Appeals court refuses to pause order blocking Trump administration downsizing of the federal workforce
An appeals court on Friday refused to freeze a California-based judge's order halting the Trump administration from downsizing the federal workforce, which means that the Department of Government Efficiency-led cuts remain on pause for now.
A split three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that the downsizing could have significant ripple effects on everything from the nation's food-safety system to veteran health care, and should stay on hold while a lawsuit plays out.
The judge who dissented, however, said President Donald Trump likely does have the legal authority to downsize the executive branch and there is a separate process for workers to appeal.
The Republican administration had sought an emergency stay of an injunction issued by U.S. Judge Susan Illston of San Francisco in a lawsuit brought by labor unions and cities, including San Francisco and Chicago, and the group Democracy Forward.
The Justice Department has also previously appealed her ruling to the Supreme Court, one of a string of emergency appeals arguing federal judges had overstepped their authority.
The judge's order questioned whether Trump's administration was acting lawfully in trying to pare the federal workforce.
Trump has repeatedly said voters gave him a mandate to remake the federal government, and he tapped billionaire Elon Musk to lead the charge through the Department of Government Efficiency.
Tens of thousands of federal workers have been fired, have left their jobs via deferred resignation programs, or have been placed on leave. There is no official figure for the job cuts, but at least 75,000 federal employees took deferred resignation, and thousands of probationary workers have already been let go.
Illston's order directs numerous federal agencies to halt acting on the president's workforce executive order signed in February and a subsequent memo issued by DOGE and the Office of Personnel Management.
Illston, who was nominated to the bench by former President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, wrote in her ruling that presidents can make large-scale overhauls of federal agencies, but only with the cooperation of Congress.
Lawyers for the government say that the executive order and memo calling for large-scale personnel reductions and reorganization plans provided only general principles that agencies should follow in exercising their own decision-making process.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
8 hours ago
- NHK
Trump administration in talks to take Intel stake, Bloomberg reports
The US media outlet Bloomberg says the administration of President Donald Trump is in talks with Intel Corp. to have the government take a stake in the struggling chipmaker. Bloomberg published the report on Thursday, quoting people familiar with the plan. The Trump administration apparently aims to boost domestic chip production by supporting the delayed construction of Intel's planned factory hub in the Midwest state of Ohio. Bloomberg said the size of the potential stake is not clear. It also said the details are still being worked out and the plans remain fluid. Intel has fallen behind in the development of chips for artificial intelligence. It posted a large operating loss last year and faces the challenge of turning its business around. Chip giants Nvidia and AMD have reportedly agreed to pay the US government 15 percent of their revenues from chip sales in China as part of an arrangement to secure export licenses. Bloomberg describes the talks with Intel as "the latest direct intervention by Trump into a key industry."
Yomiuri Shimbun
12 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Told Norwegian Minister He Wants Nobel Prize, Newspaper Says
OSLO (Reuters) — When U.S. President Donald Trump called Norway's finance minister last month to discuss tariffs, he also told him he wanted the Nobel Peace Prize, Norwegian business daily Dagens Naeringsliv reported on Thursday. Several countries including Israel, Pakistan and Cambodia have nominated Trump for brokering peace agreements or ceasefires, and he has said he deserves the Norwegian-bestowed accolade that four White House predecessors received. Out of the blue, while Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg was walking down the street in Oslo, Donald Trump called, Dagens Naeringsliv reported, citing unnamed sources. He wanted the Nobel Prize — and to discuss tariffs.
Japan Times
14 hours ago
- Japan Times
Which Donald Trump will negotiate with Putin in Alaska?
When U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin met in Helsinki in 2018, the pair alarmed allies with a friendly encounter where Trump sided with the Russian leader over his own intelligence agencies on election interference. Trump flies to a meeting in Alaska with Putin on Friday in a different public mood — impatient with the Russian's unwillingness to negotiate an end to his war in Ukraine and angry over missile strikes on Ukrainian cities. The world is waiting to see if it will be this tougher version of Trump who shows up in Anchorage or if it will be the former real estate tycoon who has sought to ingratiate himself with the wily former KGB agent in the past. The answer could have deep implications for European leaders concerned that Russia, if allowed to absorb parts of Ukraine, will be more aggressive toward NATO allies near Russia like Poland, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia. It matters even more for Ukraine, which has been losing ground to Russian forces after three-and-a-half years of grinding combat. Despite his harsher tone toward Putin over the past months, Trump has a more extensive history of trying to placate the Russian leader. When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, Trump declined to directly criticize Putin. The Russian president, shunned by multiple presidents, praised Trump for working to improve Russian-U.S. relations. Kremlin watchers are looking to see whether Trump will be enchanted by Putin again and swayed by his argument that Russia has a right to dominate Ukraine. "It's a reasonable concern to think that Trump will be bamboozled by Putin and cut a terrible deal at Ukraine's expense," said Dan Fried, a diplomat for several U.S. presidents who is now at the Atlantic Council. But a different outcome is also possible, added Fried. "There's a reasonable prospect that the administration will wake up to the fact that Putin is still playing them." The Trump administration has sought to temper expectations, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt telling reporters on Tuesday the meeting would be a "listening exercise." Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska | REUTERS Trump told reporters on Wednesday that he might broker a second meeting that includes both Putin and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy if the Alaska session goes well. Russia has given no indication it is prepared to make concessions amid Ukrainian worries that Trump might make a deal without their input. Zelenskyy says he would like to see a ceasefire first followed by security guarantees. Sweeteners and complaints When Trump assumed office again in January, the Republican president tried to revive the warmth between the two leaders from his first term, expressing sympathy for Putin's isolated position in the world and vowing to end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours. As the administration eased pressure on Russia, some Trump aides parroted Russian talking points to the dismay of Ukraine's backers. In March, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff implied in a podcast interview with conservative commentator Tucker Carlson that Russia had a right to capture four mainland regions of Ukraine — Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson — because "they're Russian speaking." And in a dramatic White House meeting in February, Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated Zelenskyy for his handling of the war, to the delight of hardliners in Russia. Despite all the sweeteners, the Russian leader has refused to play along with Trump's efforts to steer the two sides into a peace deal. Putin has talked to Trump regularly but has kept up deadly bombing raids against Ukraine. The ongoing bloodshed prompted Trump to shift to a tougher stance in July and complain that Putin was stalling him. Trump has agreed to send new weapons to Ukraine — that Europe will pay for — and has threatened new financial penalties for Moscow. Trump last week imposed an additional 25% tariff on India for buying Russian oil — indirect pressure on Moscow — but has held back from following through on his threats to impose stiffer sanctions. On Wednesday, he threatened "severe consequences" if Russia will not make a deal. "While the tone coming out of the White House has shifted, it has not yet been followed up with an expansion of U.S. sanctions — Trump's deadlines for additional sanctions keep getting pushed back — or new financial commitments from Washington to strengthen Ukrainian security," said Nicholas Fenton, of the Europe, Russia, and Eurasia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. On Monday, Trump said he should know within two minutes whether Putin is willing to make concessions. "I may say, lots of luck. Keep fighting. Or I may say, we can make a deal," he said. The lure of the deal For Trump, who is drawn to the spectacle of a high-profile summit with the world watching, the lure of making a deal is strong. He has engaged in an open campaign for a Nobel Peace Prize this year, pointing to what he has claimed as his diplomatic victories, and has unnerved U.S. allies with his eagerness for a Ukraine peace deal that they fret could embolden Putin. In recent days, Ukrainian and European leaders have protested Trump's assertion that Russia and Ukraine will have to engage in land swaps in order to reach a peace deal. While Russia occupies Crimea and large swaths of eastern Ukraine, the Ukrainians no longer hold any Russian territory, raising the question of what, exactly, could be exchanged. Trump insists that, given his personal relationship with Putin, he is the only one who can bring the war to an end. John Bolton, who was one of Trump's national security advisers in his first term and is now a sharp critic, said he was concerned that Putin was "beginning to work his magic" on Trump. "Personal relations obviously have a place in foreign affairs, just like they do in everything else. But when you're one of the world's hard men like Vladimir Putin, this is not a matter of emotion, this is a matter of cold calculation. Trump doesn't get that point," Bolton said. In a social media post on Wednesday, Trump complained that "very unfair media is at work on my meeting with Putin," citing the use of quotes from "fired losers" like Bolton.
