Key points from Rachel Reeves's Leeds reforms
The Chancellor said the 'Leeds reforms', unveiled in the West Yorkshire city, 'represent the widest set of reforms to financial services for more than a decade'.
These are the key points in the package of measures unveiled by the Treasury.
The key measures for individuals:
– A new advertising campaign will highlight the benefits of investing to individual consumers.
Major banks and financial firms including including Barclays, Lloyds, Vanguard and Hargreaves Lansdown have agreed to take part in the campaign to help spread awareness.
– Banks will be able to offer a new type of help called 'targeted support' from April next year.
This means they can alert customers about specific investment opportunities, in hopes it will encourage groups of people with cash sitting in low-return current accounts to move it into stocks and shares.
– Risk warnings on investment products will come under a review to ensure people can make accurate judgements about risk levels – potentially opening the door to some warnings being watered down.
– Long term asset funds will be allowed to be held in stocks and shares Isas next year.
Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets for Hargreaves Lansdown, said the change will 'open up far more investment' because it means cash can go into private assets and infrastructure projects, which currently are not allowed to be in mainstream Isas.
– The Government will continue to consider reforms to Isas and savings to strike the right balance between cash savings and investment.
The key measures for banks and building societies:
– Looser lending rules will allow banks and building societies to offer more mortgages at 4.5 times a buyer's income, which is expected to mean thousands more loans become available for first-time buyers.
– The bank ring-fencing regime, which separates banks' retail banking from their investment and international banking activities, will be reformed.
– The Bank of England has raised the threshold at which smaller and mid-sized banks have to start holding emergency funding.
Easing capital requirements is expected to help smaller banks scale up by freeing up more money for lending and investment.
The key measures for the City:– The UK's Financial Ombudsman Service – which settles complaints between consumers and businesses – will be modernised and simplified and decisions will be more aligned with the financial regulator.
– Plans to ease rules around senior manager appointments will be sped up, reducing the number of roles that are subject to regulatory approval.
The regime was introduced after the 2008 financial crisis to make individuals more accountable for their conduct and any problems that arise under their watch.
– Consumer Duty, a set of rules which set higher standards of consumer protection, will be reviewed by the UK's financial regulator over how it applies to investment banks and asset managers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
UK's FCA proposes 9 billion to 18 billion pound redress scheme for motor finance claims
LONDON, Aug 3 (Reuters) - Britain's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) on Sunday proposed a redress scheme for consumers with motor finance compensation claims following last week's Supreme Court ruling, estimating the cost at between 9 billion and 18 billion pounds ($12 billion and $24 billion). Friday's court decision had calmed the industry's worst fears about the size of the bill it would face over improperly disclosed commissions on car loans - a sum analysts had estimated could run to tens of billions of pounds. However, after considering that ruling, which was largely seen as a win for the banks, the FCA still proposed an industry-wide redress scheme for certain types of compensation claims. "At this stage, we think it is unlikely that the cost of any scheme, including administrative costs, would be materially lower than 9 billion pounds and it could be materially higher," the FCA said in a statement. It said the total cost was hard to estimate. It cautioned that any estimates were indicative and susceptible to change, but it said those in the middle of the 9 billion to 18 billion pounds range were "more plausible." Some level of further compensation payout had still been expected by banks after Friday's ruling, placing investor focus on the FCA's decision over whether to launch a full redress scheme, what it might look like, and how much it would cost. Lenders, including Lloyds Banking Group (LLOY.L), opens new tab, Close Brothers (CBRO.L), opens new tab, Barclays (BARC.L), opens new tab and the UK arms of Santander ( opens new tab and Bank of Ireland (BIRG.I), opens new tab, have already set aside nearly 2 billion pounds between them to cover potential motor finance compensation claims. The FCA said firms should now refresh estimates of their liabilities, increase provisions where necessary, and keep markets informed. Prior to the Supreme Court ruling, which overturned a previous court decision, there were fears the cost of redress could rival that of a payment protection insurance mis-selling scandal, which cost lenders over 40 billion pounds between 2011 and 2019. The proposed motor finance scheme would cover so-called discretionary commission arrangements - those where the broker could adjust the interest rate offered to a customer - if they had not been properly disclosed. The regulator said agreements dating back to 2007 should be considered and it would publish a consultation by early October, with an expectation that people start receiving compensation in 2026. "Our consultation will cover how firms should assess whether the relationship between the lender and borrower was unfair for the purposes of our scheme," the statement said. "Any redress scheme must be fair to consumers who have lost out and ensure the integrity of the motor finance market, so it works well for future consumers." The consultation will also look at how interest is calculated on compensation, saying it estimated a simple annual rate of around 3% would be applicable. The regulator said it had not decided whether the scheme should require customers to opt in, or be automatically involved unless they opt out. ($1 = 0.7531 pounds)
Telegraph
13 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reeves is cynically squeezing us dry– without raising taxes
The Chancellor has not had much luck with some of her tax rises. Rachel Reeves was expecting to raise up to £3.2bn each year, or around £12.7bn in this parliament, with the scrapping of non-dom status – a policy announced by her Conservative predecessor Jeremy Hunt and then ramped up by Labour. She is heading for disappointment. With the exodus of more than 10,000 millionaires from the UK last year and an expected 16,000 this year, Reeves has been warned that the move may in fact reduce rather than increase tax receipts. Speculation is thus rife that the measures may be further watered down; there has already been some initial tweaking and softening earlier this year. The imposition of VAT on school fees is likewise now widely expected to raise less than the predicted £1.7bn by 2030, due to more than expected numbers of children transferring to the state sector and becoming a burden on education budgets. The spate of independent school closures – not just as a result of the VAT change but also employer National Insurance rises, the loss of business rate relief for schools with charitable status and the gamut of extra regulation affecting all businesses – will inevitably make this worse. But, ironically, Reeves may have been rather more adept at boosting Treasury revenue with some of the tax measures she did not actually implement. Before last year's Halloween Budget there was much speculation that rates of capital gains tax (CGT) would be brought into line with those for income tax. This would have meant that higher-rate taxpayers earning over £50,270 would have had to pay 40pc instead of 24pc on taxable property gains and 20pc on other assets. Additional rate taxpayers, earning over £125,140, even worried they might be faced with a full 45pc levy on any uplift. The fear that these rates would be aligned was an entirely rational one. The great Conservative chancellor Nigel Lawson in his 1988 Budget had done just that – although the medicine that year was very much sweetened by the scrapping of all income tax rates over 40pc at the same time. Labour's manifesto, while pledging not to raise the rates of income tax or employee National Insurance, was silent about CGT. And after winning the election, Sir Keir Starmer and Reeves never tired of talking up a £22bn 'black hole' the Tories had allegedly left them. This would soon need filling – and Reeves did nothing to dampen down speculation that CGT rises and changes to the pension regime would be how she would achieve at least part of this. In the event, the Chancellor took less drastic action. She raised the rate of CGT for non-property gains from 10pc to 18pc for basic-rate taxpayers and 20pc to 24pc for those on the higher and additional rates. In other words, she aligned the rates for different asset classes to the one already levied on property. But the speculation alone did pay dividends for Reeves. In October last year, the month running up to the Budget, CGT receipts on residential property disposals was £408m – more than double that of most other months in the last tax year. Revenue from CGT is notoriously volatile when compared to other taxes. In the 2023-24 tax year, for example, CGT liabilities were 18pc down from the previous year. But the surge in the run-up to the Budget was vast. The best explanation for the Treasury's October windfall is that residential landlords sold up in advance of a clobbering that did not materialise. As Chris Etherington, of accountants RSM, has noted: 'It is clear that anticipation of CGT changes can distort taxpayer behaviour... the Chancellor benefitted from an inadvertent windfall... Reeves does not necessarily need to increase CGT rates to raise revenues. It's potentially possible to maximise CGT receipts by simply saying very little on the subject.' The Chancellor will insist that she cannot speculate about what moves she will be making in future Budgets – due to such information having an impact on the markets. But that argument does not quite wash. She is more than happy to rule out some fiscal moves, such as raising the rate of income tax. So why not others? Is it too cynical to suggest that Reeves has found her own third way? She can benefit from increased inflows without actually raising taxes. But such tactics are far from victimless – the uncertainty and disruption caused comes at a high price. Additionally, it makes it much more difficult for people to plan for the future and may make them take unnecessary decisions that they will live to regret. In other circumstances, allowing speculation to rip may in fact hurt Treasury coffers. Not closing down current Labour Party debates about a wealth tax will surely mean more wealthy people leaving the UK in anticipation of such a move. This will not only hurt our economy but also mean lower tax yields, resulting in less money for public services.
Scottish Sun
19 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Major UK high street bank quits UN-backed net zero alliance as it says body ‘not fit for purpose'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAJOR high street bank has become the latest British lender to quit the Net Zero Banking Alliance, the bank said on Friday. Barclays argued that the departure of several global lenders has left it no longer fit to support the bank's green transition. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Barclays has become the latest British lender to quit the Net Zero Banking Alliance Barclays' decision to quit the foremost banking alliance focused on tackling climate change follows on from HSBC and several major US banks. It also raises questions about the ability of the group to influence change in the sector going forward. The bank said in a statement on its website: "After consideration, we have decided to withdraw from the Net Zero Banking Alliance." It added that its commitment to be net zero by 2050 remained unchanged and that it still saw a commercial opportunity for itself and its clients in the energy transition. Earlier this week Barclays published the first update on its sustainability strategy in several years. It said the bank made £500 million in revenue from sustainable and low-carbon transition finance in 2024. Jeanne Martin, co-director of corporate engagement at responsible investment NGO ShareAction called the decision to leave the Net Zero Banking Alliance "incredibly disappointing and a step in the wrong direction at a time when the dangers of climate change are rapidly mounting." Barclays said the alliance was no longer fit for its purpose: "With the departure of most of the global banks, the organisation no longer has the membership to support our transition." The Net Zero Banking Alliance, a global initiative launched by the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative, lists more than 100 members on its website - including leading international financial institutions. A spokesperson for the alliance said it remains focused on "supporting its members to lead on climate by addressing the barriers preventing their clients from investing in the net-zero transition." Daily Money News It comes after it was announced that Barclays is slashing interest rates on its popular Rainy Day for the third time in less than seven months. From August 4, the interest rate for balances up to £5,000 will fall from 4.61% to 4.36%. The Rainy Day Saver account, which offers easy access to funds, has been a favourite among Barclays' 20 million customers. It is designed for balances up to £5,000, with savers earning the higher rate on the first £5,000 – currently 4.61%. Savings above this threshold earn just 1% interest, but customers benefit from instant access to their money at any time. At the current rate, holding £5,000 in the account would earn you £230.50 in interest over 12 months. However, when the rate drops to 4.36%, this will fall to £218 - a loss of £12.50 per year. Once boasting a competitive 5.12% interest rate earlier this year, Barclays has steadily chipped away at its appeal. In February, the rate dropped to 4.87%, followed by another cut in April to 4.61%. In February, the bank reduced the rate to 4.87%, followed by another cut in April to 4.61%. Now, just months later, rates are set to drop again, leaving savers questioning whether to stick with the account or explore better options elsewhere.
