Elon Musk's political party launch a ‘vindictive' move
'He's actually that crazy and he's actually that chaotic,' Mr Polumbo said.
'In one sense, I understand a lot of Elon Musk's frustrations here. The 'Big Beautiful Bill' is very big, which makes it very hard for it to actually be very beautiful.
'But this is quite the pendulum swing from the guy who was just very recently taking photos with the President at the White House.
'Elon needs to be careful here and separate his personal feelings about all the drama he's been involved in with this administration from what's actually the smartest strategy.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Completely untethered: Tesla's board has dropped Musk's leash, and he is running amok
In doing so, Musk is further escalating his already damaging brawl with former bestie Donald Trump whose Big Beautiful Bill has been the subject of invective from Musk, who believes its profligate spending will bankrupt the US economy. Trump's response was to declare Musk a 'train wreck' that had gone off the rails over the past five weeks. But not a peep yet from the Tesla board, which in theory is supposed to keep Musk on the rails. Shareholders must surely be waiting for updates from the company. For perspective, imagine how the board of BHP would react if its boss Mike Henry or Commonwealth Bank's chief executive, Matt Comyn, decided to start a political party as a part-time gig. They would be sent packing. For the Tesla board, placing restraints on a rogue chief executive is way more difficult. In part, this is because Musk IS Tesla – its founder, its major shareholder and its strategy engine. Loading To the extent that parallels can be found in Australia in the hazards of dealing with entrepreneurial founders, Wisetech's Richard White and Fortescue's creator and major shareholder, Andrew Forrest, would be the closest. White's complicated personal life, including multiple relationships with women, including WiseTech employees, has resulted in board upheaval following a number of complaints about inappropriate conduct, a number of which have been settled. A pushback from the Wisetech board was ultimately unsuccessful, leading to a mass resignation of a number of directors. Ultimately, White prevailed. Forrest's strategic deviation into saving the planet using Fortescue's financial resources to finance green projects has been tolerated rather than encouraged by many shareholders. He has been branded a zealot and has been an outspoken critic – particularly of those in the oil and gas industry. But his family's 36 per cent stake in Fortescue has rendered him an untouchable king of the company. Meanwhile, shareholders and regulators have attempted to intervene in the governance of Tesla for years – including a 2018 shareholder lawsuit to limit a stratospheric $US50 billion ($77 billion) pay package awarded to Musk based on hitting market capitalisation milestones. In her ruling in favour of the shareholder, Delaware judge Kathaleen McCormick noted: 'There were undoubtedly a range of healthy amounts that the board could have decided to pay Musk,' McCormick wrote, but she said the board instead 'capitulated to Musk's terms and then failed to prove that those terms were entirely fair'. But Musk's latest action, which will create for him a major distraction from running Tesla, is arguably much more serious for the company and its other shareholders. Loading It threatens to undermine the performance of the company that is already challenged by falling sales volumes and a massive influx of competition from China electric vehicle companies. Two weeks ago, Elon Musk reportedly fired Omead Afshar, the automaker's vice president of manufacturing and operations, CNBC has confirmed, following declines in car sales in key markets this year. His termination followed the resignation of Milan Kovac, previously head of Tesla's Optimus humanoid robotics program, last month. At this point, Musk's presence at the helm of Tesla is sorely needed.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Completely untethered: Tesla's board has dropped Musk's leash, and he is running amok
In doing so, Musk is further escalating his already damaging brawl with former bestie Donald Trump whose Big Beautiful Bill has been the subject of invective from Musk, who believes its profligate spending will bankrupt the US economy. Trump's response was to declare Musk a 'train wreck' that had gone off the rails over the past five weeks. But not a peep yet from the Tesla board, which in theory is supposed to keep Musk on the rails. Shareholders must surely be waiting for updates from the company. For perspective, imagine how the board of BHP would react if its boss Mike Henry or Commonwealth Bank's chief executive, Matt Comyn, decided to start a political party as a part-time gig. They would be sent packing. For the Tesla board, placing restraints on a rogue chief executive is way more difficult. In part, this is because Musk IS Tesla – its founder, its major shareholder and its strategy engine. Loading To the extent that parallels can be found in Australia in the hazards of dealing with entrepreneurial founders, Wisetech's Richard White and Fortescue's creator and major shareholder, Andrew Forrest, would be the closest. White's complicated personal life, including multiple relationships with women, including WiseTech employees, has resulted in board upheaval following a number of complaints about inappropriate conduct, a number of which have been settled. A pushback from the Wisetech board was ultimately unsuccessful, leading to a mass resignation of a number of directors. Ultimately, White prevailed. Forrest's strategic deviation into saving the planet using Fortescue's financial resources to finance green projects has been tolerated rather than encouraged by many shareholders. He has been branded a zealot and has been an outspoken critic – particularly of those in the oil and gas industry. But his family's 36 per cent stake in Fortescue has rendered him an untouchable king of the company. Meanwhile, shareholders and regulators have attempted to intervene in the governance of Tesla for years – including a 2018 shareholder lawsuit to limit a stratospheric $US50 billion ($77 billion) pay package awarded to Musk based on hitting market capitalisation milestones. In her ruling in favour of the shareholder, Delaware judge Kathaleen McCormick noted: 'There were undoubtedly a range of healthy amounts that the board could have decided to pay Musk,' McCormick wrote, but she said the board instead 'capitulated to Musk's terms and then failed to prove that those terms were entirely fair'. But Musk's latest action, which will create for him a major distraction from running Tesla, is arguably much more serious for the company and its other shareholders. Loading It threatens to undermine the performance of the company that is already challenged by falling sales volumes and a massive influx of competition from China electric vehicle companies. Two weeks ago, Elon Musk reportedly fired Omead Afshar, the automaker's vice president of manufacturing and operations, CNBC has confirmed, following declines in car sales in key markets this year. His termination followed the resignation of Milan Kovac, previously head of Tesla's Optimus humanoid robotics program, last month. At this point, Musk's presence at the helm of Tesla is sorely needed.
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Donald Trump calls Elon Musk's formation of a third US political party 'ridiculous'
United States President Donald Trump has labelled Elon Musk's plans to form a new political party as "ridiculous," in a fresh barb launched at the tech billionaire months after he formally departed the White House administration. In his remarks on Sunday, local time, Mr Trump also said that the Musk ally he once named to lead NASA would have presented a conflict of interest given the SpaceX founder's business interests in space. A day after Mr Musk escalated his feud with the president and announced the formation of a new US political party, Mr Trump was asked about it before boarding Air Force One in Morristown, New Jersey, as he returned to Washington DC upon visiting his nearby golf club. "We have a tremendous success with the Republican Party. The Democrats have lost their way, but it's always been a two-party system, and I think starting a third party just adds to confusion. "It really seems to have been developed for two parties. "Third parties have never worked, so he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous." Shortly after speaking about Mr Musk, Mr Trump posted further comments on his Truth Social platform, saying, "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks." "The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS, and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats, who have lost their confidence and their minds!" the president's post said. Mr Musk announced on Saturday that he is establishing the "America Party" in response to Mr Trump's tax-cut and spending bill, which the billionaire said would bankrupt the country. "What the heck was the point of @DOGE if he's just going to increase the debt by $5 trillion??" Mr Musk wrote on X on Sunday, referring to the government downsizing agency he briefly led. Critics have said the bill will damage the US economy by significantly adding to the federal budget deficit. Mr Musk said his new party would in next year's midterm elections look to unseat Republican politicians in Congress who backed the sweeping measure known as the "big, beautiful bill". The move comes after he spent millions of dollars underwriting Mr Trump's 2024 re-election effort and, for a time, regularly showed up at the president's side in the White House Oval Office and elsewhere. The pair's disagreement over the spending bill led to a falling out that Mr Musk briefly tried unsuccessfully to repair. The president has said Mr Musk is unhappy because the measure, which was signed into law on Friday, takes away green-energy credits for Tesla's electric vehicles. Mr Trump has threatened to pull billions of dollars Tesla and SpaceX receive in government contracts and subsidies in response to Musk's criticism. In his social media comments about Mr Musk, the president also said it was "inappropriate" to have named an ally of the billionaire, Jared Isaacman, as NASA administrator considering Mr Musk's business with the space agency. In December Mr Trump named Mr Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut, to lead NASA but withdrew the nomination on May 31, before his Senate confirmation vote and without explanation. Mr Trump, who has yet to announce a new NASA nominee, on Sunday confirmed media reports he disapproved of Mr Isaacman's previous support for Democratic politicians. "I also thought it inappropriate that a very close friend of Elon, who was in the Space Business, run NASA, when NASA is such a big part of Elon's corporate life," the president said on Truth Social. "My Number One charge is to protect the American Public!" Mr Musk's announcement of a new party immediately brought a rebuke from investment firm Azoria Partners, which said on Saturday it will postpone the listing of its Azoria Tesla Convexity exchange-traded fund because the party's creation posed "a conflict with his full-time responsibilities as CEO". Azoria was set to launch the Tesla ETF this week. The company's CEO, James Fishback, posted on X several critical comments about the new party and reiterated his support for Mr Trump. "I encourage the Board to meet immediately and ask Elon to clarify his political ambitions and evaluate whether they are compatible with his full-time obligations to Tesla as CEO," Mr Fishback said. Reuters
