Cavan Taylor obituary: Senior City lawyer behind merger
He was also skilled in dealing with clients. Andrew Walker, his successor as senior partner at Lovell White Durrant (Lovells) said he had an 'outstanding ability to engage with people and impress them'. Taylor would tell them, 'I want you to know that my firm's relationship with your company is something we cherish.' Walker added, 'It still impressed me when it was said to a second client on the same day.'
Cavan Taylor was born in 1935 in Beckenham, Kent, the only child of Albert William Taylor (known as Pat), an insurance assessor, and Muriel (née Horncastle), who worked as a secretary. He grew up in Hinchley Wood, Surrey, and at the age of eight went to King's College School, Wimbledon, maintaining a lifelong love of the institution. He was awarded a scholarship by Surrey county council to read modern languages at Emmanuel College, Cambridge, but he chose to switch to law.
By 1957 his parents had moved to Cobham, Surrey, where he met Helen (née Tinling) whose family lived opposite his. She was a music teacher, later becoming an artist. They married in 1962 and had three children: Karen, Sean and Camilla, who survive him with five grandchildren. The family's life was irrevocably changed when, aged 50, Helen suffered a serious stroke. Doctors advised that she was unlikely to survive but she lived for a further 38 years, during which time Taylor cared for her devotedly. She died in February 2021.
Their son Sean, a children's author and poet, wrote on his father's death: 'Mum's illness was a life changer. You were still in your forties. Both of you lost so much. But what I hear remembered is not a catastrophe. It's the way you wore what happened with the lightness of love.'
After National Service Taylor embarked on his law degree and also took a postgraduate LLM. In 1958 he joined Herbert Smith as an articled clerk, qualifying in 1961. In 1963 he moved in-house to the Distillers Company, then dealing with claims arising from its role as the distributor for thalidomide, the drug that caused deformities in thousands of babies. In 1965 he returned to private practice to join Piesse & Sons, which became Durrant Piesse before the merger with Lovells. He was senior partner from 1991 to 1996.
Away from his legal career, Taylor became a governor and chairman of King's College School. In that role, former school heads recall his diplomacy, wit and enthusiasm. A new library building was named after him in 2003 in recognition of his contribution to fundraising. Robin Reeve, who was appointed headmaster at King's when Taylor was chairman of the governors, cited his ability to 'bring an audience together with such a sure lightness of touch or bring a meeting to what was the right conclusion when that was far from obvious when it had begun'.
A fluent French speaker, he backed the school's introduction of the International Baccalaureate in 2001 and made no secret of his hope that it would in time become co-educational, as is now planned. Tony Evans, who succeeded Reeve as head, noted that 'change, and even determined reform, held no fear for him'.
After retirement in 1996 he became a supporter of the Prisoners' Education Trust and also loved working in his garden. His son recalled of him, 'Just being able to water your tomatoes was enough to make it the best of times.'
Not long before he died, Taylor said, 'I think I'd like my last words to be, 'It's all been really rather fun.' And that would be rather better than saying, 'Who the hell did I lend my lawnmower to?' '
Cavan Taylor, senior City solicitor, was born on February 23, 1935. He died on May 8, 2025, aged 90
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
27 minutes ago
- The National
Labour rushed to help Lindsey oil refinery. So why not Grangemouth?
Here, Michelle Thomson, the SNP MSP for Falkirk East – which includes Grangemouth, writes on the Labour Government's differing approaches. LIKE many, I was alarmed to hear of the potential closure of Lindsey Oil Refinery in North Lincolnshire at the end of last month. On June 30, Prax Group, the owners of the refinery, announced they were going into administration, and therefore the future of the site was at risk. The very same day, the UK Government sprang into action. Energy Minister Michael Shanks gave a statement to the House of Commons confirming the [[UK Government]] is funding the continued operation of the refinery, adding: 'The Government will ensure supplies are maintained, protect our energy security, and do everything we can to support workers.' Energy Minister Michael ShanksNow, I welcome this, and any action to save jobs is commendable. All options should be considered to keep Lindsey operating. But as the constituency MSP for Grangemouth, I cannot help but think – while the [[UK Government]] sprang into action for the Lindsey refinery the day the news broke, where was that sense of urgency and action for [[Grangemouth]]? Yes, the circumstances are different – but over a period of months, there was nothing even close to what took place for Lindsey in a day – no urgent statement, and little to no meaningful Government intervention. READ MORE: Labour admit 'not a penny' of £200m Grangemouth rescue fund spent This isn't the first time either. Many Scots were quite rightly astounded that the UK Government very quickly spent billions to save British Steel in Scunthorpe but came nowhere close for Grangemouth. It's worth repeating that Scotland generates well over 90% of the UK's crude oil in any given year – but now has no capacity to refine it. It's also worth repeating that Labour promised to save [[Grangemouth]] before the election and failed. Indeed, the leader of the Labour Party in Scotland said: "We would step in to save the jobs at the refinery." This is the second refinery to face closure on Labour's watch, with thousands of related jobs being lost elsewhere in the supply chain. It would appear that, when it comes to industry elsewhere in the UK, Westminster can immediately pull out all the stops – but when it's in Scotland, the [[UK Government]] simply isn't interested. READ MORE: 'Unacceptable': SNP hit out as Labour 'keep Tory-era veto on Scottish laws' Some may argue that these issues are for the Scottish Government to respond to. This is correct – but any response must include the power to take financial action in the form of significant borrowing powers. These are powers that the [[Scottish Government]] lacks. The truth is, Grangemouth is just as important to Scotland's industrial output as Lindsey is to England's. It's no wonder that a growing number in Scotland quite rightly feel that Scotland is an afterthought to this – or any – UK government. It begs the question: if the UK Government can immediately step in to save major industrial sites in England – on more than one occasion – then why not in Scotland? My view is, as it always has been, that the only way to ensure Scotland's massive natural wealth is utilised for the benefit of Scotland's people is with independence for Scotland.
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
BBC Studios marks a year of record revenues and creative success
• BBC Commercial delivers record revenues of £2.2bn in 2024/25 • Strategic investments paying off; growth from previous year investments includes 20% increase in BritBox International revenues in first full year of ownership • Retains position as the UK's most awarded studio, with seven Emmy awards, an Oscar for Conclave, and more than 150 awards won in the year • Global hit Bluey boosts consumer products revenues BBC Commercial, a global media company which is part of the BBC Group, today released its annual results as part of the BBC's Annual Report and Accounts, marking a year where the company delivered record revenue and industry-awarded creative success. The company, which makes and distributes some of the world's most sought-after content as well as creating and nurturing iconic brands, achieved record revenues of £2.2bn (2023/24: £1.9bn) and EBITDA of £228m (2023/24: £199m) in a challenging market, driven by a diversified portfolio; strong performance for BritBox International; and its consumer products division, especially global hit Bluey. BBC Studios, the main commercial arm of the BBC Commercial group, recorded its fourth consecutive year of profit in excess of £200m, expressed as EBITDA, of £225m (2023/24: £202m), an increase of 11% year on year, despite organic investment in media & streaming, including and UKTV, which both saw audience growth. The profits generated by BBC Studios go back to the BBC to support its mission in the UK. Tom Fussell, CEO of BBC Commercial said: 'BBC Commercial has delivered a strong set of results, which show that our strategy is working and the investments made in previous years, together with a diversified portfolio, are delivering a trajectory of sustainable growth, despite ongoing global macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty. Together with the continuing recognition for the craft and creativity of our content studio and the demand for our content around the world, BBC Commercial is well placed to support a robust creative and entertainment industry and cement its role as a global ambassador for the best of UK content.' Over the last few years, the company has made a series of strategic investments in its routes to market, including taking full ownership of global streamer BritBox International and enhancements to digital services for UKTV. Investment in digital platforms was key in delivering a 43% growth in revenues for the media and streaming division. BritBox International's revenues were up 20% year-on-year, with popular UK titles such as Ludwig and Blue Lights drawing in North American audiences. BBC Studios' multi-channel network, UKTV, also recorded a strong performance. Its direct-to-consumer service U grew views by a third in 2024, whilst UKTV saw total viewer hours to its VOD content across its free and pay platforms grow by 56 million hours year-on-year. Drama content performed particularly well with The Marlow Murder Club becoming the network's highest rating show of 2024, watched by 2.6 million viewers. The new and BBC app have established themselves as the key digital platforms for international audiences who want trusted, impartial BBC news. saw a 15% uplift in global visitors over the year whilst registrations have grown by 78% year-on-year, demonstrating the international reputation of the BBC brand. BBC Studios' world-class creativity continued to power its success with the business winning over 150 awards. Content highlights from the most-awarded UK production company included feature film Conclave, made by wholly owned House Productions, which won four BAFTAs and an Academy Award, wholly owned Clerkenwell Films' Baby Reindeer which won six Emmys, a 20th anniversary for Strictly Come Dancing in the UK as the popularity of the international brand, Dancing with the Stars, continues. Factual title The Americas, narrated by Tom Hanks and made for NBC, became the most-watched nature documentary on US linear television for more than fifteen years, whilst in the UK, BBC Studios helped mark the 80th anniversary of D-Day with a raft of memorable programming, including the RTS Programme Award-winning D-Day 80: Tribute to the Fallen. The business has expanded and consolidated its international production portfolio, now making programmes in ten territories worldwide. The performance of BBC Studios' brands and licensing business was led by global hit Bluey, as the children's title was named the most-streamed programme in the US in 2024, the Bluey's World immersive experience opened in Brisbane, Australia, and a much-anticipated feature film was announced in partnership with Disney+, set to arrive in cinemas in 2027. These results mean that BBC Commercial remains on track to meet its five-year returns commitment of £1.5bn by 2026/27 (a 30% increase on the previous five-year period), having already delivered £1,028m during the first three years. Pay Gap Report BBC Studios also today publishes its Pay Gap Report, showing improvements in eight of the 10 pay gaps (both median and mean) on its 2024 performance. The report also shows that over 96% of the business' female employees are in a career band with a median pay gap of less than 5%, and that 21% are in a career band with a median pay gap in favour of women. The company's median gender pay gap for 2024/25 was 10.7% (2023/24: 11.5%) and a mean gender pay gap of 11.3% (2023/24: 13.4%). BBC Studios continues to be amongst the most transparent media companies when it comes to voluntary reporting on protected characteristics, and the business intends to continue to expand its approach to transparency in future years. BBC Studios CEO Tom Fussell said: 'The data in today's Pay Gap Report is encouraging, although we continue to strive to improve representation across all levels across - and all characteristics in – the business. We are taking proactive steps to address our representation through initiatives such as BBC Extend and are also working to improve our disclosure rates in order to achieve a more inclusive and representative workforce.' -Ends- For more information, please contact: About BBC Studios BBC Studios is the main commercial arm of BBC Commercial Ltd and generated revenues of £2.1 billion in the last year and profits of over £200 million for a fourth consecutive year. Able to take an idea seamlessly from thought to screen and beyond, the business is built on two operating areas: the content studio, which produces, invests and distributes TV and audio globally and media & streaming, with BBC branded channels, services including UKTV, and BritBox International and joint ventures in the UK and internationally. The business made almost 3,300 hours of award-winning British programmes last year for a wide range of UK and global broadcasters and platforms. Its content is internationally recognised across a broad range of genres and specialisms, and includes world-famous brands like Strictly Come Dancing/Dancing with the Stars, the Planet series, Bluey and Doctor Who. BBC Studios | Website | Press Office | X | LinkedIn | Instagram |
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Will Rachel Reeves' mortgage bombshell do more harm than good?
There's a great deal riding on Rachel Reeves' Mansion House speech tonight – more so than usual. Between the government's welfare reform plans being torn to shreds, the economy hitting a wall and public finances being mired in a sea of red ink, things haven't been great for the chancellor lately. Then there was her tearful appearance in the House of Commons a few weeks ago, blamed on a personal issue, and the lukewarm endorsement she received from Keir Starmer – which was swiftly reversed because the fiscally hawkish Reeves is seen in the City as greatly preferable to any of her possible replacements, and the markets reacted very badly when speculation about her future was at its height. Of course, she is not solely responsible for all of the above, but she does need to get back on the front foot – and her audience with City grandees is key to her success. As is typically the case with the annual event, large parts of its contents have been pushed out in advance – most notably the so-called 'Leeds reforms' which will tear up some of the post-financial crisis regulations that the City has been chafing against. At the centre of this are plans to make it easier for people to obtain bigger mortgages. The government is also launching a state-backed mortgage guarantor. The risks are obvious: do this and you could easily end up with more bad debt and more defaults when economic conditions turn against borrowers. Interest rates are on a downward path, and mortgage deals have been improving, which helps. But it won't always be that way, and unemployment is rising (thanks in part to Reeves increasing taxes on jobs). The new guarantor will also inevitably shift the burden of risk on to the taxpayer. Am I alone in having a problem with privatised profits and socialised losses? The City will always applaud deregulation, and quietly welcomed Labour's prodding the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to cool its regulatory jets and get with the programme. The Leeds reforms promise more of the same – including reform of the Financial Ombudsman, which has in recent years been functioning as a quasi-regulator. That, we are told, will end. An easing of the much hated senior managers and certification regime, another post-crisis measure, is promised. Ditto the FCA's consumer duty rules. So, too, are there are plans to boost fintech – and to ensure the Basel capital rules on banks are implemented in a way that 'supports UK competitiveness'. I suspect this means we'll find a way of cheating. A review of the ring-fencing regime – designed to protect retail banking assets (so yours and mine) from the City casino – is promised. My bet is that this will end up getting scrapped. Cross your fingers. If things go wrong again, it could get very messy. And there will be another crisis. It's in the nature of banking. City trade body UK Finance was positively gushing in response. 'We submitted a range of ideas to government to help support growth and the UK's position as a global financial centre. Across many of these key areas the chancellor has listened and delivered significant positive change,' said its CEO, David Postings. Of course he did. But here's the thing: if you take a look at the Treasury's press release, you will see that there is one very big omission. It is the one thing everyone attending tonight's shindig will want to hear about. It trumps even the most radical parts of the 'Leeds Reforms' and will ultimately be what Reeves is judged on. By now you've doubtless guessed that I'm talking about tax. Reeves has already soaked businesses by taxing jobs, with predictable results when it comes to unemployment. The City's view is that it already pays enough, contributing nearly £1 in every £10 the chancellor raises. Reeves is hoping that her reforms will spur growth, which she desperately needs. The City will tell her that it won't happen if she hits it again. That doesn't just apply to her increasing the burden on businesses. She will also be told not to hammer Britain's millionaires. With little headroom left over, her self-imposed fiscal rules and a tax-raising budget expected, Reeves has said the burden of balancing the books will fall on those whose shoulders are 'the broadest'. Most would agree that this is only fair. Many understandably find it offensive that Britain's poorest are being kicked via what remains of welfare reform while the richest employ clever accountants to cut their bills. But if she hits the uber rich too hard it turns into a zero sum game, because while some will stick around and grouse about their bills, others will just leave altogether. The result is that you don't end up raising more money – and you may, in fact, end up with less. So, how does Reeves plan to solve this problem ? I'm not sure the City will get an answer. Not yet. Reeves has made a start at re-establishing some credibility and authority, but the likely response to Mansion House will be this: 'Good start. But our verdict – and our business decisions – are on hold until the budget is in.'
