logo
Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders To Acquire Controlling Stake In Colombo Dockyard PLC

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders To Acquire Controlling Stake In Colombo Dockyard PLC

NDTVa day ago

Mumbai:
State-run Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Limited (MDL) has decided to acquire a controlling stake in Sri Lanka's Colombo Dockyard PLC under a USD 52.96 million deal, a move that is expected to expand India's strategic presence in the island nation.
MDL's decision marks its first international venture and is seen as a major milestone in the company's transformation from a purely domestic shipbuilder into a regional maritime player with global aspirations.
"Located in the Port of Colombo, Colombo Dockyard PLC (CDPLC) gives MDL a strategic foothold in the Indian Ocean Region-- a key maritime corridor," the MDL said in a statement.
Officials said MDL's acquiring controlling stakes in CDPLC will significantly change the shipbuilding and ship repair landscape in the region.
The MDL will bring an order pipeline for CDPLC from both domestic and international markets for repairs, refits and new builds, they said.
As such there is a continuous revenue stream of ship repairs from the Indian sub-continent and MDL acquiring controlling stakes would only further this trend, they said.
The move comes amid concerns in New Delhi over China's persistent attempts to expand its strategic influence in the island nation.
Colombo Dockyard PLC, listed on the Colombo Stock Exchange, is the flagship of Sri Lanka's maritime industry and serves a wide spectrum of commercial and governmental clients across Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.
It is Sri Lanka's largest shipyard.
"The investment, valued at up to USD 52.96 million, will be carried out through a combination of primary infusion and secondary share purchase, including the acquisition of shares from Onomichi Dockyard Co Ltd, the current majority shareholder," the readout said.
A number of orders for which potential clients are approaching MDL can also be diverted to CDPLC which will ensure that there is a supply chain and industrial connectivity, the officials cited above said.
They said both the shipyards possess enormous expertise garnered over the past decades and this strength can be leveraged for mutual benefit and can result in a win-win scenario.
The resources available at both the yards can be shared for mutual benefit.
For instance, the detailed design capabilities possessed by both the yards can be leveraged for projects at MDL as well as at CDPLC.
The CDPLC which is currently under financial distress can benefit from MDL's strong financial capabilities and resource base thereby expediting the turnaround process, the officials said.
The MDL can leverage its resources for augmentation of the operations of CDPLC and its subsidiaries in other ports of the country based on opportunities that may arise, they added.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Edn institutions must improve standards and play a key role in nation's growth'
‘Edn institutions must improve standards and play a key role in nation's growth'

Hans India

time33 minutes ago

  • Hans India

‘Edn institutions must improve standards and play a key role in nation's growth'

Vijayawada: Amid widespread concerns over declining standards in educational institutions, Rajya Sabha member and BJP leader Paka Venkata Satyanarayana has on Saturday underscored that educational institutions need to improve their standards to play a significant role in shaping the growing Indian economy. He said that India's annual budget volume had increased from Rs.14 lakh crore to Rs.50 lakh crore over the past one decade and exports from India were also increasing as 'Make in India' initiative had been yielding good results. Speaking as the chief guest at the Andhra Pradesh Technical Education Fair organized byThe Hans India, hmtvand RED FM 93.5 at the Siddhartha Academy of Higher education, Kanuru, here, the MP said that the government alone could not develop the country. Educational institutions should also be part and parcel of the economic development of the country and fulfill the future needs of the country by delivering quality education and upgrading the standards. He urged educational institutions to evolve as the concept of education had changed in recent years and economic relations were getting more important. Pro Vice chancellor of the Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education (Deemed to be University) Vijayawada AV Ratna Prasad and Pro Vice chancellor of the SRM University, Amaravati, Dr Ch Satish Kumar, Managing Director of The Hans India and HMTV K Hanumanta Rao and others were present. The organizers presented awards to the best colleges and best universities in Andhra Pradesh in nine categories. Faculty members and representatives from various engineering colleges and universities attended the awards presentation programme. Participating universities and colleges put up stalls for the two-day Technical Education Fair highlighting the courses offered by them, facilities available in their institutions and other details. The education fair concludes on Sunday. Satyanarayana congratulated The Hans India for taking the initiative to recognize the best educational institutions in the state and honouring them with awards. Pro Vice chancellors of the Siddhaartha Academy of Higher Education (Deemed to be University) Vijayawada AV Ratna Prasad also congratulated The Hans India for hosting the education fair 2025 and presenting the awards to educational institutions. SRM University Pro Vice Chancellor Dr Ch Satish Kumar thanked organizers for presenting awards to the university. Faculty members received the awards with great joy from the chief guest.

Debt-free stocks aren't always risk-free. Here's proof.
Debt-free stocks aren't always risk-free. Here's proof.

Mint

time37 minutes ago

  • Mint

Debt-free stocks aren't always risk-free. Here's proof.

We've all been taught that debt-free companies are fundamentally strong. They generate steady cash flows, pay dividends, or reinvest in the business—all of which contribute to shareholder returns. And rightly so: a clean balance sheet often signals financial strength. Companies with zero debt enjoy lower interest burdens, greater flexibility, and resilience during downturns. But here's the catch—being debt-free doesn't make a stock risk-free. Read this | India Inc's cash ammo, lower debt offer cushion. But there's a problem A company may have no leverage, yet still struggle with low margins, poor execution, policy shocks, governance issues, or rising competition. In some cases, staying debt-free isn't even a choice—lenders might avoid the business altogether. That's why investors need to look beyond balance sheets and ask: is a debt-free company fundamentally sound, or are there hidden risks? This article examines three such stocks—Mazagon Dock, Indraprastha Gas, and Sirca Paints—which appear strong on paper but face serious headwinds. Mazagon Dock: Defence tailwinds aren't bulletproof Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd has been a star of India's booming defence manufacturing push, delivering a staggering 3,600% return over the past five years. Founded in 1774, it's the only Indian shipyard to have built destroyers, submarines, and corvettes for the Indian Navy. It has remained debt-free since FY16—alongside peers like Garden Reach (also debt-free) and Cochin Shipyard (which carries minimal debt of ₹23 crore). But its customer concentration poses a key risk. Nearly all of Mazagon's revenue depends on the Ministry of Defence (Indian Navy), making it highly vulnerable to budget cycles, policy changes, and procurement delays that could impact order flows. Shipbuilding is a long-gestation industry, with large vessels taking four to six years to complete. Revenues are booked on a percentage-of-completion basis, making earnings vulnerable to project delays. This risk played out in Q4FY25. Despite a strong order book, revenue grew just 2.3% YoY to ₹3,174 crore. Margins, however, collapsed by 14 percentage points to 3%, dragging net profit down 51% to ₹327 crore. A sharp rise in expenses was to blame. The company made provisions of ₹532 crore—up 460% YoY—for potential losses on two contracts: a Fast Patrol Vessel for the Coast Guard and six ships for Denmark. The spike reflects component cost escalations and margin compression from rising subcontracting costs. The margin blowout wasn't just a one-off. Management has warned that recently completed high-margin contracts aren't sustainable going forward. While the current order book of ₹32,260 crore provides revenue visibility for three years, growth momentum is softening. The company now expects revenue growth of 8–10%, less than half its recent pace. Large projects like Project 75(I) are facing delays. Mazagon hopes to win ₹90,000 crore in new orders, which would boost its total order book to ₹1.25 trillion. But it expects profit-before-tax margins to fall to 15%, down from 25-26% in the recent past. The acquisition of Colombo Dockyard adds further risk. While it could boost revenue by 25%, the Sri Lankan firm reported a ₹90 crore loss on ₹725 crore revenue in FY24 and carries ₹1,091 crore in debt. The acquisition ends Mazagon's debt-free status and puts near-term pressure on margins. Read this | Mazagon Dock investors should not get swayed by narrative and newsflow At a P/E of 52, the stock's valuation leaves little room for disappointment, especially with growth slowing and profitability under strain. Indraprastha Gas: Caught between gas cuts and EV adoption Indraprastha Gas Ltd (IGL), another debt-free name, is facing risks on multiple fronts. The most immediate concern is regulatory. City gas distributors like IGL depend on subsidized domestic gas—allocated by the government—for their core sectors: CNG (transport) and PNG (households). Industrial and commercial demand, however, is met through costlier imported gas. In November 2024, the government cut domestic gas allocations by 20%—the second such cut in a year. Domestic APM gas production is declining 9–10% annually as fields mature. JPMorgan expects the subsidized allocation to be phased out. To fill the gap, IGL must increasingly rely on New Well Gas (at $8–9/MMBtu) and spot LNG (up to $14/MMBtu). Read this | IGL seeks renewable energy assets as it looks to turn net zero The impact is already visible: IGL shares fell 20% on 18 November after the allocation cut. Care Ratings estimates margin erosion of around five percentage points in FY26. The rise of electric vehicles adds a structural headwind. Delhi, IGL's core market, is a leader in EV adoption. With 75% of IGL's CNG revenue coming from Delhi, a long-term decline in demand is likely. Financially, IGL's revenue has stagnated at around ₹14,000 crore over three years - ₹14,133 crore (FY23), ₹14,000 crore (FY24), and ₹14,928 crore (FY25). Net profit in the same period has fluctuated: ₹1,640 crore, ₹1,983 crore, and ₹1,713 crore, respectively. The stock trades at a P/E of 17, well below its 10-year median of 26, reflecting the market's muted expectations. Like its peers Mahanagar Gas and Gujarat Gas—both debt-free—IGL's clean balance sheet does not immunize it from regulatory and demand shocks. Sirca Paints: Clean balance sheet, but cracks are emerging Sirca Paints, known for its premium wood finishes under the Sirca and Unico brands, has grown steadily but faces rising competitive pressure. The company earns about 70% of revenue from retail customers and 30% from OEMs like Godrej and Jindal Stainless. Revenue rose from ₹264 crore in FY23 to ₹374 crore in FY25, but profit remained largely flat - ₹46 crore, ₹51 crore, and ₹49 crore over FY23–25. Sirca's margins declined by 89 basis points to 18.8% as new entrant Birla Opus captured 6.1% market share, mainly from larger players like Asian Paints and Berger. With a modest 0.6% share, Sirca is especially vulnerable. To defend its turf, it may need to increase discounts, putting further pressure on margins. Input costs are another concern. Crude oil derivatives account for 40% of Sirca's raw material expenses, exposing it to volatility in global oil prices. Despite these challenges, Sirca remains entirely debt-free, unlike larger rivals such as Asian Paints ( ₹864 crore), Berger Paints ( ₹146 crore), and Kansai Nerolac ( ₹118 crore). But in a consolidating market, Sirca may face pressure to scale up, possibly making it an acquisition target. Conclusion: Debt free is not risk free A debt-free balance sheet may provide comfort, but it doesn't tell the full story. Mazagon Dock's stretched valuation and falling margins highlight how execution risks and order dependency can undermine even a high-performing stock. Indraprastha Gas faces regulatory cuts and long-term demand shifts as EVs gain ground. Sirca Paints, while financially conservative, is up against intensifying competition and volatile input costs. Each of these companies shows that low or no leverage doesn't shield against growth headwinds, margin pressure, or strategic threats. For more such analyses, read Profit Pulse. Ultimately, earnings growth and business quality matter more than balance sheet optics. Investors must dig deeper to ask: is the company truly debt-free—or just waiting for its next challenge? About the author: Madhvendra has over seven years of experience in equity markets and has cleared the NISM-Series-XV: Research Analyst Certification Examination. He specialises in writing detailed research articles on listed Indian companies, sectoral trends, and macroeconomic developments. Disclosure: The writer does not hold the stocks discussed in this article. The purpose of this article is only to share interesting charts, data points, and thought-provoking opinions. It is NOT a recommendation. If you wish to consider an investment, you are strongly advised to consult your advisor. This article is strictly for educational purposes only.

How Prada-Kolhapuri controversy exposes the continued exploitation of artisan communities
How Prada-Kolhapuri controversy exposes the continued exploitation of artisan communities

Indian Express

time41 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

How Prada-Kolhapuri controversy exposes the continued exploitation of artisan communities

(Written by Abhinandita N Kashyap) What if something that your grandfather wore as footwear, costing Rs 500, turned up on an international luxury runway as a contemporary sandal, which is priced at more than Rs 1 lakh — with no mention of where it actually came from? That's exactly what happened as Italian luxury fashion brand Prada recently listed a pair of flat leather sandals for about a lakh on their website. These sandals have a striking resemblance to India's age-old iconic Kolhapuris. The development has sparked debates about cultural appropriation, the economic struggles of Indian artisan communities, and the limits of global intellectual property (IP) protections. Kolhapuri chappals Kolhapuri chappals are handcrafted unisex leather sandals traditionally made by artisans in Maharashtra's Kolhapur district and parts of Karnataka. Believed to have originated centuries ago, these sandals are best known for their distinctive braided leather straps, intricate cutwork, durable construction and timeless craftsmanship. Once adorned by royalty and later popularised across India for their rustic charm, Kolhapuris are not merely footwear. These sandals are a marker of regional identity and craftsmanship involving a manufacturing process that is entirely manual, involving vegetable-tanned leather and indigenous techniques passed down from generation to generation. In 2019, after sustained advocacy by artisan groups and craft researchers, Kolhapuri chappals were granted a Geographical Indication (GI) tag under India's Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999. A GI tag helps protect products originating from a specific region, known for their unique features attributable to their geography, materials, and traditional know-how. However, Kolhapuri artisans have continued to struggle with shrinking markets and competition from factory-made imitations. According to a report by The Voice of Fashion, there are currently an estimated 15,000-20,000 artisans involved in Kolhapuri chappal production, a sharp decline from previous decades. Artisans told the magazine that while luxury fashion profits from their craft's cultural cachet, their own communities remain invisible, underpaid and excluded from global markets. Prada's cultural appropriation At the heart of the controversy lies the concept of cultural appropriation. Typically cultural appropriation refers to when elements of culture, particularly those of historically oppressed or colonised societies, are adopted by dominant groups without consent, attribution, or compensation. In the world of fashion, this often translates to luxury brands borrowing indigenous motifs, crafts, and garments for profit. Indian designers, fashion historians and cultural commentators pointed out that the design of Prada's sandals was unmistakably Kolhapuri in construction and aesthetic. To make things worse, the brand did not mention India, Kolhapur, or the craft's artisan legacy. Another major contention for criticism was the price disparity. Prada is reportedly planning to sell the product for over Rs 1 lakh — Indian artisans sell a pair for under Rs 1,000. Note that Prada is not the first brand to exploit indigenous artisans for their benefit. In 2015, Isabel Marant, a French designer, faced backlash in Mexico for selling a blouse identical to the traditional embroidery of the Mixe community in Oaxaca. Christian Dior, in 2019, used designs resembling traditional Mexican horsewomen attire for its Cruise collection. In India, brands like Louis Vuitton have previously featured Banarasi motifs and Indian embroidery styles in collections without direct collaboration with artisan communities. These controversies raise persistent questions about cultural equity, economic justice, and who profits from indigenous heritage in the global luxury market. Limits of global IP protections India's Geographical Indications Act (1999) protects products like Kolhapuris within Indian territory, preventing commercial use of the term 'Kolhapuri Chappal' by unauthorised producers. However, this protection fails to extend beyond India's borders. Internationally, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is currently having discussions about protecting traditional cultural expressions and geographical indications. However, as of now, there is no binding international framework that prevents the aesthetic imitation of indigenous designs unless it involves trademark, copyright, or patent infringement. And this very legal grey zone allows luxury brands to replicate indigenous designs, so long as they avoid using protected names or misleading branding. That's why after the Prada-Kolhapuri controversy, there have been fresh calls for the Indian government to push for stronger international protections for GI-tagged products, and for luxury brands to adopt fair trade collaborations with artisan groups. The significance The outrage over Prada's move arrives amid a growing global conversation about decolonising fashion, ethical consumption, and the rights of indigenous artisans. As the world increasingly prizes sustainable, handmade, and heritage products, ensuring that the benefits of such trends reach their original creators is no longer just a cultural concern, but a matter of economic justice. The latest controversy is a window into the ongoing power imbalances in the global fashion industry and a reminder of how cultural heritage, when divorced from its communities, becomes another commodity for profit. For India, it signals the continuing need to safeguard not just the products of its artisan economy, but the dignity and livelihoods of those who create them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store