American Eagle breaks silence on Sydney Sweeney ‘great jeans' ad controversy
American Eagle has responded to critics after the brand's new denim campaign with Sydney Sweeney caused major controversy.
''Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans,' the company said Friday in a statement obtained by The Post. 'Her jeans. Her story.'
Advertisement
7 Sydney Sweeney posing for American Eagle's new denim ad campaign.
American Eagle
7 American Eagle shared this response on Friday after their new 'Great Jeans' campaign with Sydney Sweeney caused major controversy.
Instagram/@americaneagle
'We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way,' the statement continued. 'Great jeans look good on everyone.'
Advertisement
Sweeney, 27, and American Eagle faced backlash earlier this week after the blonde-haired, blue-eyed 'White Lotus' starlet appeared in a new denim ad for the popular clothing and accessories retailer.
'I have great jeans… now you can too,' the 'Euphoria' actress wrote on Instagram on July 23, alongside a video for the controversial campaign.
7 Sydney Sweeney posing for American Eagle's new 'Great Jeans' ad campaign.
American Eagle
But the tagline, which was seemingly a pun on the word 'genes,' had some social media users comparing the marketing move to 'Nazi propaganda.'
Advertisement
'I thought it was gonna be, like, kinda bad, but wow,' one critic wrote on TikTok. 'That's gonna be in history books!'
'I will be the friend that's too woke, but those Sydney Sweeney American Eagle ads are weird,' another added. 'Like, fascist weird. Like Nazi propaganda weird.'
7 An ad from American Eagle's new 'Great Jeans' campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney.
American Eagle
'Like, a blonde-haired, blue-eyed white woman is talking about her good genes. That is Nazi Propaganda,' a third person commented, while a fourth responded, 'Saying that a blonde-haired, blue-eyed girl has 'good genes' is Nazi s–t.'
Advertisement
Singers Lizzo, 37, and Doja Cat, 29, also took to social media to ridicule Sweeney and American Eagle over the controversy.
'My jeans are black…' the 'Truth Hurts' singer wrote alongside a digitally altered picture showing herself in the denim shirt and jeans that Sweeney wore for the American Eagle photo shoot.
7 An ad from American Eagle's controversial new ad campaign with 'Euphoria' star Sydney Sweeney.
American Eagle
Doja Cat shared a TikTok video of herself repeating Sweeney's American Eagle campaign monologue with an exaggerated accent.
However, others came to the 'Anyone But You' star's defense and agreed that American Eagle's new denim campaign was nothing beyond a clever play on words.
'I'm confused, why are people outraged by this?' one fan wrote on Instagram. 'She looks stunning!'
7 Sydney Sweeney in American Eagle's new denim 'Great Jeans' campaign.
American Eagle
'You have absolutely nothing to apologize for,' someone else commented, while a third wrote, 'If you want to hate on this ad campaign, please go touch grass!'
Advertisement
Still, American Eagle appeared to distance itself from the 'Nazi propaganda' backlash by sharing other ads from the campaign that did not feature Sweeney.
'Denim on denim on denim… on denim,' the company wrote alongside the new ad on July 27. 'AE has great jeans.'
7 Sydney Sweeney wearing all denim and lying on the ground for American Eagle's new 'Great Jeans' ad campaign.
American Eagle
Plus, American Eagle's stock rose more than 10% immediately after the new campaign kicked off on July 23.
Advertisement
Sweeney herself has yet to respond to the backlash and controversy caused by her 'Great Jeans' ad campaign.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
Meghan Markle faces new legal battle as half-sister Samantha heads to court again
Meghan Markle is gearing up for yet another legal bout with her half-sister, Samantha Markle. The Duchess of Sussex emerged victorious in early 2023 after Samantha had sued her in federal court in Florida for allegedly making 'demonstrably false and malicious statements' about her to a world audience during a sit-down interview with Oprah Winfrey. Samantha, 60, filed the $75,000 lawsuit after the 'Suits' alum, 44, told Winfrey that she grew up as an only child during her and Prince Harry's bombshell March 2021 interview. Advertisement 5 Meghan Markle is gearing up for yet another legal bout with her half-sister. GC Images Samantha, who shares the same dad as the duchess, claimed the comments subjected her to 'humiliation and hatred.' At the time, a judge at the 11th Circuit Court of Appeal in Atlanta, Ga., had scheduled the case for the week commencing August 11. Advertisement However, a recent court filing shows the hearing will now take place on September 9 in Jacksonville, Fla. The Post has reached out to Meghan's reps for comment. Prior to her 2023 filing, Samantha, 60, had previously filed her libel lawsuit against Meghan in late 2022 — two years after the Sussexes quit royal life and moved to the US. 5 Samantha had sued the Duchess of Sussex over revelations made in her interview with Oprah Winfrey. Advertisement At the time, Meghan's legal team had dismissed her half-sister's claims, saying they would 'give it [the case] the minimum attention necessary, which is all it deserves.' Their estranged father, Thomas Markle Sr., said in March 2022 that he was willing to testify in Samantha's case. Samantha suffered a major blow the following year after a Florida judge dismissed her lawsuit against the As Ever founder, saying Meghan's remarks were opinions and 'not capable of being proved false.' 5 The Duke and Duchess of Sussex sat down with Oprah Winfrey for a tell-all interview in March 2021. Advertisement 'As a reasonable listener would understand it, Defendant merely expresses an opinion about her childhood and her relationship with her half-siblings,' US District Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell wrote in her order. Samantha also wanted the former actress to take back allegations she made against the royal family. Follow The Post's royal family live blog for the latest pics, news, exclusive details and more Meghan's lawyer, Michael Kump, however, said Samantha had no grounds to sue for defamation. He added that the former working royal has a right to voice opinions 'and even criticize' under the First Amendment. The estranged half-sisters had been at odds for years before the infamous interview. 5 Samantha claimed that Meghan made 'demonstrably false and malicious statements' about her to a world audience. CBS Meghan has repeatedly accused Samantha and their father, who earlier this year moved to the Philippines, of selling stories to the British tabloids. For her part, Samantha has continued to take shots at the duchess and brother-in-law Prince Harry as the couple continues putting out documentaries and memories. Advertisement The duo also have a different recollection of their closeness growing up. Meghan previously asserted that she never had a relationship with Samantha and even said in her 2022 Netflix docuseries, 'Harry & Meghan,' that her half-sister has fabricated how close they are. 5 Their estranged father, Thomas Markle Sr., said in March 2022 that he was willing to testify in Samantha's case. @tauerbach/Twitter Advertisement 'I don't know your middle name. I don't know your birthday,' she said of Samantha. 'You're telling these people you raised me, and you coined me Princess Pushy? I hadn't had a fallout with her. We didn't have a closeness to be able to have that. And I wanted a sister.' What's more, the mom of two claimed she was in her early 20s the last time she saw Samantha.
NBC News
40 minutes ago
- NBC News
Is an AI backlash brewing? What 'clanker' says about growing frustrations with emerging tech
It's a slur for the AI age. 'Clanker,' a word that traces back to a Star Wars video game, has emerged in recent weeks as the internet's favorite epithet for any kind of technology looking to replace humans. On TikTok, people harass robots in stores and on sidewalks with it. Search interest for the term has spiked. On X, Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., used the term last week to tout a new piece of legislation. 'Sick of yelling 'REPRESENTATIVE' into the phone 10 times just to talk to a human being?,' he posted on X. 'My new bill makes sure you don't have to talk to a clanker if you don't want to.' In one video, which has more than 6 million views on TikTok, a small, four-wheeled delivery robot gets berated with the word. 'It makes me sick just seeing a...' Nic, a 19-year-old student and aspiring content creator in Miami Beach who posted the video, says as it approached, adding: 'Clanker!' A slur is generally defined as a word or phrase meant to denigrate a person based on their membership to a particular group such as a race, gender or religion — one that goes beyond rudeness into overt bigotry. They are almost always directed at people. 'Clanker' appears to have peeked into the internet's lexicon starting in early June, with Google Trends data showing a sudden uptick in search interest. An entry on a website dedicated to documenting the varied weirdness of the internet, traced the term back to the 2010s, when Star Wars communities adopted it from its use in various Star Wars shows to refer to battle robots. Other pieces of science fiction also predicted the rise of slurs for machines, most notably 'Blade Runner,' with 'skinjob' to refer to highly advanced, humanlike robots. But there's a catch. By using a slur in a way that would typically apply to a human, people are also elevating the technology, offering some sense that people both want to put down the machines and recognize their ascension in society. Adam Aleksic, a linguist who is also a content creator focused on how the internet is shaping language, said he first noticed the emergence of 'clanker' a couple of weeks ago. Its use mirrored classic slurs related to racial tropes and appeared to emerge out of a growing 'cultural need' related to growing unease with where advanced technology is heading. In one video — somewhat ironically appearing to have been created by AI — a man berates his daughter during a family dinner for dating 'a goddamned clanker,' before his wife steps in and apologizes to the robot. 'What we're doing is we're anthropomorphizing and personifying and simplifying the concept of an AI, reducing it into an analogy of a human and kind of playing into the same tropes,' Aleksic said. 'Naturally, when we trend in that direction, it does play into those tropes of how people have treated marginalized communities before.' The use of 'clanker' is rising as people are more often encountering AI and robots in their daily lives, something that is only expected to continue in the coming years. The steady expansion of Waymo's driverless cars across U.S. cities has also come with some human-inflicted bumps and bruises for the vehicles along the way. Food delivery bots are an increasingly common sight on sidewalks. In the virtual world, cybersecurity firms continue to warn about the proliferation of bots on the web that comprise a growing share of all web traffic — including as many as one in five social media accounts. The anti-machine backlash has long been simmering but is now seemingly breaking to the surface. A global report by Gartner research group found that 64% of customers would prefer that companies didn't use AI for customer service — with another 53% stating they would consider switching to a competitor if they found out a company was doing so. People are becoming more worried about AI taking their job s, even though evidence of actual AI-related job losses is relatively scant. 'Clanker' is also not the first pejorative term for something related to AI to have spread across the internet. 'Slop' as a catchall term for AI-generated content that is of low quality or obviously created by AI — such as 'shrimp Jesus' — entered internet parlance last year and has since become widely used. Other anti-AI terms that have emerged include 'tin skin' and 'toaster,' a term that traces back to the science fiction show Battlestar Galactica. And there's even some pushback — joking and serious — about whether such slurs should be used. In a Reddit community for Black women, a post about 'clanker' offered some sense of the tension: 'And I know it's probably a joke in all from social media, but I can't help but feel like it's incredibly tasteless.' Others have noted that some of the enthusiastic embrace of 'clanker' feels more about being able to throw around a slur rather than any deeper issue with technology. Nic, whose TikTok video helped spark the 'clanker' phenomenon, said he sees both why people have taken to the phrase as well as why some find it problematic. Nic, who asked to withhold his last name out of privacy concerns, said he did sense some people were using the word as a stand-in for a racial epithet. Still, Nic, who is Black, said he saw the term more broadly as a lighthearted way to express a growing anxiety with where technology is headed, particularly as it pertains to the future of employment. 'I see it as being a push back against AI,' he said. 'A lot of lives are being changed because of robots ... and me personally I see it as a stupid way of fighting, but there's a little truth to it, as well.'
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Brain rot summer
We like to see ourselves as individual free thinkers. But when a hot summer trend hits — a style, a song, or even a meme — we can't resist wearing it, blasting it, and posting it. But what about this summer? It's August — schools are reopening, football is returning — and no big trend has taken hold. Summer 2025 feels squishy, undefinable, and chaotic. This season's most anticipated movies are all franchise revivals, like "Jurassic Park," "Superman," "Lilo & Stitch," and the "Fantastic Four." Netflix just set a record for biggest opening of any in-house film: the sequel to the 1996 classic "Happy Gilmore." Where indelible songs of the summer have consistently broken through in years past — "It's Gonna Be Me" in 2000, "Gangnam Style" in 2012, "Espresso" in 2024 — this year lacks a clear winner. At this writing, "Ordinary" by YouTuber-turned-crooner Alex Warren is atop the Billboard Hot 100, a moody tune poised more for overuse as a wedding first dance than it is to be a poolside bop. The most hyped tour of the summer was Beyonce's Cowboy Carter, which promoted an album that dropped 16 months ago. "Should we be concerned that it's August in a week and so far the song of the summer is 'nothing beats a Jet2 Holiday '?" one TikToker asked, referencing the viral sound meme that uses the audio vacation ad from British company Jet2holidays. It has appeared in millions of videos to juxtapose a fun vacation melting down into disaster. Even fashion and visual aesthetic trends have come undone. 2024 was lime green Brat summer, 2023 was bubble gum pink thanks to Barbenheimer and Taylor Swift's Eras Tour, Beyonce's "Renaissance" chrome shone in 2022. As Vogue recently noted, "There is almost always one color that dominates. That said, this season seems to be the exception to the rule. There wasn't one single shade that reigned supreme." Welcome to brain rot summer. AI slop has infected TikTok, Facebook, and X, and people can't tell that even a herd of bunnies jumping on a trampoline is AI generated. The biggest monoculture moment we've seen so far was the Coldplaygate affair, a moment so cringe it cut through all our FYPs. I'm watching snippets of vacations gone wrong on TikTok and the Jet2holidays ad is living rent free in my head. The internet is piling on Sydney Sweeney and American Eagle with accusations that an ad for jeans was actually a Nazi dog whistle, and in the past few months Katy Perry has gone to space with Lauren Sánchez and Gayle King, split with Orlando Bloom, and is hanging out with Justin Trudeau, a summer romance gossip that feels like a Mad Libs concoction. It's easy to feel the absence of a universal vibe this summer, but the lack of a ubiquitous pop culture hit may be the result of a longer shift, says Joel Penney, a professor in the College of Communication and Media at Montclair State University. "There's been this huge pattern of media fragmentation that's been going on for a very long time." Because more people stream music and TV, "the catalog becomes just as important as anything new," Penney says. Sequels are safer bets for Hollywood to make, and Spotify spins up personalized playlists that feature older songs. Popular content creators with podcasts or large social media followings may seem big, but they also filter us into smaller media bubbles. The privilege of crystallizing and spreading our trends to massive audiences used to rest with late-night hosts, but their influence is waning: Stephen Colbert performed the viral "Apple" dance to go along with the "Brat" song last summer, but this summer his show is facing cancellation. There's been this huge pattern of media fragmentation that's been going on for a very long time. Joel Penney The news cycle, also popular late-night fodder, is fast paced and relentless. President Donald Trump is dominating news headlines in ways few other politicians ever have, from speculation around what's in the Jeffrey Epstein files to how tariffs will affect the economy to his posts on Sydney Sweeney. "Trump takes up all of the oxygen," Penney says. That's been true since he took office for the first time, with a report from Harvard' Shorenstein Center finding Trump was the topic of 41 percent of all news stories, tripling the coverage of past presidents. "There's just so much Trump all the time in the news that it kind of becomes pop culture," leaving little room for other pop culture moments to reach escape velocity. The big summer trends are often driven by, or at least seized by, marketers. "Barbie" had a $150 million marketing budget, more than the budget for the movie itself, and it paid off: The movie earned nearly $1.5 billion globally. If today we don't have one pop princess or color reigning supreme, maybe it's just an off year when no major, resonating work dropped just as the weather warmed up. But it could be an indication that people are growing tired of the mainstream, and weary of their social feeds being driven by algorithms over people. "The brain rot is super real," says Andrew Roth, founder and CEO of the Gen Z-focused research firm DCDX. "This summer is almost an escape from all of that, where people are going offline." DJs are turning coffee shops into spaces to vibe. Friendship and IRL dating apps are becoming popular as young people shirk traditional swiping. The hottest item to buy this summer is a Labubu; a toy made for adults whose appeal lies part in childhood nostalgia, and part in the IRL anticipation of opening a box without knowing exactly what you'll get. "Niche passions in communities are rising up to be an escape from that mainstream narrative that's everywhere," Roth says. "It doesn't feel like everyone wants to be a part of the same Barbenheimer or Brat summer experience. It's more of an individualized, spontaneous one." Maybe after two summers with blockbuster trends, we're feeling burned out and relishing in a break from monoculture. Critics and consumers alike have been feeling like the 2020s are culturally shallow for years, and attitudes about our entertainment landscape are pessimistic. A 2024 YouGov poll found people were most likely to say the 2020s has the worst TV, sporting events, radio programming, music, fashion, and movies, compared to every other decade over the past century. These opinions could be more nostalgia-driven than honest (the 2020s have spurred a deluge of water-cooler talk around highly acclaimed television series like "Severance" and "Succession"), or they could capture the growing frustration with the massive amounts of content we now have to choose from, and the age-old adage that quantity does not trump quality. Trends have shorter lives in our world where short-form video and algorithms dictate who sees what. Brat summer was maybe not just the winner of 2024, but such a massive hit that it became the exception and dragged on for so long that Charli XCX had to declare it over herself. In April, she suggested a litany of artists who could take up the torch. None have. No forced marketing campaign has led to the mass proliferation of one style, song, or movie. So how will we remember the Summer of 2025? Will it be the Astronomer affair? The coupling up of "Love Island's" Nicolandria, or the very public breakup of Elon Musk and Trump? Maybe we'll all have different memories of what defined the season and what we watched and listened to this summer — a patchwork that reflects the chaos that summer brought.
