Completely untethered: Tesla's board has dropped Musk's leash, and he is running amok
Trump's response was to declare Musk a 'train wreck' that had gone off the rails over the past five weeks.
But not a peep yet from the Tesla board, which in theory is supposed to keep Musk on the rails. Shareholders must surely be waiting for updates from the company.
For perspective, imagine how the board of BHP would react if its boss Mike Henry or Commonwealth Bank's chief executive, Matt Comyn, decided to start a political party as a part-time gig.
They would be sent packing.
For the Tesla board, placing restraints on a rogue chief executive is way more difficult. In part, this is because Musk IS Tesla – its founder, its major shareholder and its strategy engine.
Loading
To the extent that parallels can be found in Australia in the hazards of dealing with entrepreneurial founders, Wisetech's Richard White and Fortescue's creator and major shareholder, Andrew Forrest, would be the closest.
White's complicated personal life, including multiple relationships with women, including WiseTech employees, has resulted in board upheaval following a number of complaints about inappropriate conduct, a number of which have been settled.
A pushback from the Wisetech board was ultimately unsuccessful, leading to a mass resignation of a number of directors. Ultimately, White prevailed.
Forrest's strategic deviation into saving the planet using Fortescue's financial resources to finance green projects has been tolerated rather than encouraged by many shareholders. He has been branded a zealot and has been an outspoken critic – particularly of those in the oil and gas industry. But his family's 36 per cent stake in Fortescue has rendered him an untouchable king of the company.
Meanwhile, shareholders and regulators have attempted to intervene in the governance of Tesla for years – including a 2018 shareholder lawsuit to limit a stratospheric $US50 billion ($77 billion) pay package awarded to Musk based on hitting market capitalisation milestones.
In her ruling in favour of the shareholder, Delaware judge Kathaleen McCormick noted: 'There were undoubtedly a range of healthy amounts that the board could have decided to pay Musk,' McCormick wrote, but she said the board instead 'capitulated to Musk's terms and then failed to prove that those terms were entirely fair'.
But Musk's latest action, which will create for him a major distraction from running Tesla, is arguably much more serious for the company and its other shareholders.
Loading
It threatens to undermine the performance of the company that is already challenged by falling sales volumes and a massive influx of competition from China electric vehicle companies.
Two weeks ago, Elon Musk reportedly fired Omead Afshar, the automaker's vice president of manufacturing and operations, CNBC has confirmed, following declines in car sales in key markets this year. His termination followed the resignation of Milan Kovac, previously head of Tesla's Optimus humanoid robotics program, last month.
At this point, Musk's presence at the helm of Tesla is sorely needed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Donald Trump brands Elon Musk a 'train wreck'
President Donald Trump has branded Elon Musk a "train wreck". The 78-year-old commander-in-chief hit out at his former friend and advisor after the tech mogul declared his intention to start his own political party, the America Party, and warned the Space X boss that the initiative would fail. He wrote on his Truth Social platform: 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks. He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States." Trump warned that Musk's plans for a third political party to rival the Democrats and Republicans would cause "total disruption and chaos". He continued: 'The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION CHAOS,' Trump wrote in his Truth Social post, 'and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats, who have lost their confidence and their minds! Republicans, on the other hand, are a smooth running 'machine,' that just passed the biggest Bill of its kind in the History of our Country.' The two men fell out because of a proposed spending bill, and Trump claimed Musk objected because of his own personal financial interests. He wrote: 'It is a Great Bill but, unfortunately for Elon, it eliminates the ridiculous Electric Vehicle (EV) Mandate, which would have forced everyone to buy an Electric Car in a short period of time. I have been strongly opposed to that from the very beginning. "People are now allowed to buy whatever they want - Gasoline Powered, Hybrids (which are doing very well), or New Technologies as they come about - No more EV Mandate." The Tesla boss shared his intention to set up a political party to give people "back [their] freedom" over the weekend. He wrote: 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste + graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.'
AU Financial Review
5 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Macquarie, Fortescue and BlueScope chiefs headline delegation to China
Macquarie chief executive Shemara Wikramanayake and billionaire Fortescue chairman Andrew Forrest are among a delegation of high-profile business executives who will accompany Anthony Albanese on a trip to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang next week. While details are yet to be finalised, two people briefed on the matter said Wikramanayake and Forrest would be joined by BlueScope Steel chief executive Mark Vassella, HSBC Australia chief executive Antony Shaw and Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer chairwoman Rebecca Maslen-Stannage.
Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Completely untethered: Tesla's board has dropped Musk's leash, and he is running amok
In doing so, Musk is further escalating his already damaging brawl with former bestie Donald Trump whose Big Beautiful Bill has been the subject of invective from Musk, who believes its profligate spending will bankrupt the US economy. Trump's response was to declare Musk a 'train wreck' that had gone off the rails over the past five weeks. But not a peep yet from the Tesla board, which in theory is supposed to keep Musk on the rails. Shareholders must surely be waiting for updates from the company. For perspective, imagine how the board of BHP would react if its boss Mike Henry or Commonwealth Bank's chief executive, Matt Comyn, decided to start a political party as a part-time gig. They would be sent packing. For the Tesla board, placing restraints on a rogue chief executive is way more difficult. In part, this is because Musk IS Tesla – its founder, its major shareholder and its strategy engine. Loading To the extent that parallels can be found in Australia in the hazards of dealing with entrepreneurial founders, Wisetech's Richard White and Fortescue's creator and major shareholder, Andrew Forrest, would be the closest. White's complicated personal life, including multiple relationships with women, including WiseTech employees, has resulted in board upheaval following a number of complaints about inappropriate conduct, a number of which have been settled. A pushback from the Wisetech board was ultimately unsuccessful, leading to a mass resignation of a number of directors. Ultimately, White prevailed. Forrest's strategic deviation into saving the planet using Fortescue's financial resources to finance green projects has been tolerated rather than encouraged by many shareholders. He has been branded a zealot and has been an outspoken critic – particularly of those in the oil and gas industry. But his family's 36 per cent stake in Fortescue has rendered him an untouchable king of the company. Meanwhile, shareholders and regulators have attempted to intervene in the governance of Tesla for years – including a 2018 shareholder lawsuit to limit a stratospheric $US50 billion ($77 billion) pay package awarded to Musk based on hitting market capitalisation milestones. In her ruling in favour of the shareholder, Delaware judge Kathaleen McCormick noted: 'There were undoubtedly a range of healthy amounts that the board could have decided to pay Musk,' McCormick wrote, but she said the board instead 'capitulated to Musk's terms and then failed to prove that those terms were entirely fair'. But Musk's latest action, which will create for him a major distraction from running Tesla, is arguably much more serious for the company and its other shareholders. Loading It threatens to undermine the performance of the company that is already challenged by falling sales volumes and a massive influx of competition from China electric vehicle companies. Two weeks ago, Elon Musk reportedly fired Omead Afshar, the automaker's vice president of manufacturing and operations, CNBC has confirmed, following declines in car sales in key markets this year. His termination followed the resignation of Milan Kovac, previously head of Tesla's Optimus humanoid robotics program, last month. At this point, Musk's presence at the helm of Tesla is sorely needed.
