Crisco owner B&G Foods sells tomato brands amid efforts to reshape portfolio
This story was originally published on Food Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Food Dive newsletter.
B&G Foods sold two of its tomato brands to a private equity company as the Crisco owner looks to offload some of its portfolio and reduce debt.
Violet Foods, a newly formed portfolio company of Amphora Equity Partners, will acquire B&G's Don Pepino and Sclafani brands for an undisclosed amount. Don Pepino makes sauces used in pizza shops across the East Coast, while Sclafani is known for its tomatoes, tomato puree and whole peeled tomatoes.
The sale included the manufacturing facility in Williamstown, New Jersey where the products are produced. Financial details of the transaction were not disclosed.
Built through a series of acquisitions, B&G Foods is taking a far different approach these days. The New Jersey company has been actively slimming down its portfolio to streamline its focus and reduce its overall debt load.
B&G sold Green Giant canned business to Seneca Foods in 2023 and snacks brand Back to Nature a year earlier to Barilla. The company is also looking to sell the Green Giant frozen business.
Don Pepino and Sclafani are smaller offerings within B&G's portfolio of more than 50 brands that also include Ortega, Cream of Wheat and Crisco. Don Pepino and Sclafani make sauces and tomato products, categories that face significant competition from brand names and private-label offerings. This headwind is unlikely to abate as inflation-weary consumers cut back on spending and look to save money when they can.
During the company's first-quarter earnings call, CEO Casey Keller said reshaping B&G's portfolio 'is a very high priority for the company and critical to our future strategic direction and risk profile.' The CEO said his goal includes creating 'a more highly focused B&G' that can be a foundation for M&A growth in its core business lines, principally spices and seasonings, Mexican meal preparation and baking staples.
Recommended Reading
B&G Foods exploring sale of Green Giant frozen, canned vegetable businesses
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
A cybersecurity play set to run even higher, and how to trade this week's inflation reports
(This is a wrap-up of the key money moving discussions on CNBC's "Worldwide Exchange" exclusive for PRO subscribers. Worldwide Exchange airs at 5 a.m. ET each day.) Investors are looking for opportunities in emerging markets on the back of U.S.-China trade talks and at a cybersecurity play focused on AI and remote work. Worldwide Exchange pick: CrowdStrike Shana Sissel of Banrion Capital sees more upside in CrowdStrike despite the cybersecurity giant seeing a more than 35% gain this year. "It's the leading player in that space. … Its Falcon XDR technology is incorporating AI, remote work continues to be a tailwind to the stock," said Sissel. CrowdStrike reported Tuesday where revenue inline with estimates and a better-than-expected profit, but guidance that was below expectations. But Bernstein downgraded CrowdStrike on Friday to market perform from outperform, citing valuation concerns. CrowdStrike trades at roughly 133 times forward earnings. Worldwide Exchange pick: Mexican stocks Alastair Pinder, head of emerging markets at HSBC, said U.S.-China trade talks in London are a tailwind for emerging markets and believes Mexico will be one of the biggest winners. "A surprise market that could do very well this year is Mexico," said Pinder. "They are a beneficiary long term of these trade tensions and this rejiggering of supply chains away from Asia and towards America … this is a market that trades at 12-times earnings it's used to be 19 times a lot of the bad news is already reflected in the price." The iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) has gained nearly 30% year to date. The dollar has dropped 8% against the Mexican peso. The trade ahead of CPI and PPI Jimmy Lee of Wealth Consulting group sees inflation improving and growing opportunities in interest rate sensitive cyclicals and small caps. His comments come ahead of the latest consumer and producer price index readings due this week. "I believe if the headline number continues to come in lower that there may be one or two more cuts than what the market is pricing in," Lee said to CNBC. "I like the cyclical sectors that would perform better in a lower rate environment as well as an economy that is not going into recession. … I think the smaller cap and mid cap stocks that have not participated in this year will come back." Citi on Monday lowered its outlook for Federal Reserve rate cuts from 100 basis points in 2025 to 75 basis points. Tracking the TIPS Gilbert Garcia of Garcia Hamilton believes we are likely seeing a peak in U.S. Treasury yields, noting it's an ideal time to buy at any point on the curve. "If you look at the real rate on TIPS (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities) they are unusually high … the real rate is roughly 250 basis points, which it should normally be 50 to 75 basis points," he said. Garcia noted bond yields moved higher after the jobs report but expects continued downward revisions similar to the 30,000 in April and 65,000 in March. Garcia expects those revisions to be eventually be reflected in bond pricing.
Time Business News
2 hours ago
- Time Business News
From Open Borders to Closed Doors: The Decline of Global Mobility
VANCOUVER, British Columbia — Once hailed as a triumph of globalization and diplomacy, visa-free access, unrestricted tourism, and economic migration have been sharply curtailed. In 2025, the promise of global mobility has been replaced with digital walls, biometric checkpoints, algorithmic profiling, and a new form of travel apartheid that silently determines who gets to move—and who doesn't. A comprehensive investigation by Amicus International Consulting, a firm specializing in second passports, digital identity restructuring, and privacy-driven mobility solutions, reveals that global travel freedom is shrinking at an alarming pace. This rollback is not occurring through declared policy changes alone but rather through an invisible scaffolding of surveillance infrastructure, pre-emptive vetting systems, AI-generated no-fly lists, and ever-expanding visa regimes. While passports once opened doors, today they merely mark the starting point of a digital evaluation that determines your mobility score—and your future. A Decade of Regression: The Fall of Mobility Rankings In the early 2010s, international travel hit an all-time high. Visa-free treaties multiplied, low-cost airlines expanded access, and millions moved freely for work, education, and leisure. But the last decade has reversed that progress. According to the 2025 Passport Index, only 48 countries have seen improvements in mobility since 2020, while 127 have seen either stagnation or decline. Nations previously considered 'passport strongholds'—such as the U.S., U.K., and Germany—now face reciprocal visa requirements, particularly in the Middle East, Asia, and Africa. The reasons include: Retaliatory diplomatic measures AI-based national risk scoring Rise in right-wing populism and nationalism Militarized pandemic-era travel protocols that were never rolled back Algorithmic suspicion based on digital behaviour Case Study: Indian Entrepreneur Denied Despite Visa-Free Access Rohit P., a 37-year-old Indian national and business executive, was denied boarding at a Frankfurt Airport in 2024 en route to Mexico, a country with which India has reciprocal visa-free agreements for business travellers. Although his documents were in order, a biometric scan flagged his previous travel to Iran and the use of encrypted messaging apps on his phone, as a result, airline staff were issued an 'offload request' by Mexican border authorities via the global API-PNR system (Advanced Passenger Information and Passenger Name Record). He was never officially denied entry, yet he was prevented from travelling, and the incident never appeared on paper. His only mistake: travel metadata that made him look suspicious to a machine. The New Gatekeepers: AI and Predictive Border Security In 2025, travel freedom is not determined by what you've done, but by what a government thinks you might do. Using real-time AI systems, countries now run predictive threat assessments on travelers. These systems scan for: Political affiliations Search engine histories Encrypted communication use Travel routes overlapping with 'high-risk' zones Social network affiliations and 'guilt by association' analytics This 'Minority Report'-style system of pre-crime prediction has led to hundreds of thousands of denied entries, most without explanation or recourse. Biometrics as Borders: The New Global Checkpoint While traditional travel controls relied on passports and visas, modern mobility is increasingly filtered through biometric data, including facial recognition, iris scans, and fingerprinting. These systems are: Deployed at 92% of all international terminals Integrated with INTERPOL and FBI databases Used to generate real-time matches with terrorist, criminal, or political threat profiles Increasingly outsourced to private vendors with limited accountability According to Amicus' 2025 field report, over 120,000 travelers were rejected due to biometric mismatches or facial recognition misidentification last year alone. Case Study: South Korean NGO Worker Flagged as a Threat In 2023, a South Korean national working with a humanitarian NGO in Lebanon was denied entry to Canada at Pearson International Airport. The traveller held a visa and had no criminal record. CBSA agents cited an algorithmic security risk. Internal documents later revealed that the traveller's association with Middle Eastern activists on Facebook triggered an AI-generated national security warning, despite no direct communication with any blocked entity. Second Passports: The Only Path Around Geopolitical Targeting Amicus International Consulting reports a significant increase in second citizenship applications from individuals who wish to escape travel discrimination based on their nationality. Many are from: China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus Iran and Lebanon Nigeria, Sudan, and Ethiopia Venezuela and Colombia By acquiring second passports legally through economic citizenship or ancestral lineage, clients can bypass risk profiling associated with their original nationality. One such client, a Lebanese tech entrepreneur, was repeatedly denied visas to the EU and the U.S. despite his business credentials. After acquiring Grenadian citizenship through Amicus, he can now travel visa-free to over 145 countries and is no longer subject to secondary screening at airports. Digital Discrimination: Metadata Is the New Border Wall In the post-pandemic digital era, travel bans no longer need to be physical; instead, they can be implemented virtually. A person can be denied entry before they even board a plane, based on machines interpreting their online behaviour. Risk engines now scan for: Tweets or posts criticizing foreign governments Participation in protests (flagged via facial recognition in crowds) Shared devices or IPs with high-risk individuals Anonymous browsing tools like Tor or VPNs Use of cryptocurrency wallets associated with sanctioned addresses This level of surveillance has created a two-tier system of mobility: those with clean, controlled digital lives and those permanently flagged by invisible systems. Dark Web Visas and the Rise of Black Market Mobility As legal pathways narrow, the underground has risen to fill the void. Amicus cyber teams report a 300% increase in dark web listings for forged biometric passports, visa approvals, and synthetic identities. Current black-market offerings include: Legitimate visa approvals obtained via bribes in understaffed embassies Deepfake-assisted biometric profiles that match stolen passport data Fabricated travel histories that bypass algorithmic risk filters 'Clean' digital identities linked to shell corporations and crypto wallets Interpol estimates that in 2024 alone, over 75,000 travelers entered countries using forged or manipulated travel profiles—many undetected due to biometric spoofing. Case Study: Stateless Activist Finds Mobility Through Amicus An activist from Myanmar, stripped of her citizenship after organizing protests, was left stateless and unable to travel. She retained Amicus in 2023. Through a combination of: Legal name change via religious conversion in South Asia Second passport from Dominica via donation route Digital footprint removal and metadata scrub Resettlement support and diplomatic backing She now resides legally in Europe under a new identity, has full mobility, and speaks freely as a human rights advocate—outside the reach of her persecutors. Where You Can Still Move Freely According to Amicus' 2025 Global Mobility Resilience Index, the top five countries offering favorable passport strength, digital neutrality, and geopolitical flexibility are: Grenada Portugal Uruguay Georgia Antigua and Barbuda These nations have minimal data-sharing obligations with aggressive surveillance states and offer flexible residency and citizenship programs. Amicus International: Restoring Freedom of Movement Amicus provides bespoke solutions to clients facing travel restrictions, including: Second citizenship and passport acquisition Metadata audit and digital cleansing services Appeals for unjust visa denials Residency relocation to privacy-focused countries Legal support for political asylum and safe passage With more than 900 successful second passport cases in the last two years, Amicus remains a global leader in restoring lawful movement rights to those trapped by digital profiling and geopolitical bans. Conclusion: A New Cartography of Control Borders have moved from maps to machines. Your travel rights are no longer printed in your passport but coded into algorithms that score your perceived intent, associations, and threat level. We have moved from open borders to silent closures, from diplomatic agreements to automated denials. In this new world, knowledge is power—and Amicus International Consulting remains at the forefront of protecting that power. Whether you're a refugee from surveillance, a businessperson unfairly flagged, or a global citizen seeking freedom from digital constraints, Amicus ensures your right to move is restored, protected, and reimagined. Contact InformationPhone: +1 (604) 200-5402Email: info@ Website:
Time Business News
2 hours ago
- Time Business News
The Smart Wall: When Borders Become Digital Prisons
VANCOUVER, B.C. — As governments shift their focus from physical barriers to digital surveillance systems, a new kind of border is emerging—one that tracks, anticipates, and intercepts movement without the need for walls or fences. This phenomenon, often referred to as the 'Smart Wall,' represents a seismic shift in how countries secure their borders and control migration. However, while policymakers claim it enhances national security, critics argue that it creates digital prisons that strip individuals of their privacy, mobility, and the right to seek refuge. Amicus International Consulting, a global leader in legal identity change and international migration advisory, has seen firsthand how emerging border technologies are transforming both enforcement and evasion. This press release explores the technologies behind the Smart Wall, their global impact, and the legal dilemmas now facing asylum seekers, stateless persons, and fugitives. What Is a Smart Wall? A Smart Wall is a border enforcement strategy that uses technology, rather than concrete or steel, to detect, monitor, and deter unauthorized crossings. It typically includes: High-resolution drones Ground sensors AI-enhanced surveillance cameras Satellite tracking systems Facial recognition and biometric verification Advanced data analytics Unlike traditional walls, Smart Walls are invisible but ever-present. They do not block geography; they monitor behaviour. By blending artificial intelligence with real-time sensor data, Smart Walls allow authorities to predict migration patterns, identify individuals of interest, and share intelligence across international networks. Case Study: The U.S.-Mexico Border In recent years, the United States has invested over $1.2 billion in Smart Wall technologies along the southern border. The system, powered by AI and supported by private defence contractors, includes drone surveillance, automated license plate readers, and biometric sensors capable of identifying individuals in motion. This network works not only at the line of contact but also deep into U.S. territory and across Mexican states. In effect, it creates a surveillance buffer zone extending miles beyond the border, blurring the lines between border enforcement and internal tracking. Human rights organizations, including the ACLU, have challenged these developments, citing privacy violations and the lack of transparency or judicial oversight. The Rise of Pre-Border Enforcement What makes Smart Walls more controversial is their ability to act before a traveller arrives. Governments now routinely access Passenger Name Records (PNR), share biometric data, and use algorithmic profiling to identify 'high-risk' travellers before they board planes or even apply for visas. In 2024, the European Union expanded its Entry/Exit System (EES), logging every border crossing made by non-EU citizens, including fingerprints and facial scans. Coupled with the European Travel Information and Authorization System (ETIAS), these tools enable predictive vetting based on personal, behavioural, and even political data. This predictive approach has turned many international travellers into unwitting targets of preemptive surveillance, often without recourse or explanation. When the Wall Is a Database For many, a border is no longer a place—it's a profile in a database. Governments worldwide maintain watchlists, blocklists, and visa denials based on opaque criteria. If your name, appearance, or travel history raises red flags, you may never be allowed to board a flight, regardless of your intent or legal rights. In 2023 alone, more than 2.4 million passengers were prevented from travelling due to pre-boarding algorithmic flagging, according to data from the International Air Transport Association (IATA) and INTERPOL. This phenomenon disproportionately affects: Asylum seekers Political dissidents Fugitives from oppressive regimes Transnational activists Stateless persons without a conventional ID Case Study: Jamal Khashoggi's Digital Trail The 2018 assassination of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi was partially enabled by digital tracking. Turkish intelligence later confirmed that Saudi operatives used mobile phone metadata, airline travel logs, and digital surveillance to orchestrate his capture and murder. The case became a landmark moment, demonstrating how digital tracking tools can be weaponized to monitor and neutralize dissent, even in foreign jurisdictions. The Legal Grey Zone: Predictive Policing and Due Process Predictive surveillance raises major legal questions. Is it lawful to deny someone entry based on a probability score generated by AI? What rights does a flagged traveller have when they're denied boarding in a third country? Can you challenge a decision made by an algorithm? Most current legal frameworks do not adequately address these questions. The right to mobility, enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is now clashing with national security algorithms programmed by private firms. As Amicus International notes, 'Borders have become invisible battlegrounds where algorithms, not judges, decide the fate of travellers.' The Human Cost of Smart Walls The impact of digital border control on vulnerable populations is profound. In 2024: Over 40,000 asylum claims were denied based on prior travel history. Stateless Rohingya refugees were rejected from Malaysian entry despite UNHCR documentation. LGBTQ+ activists flagged as 'cultural disruptors' were denied boarding to European safe havens. Dozens of political dissidents were detained at pre-clearance zones before flights ever left the ground. In each of these cases, the Smart Wall wasn't a line in the sand—it was an algorithmic no-fly zone programmed thousands of miles away. Amicus International's Response: Legal Pathways Through the Digital Maze Amicus International Consulting is at the forefront of helping clients navigate this digital transformation of borders. Their services include: Legal second citizenship acquisition through legitimate means, such as ancestry or investment through legitimate means, such as ancestry or investment Name and identity change assistance in compliant jurisdictions in compliant jurisdictions Pre-clearance legal preparation to ensure smooth airport transitions to ensure smooth airport transitions Digital footprint audits to help clients understand what data is being collected to help clients understand what data is being collected Emergency relocation planning for high-risk individuals and dissidents The firm emphasizes legal solutions only, warning that attempting to bypass digital security systems without a lawful grounding can lead to arrest, detention, or permanent blocklisting. Case Study: Escape from Biometric Detection In 2022, Amicus assisted a Belarusian human rights activist facing surveillance by state intelligence. After being flagged on biometric watchlists, he could no longer enter most EU countries. Amicus developed a legal strategy for changing the client's identity, enabling them to obtain Caribbean citizenship under Saint Kitts and Nevis' investment program. With a new identity and citizenship, the client relocated to South Africa, where he now works remotely for an international non-governmental organization (NGO). The biometric systems never matched him again, because he no longer existed under the same parameters. Ethical Concerns: Who Programs the Border? One of the most alarming aspects of the Smart Wall is the lack of public transparency. Companies like Palantir, Elbit Systems, and Anduril develop the predictive software used in Smart Wall projects. Their algorithms are often classified as proprietary, preventing scrutiny or external review. This leads to: Bias reinforcement against ethnic and political groups against ethnic and political groups False positives that block innocent travellers that block innocent travellers No straightforward appeals process for algorithmic decisions for algorithmic decisions Private influence over public policy In effect, corporations are building the walls and setting the rules. Policy Recommendations Amicus International calls for a renewed global conversation on digital borders and legal rights. Recommendations include: Public transparency mandates for Smart Wall algorithms International treaty updates to account for digital border controls Appeal mechanisms for algorithm-based travel denials Digital mobility rights enshrined in international law Protection for data sovereignty in global PNR and biometric databases Conclusion: The Wall You Cannot See The Smart Wall is not just a new border—it's a new paradigm. One where unseen forces govern identity, intent, and mobility, and where crossing a border has less to do with visas and more to do with machine learning predictions. Amicus International Consulting encourages travellers, asylum seekers, and global citizens to take proactive steps. Understanding the legal landscape of digital surveillance is not just advisable—it's essential for survival in the post-biometric age. Contact Information Phone: +1 (604) 200-5402Email: info@ Website:
