logo
2 cheap FTSE 100 shares to consider buying in June

2 cheap FTSE 100 shares to consider buying in June

Yahoo14 hours ago

How do we tell if a FTSE 100 stock looks cheap? One way is to seek out share prices that have fallen this year, and that brings Associated British Foods (LSE: ABF) into view.
The shares are up from their 52-week low in March, but we're still looking at a 12-month fall of 20%.
Some of the weakness has to be down to retail fears facing the company's Primark high street chain. We also have at a collection of five different business here, with Grocery, Ingredients, Sugar, and Agriculture divisions added to Retail.
That brings diversification, which is a good thing. But it can also suggest a company lacks focus, and top management have to keep their eyes on numerous balls.
With first-half results in April, CEO George Weston said he was 'frustrated with the results in our Sugar business.' But the other four are doing fine, in line with full-year guidance. The update gave the share price a boost at the time.
Forecasts indicate a fall in earnings per share for the full year, and that has to be holding the stock back. But analysts expect a return to earnings growth that could drop the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio to under 9.5 by 2027.
Associated British Foods had net debt of £2.8bn at 1 March, up from £2.5bn a year previously. Against a market cap of nearly £15bn, that doesn't worry me too much. But it's worth keeping an eye on.
There's risk from retail exposure, and a possibly perceived lack of focus. But I think long-term investors should consider it.
Looking for FTSE 100 stocks on low P/E valuations can also throw up candidates. And that draws my attention to M&G (LSE: MNG). M&G seems to come up in a number of my searches on different factors, like its big 8.3% forecast dividend yield.
There's a forecast P/E of 10 on the cards for the current year. And a mooted recovery from the past couple of tough years could see it drop close to eight by 2027.
Investment management companies are often on lower P/Es and can be cyclical. But the predicted earnings growth over the next few years should cover the dividends, which are also expected to rise. The cover might be a bit thin though.
With 2024 results released in March, CEO Andrea Rossi spoke of 'two new targets for 2025-2027: to grow adjusted operating profit before tax on average by 5% or more per annum, and to generate £2.7 billion of operating capital.'
The boss added: 'I am delighted to announce that today we are moving to a progressive dividend policy, starting with a 2% increase for the 2024 total dividend per share.' That all sounds ambitiously positive.
But the risk hasn't gone away. The world seem to be lurching from one trade-related economic crunch to another on an almost daily basis. And if M&G's dividends can't keep up with inflation, the shares could take another knock. But I see a decent chance of a bull run here and feel it's worth a closer look.
The post 2 cheap FTSE 100 shares to consider buying in June appeared first on The Motley Fool UK.
More reading
5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50
One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool
Alan Oscroft has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Associated British Foods Plc and M&g Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.
Motley Fool UK 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns
Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns

The High Court of England and Wales says lawyers need to take stronger steps to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence in their work. In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT 'are not capable of conducting reliable legal research." 'Such tools can produce apparently coherent and plausible responses to prompts, but those coherent and plausible responses may turn out to be entirely incorrect,' Judge Sharp wrote. 'The responses may make confident assertions that are simply untrue.' That doesn't mean lawyers cannot use AI in their research, but she said they have a professional duty 'to check the accuracy of such research by reference to authoritative sources, before using it in the course of their professional work.' Judge Sharp suggested that the growing number of cases where lawyers (including, on the U.S. side, lawyers representing major AI platforms) have cited what appear to be AI-generated falsehoods suggests that 'more needs to be done to ensure that the guidance is followed and lawyers comply with their duties to the court,' and she said her ruling will be forwarded to professional bodies including the Bar Council and the Law Society. In one of the cases in question, a lawyer representing a man seeking damages against two banks submitted a filing with 45 citations — 18 of those cases did not exist, while many others 'did not contain the quotations that were attributed to them, did not support the propositions for which they were cited, and did not have any relevance to the subject matter of the application,' Judge Sharp said. In the other, a lawyer representing a man who had been evicted from his London home wrote a court filing citing five cases that did not appear to exist. (The lawyer denied using AI, though she said the citations may have come from AI-generated summaries that appeared in 'Google or Safari.') Judge Sharp said that while the court decided not to initiate contempt proceedings, that is 'not a precedent.' 'Lawyers who do not comply with their professional obligations in this respect risk severe sanction,' she added. Both lawyers were either referred or referred themselves to professional regulators. Judge Sharp noted that when lawyers do not meet their duties to the court, the court's powers range from 'public admonition' to the imposition of costs, contempt proceedings, or even 'referral to the police.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data

Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns
Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns

TechCrunch

timean hour ago

  • TechCrunch

Lawyers could face ‘severe' penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns

The High Court of England and Wales says lawyers need to take stronger steps to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence in their work. In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT 'are not capable of conducting reliable legal research.' 'Such tools can produce apparently coherent and plausible responses to prompts, but those coherent and plausible responses may turn out to be entirely incorrect,' Judge Sharp wrote. 'The responses may make confident assertions that are simply untrue.' That doesn't mean lawyers cannot use AI in their research, but she said they have a professional duty 'to check the accuracy of such research by reference to authoritative sources, before using it in the course of their professional work.' Judge Sharp suggested that the growing number of cases where lawyers (including, on the U.S. side, lawyers representing major AI platforms) have cited what appear to be AI-generated falsehoods suggests that 'more needs to be done to ensure that the guidance is followed and lawyers comply with their duties to the court,' and she said her ruling will be forwarded to professional bodies including the Bar Council and the Law Society. In one of the cases in question, a lawyer representing a man seeking damages against two banks submitted a filing with 45 citations — 18 of those cases did not exist, while many others 'did not contain the quotations that were attributed to them, did not support the propositions for which they were cited, and did not have any relevance to the subject matter of the application,' Judge Sharp said. In the other, a lawyer representing a man who had been evicted from his London home wrote a court filing citing five cases that did not appear to exist. (The lawyer denied using AI, though she said the citations may have come from AI-generated summaries that appeared in 'Google or Safari.') Judge Sharp said that while the court decided not to initiate contempt proceedings, that is 'not a precedent.' Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW 'Lawyers who do not comply with their professional obligations in this respect risk severe sanction,' she added. Both lawyers were either referred or referred themselves to professional regulators. Judge Sharp noted that when lawyers do not meet their duties to the court, the court's powers range from 'public admonition' to the imposition of costs, contempt proceedings, or even 'referral to the police.'

ECB Is in Good Position on Rates, Lagarde Tells Monaco Info
ECB Is in Good Position on Rates, Lagarde Tells Monaco Info

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

ECB Is in Good Position on Rates, Lagarde Tells Monaco Info

(Bloomberg) -- The latest interest-rate moves primes the European Central Bank to meet its medium-term inflation goal, President Christine Lagarde told television station Monaco Info. Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn Trump Said He Fired the National Portrait Gallery Director. She's Still There. 'We think we have really reached a good position,' she said in an interview broadcast Saturday, adding that the latest olicy decision was 'well calibrated.' Speaking on the sidelines of an event on oceans, Lagarde said that policymakers will be attentive to incoming data 'to know if we need to adjust or not adjust' borrowing costs. 'But I think we are currently well positioned to face moments that will be delicate and very uncertain.' After an eight rate reduction in a year and a total easing of 200 basis points, the cutting campaign is nearing an end, Lagarde has said after the latest decision on Thursday. The ECB is now 'in a good position' to deal with uncertainties ahead, not least due to US trade policies, she said. Officials from across the hawk-dove-spectrum have echoed that the recent cycle is almost, if not completely over. Greece's Yannis Stournaras, one of the most dovish policymakers, told Bloomberg on Friday that the bar for more cuts is 'high,' while more hawkish Boris Vujcic from Croatia said Saturday the ECB is 'nearly done.' The ECB's projections published Thursday foresee inflation to slow to 1.6% in 2026, before returning to 2% in 2027, matching the institution's medium-term target. Growth is expected to strengthen over the forecast horizon. Lagarde also said in the interview that 'the euro is doing well,' adding that the ECB's monetary policy has allowed officials to tame inflation from a peak of more than 10% to the 2% level that is the central bank's target. 'I think we are well calibrated to reach this medium-term goal,' she said. Speaking in a separate interview with TV Monaco, Lagarde said while the ECB's most recent economic projections don't take into account a scenario of 50% tariffs on European goods shipped to the US, such a level 'would be rather disastrous for international trade.' (Updates with comment on trade in final paragraph) Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? What Does Musk-Trump Split Mean for a 'Big, Beautiful Bill'? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store