Lord Nelson paintings scrapped in Parliament diversity drive
Paintings of Lord Nelson have been taken down as part of plans to make artworks in Parliament more diverse, The Telegraph can reveal.
Pictures of the British naval hero have been taken down following an MP-led review of parliamentary art linked to slavery and racism.
Two images of Nelson have been taken down since the Black Lives Matter-inspired project began in 2020, including one depicting the commander dying for his country at the Battle of Trafalgar.
A portrait of Sir Francis Drake, another naval commander has also been removed.
Nelson was criticised by Black Lives Matter activists for alleged personal support of slavery, and Drake was targeted for his youthful involvement in the slave trade.
While images of national heroes have been removed, portraits of Labour grandees including Ms Cooper, the Home Secretary, have been installed as part of ongoing efforts to boost gender and ethnic diversity.
The portraits form part of the Parliamentary Art Collection overseen by the Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art, a cross-party group of MPs.
This manages the slavery review, which aims to increase the representation of minorities in Parliamentary artworks, as well as separate efforts to include more portraits of women.
Ms Cooper has personally made the case for increasing the representation in the Parliamentary Art Collection as part of a Labour mission to 'modernise' Westminster.
Speaking in 2024, she said: 'Westminster is a changing place, with more women MPs, people from ethnic minorities and people with disabilities.
'It would be great to see this change increasingly represented in the artwork around the estate, providing encouragement and inspiration for future generations of politicians.'
As part of the ongoing work of diversification, a portrait of Baroness Hodge, the Labour peer and former culture secretary, has been installed since 2020.
Four portraits of Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell have been taken down in the same period. The staunch Parliamentarian was named as a supporter of the slave trade in the MP-led review of artworks purportedly linked to slavery.
A portrait of Baroness Hoey, the former Labour minister, has also been put on display following the commitment to diversify Parliamentary art.
Meanwhile, images of William Pitt the Elder and George Canning, both former prime ministers, were taken down, along with a print depicting the abolitionist William Wilberforce.
Depictions of Millicent Fawcett and Barbara Duvall, the Suffragist campaigners, have been installed as part of the drive to increase the representation of women, along with a painting of Baroness May, the former prime minister.
Despite the aim of increasing the representation of women in Parliament, four images of Elizabeth I have been removed. These depict the defeat of the Spanish Armada, and the monarch commissioning Sir Walter Raleigh to begin colonial expansion in the Americas.
Four images of Sir Lindsay Hoyle, the Labour MP and Speaker, have been installed on the parliamentary estate, which includes the Palace of Westminster and outlying office buildings.
While ongoing work has led to the gradual removal and installation of work under the supervision of the Speaker's advisory committee on works of art since 2020, following Labour's 2024 election win, swift changes were made.
The Telegraph revealed that in the immediate wake of the landslide, portraits of Sir Winston Churchill and the Duke of Wellington were removed from Parliament.
This followed revelations that Sir Keir Starmer rid No 10 of portraits depicting Elizabeth I, Sir Walter Raleigh, Margaret Thatcher and William Shakespeare following his arrival in Downing Street.
Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, has also made changes to No 11, where portraits of David Lloyd George and Benjamin Disraeli, the former prime ministers, have been replaced with artworks about mental health.
A spokesman for UK Parliament said: 'There are more than 26,000 items within Parliament's collections, and there are regular movements, for example, due to maintenance works in an area, changes to the occupancy of offices or spaces and conservation needs.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
40 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Should Holyrood have a second chamber like the House of Lords?
Lord George Foulkes says having a second chamber could improve how many different aspects of the Scottish Parliament work. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A Labour peer and former MSP says introducing a second chamber in Scotland could improve how things work in Holyrood. Writing exclusively for Scotland on Sunday, Lord George Foulkes says the next government after the 2026 Holyrood election should consider reviewing a number of aspects of how the Scottish Parliament works. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He says this should include considering whether or not a second chamber, similar to the House of Lords in Westminster, should be created. The state opening of parliament in the House of Lords. | Henry Nicholls/Press Association. He said: 'After more than a quarter of a century of existence, I fear that the Scottish Parliament is not living up to the hopes and expectations of Donald Dewar and John Smith, its principal architects, or John P Mackintosh and Jim Boyack, who were the inspiration behind it. 'In Westminster, select committees regularly challenge governments of both main parties - however, north of the border, parliament and its committees have largely failed to act as an effective check on the executive. 'This situation is compounded by the absence of a second chamber in Scotland, which could revise, improve and very occasionally throw out defective legislation.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lord Foulkes, who was a Labour MSP from 2007 until 2011 said whichever party wins the next election need to prioritise a 'major review' of the Scottish Parliament, including the electoral system, the case for a second chamber, the size of the executive, MSPs' privileges, and the role of the presiding officer. He said: 'To rescue Holyrood, people need to see that their money is being spent wisely and effectively, especially since we have decided to impose higher tax rates than in other parts of the country.' Should the SNP win the 2026 election, this is unlikely to happen - the SNP has had a long-standing opposition to the House of Lords and refuses to nominate peers to Westminster's second chamber. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour peer Lord George Foulkes Last year, the SNP tried to force a vote on scrapping the House of Lords completely by trying to amend a bill which aimed to remove hereditary peers from the second chamber. The nationalists have previously branded the House of Lords an 'affront to democracy' and say only around one in nine peers can be described as Scottish. In his column he also attacks the current SNP government and MSPs' inability to 'stick to devolved competencies', saying this exposes flaws in the inner workings of Holyrood. He draws particular attention to former first minister Humza Yousaf for his 'misalignment of priorities' by focusing on the war in Gaza instead of Scottish public services. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lord Foulkes said: 'The SNP's unwillingness to seriously engage with the current devolution framework means that, should they triumph next year, we will face another five years of uncertainty and decline while they hum and haw over when and if to press the independence button. 'Hopefully, the recent [Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse] by-election result can be the turning point we need - if Scottish Labour risks being even bolder and more visionary, there is an excellent chance we could seize an overall majority and finally begin to realise the full benefits of devolution.'
Scotsman
40 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why we need to make fathers visible
A protest was held this week at the Scottish Parliament. Picture: Andrew Carr | Andrew Carr This would be a good time for policy makers revisit and renew a coherent parenting strategy Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... There was an amiable gathering of fathers and mothers, and babies in slings and buggies outside the Scottish Parliament on Wednesday afternoon, protesting the poor provision of paternity leave in the UK. The Singing Mamas sang 'Under Pressure' and a parental leave version of 'Bella Ciao'. Paternity leave was introduced by Labour in 2003. In cash, it amounts to less than half the minimum wage. In duration, a basic two weeks. Hundreds of employers, of course, add their own more generous schemes on top of the statutory obligation. I discovered on Wednesday, that the Scottish Parliament is not among them. The campaign for fathers to spend more time with their partner and new child is like being in favour of virtue. Who can disagree? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The narrow focus on paternity leave, however, could be the key that opens up a much-needed wider debate on the visibility and positive resource of fathers that has been dormant during a period of significant demographic change. I look back to 2012 and the launch of the Scottish Government's National Parenting Strategy. The Minister for Children and Young People, Aileen Campbell, gave a passionate speech. She said, 'Valuing parents is one of the single biggest ways of giving the nation's children the best start in life.' It was part of the ambition for 'Scotland to be the best place in the world to grow up.' There were 14 pages of 'commitments'. One page was specifically about fathers under the strapline 'Parents facing additional challenges'. Funding was put in place 'for organisations such as Men in Childcare, working to redress the existing gender imbalance and the need for more men in early years settings.' The redoubtable Kenny Spence who has been driving the cause of men in childcare, reports the funding raised the number of men in the early years workforce from 2% to 4%. Is 4% in early years, or 9% of male staff in Primary Schools, enough? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Families Need Fathers Scotland – that's us. We changed our name to Shared Parenting Scotland in 2020 to reflect the evolution of our client base as we took more calls from mothers, grandmothers and new partners. We were funded to 'provide support to fathers and other family members facing contact problems with their children.' Much of our casework reveals the kaleidoscope of embedded barriers and disincentives to sharing parenting after divorce or separation. There was a commitment to a 'twice-yearly fathers round table meeting acting in an advisory capacity on national policy and how it impacts fathers.' The Fathers Advisory Board was very useful but just faded away about 2018. There have been Third Sector bright spots. The birth of Dads Rock which now reaches across Scotland was based on the building the role and recognition of fathers in parenting from ante-natal classes onwards. Fathers Network Scotland came up with the Year of the Dad in 2015, which had buy-in from all sectors. Its annual Dads Survey is now becoming a valuable longitudinal study of both the time fathers are spending with their children, as well as the pressures they experience when balancing parenting with work – feeling guilty at both. This would be a good time for policy makers at local and central government level to revisit and renew that 2012 commitment to a coherent parenting strategy.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish Tories struggle to be heard after election skelping
'We stopped Nicola Sturgeon converting her gender bill into law. And we have watched Labour try government — but Sir Keir Starmer keeps dropping the ball.' But for all the jibes, the problem facing Mr Findlay's party is that they are struggling to even get on the pitch. READ MORE Findlay: Tories can win seats at Holyrood election despite polls pointing to drubbing Tories unveil plans for 'Scottish first' medical student training policy For Women Scotland threaten SNP with fresh legal action over Supreme Court ruling The party suffered its worst-ever defeat at last year's general election, slumping to just 121 seats UK-wide — a loss of 244. In Scotland, the scale of the collapse was slightly masked. Despite a chaotic campaign that saw Douglas Ross alienate members and then quit before polling day, the party managed to hold on to five of its six seats. Although the Tory vote halved, support for the SNP — the main challengers in each Conservative-held seat — declined even more sharply. The ghosts of Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak continue to haunt the party, while the spectre of Nigel Farage looms ever larger. The latest projections from Professor Sir John Curtice, based on last month's Survation poll, paint a bleak picture for next year's Holyrood vote. His modelling has the Tories slumping to fourth place with just 13 MSPs — less than half their current tally of 30. The SNP would return 58 seats, while Reform UK would leapfrog the Conservatives to become the main opposition on 21. Labour would win 18 seats, with the LibDems and Greens on 10 and 8 respectively. Mr Findlay did not shy away from the scale of the challenge, admitting that a huge effort would be needed to even earn the right to be heard. Yet despite the grim outlook, the party is hopeful. 'You would think we had no right to be as upbeat as we are, but it is the phenomena of the Conservative Party,' said Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland. 'Against all of the odds, we are feeling genuinely optimistic and positive.'I think we knew that 2024 was going to be terrible. Having taken that skelping, I think people are back to renew the party — and that is the strong statement of both Russell and Kemi's remarks.' 'We are sitting in a much diminished form at Westminster, our worst ever election result in over 250 years of the Conservative Party really being in existence. And really beginning the fightback,' shadow Scottish secretary Andrew Bowie told Unspun Live, The Herald's politics podcast. 'And that is where we are right now — beginning that long, hard slog of regaining the trust of the British people, hopefully with a view to getting back into power in short order in four years' time.' Mr Findlay has settled into the role of party leader. He is much more relaxed and less like the deer trapped in the headlights he resembled when he took over from Douglas Ross last September. He is putting the effort in. One Tory staffer said the boss had rehearsed his 42-minute address at least eight times before delivering it to party members on Saturday lunchtime. It was an unashamedly Conservative speech with a raft of policies rooted in the party's traditional values: tax cuts funded by £650 million in savings from slashing quangos and civil service jobs; scrapping the SNP's 2045 net zero target; and a pledge to train more Scottish medical students to reduce NHS reliance on immigration. For years, Scottish Tory speeches at conference have been dominated by saying no to indyref2. That was in Mr Findlay's speech, of course — but it was his programme for government that was to the fore. 'The way we beat Reform is by having good, proper policies in place. We have not seen very much from Reform policy-wise,' North East list MSP Douglas Lumsden told The Herald on Sunday. 'I still think there is enough time [to turn things around]. It is 11 months before the election and this is about building a positive message we can take next year. 'We absolutely need to move on from the past.' The scale of the party's challenge — and the threat from Reform — was made painfully clear earlier this month at the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, where the Tories came a distant fourth. In a seat where they had won 17.5% at the last Holyrood election, they only just managed to hold on to their Reform took 26% of the vote. While Labour's surprise win has led to grumblings in the SNP, Mr Lumsden insists the party is united behind Mr Findlay. 'We are 100% behind Russell. There is no briefing at all from anyone. Russell has a brilliant personality and the more people who get to know him the more they like him — so we need to promote Russell.' READ MORE While Mr Findlay's position might be safe, the same cannot be said for Kemi Badenoch. Potential leadership hopefuls are on manoeuvres. The leader of the opposition delivered her speech on Friday. It was only her second trip to Scotland since becoming leader in November. 'There is a lot of work to be done, a lot of messaging, a lot of renewal — and she has got the runway that Russell and the rest of us do not have,' Mr Kerr said. 'I am not worried about threats to her leadership. She is letting her colleagues get on with it. She is not a leader who is lying awake worrying about a challenge to her leadership,' he added. 'Anybody who is going to contest Kemi or Russell for leadership right now is mad — because the challenges will not change.' Mr Kerr compared Ms Badenoch to Margaret Thatcher: 'I am old enough to remember our first female leader and the same stuff was being said about her in terms of her role as Leader of the Opposition and her performance and PMQs — and look what happened to her.' 'You know, we have been written off as a party before,' Mr Findlay told The Herald on Sunday. 'There are many people at this conference who have been around for a very long time, and they have seen some pretty dark days. 'And you know what keeps people going? You know that resilience that we all saw in the hall today — it is because we know that what we stand for is right. 'We stand for personal responsibility, lower taxation, fairer taxes for people, integrity and ensuring the very best public services. We want a Scottish Parliament that is entirely focused on delivering for Scotland — not the fringe obsessions of the SNP and Labour.'So we will be fighting for every single vote.' Murrayfield is used to resilience and fighting talk — it is also, however, no stranger to the wooden spoon, a fate Mr Findlay will be desperae to avoid next May.
