Private Japanese Lunar Lander Crashes Into Moon's Surface
After launching into space on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket in January and spending nearly six months on a gravity-fueled journey toward the Moon, Resilience was poised to land Thursday afternoon (early Friday morning in Japan). If all went well, the lander would touch down near the center of Mare Frigoris, a lunar sea near the Moon's north pole.
But all did not go well. One minute and 45 seconds before Resilience's scheduled touchdown, mission control abruptly lost communication with the spacecraft. In the minutes immediately following the scheduled landing (3:17 p.m. EST, or 4:17 a.m. JST), Ispace terminated its live stream, noting that it would continue to attempt contact with Resilience. That's the message the company continued to communicate on social media for roughly two hours after Resilience went quiet.
The last telemetry update Ispace provided before terminating its live stream. Credit: Ispace
Then, at nearly 8:30 p.m. EST, Ispace CEO Takeshi Hakamada appeared in an impromptu media conference to confirm that the mission was a failure. Mission control would no longer attempt to reestablish communications with its spacecraft.
"This is our second failure, and about these results, we have to really take it seriously,' Hakamada said in translation, referring to the company's first attempt to place a lander on the Moon in April 2023.
Though Ispace hasn't had enough time to conduct a thorough postmortem investigation, its engineers believe Resilience experienced a "hard landing" on the lunar surface, according to a statement published Friday morning.
"The laser rangefinder used to measure the distance to the lunar surface experienced delays in obtaining valid measurement values," the statement reads. "As a result, the lander was unable to decelerate sufficiently to reach the required speed for the planned lunar landing. Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface."
Ispace will nonetheless attempt a soft landing again in 2027, when its third and fourth missions aim a new spacecraft, Apex 1.0, at the far side of the Moon.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
Ninntedo Switch 2 heat warning issued — don't play above this temperature
High temperatures and advanced technology often don't mix well. The newly-released Nintendo Switch 2 (and its predecessor) are no exception. Nintendo's Japanese customer service X account recently posted that the Switch and Switch 2 should only be used between 5 and 35 degrees Celsius (41 to 95 degrees Fahrenheit). 'Using Nintendo Switch or Nintendo Switch 2 in a hot environment may cause the console to become hot. Please use it in a place between 5 and 35 degrees C, as it may cause a malfunction,' Nintendo Japan's customer service posted on X. 'Recently, the temperature has been exceeding 35°C for several days. Please be careful when using outdoors." Although the Japanese account posted the PSA, this applies to consoles sold worldwide. If you live in a hotter climate and want to play your Switch outside, ensure the temperature's below 95 degrees Fahrenheit; otherwise, your console may malfunction. And while Nintendo didn't specify whether it would be the type of malfunction that could cause long-term damage, I think most would rather not risk it. If you're playing in an air-conditionedHowever,withoutdoesn'tyou'redoesn't area or in a climate that doesn't exceed those temperatures, then you have nothing to worry about. But if you're in a hot environment that doesn't have access to an air conditioner or you want to play outside, it's something to be slightly concerned about. Now, before anyone claims the Switch 2 is a poorly designed console with poor heat dispersion, it's far from the only device with temperature usage restrictions. For example, the iPhone 16 has a reTom'sded max ambient temperture of 95 degrees — the same as the Switch 2. The far more powerful Steam Deck has the 95 degree temperture limit. The point is: it's something to keep in mind when using your Nintendo Switch 2, but the temperture limit isn't neccessarilly something wrong with the Nintendo consoles — it's a common limition for handheld devices. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
NASA, SpaceX punch through weather threat for Crew-11 launch
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — SpaceX was back one day after a weather-related scrub and threaded the needle amid threatening clouds to send up the Crew-11 mission to the International Space Station. A Falcon 9 rocket topped with the Crew Dragon Endeavour lifted off from Kennedy Space Center's Launch Pad 39-A at 11:43 a.m. Eastern time carrying NASA astronauts Zena Cardman and Mike Fincke, JAXA astronaut Kimiya Yui and Roscosmos cosmonaut Oleg Platonov to space. 'I have no emotions but joy right now. That was absolutely transcendent — ride of a lifetime,' said Cardman, making her first trip to space. 'Boy, it's great to be back in orbit again,' Fincke added as he returned for his fourth trip to orbit. 'Thank you to SpaceX and NASA to get us here. What a ride.' The first-stage booster for this mission made its third flight and touched back down for what was SpaceX's final use of Landing Zone 1 at nearby Cape Canaveral Space Force Station sending a sonic boom across the Space Coast. The quartet shot through a break amid darkening clouds and into space. The previous day, they had their launch scrubbed with one minute and seven seconds on the countdown clock when a storm cell opened up right over the pad. They actually had to put on raincoats over their spacesuits as they made their way out of the capsule for what turned out to be just a one-day delay. The quartet, who arrived to KSC on Saturday, were back Friday getting prepped for launch, donning their spacesuits after 7 a.m. at the Neil Armstrong Operations & Checkout Building. They made their walkout after 8 a.m. to ride over to launch pad in black Teslas with license plates that read 'Live,' 'Laugh' and 'Launch.' By 9 a.m. the had made their way up the launch tower to climb back on board their spacecraft. With an hour to go, all were prepped in their seats with the hatch closed awaiting fueling and arming of the launch escape system. When it does launch, NASA Commercial Crew Program manager Steve Stich said it will be groundbreaking for NASA use of a commercial spacecraft. 'We worked very hard with SpaceX to complete all the reuse activities for this vehicle. We had certified the vehicles — the Dragons — for only five flights. Now, we've completed all that work, and we're really ready to go,' he said. It was the same Crew Dragon that flew the first astronauts for SpaceX back in 2020, now part of a stable of five crew-capable Dragons. With Crew-11's launch, SpaceX will have flown 74 humans across 19 missions in just over five years. The mission will relieve the Crew-10 members who have been on board the space station since mid-March, but won't undock until they complete a short handover period during with the space station population will grow from seven to 11. Crew-11 is targeting docking with the station around 3 a.m. Saturday after a 16-hour trip. The crew will be on the station for at least six months, but NASA could stretch the mission to as long as eight months. For its members, Cardman and Platonov are rookies while Yui is making his second trip having flown to the station a decade ago, and Fincke is making his fourth trip to space having last flown to the station as part STS-134, the last flight of Space Shuttle Endeavour, as well as two previous missions on Soyuz spacecraft. Cardman had originally been tapped to command the Crew-9 mission, but was bumped after NASA needed space on board to allow for the return flight to the two Boeing Starliner astronauts that were left behind on the station when their spacecraft was sent home without crew because of safety concerns. Fincke and Yui had both been training to fly future crewed missions of Starliner, but were shifted to this SpaceX mission as Boeing's beleaguered spacecraft continues to face delays. With their arrival to the station, the orbiting laboratory will have welcomed 290 people from 26 nations. The station will mark 25 years of continuous human presence in November having began Expedition 1 in 2020. The Crew-11 crew will become of Expedition 73 when they arrive and continue on as part of Expedition 74 that begins in November when the next replacement crew from Russia arrives. _____ Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Support for NASA returning to the moon and going to Mars is surging
A recent poll conducted by CBS News provides an encouraging look into public support for the Artemis program to return astronauts to the moon and eventually send humans to Mars. Sixty-seven percent of respondents favor a return to the moon and just 33 percent oppose one. On Mars, sixty-five percent favor sending astronauts to the red planet with 35 percent in opposition. Support for sending astronauts back to the moon tracks favorably among all age groups, with 71 percent of 18 to 29-year-olds in favor. The current favorable view of the Artemis program contrasts with what people thought of the Apollo program to land men on the moon while it was ongoing. As space historian Roger Launius pointed out, most Americans, with the exception of one poll taken in July 1969, took a dim view of going to the moon. 'Consistently throughout the decade, 45-60 percent of Americans believed that the government was spending too much on space, indicative of a lack of commitment to the spaceflight agenda,' Launius wrote. Incidentally, the CBS News poll shows that now Americans believe that the Apollo program was worth the effort, 77 to 23 percent. The findings were consistent with those taken on the 50th and 40th anniversaries of the first moon landing. The fact that support for going back to the moon and on to Mars is uniform across all age groups jumps out. In times past, some have suggested that supporters for sending astronauts beyond low Earth orbit mainly consisted of boomers nostalgic for the glories of the Apollo program. If that was ever the case, it isn't any longer. Laura Seward Forczyk, a space career consultant, video blogger and author of ' Rise of the Space Age Millennials,' likely spoke for a lot of younger people on X when she posted, 'I hope to live to see humans walking on another world again. Artemis III can't come soon enough.' Her sentiment expresses a desire for something beautiful and glorious in a world often ugly and dispiriting. Come to think of it, that was the Apollo 11 moon landing in the midst of the turmoil of the 1960s. A lot of famous space influencers, such as former NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine, billionaire private space traveler Jared Isaacman, video blogger Eliana Sheriff and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk were not alive when men first walked on the moon. One word of caution should be made about how poll results can often be influenced by question-wording. In 2023, the Pew organization released a poll suggesting that returning to the moon and on to Mars were of lower priority than things like asteroid detection and measuring climate change. Nevertheless, when combining the answers 'top priority' and 'important but lower priority' space exploration still enjoyed healthy support, with 57 percent favoring a return to the moon and 56 percent going to Mars. People are looking forward to witnessing the first footsteps on the moon in over 50 years and the first ever on Mars. Donald Trump was the latest president of the United States to make that promise when he started the Artemis program during his first term. Now, he has to deliver. Unfortunately, President Trump is in serious danger of blowing it. Over six months into his second administration, America still does not have a permanent NASA administrator, thanks to Trump's capricious, last-minute withdrawal of Isaacman's nomination. The White House and the Congress are wrangling over NASA science funding and how long the space agency should retain the Orion Space Launch System architecture for returning to the moon. Trump needs to move quickly to nominate a permanent head of NASA. He could change his mind again about Isaacman, though he may be loath to admit to making a mistake. The White House also needs to reestablish the National Space Council as a center for the formulation of space policy. The council performed great service during the first Trump administration. It can do so again. Finally, Trump and Musk should resolve their feud. The most powerful man in the world and the world's richest man work better together than at cross purposes. Trump has won some great domestic and foreign policy victories. It will be a pity if his legacy is one of letting China get back to the moon before we do. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled ' Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon? ' as well as ' The Moon, Mars and Beyond ' and, most recently, ' Why is America Going Back to the Moon? ' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.
