ships in the region that an escalation of tensions could impact shipping. It advised vessels to be cautious in the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman, and the Strait of Hormuz — waterways that all border Iran.
Iraq's state-run Iraqi News Agency said the evacuation of some nonessential employees from the US Embassy in Baghdad was part of 'procedures related to the US diplomatic presence in a number of Middle Eastern countries, not just Iraq,' adding that Iraqi officials 'have not recorded any security indicators that warrant an evacuation.'
Tensions have escalated recently amid a deadlock in negotiations between the US and Iran over Tehran's advancing nuclear program. The ongoing war — now over 18 months — between Israel and Hamas in Gaza has heightened concerns of a broader conflict that could draw in the US, Israel, Iran, and its regional allies.
Speaking at the Kennedy Centre in Washington on Wednesday, President Trump said staff were being "moved out, because it could be a dangerous place. We'll see what happens."
When asked if there was anything that could be done to reduce tensions in the region, Trump responded that Tehran "can't have a nuclear weapon, firstly."
The talks seek to limit Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for relief from the crushing economic sanctions the US has placed on the country. Iran says its nuclear programme is peaceful.
The next and sixth round of talks, which had been tentatively scheduled for this weekend in Oman, now looks increasingly likely to be cancelled, according to two officials who spoke to AP on condition of anonymity.
In a separate interview with the New York Post's 'Pod Force One' podcast, Trump said he was "getting more and more less confident about' a deal.
'They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame. I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago. Something happened to them," he said in the interview released on Wednesday.
Iran's mission to the UN posted on social media that 'threats of overwhelming force won't change the facts."
US militarism "only fuels instability," the mission claimed.
Iranian Defense Minister General Aziz Nasirzadeh separately told journalists Wednesday that Tehran would be ready to respond to airstrikes.
'If conflict is imposed on us, the opponent's casualties will certainly be more than ours, and in that case, America must leave the region, because all its bases are within our reach,' he said. 'We have access to them, and we will target all of them in the host countries without hesitation.'
Amid growing tensions with Tehran, the top US military officer for the Middle East, General Erik Kurilla, was scheduled to testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Thursday, but that testimony has now been postponed, according to the committee's website. The Pentagon has not commented on the postponement.
Myanmar is on "a path to self-destruction" if violence in the conflict-wracked Southeast Asian nation doesn't end, the UN envoy has warned.
Julie Bishop told the UN General Assembly that "alarmingly" the violence didn't end after a powerful earthquake in late March devastated parts of the capital, Naypyidaw, and the country's second-largest city, Mandalay, killing more than 3,000 people and injuring thousands more.
Ceasefires announced by some parties have largely not been observed, "embedding a crisis within a crisis," and people in Myanmar must now deal with the raging conflict and the earthquake's devastation, Bishop said.
"A zero-sum approach persists on all sides," she said. "Armed clashes remain a barrier to meeting humanitarian needs. The flow of weapons into the country is fuelling the expectations that a military solution is possible."
A widespread armed struggle against military rule in Myanmar began in February 2021 after generals seized power from the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi.
More than 6,600 civilians are estimated to have been killed by security forces, according to figures compiled by non-governmental organisations.
The military takeover triggered intensified fighting with long-established armed militias organised by Myanmar's ethnic minority groups in its border regions, which have struggled for decades for more autonomy.
It also led to the formation of pro-democracy militias that support a national unity government established by elected lawmakers barred from taking their seats after the army takeover.
More than 22,000 political prisoners are still in detention, Bishop said, including Suu Kyi, who turns 80 on 19 June, and the ousted president, Win Myint.
The UN envoy said she detected "some openness to political dialogue with some regional support, but there is not yet broader agreement on how to move forward."
In meetings with the country's leaders, Bishop said she encouraged them to reconsider their strategy, which has left the country more divided.
She also warned against elections, planned for December or January, saying they risk fuelling greater resistance and instability unless there is an end to the violence and they can be held in an inclusive and transparent way.
Bishop said she has been coordinating further action with Othman Hashim, the special envoy for Myanmar from the 10-nation Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and they agreed to visit Myanmar together.
The UN envoy said she had a meeting online on Monday with representatives of the Rohingya minority from Myanmar and Bangladesh.
She said the situation for the Rohingya in Myanmar's northern Rakhine state remains dire, with up to 80% of civilians living in poverty and caught in crossfire between the government's military forces and the Arakan Army, the well-armed military wing of the Rakhine ethnic minority, and "subject to forced recruitment and other abuses."
More than 700,000 Muslim Rohingya fled to Bangladesh from Myanmar starting in late August 2017 when Myanmar's military launched a "clearance operation."
Members of the ethnic group face discrimination and are denied citizenship and other rights in the Buddhist-majority nation.
Bishop said there's hope that a high-level conference on the Rohingya and other minorities called for by the UN General Assembly on 30 September will put a spotlight on the urgency of finding "durable solutions" to their plight.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'In the war in Ukraine, territory is important, yes, but not as much as it seems'
'In the war in Ukraine, territory is important, yes, but not as much as it seems'

LeMonde

timean hour ago

  • LeMonde

'In the war in Ukraine, territory is important, yes, but not as much as it seems'

Vladimir Putin had already ordered the killing or mutilation of hundreds of thousands of Russians and Ukrainians. The president of the Russian Federation will go down in history as the architect of a "war of choice." Behind the aggression he has carried out for more than three years, the same question – rarely asked and never truly answered – continues to surface throughout the battles in the Donbas: Why this slaughter? This has been a key question for understanding just how difficult it would be to even sketch out the possibility of negotiations. Back at the White House, Donald Trump, more swaggering than ever, believed that "24 hours" would be enough for him to resolve the problem. For him, it was a real estate issue, and as the self-proclaimed "king of the deal," he knew about such things. He had proven himself in property development in New York and New Jersey. Basic rule: land dictates everything, just like in golf. So it was time for a de jure recognition Russia's annexation of Crimea, because that's how it's been since 2014, he said, and everyone, more or less, seemed to accept it. Then, a de facto recognition of the Russian army's control over part of Ukraine's eastern border, the Donbas, because Kyiv's forces lack the means to retake it. In exchange for this "real estate" arrangement, Ukrainians would be guaranteed the means to defend themselves against another Russian offensive, but without joining NATO. The result was disappointment. Ukrainians did not like the proposal, but perhaps more interestingly, neither did the Russians. The reason being that in this conflict between both parties, the issue of territory is important, yes, but not as much as it seems. The primary objective of the 10 Russian armored divisions that crossed the border on February 24, 2022, was not the Donbas, but Kyiv. Their mission was to overthrow the democratically elected president, Volodymyr Zelensky, and install a government in the Ukrainian capital that would answer to the Kremlin.

Senior US Democrat condemns Israel's 'reckless escalation'
Senior US Democrat condemns Israel's 'reckless escalation'

France 24

time2 hours ago

  • France 24

Senior US Democrat condemns Israel's 'reckless escalation'

"Israel's alarming decision to launch airstrikes on Iran is a reckless escalation that risks igniting regional violence," Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island said in a statement. His comment came after Israel carried out a "preemptive" strike against Tehran's nuclear and military sites, in defiance of a call from US President Donald Trump to refrain from attacking Iran. Reed, the top Democrat on the US Senate Armed Services Committee, warned that the "strikes threaten not only the lives of innocent civilians but the stability of the entire Middle East and the safety of American citizens and forces." "While tensions between Israel and Iran are real and complex, military aggression of this scale is never the answer," he insisted. "I urge both nations to show immediate restraint, and I call on President Trump and our international partners to press for diplomatic de-escalation before this crisis spirals further out of control." Other Democrats also voiced alarm. "This action ordered by Prime Minister Netanyahu appears to deliberately undermine ongoing American diplomatic negotiations about Iran's nuclear program," Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey said on X. Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut agreed. "This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu's own making, and now the region risks spiraling toward a new, deadly conflict," he warned on X. He also took a political jab at the US president, insisting that Israel's decision to attack "is further evidence of how little respect world powers -- including our own allies -- have for President Trump." Republican senators responded as well, but with a very different tone. Tom Cotton of Arkasas insisted on X that "Iran is the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism, has the blood of thousands of Americans on its hands, and is rushing to build not only nuclear weapons, but also missiles that can strike the United States." "We back Israel to the hilt, all the way." Ted Cruz of Texas agreed. "Israel is doing a favor to America right now by taking out Iran's nuclear capacity," he said.

Federal judge says Trump illegally deployed the National Guard to help with LA protests, must return control to California
Federal judge says Trump illegally deployed the National Guard to help with LA protests, must return control to California

LeMonde

time2 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Federal judge says Trump illegally deployed the National Guard to help with LA protests, must return control to California

A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order on Thursday, June 12, directing President Donald Trump to return control of the National Guard to California. The order, which takes effect at noon Friday, said the deployment of the Guard was illegal and both violated the 10th Amendment and exceeded Trump's statutory authority. The White House had no immediate comment on the ruling. US District Judge Charles Breyer said Trump overstepped his bounds in ordering the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard members to Los Angeles after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown. It was not immediately clear how that would change the situation on the ground. California Governor Gavin Newsom sued to block the Guard's deployment against his wishes. California later filed an emergency motion asking the judge to block the Guard from assisting with immigration raids. He argued that the troops were originally deployed to protect federal buildings and wanted the court to block the troops from helping protect immigration agents during the raids, saying that involving the Guard would only escalate tensions and promote civil unrest. In a broad ruling, the judge determined Trump had not properly called the Guard up in the first place. Major General Scott Sherman said that as of Wednesday about 500 of the Guard troops have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations . Photos of Guard soldiers providing security for the agents have already been circulated by immigration officials. Sherman is commander of Task Force 51, which is overseeing the Guard troops and Marines sent to Los Angeles. Earlier in the day Breyer said he intended to rule quickly. "This country was founded in response to a monarch, and the Constitution is a document of limitations. I'm trying to figure out where the lines are drawn," the judge said before a packed courtroom.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store