
column rosalind pereira quiet war against waste
People go into the sea to swim, Rosalind Pereira observes. 'Then they discard their clothes on the beach and get into new clothes.' For the co-founder of Project Aamhi, a community waste management effort that enables people in 17 coastal Maharashtra villages to keep their neighbourhoods and beaches clean, this peculiar swimming habit sparked an idea.
In addition to 10 tonnes of plastic waste, Aamhi was collecting 800-900 kg of fabric every month from the beaches around Alibaug, a 20 minute speed boat ride from Mumbai's Gateway of India for those who can afford it.
Now, apart from sending sacks of clothes to recycler Goonj, the fabric is upcycled into colourful, reinforced 'Potli' bags that are sold for ₹100 and distributed free to fishing communities.
As I write this, I'm looking at an azure bag with bronze sequinned embroidery and imagining the woman who abandoned her shiny wet kurta on the beach.
Pereira, 53, a graduate of the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, finds ways to make big change in little things. If you have ever found yourself wondering what you could possibly do as an individual to improve the world around you, her story is inspirational.
In a world where the majority are insular and lazy, Pereira pushes for change with empathy and kindness. Maybe it was her 'doer' mother who 'always bustled around looking for commonsensical solutions' or her father who actively contributed to the church community, but Pereira learned early that you can't wait around for someone else to act.
'I always feel that when women are included in the economic system, families develop. A lot of women's money is plowed back, they become independent financially and in thought, increasingly bold'Rosalind Pereira Co-founder of Aamhi
Aamhi or the 'we' club
Whether it's her co-founders at Aamhi or the supportive residents of the bungalows that line the coast or the corporate funders for her programmes or the woman panchayat head who buys into all her hard work, Pereira draws partners, co-founders and like-minded individuals like moths to her flame. Aamhi, in Marathi, fittingly means 'we'.
Most of her ideas are led by women. 'I always feel that when women are included in the economic system, families develop,' she says. 'A lot of women's money is plowed back, they become independent financially and in thought, increasingly bold.'
Since 2022, Aamhi has collected 370 tonnes of waste and recycled 327 tonnes, preventing it from polluting some 750 km of coastline. It's Pereira's latest baby, but she has been lighting sparks everywhere for decades now.
It began with Maya Bazaar, her sustainable jewellery venture that now includes in its embrace 400 artisans. Her first sustainable venture Maya Bazaar, which she started in 1997 to preserve one craft—the art of making knotted thread jewellery—now includes in its embrace 400 artisans, including many women's groups. While back then one large store dismissed the pieces as 'work done in villages', now the brand's large format pieces are retailed in 35 stores and have been spotted on actors Kareena Kapoor and Shabana Azmi.
An idea can click at any time. When she found the villagers had poisoned 16 dogs during COVID-19 by feeding them vada pavs stuffed with phorate, a pesticide, she knew it was because the dogs in the area needed to be sterilised. Two surgeons in Alibaug offered to subsidise the procedure, a company supplied medicines, volunteers looked after the dogs and cleaned up. 'Everything came together and worked beautifully in our favour,' she says. Nearly 1,000 dogs have been sterilised so far.
Her waste venture too, began with her roping in husband Siraj to pick up garbage from the beach down the road from their home. It grew from there, but interacting with unresponsive local bodies and working to change people's behaviour is hard work.
'Incentivise the picking up, or make it more expensive to produce and make the producer responsible'Rosalind PereiraCo-founder of Aamhi
The problem within
'You've got me at a time when I'm feeling defeated,' Pereira tells me. For the first two years Aamhi focused on cleaning public spaces and people were happy. 'But what comes out comes from inside [homes] and there has been a pushback against our efforts to try to make people segregate at source,' she says. 'Nobody is willing to enforce errant panchayats, it's an unpopular move,' she says.
Aamhi collects 'low-value waste' after the recyclers have picked out the bottles and other items with resale value. 'The most polluting item and the hardest to recycle because it is so thin is single use plastic,' says Pereira, citing the example of a packet of Kurkure, the popular PepsiCo snack. 'To collect one kg would be 333 bags of Kurkure.'
'Incentivise the picking up, or make it more expensive to produce and make the producer responsible,' she says, knowing that her unpopular ideas are unlikely to be implemented in a hurry. A study of 10 kg of plastic bags clearly identified the polluting companies, none of which work to clear waste in the area.
Pereira has a wealth of information about how the dozen or so material recovery facilities funded by the Swachh Bharat Mission in Raigad district, where she operates, don't work, and how no local authority is willing to take on this issue despite the fact that tourism and development in the area is set to rise dramatically. 'Nobody's asking questions about the waste,' she says, adding that no legislative help is forthcoming too.
But she isn't dissuaded. She will focus on supporters who push her to do more, and continue to encourage others to replicate the 'guerilla effort' that is Aamhi. Because she doesn't know any other way.
'I feel a huge sense of responsibility to act, to repair in whatever tiny way possible,' she says. 'Change can only happen if one acts and not just observes.' Even if it's one Kurkure packet at a time.
Priya Ramani is a Bengaluru-based journalist and the co-founder of India Love Project on Instagram.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
15 hours ago
- New Indian Express
A govt school that stands out: Nizamabad school thrives amid private competition
NIZAMABAD : Tucked into the heart of Dubba, a bustling working-class neighbourhood, a government school is quietly rewriting the story of public education. Surrounded by over a dozen private institutions, the Government High School and Primary School in Dubba doesn't just survive; it thrives. With more than 450 students in the high school and strong enrolment in the primary wing, its campus comes alive each morning with youthful chatter, recitations and the buzz of assembly, proof that public-funded institutions still matter. Dubba is home to hundreds of migrant families, many from neighbouring Maharashtra. Marathi may be the mother tongue, but their aspirations are rooted in education. In this densely packed locality where every rupee counts, this school has emerged as a trusted option for families chasing better futures. The school runs three sections per class — two in English, one in Telugu. Each morning begins with a community-centred assembly. Students take turns at the mic: reading the day's news in English, explaining a historical date or decoding a quote. 'For many parents waiting at the gate, it's the first time they hear their child speak confidently in English,' says headmaster Thirkovel Srinivas. 'That pride spreads. And word-of-mouth brings more students to us.' Recognition and a fresh coat of paint Academically, the school maintains a 95% pass rate in Class 10 board exams, with several students scoring above 530 marks. But it's the school's focus beyond textbooks that sets it apart. The NCC programme is a major draw, offering students discipline, exposure and a sense of purpose. Other events, like Science Day, with project exhibitions and demonstrations, help connect the school to the wider community. 'When parents see their children taking part, they're more likely to trust the system,' says Srinivas. Teachers, too, have been recognised: several are selected as resource persons for Science Day. This year, the theme is AI.


Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
Vidarbha's ‘Zudpi' scrub lands are ‘forest' lands: how SC ruling has struck a balance between development and environment concerns
After several decades of litigation over about 86,000 hectares of Zudpi jungle (shrub forest) lands peculiar to Maharashtra's eastern Vidarbha region, the Supreme Court last month ruled that such lands should be considered as 'forest' lands. On May 22, the top court provided clarity on the usage of Zudpi lands, saying they cannot be converted without prior approval from the central government, and only after complying with the conditions laid down by the court. An official report referred to by the court says Zudpi is a Marathi word that literally translates to bushes or shrubs, and Zudpi land means an inferior type of unoccupied land with bushy growth. The term was used for all wastelands that were not occupied by individual farmers for cultivation and other purposes. According to the report, Zudpi jungle lands are peculiar to six districts of eastern Vidarbha (Nagpur division) – Nagpur, Chandrapur, Gadchiroli, Bhandara, Wardha, and Gondia – and have been used for non-forest purposes for the past several decades. These lands, traditionally used for grazing, were classified as Gairan under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. For decades, legal status uncertain Vidarbha's Zudpi lands remained in a legal limbo for decades due to administrative lapses, inconsistent government actions, and contrasting interpretations of India's forest laws. Initially vested with the Revenue Department, these lands were used for development, public amenities like schools, health centres, water pipelines, burial grounds, and for allotment to landless farmers. They were also used for infrastructure projects, including railways, defence, and irrigation. After the reorganisation of states in 1960, similar lands elsewhere in Maharashtra were recorded as Gairan or Gurcharan. However, in Vidarbha, they continued to be classified as 'Zudpi Jungle' due to bureaucratic inaction. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (FCA) prohibited diversion of forest land without the Centre's approval. However, in November 1987, the Maharashtra government issued an order declaring Zudpi lands as 'scrub forests' that would not attract the provisions of FCA, and handed them to the Revenue Department for afforestation and grazing purposes. This 1987 Government Order was challenged by the Bombay Environmental Action Group (BEAG) before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. While this plea was pending, the Centre in February 1992 changed and relaxed its earlier position. It clarified that Zudpi Jungle would continue to be treated as 'forest lands' under the FCA; however, for the part of Zudpi lands that were used for non-forest purposes, the state government shall make a proposal to the Centre seeking its approval under the FCA. Taking a cue from the Centre's decision, the Maharashtra government in 1994 withdrew its 1987 order. With these changing positions, ambiguity prevailed until the Supreme Court's December 12, 1996 judgment in the 'TN Godavarman Thirumulpad' case, which stated that Zudpi lands would also be treated as 'forest lands' under the FCA. In 1998, a High-Powered Committee appointed by the state government recommended that 92,115 hectares should be declared protected forests and 86,409 hectares that were unfit for forest use should be de-notified. Eight years ago, the state government again pushed to denotify Zudpi jungle lands. In 2019, the Maharashtra government, through the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur, filed an interim application and sought the SC's approval to exclude the latter category of land from the purview of FCA. The SC formed a Central Empowered Committee (CEC), which filed its first report after site visits. Since some issues were yet to be resolved, the SC last year sought another report from the CEC. This report formed the basis of the SC's May 22, 2025 verdict. GOVERNMENT: The Maharashtra government argued that Zudpi lands were never forest lands, and due to the reorganisation of states and the inaction of certain officials, the revenue records were never corrected. As such, these lands continued to be erroneously described as Zudpi lands in revenue records. The state argued that denying it relief would lead to 'grave and irreparable damage' to lakhs of citizens, and would stall several projects. INTERVENER: Environmentalist Prasad Khale, intervener in the case, however, argued that de-notifying these lands would degrade healthy forests and disrupt wildlife corridors. He submitted that the 2025 CEC report had ignored ecological concerns, including those of wildlife corridors and the protection of scrub forests, which should not be used for non-forest activities. SC directives strike a balance The Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan R Gavai and Justice Augustine Masih said that it could arrive at a solution to 'balance the rights of the citizens at large on one hand and the interest of the environment on the other hand' due to the efforts made by the CEC. The SC recognised that a large number of Zudpi lands in Nagpur city alone had public utilities such as the High Court building, defence buildings, state secretariat, graveyards, etc. It said citizens residing on these lands for years, or farmers could not be deprived of their residence or livelihood. Therefore, the Supreme Court held that Zudpi jungle lands would be treated as forests, but made exceptions for lands allotted for non-forest use before December 12, 1996. For such lands, where classification (purpose) hadn't changed, the state would be required to obtain the Centre's approval under Section 2 of the FCA for their deletion from the list of forest areas. The court said the Centre shall consider proposals without imposing compensatory afforestation conditions, and should not seek deposition of Net Present Value (NPV) levies. The court directed the Centre and the state to consult and finalise a proposal format within three months with prior approval of the CEC. For post-December 12, 1996 allotments of Zudpi lands, the Centre shall process proposals only after ascertaining reasons and ensuring action against the officers who took allotment decisions in violation of the SC's directions. Special Task Forces in each district will remove encroachments made after October 25, 1980, within two years. All commercial allotments post-October 25, 1989, are to be treated as encroachments. The court clarified no land may be diverted to non-government entities after scrutiny. The Revenue Department must transfer remaining Zudpi lands to the Forest Department within a year, which are to be used for compensatory afforestation. Other Zudpi lands will not be allowed for compensatory afforestation unless certified by the Chief Secretary. Benefitting the state's development plans The verdict has in some ways paved the way for infrastructure and other development works that the state government plans to undertake on certain tracts of lands, after obtaining approval from the central government. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis welcomed the ruling, calling it a boost to Vidarbha's stalled development. The CEC will monitor the transfer of forest land, as directed by the SC. States and Union Territories have been directed to reclaim possession of such lands from occupiers and hand them over to the Forest Department. The SC had said that if reclaiming possession is not in the public interest, the state/UTs shall recover land costs from occupiers and use them to develop forests.


Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Western Bypass used as dumping shortcut
Colva: The much-anticipated Western Bypass and its service roads may have drastically cut down travel time, but they have unfortunately taken on a far less welcome identity — as an unofficial garbage dumping zone. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Stretching across 2.7km from Navelim through Benaulim to Seraulim, this stretch of the bypass is now marred by piles of garbage, creating not just an eyesore but a looming environmental hazard. Plastic waste is discarded along the stretch. Locals and environmentalists fear that these pollutants could eventually find their way into the region's water bodies since the road cuts through ecologically sensitive catchment areas. The problem is aggravated by the lack of a scientific and decentralised waste collection system in the peripheral villages surrounding Margao. Villagers often end up discarding garbage along roadsides, especially wet waste which is not collected regularly. With the Margao Municipal Council (MMC) reportedly imposing heavy fines on non-Margao residents using its waste collection stations, residents from neighbouring villages find themselves caught in a bind. Former MMC chairperson Savio Coutinho blamed the worsening situation on the systemic failure of local governance. 'This crisis stems from a lack of political will and citizen engagement. I had proposed a model where village waste — if properly segregated — could be accepted by the city's waste management system for a nominal fee,' Coutinho said. 'Blaming villagers alone is unjust. City dwellers too have been seen dumping garbage along the bypass.' Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Coutinho also emphasised that penalties alone cannot curb the problem. 'People will always find a place to dump their garbage if no structured disposal system exists,' he said. 'Restrictions without solutions only worsen illegal dumping.' Local activist Santan Pereira from Benaulim echoed similar concerns. 'Our panchayats have no facilities for wet waste disposal,' he said. 'While they collect dry waste once a week, wet waste remains unaddressed. Naturally, roadside dumping becomes the go-to solution.' Pereira also raised questions about inconsistent policies and poor regulation. 'Panchayats permit chicken slaughter stalls without any verification of waste disposal methods,' he said. 'Residential projects are sanctioned without checking if proper garbage systems are in place. All of this leads to more waste — much of it organic — being dumped on roadsides.' While every village panchayat technically has a garbage management committee, Pereira said these committees rarely meet or function as intended. 'What's the point of having these committees on paper if they don't take active steps to address this pressing issue?' he said. Without urgent coordination between municipal authorities, panchayats, and state govt, and without sustainable, village-level waste management solutions, this convenience corridor could soon become an environmental catastrophe in the making, Coutinho said.