logo
Florida lawmakers pass $115B budget, ending weeks-long standoff

Florida lawmakers pass $115B budget, ending weeks-long standoff

Yahoo24-06-2025
Two weeks away from a state government shutdown, and 45 days past their original deadline, Florida lawmakers finally passed a budget for 2025-26 late in the evening of June 16.
The $115.1 billion spending plan is $3 billion less than the current year, ending an extended stalemate between the House and Senate over tax cuts.
Senate budget chief Ed Hooper, R-Clearwater, admitted there were 'shouting matches' and 'finger pointing' in the deadlock over the budget between the chambers.
But 'nobody on either side can claim 'we won,' because I hope the state of Florida won,' he said ahead of the vote.
On the main budget bill (SB 2500), the Senate approved it unanimously and the House voted 103-2, with only Reps. Dotie Joseph, D-North Miami, and Angie Nixon, D-Jacksonville, voting against it.
Despite the overwhelming support for the main appropriations bill, Democrats expressed frustration and disappointment with other bills to put parts of it into effect.
They took issue with provisions to allow Gov. Ron DeSantis' office to probe spending by local governments, to allow charter school operators to set up shop within an existing public school and to reverse a decision made last year to dedicate funding from the Seminole Gaming Compact to environmental and land conservation programs.
Rep. Robin Bartleman, D-Weston, took particular issue with the charter school provision, known as Schools of Hope, in SB 2510. A similar bill failed to pass during the regular session, but the provision popped up in what's known as a budget conforming bill negotiated between the chambers.
The bill 'got debated in the Senate and that bill did not cross the threshold,' Bartleman said. 'Why are you messing with schools that are working? This is a sin.'
The bill passed along partisan lines, 80-24 in the House and 25-9 in the Senate.
During the regular session that was supposed to end May 2, House and Senate leaders reached an impasse over tax cuts. House Speaker Daniel Perez, R-Miami, preferred to cut the state sales tax from 6% to 5.25%, while Senate President Ben Albritton, R-Wauchula, feared such a large cut would jeopardize funding for vital services in future years.
DeSantis, too, threatened to veto a sales tax cut when Albritton and Perez reached an initial deal for a smaller sales tax cut, fretting it would threaten his push for large property tax cuts.
The tax cut bill (HB 7031) doesn't have an overall sales tax cut or a property tax cut, but includes the elimination of the tax businesses pay on rents and targeted exemptions of sales tax for certain items. The bill will cost state coffers $1.3 billion, with $904 million of it coming from the business rent tax elimination.
Republican legislative leaders defended their work as providing a balanced budget – something required by the state constitution – while giving tax breaks to help families and businesses.
"Florida Senate Republicans recognize that it is hardworking families and business owners, not the government, who create jobs and build thriving communities throughout our state,' Senate Republican Leader Jim Boyd of Sarasota said in a statement.
'We are always mindful that every dollar state government spends comes from a family or business that earned it. Our constituents are counting on us to invest their tax dollars wisely, with a focus on the long-term financial stability of our state.'
The budget – which goes into effect July 1 – now heads to Gov. Ron DeSantis, who didn't attend the traditional 'hanky drop' ceremony at the end of session because he is on a trade mission in France. The governor must sign the budget into law like any other bill, but has line-item veto authority for it, and may well excise a fair amount of spending.
If you can't read the budget bill posted above, click here.
Gray Rohrer is a reporter with the USA TODAY Network-Florida Capital Bureau. He can be reached at grohrer@gannett.com. Follow him on X: @GrayRohrer.
This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: $115B state budget clears Legislature 45 days past original deadline
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan
California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan

San Francisco Chronicle​

timea few seconds ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan

The state Supreme Court opened the door Wednesday to plans by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats to redraw California's congressional districts in a gerrymander designed to pick up five seats, rejecting a Republican legal challenge. A lawsuit Monday by legislative Republicans contended the hastily drafted ballot measure, scheduled for votes in both houses on Thursday, has not been published long enough to meet the public-notice requirements in the state Constitution. But the court dismissed the suit Wednesday in a brief order with little explanation. The Republican lawmakers 'have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under (the) California Constitution,' the court said. Six justices, all appointed by Democratic governors, endorsed the order, while Justice Carol Corrigan, the only Republican appointee, was absent and did not participate, the court said. Newsom proposed the ballot measure, titled the Election Rigging Response Act, after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott introduced legislation to redraw the state's House districts and enable Republicans to pick up five seats in next year's elections. Democrats currently hold 43 of California's 52 House seats. The governor's measure, if approved by two-thirds majorities in both the Assembly and state Senate — where Democrats hold more than two-thirds of the seats — would redesign California's House seats for the rest of this decade in response to changes in Texas or any other state. Ballot measures approved by the voters in 2008 and 2010 established a bipartisan, independent commission to draft congressional and legislative districts in California, a task previously left up to state legislators, who design districts in most states. Newsom's proposed state constitutional amendment, ACA8, would temporarily suspend that commission if approved by a majority of the voters in November. While California law does not allow legislative action on a proposed measure until 30 days after it has been introduced, Democrats apparently sidestepped that deadline with a longstanding practice known as 'gut and amend' — using other legislation that had been pending for more than 30 days, erasing the contents and replacing them with the redistricting language. That was apparently enough to defeat the Republicans' lawsuit. Other Republican lawmakers, and the National Republican Congressional Committee, have promised additional challenges under the California Constitution and federal election laws.

Vance scoffs at ‘idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic' Trump's social media style
Vance scoffs at ‘idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic' Trump's social media style

The Hill

timea few seconds ago

  • The Hill

Vance scoffs at ‘idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic' Trump's social media style

Vice President JD Vance criticized California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Wednesday for trying to 'mimic' President Trump's style on social media. In an interview on Fox News's 'The Ingraham Angle,' the vice president said Newsom's revamped approach to online messaging misses the 'fundamental genius' that has fueled Trump's appeal. 'This idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic Donald Trump's style — I think that ignores the fundamental genius of President Trump's political success,' Vance said, 'which is that he's authentic.' 'He just is who he is,' Vance added. The comments came after Fox News host Laura Ingraham noted Democrats 'are still doing their 2024 autopsy' and seem to have concluded that they need to be tougher and 'be more like Trump in tone' to win future elections. Vance said that lesson is misguided. 'Look, the autopsy for the Democrats — some free political advice from the president of the United States — is stop sounding like crazy people,' Vance said. 'That really is all it is.' 'You've got to be yourself,' Vance added after criticizing Newsom's approach. 'You've actually got to talk to people honestly about the issues. I don't think it's that complicated: Don't be a crazy person. Be authentic.' Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential contender, in recent days has rolled out a revamped messaging strategy that mirrors Trump's signature social media style. The California governor has posted rants in all-caps letters, he's assigned nicknames to his political opponents, and he's referred to his legislative proposals and political rallies as 'beautiful.' While Newsom's approach has been embraced by many Democrats, who have struggled to find their footing since losing the 2024 election, the governor has faced criticism from some Republicans and Fox News hosts. 'FOX HATES THAT I AM AMERICA'S MOST FAVORITE GOVERNOR ('RATINGS KING') SAVING AMERICA,' Newsom's office posted earlier this week, responding to that criticism.

California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push
California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push

The Hill

timea few seconds ago

  • The Hill

California Supreme Court rejects GOP effort to halt Newsom's redistricting push

The California Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a petition filed by state Republican legislators seeking to halt Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) plan to redistrict California's congressional map. 'Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under California Constitution article IV, section 8,' reads a brief order posted to the docket. Newsom has hit back at Republican redistricting efforts in Texas by pushing for a special election this November to get voters' approval on a more favorable House map for Democrats in California in time for the 2026 midterms. The ruling paves the way for the California legislature to proceed with voting as soon as Thursday on a package that would set up the special election. Republicans' legal challenge revolved around a 30-day waiting period mandated under the state constitution before an introduced bill can be passed, unless three-fourths of lawmakers agree to waive the requirement. Democrats looked to get around the requirement by gutting the text of bills introduced in February and replacing them with the redistricting effort. Four state Republican legislators — Sen. Tony Strickland, Sen. Suzette Martinez Valladares, Assemblyman Tri Ta and Assemblywoman Kate Sanchez — went to the state's high court on Tuesday seeking to effectively block the redistricting effort. The petition sought to stop Democrats from moving ahead until Sept. 18, far past the window that state officials have said would be necessary to prepare for an election on Nov. 4. The lawmakers' attorneys acknowledged in court filings that it was a case of first impression but said that permitting Democrats' strategy would be 'comically absurd.' In a joint statement, the lawmakers stressed the court did not explain its ruling and said it is 'not the end of this fight.' 'This means Governor Newsom and the Democrats' plan to gut the voter-created Citizens Redistricting Commission, silence public input, and stick taxpayers with a $200+ million bill will proceed,' the statement reads. 'We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians,' it continued.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store