Book bans could escalate after Department of Education dismisses censorship complaints

Axios

21-02-2025

The U.S. Department of Education is stepping away from the fight over book bans, a move civil rights groups warn could give local officials more power to censor books on race, gender and identity.
Why it matters: Librarians and legal experts argue that book bans threaten First Amendment rights, warning that government censorship jeopardizes free speech and silences marginalized voices.
"If you want to control people, you interfere with their access to information," Deborah Caldwell-Stone, director of the Office for Intellectual Freedom at the American Library Association (ALA), told Axios.
"That's why we're telling people to come together and unite against book bans. Everyone has the power to resist — whether by voting, showing up at board meetings, or supporting their local libraries."
Catch up quick: On Jan. 24, the DOE's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) dismissed 11 complaints related to book bans and rescinded guidance that had previously suggested such bans could violate civil rights laws.
The OCR contended that removing "age-inappropriate" books is a matter of local control, not a civil rights violation.
The DOE also eliminated its book ban coordinator position, indicating a broader rollback of federal oversight regarding school censorship.
What they're saying: The ALA condemned the DOE's decision as a dangerous dismissal of censorship issues, warning that ideological book removals are unconstitutional and have been ruled against by courts.
"This isn't just about banning books — it's about controlling education and access to information," Caldwell-Stone told Axios. "And it's getting worse."
The ALA urged Americans to attend school board and library meetings to combat government overreach.
Friction point: Caldwell-Stone warns that the DOE's decision could undermine these legal battles, shifting the fight entirely to local school boards and state legislatures.
"We are seeing courts reject the idea that government officials can dictate what we're allowed to read," she said. "But without federal oversight, school boards and libraries are under enormous pressure to censor content."
Jeffrey R. Henig, an education policy expert at Columbia University, warns of federal intervention in local curricula.
"This administration is likely to use federal funding to pressure schools into restricting discussions on race, history, and systemic inequalities — taking the Florida model and expanding it nationally," Henig said.
The big picture: Since 2021, 44 states have proposed laws restricting discussions on race and gender, fueling a surge in book bans. Advocacy groups report thousands of challenges, mainly targeting books on race, gender and identity.
Laws in several states — including Florida, Georgia, Tennessee and Alabama — have placed restrictions on classroom discussions about race and identity.
The ALA recorded 414 censorship attempts in the first eight months of 2024, affecting 1,128 unique titles.
PEN America reported more than 10,000 book bans in public schools during the 2023–24 school year, marking an all-time high.
What they're saying:"During Jim Crow, segregationists banned civil rights literature because they didn't want people to see how unjust segregation was," said Ibram X. Kendi, an acclaimed author and scholar whose book " How to Be an Antiracist" has been targeted in recent bans.
"Today, those trying to conserve racism are banning anti-racist books to keep people from understanding that racism still exists — and still harms people."
Martha S. Jones, a historian at Johns Hopkins University, says book bans disproportionately target marginalized voices.
Her book" Vanguard: How Black Women Broke Barriers, Won the Vote, and Insisted on Equality for All" was challenged at a Louisiana library for "not telling both sides of the story."
"The problem is that some people in history don't look very good," Jones said. "The book tells the truth about those who worked to keep Black women from voting. That's history — it's not always polite, and it's not always pretty."
What's next: With the DOE backing away from oversight, censorship battles will increasingly play out at the state and local level.
"The fight is far from over," Caldwell-Stone said. "This is about power — who controls what we learn, what we read, and ultimately, what we think."