logo
Mamdani's stunning victory marks the rise of a new American Left

Mamdani's stunning victory marks the rise of a new American Left

Al Jazeera7 hours ago

Zohran Mamdani's stunning win in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor signals a seismic shift in US politics. The victory of the Ugandan-Indian American state assemblyman confirms what has been quietly building for years: A new working-class immigrant politics, rooted in organising, solidarity, and a sharp critique of inequality, is taking hold within the Democratic Party. Mamdani's campaign – focused on rent freezes, universal childcare, public transit, and green infrastructure – galvanised multiracial working-class coalitions across the city. His win is a repudiation of corporate influence and local corruption, and a powerful endorsement of politics shaped by immigrants with deep ties to global struggles for justice.
This movement is not limited to New York. In Congress, Ilhan Omar – refugee, former security guard, and daughter of Somali immigrants – has helped define this new left. Joining her is Rashida Tlaib, the first and only Palestinian American woman to serve in Congress. Tlaib, Omar and Mamdani represent a politics shaped not just by US inequality, but by personal or ancestral experiences of instability, austerity, and repression in the Global South. They have emerged as the public faces of a broader trend: Politicians from immigrant backgrounds forming the backbone of an ascendant, insurgent Democratic Left.
That's not the version of immigration Donald Trump has in mind.
In October 2019, then-President Trump addressed a campaign rally in Minneapolis – a city with a large Somali population, represented by Ilhan Omar. Drawing on familiar right-wing tropes, Trump warned that immigrants and refugees were changing the United States for the worse. The subtext was clear: This was a dog whistle to MAGA voters, particularly white working- and middle-class Americans who blamed immigration for the country's decline. This rhetoric previewed what is now commonplace – unlawful, often brutal deportations of thousands from Latin America, Africa, and Asia. In Trump's telling, immigration from 'shithole' countries was responsible for crime, economic stagnation, and the misuse of public benefits. What he didn't say was that many Somali immigrants in Minneapolis had fled violence – some of it triggered or worsened by US foreign policy.
But Trump was at least partly right: migrants and their offspring are changing US political life – just not in the way he feared.
In fact, just a year before Trump's speech, the outskirts of Minneapolis were the site of the first worker strikes against Amazon's exploitative labour practices. Led mainly by Somali immigrants, these actions helped catalyse a renewed national labour movement. What began in one warehouse soon spread, with other Amazon plants and industries following suit.
This is what makes Mamdani's mayoral primary win so significant. Alongside figures like Omar, he exemplifies a new kind of leadership – grounded in lived experience, powered by grassroots organising, and capable of translating complex policy into plainspoken demands for justice. His campaign focused on economic dignity, tenant rights, childcare, climate resilience, and taxing the rich – all anchored in the real conditions of working-class life.
Just take African immigrants, where Mamdani and Omar have roots: There are now roughly 2.1 million sub-Saharan African immigrants living in the US, making up about 5 percent of the total foreign-born population. Much coverage emphasises how well-educated or professionally successful African immigrants are – facts often highlighted by middle- and upper-class diasporas. But these narratives obscure the reality for most: Lower average incomes, more precarious work, and higher poverty rates than other immigrant groups.
Yet it is from this working-class base that a new politics is emerging – one with the potential to reshape the Democratic Party from the ground up.
As the founder of the website Africa Is a Country, I spent nearly a decade and a half tracing how Africans are reinventing democratic politics despite the pressures of neoliberalism, authoritarianism, and militarism. From Nigeria's EndSARS and Uganda's Walk to Work to the Arab Spring and South Africa's Fees Must Fall, African activists have offered bold critiques of injustice. These movements have also influenced global struggles – most clearly in the resonance between them and Black Lives Matter.
Many African immigrants in the US draw on these traditions of resistance. Mamdani organised alongside New York City taxi drivers fighting debt. Omar has cleaned offices and worked on assembly lines. Both have built political careers by listening to, and organising with, communities pushed to the margins.
In a nation still reeling from Trump-era xenophobia and inequality, these new leaders offer a hopeful alternative. They are building solidarity across divides – between immigrants and the native-born, Muslims and non-Muslims, Black Americans and new African arrivals, and the second-generation offspring of migrants from elsewhere – grounded not in assimilation, but in shared struggle.
As political theorist Corey Robin recently noted on social media, Mamdani is a 'happy warrior' in the mould of Franklin Roosevelt: Sharp, grounded, and unafraid to engage in real debate. That he is Muslim and South Asian deepens his significance in a city and nation transformed by global migration. He represents a radically democratic future – one conservatives can neither contain nor comprehend.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mistakenly deported man Kilmar Abrego Garcia to remain in jail for now
Mistakenly deported man Kilmar Abrego Garcia to remain in jail for now

Al Jazeera

time25 minutes ago

  • Al Jazeera

Mistakenly deported man Kilmar Abrego Garcia to remain in jail for now

A Salvadoran national whose mistaken deportation spurred national outcry in the United States will remain in jail for now, as lawyers discuss how to prevent him from being removed from the country a second time. On Wednesday, Kilmar Abrego Garcia was set to be released from pre-trial custody without having to post bail. He is being held in detention in Nashville, Tennessee, on criminal charges of human smuggling. The administration of President Donald Trump had sought to stop his release, deeming him to be a flight risk. But US District Judge Waverly Crenshaw upheld a magistrate judge's earlier decision finding that Abrego Garcia was eligible to walk free. However, in an unexpected twist, lawyers on both sides argued that, if Abrego Garcia were released, he risks being taken into the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for a second deportation. That would deprive Abrego Garcia of the chance to defend himself against the charges, which he has denied. And lawyers for the government argued that it would also scuttle their criminal case against him. Judge Crenshaw noted in a written decision that, since it is the government's choice whether or not to deport Abrego Garcia, the situation appeared to be a case of the executive branch doing 'injury on itself'. 'If deported, the Government argues, the Department of Justice will be deprived of the opportunity to pursue its criminal charges against Abrego,' Crenshaw wrote. But, he added, 'it is the Executive Branch's decision that places the Government in this predicament.' Ultimately, it was decided that Abrego Garcia would remain in custody while lawyers sparred over whether they could prevent Abrego Garcia's deportation if he were released to await trial. A high-profile case Abrego Garcia appeared at the Wednesday hearing wearing an orange jail-issued T-shirt and a headset to listen to the proceedings through a Spanish interpreter. It was the latest chapter in an ongoing fight between Abrego Garcia and the Trump administration over whether he would be allowed to stay in the US. According to his lawyers, Abrego Garcia fled El Salvador as a teenager to avoid gang violence, arriving in the US around 2011. He has lived for more than a decade in Maryland, where he and his American wife are raising three children. In 2019, a judge granted him a protection order that barred his removal from the US. But on March 15, Abrego Garcia was swept up in the immigration raids being conducted as part of President Trump's mass deportation campaign. He and more than 200 other Venezuelans and Salvadorans were accused of being gang members, and they were deported to El Salvador. Many of the men were sent to the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo, or CECOT, a maximum-security prison for those accused of terrorism. But advocates for the deported immigrants have argued that many of their clients had no criminal records and were in the process of seeking legal immigration status in the US. Advocates have also pointed out that ICE has provided scant evidence against some of the deported individuals, in some cases appearing to arrest people based solely on their tattoos. The Trump administration, however, has designated Latin American gangs like MS-13 and Tren de Aragua as 'foreign terrorist organisations' and sought to crack down on their presence in the US. A number of legal challenges followed the deportation flights to El Salvador. In Abrego Garcia's case, the government acknowledged that his removal had been the result of an 'administrative error'. But the Trump administration initially insisted he could not be brought back to the US even after the Supreme Court in April ordered the government to 'facilitate' his return. A return to the US That changed on June 7, when Abrego Garcia was returned to the US. The Trump administration justified the return as necessary to confront him with charges of smuggling undocumented migrants inside the US. Those charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding in Tennessee. In a video recording of the stop, one of the police officers observed that Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers and speculated he might be a smuggler. But no criminal charges were brought at the time. In announcing Abrego Garcia's return to the US this month, the Trump administration revealed it had sought a criminal indictment in May of this year. At the recent detention hearings, Homeland Security special agent Peter Joseph testified that he did not begin investigating Abrego Garcia until April. Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty to the smuggling charges on June 13, and his lawyers have characterised them as an attempt to justify his mistaken deportation. On Sunday, US Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes ruled that Abrego Garcia does not have to remain in jail before his criminal trial. But she described that decision as 'little more than an academic exercise', given that it was likely Abrego Garcia would be taken back into custody by ICE if released. How to prevent Abrego Garcia from being deported a second time became the focus of Wednesday's hearing. A lawyer for Abrego Garcia, Sean Hecker, noted that witnesses cooperating with the Trump administration had been protected from possible deportation. 'The government has ensured witness cooperation by ensuring that people will not be deported,' Hecker said. If the government could protect those witnesses from removal, Hecker asked why it could not do the same for Abrego Garcia. Representing the government's case, meanwhile, was acting US Attorney Rob McGuire. He argued that the executive branch of the government was vast, and he had little control over every entity's actions. Still, he added, he would ask the Department of Homeland Security for its cooperation in not deporting Abrego Garcia. 'That's a separate agency with separate leadership and separate directions,' McGuire said. 'I will coordinate, but I can't tell them what to do.' Speaking at a news conference before the court hearing, Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, noted that it had been 106 days since her husband had been 'abducted' by the government. She called for his safe return. 'Kilmar should never have been taken away from us,' she said. 'This fight has been the hardest thing in my life.'

Faith leaders challenge Texas law requiring Ten Commandments in classrooms
Faith leaders challenge Texas law requiring Ten Commandments in classrooms

Al Jazeera

time4 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Faith leaders challenge Texas law requiring Ten Commandments in classrooms

A group of faith leaders in the United States have filed a lawsuit seeking to block the state of Texas from requiring the Ten Commandments, as detailed in the Old Testament of the Bible, to be displayed in public classrooms. Their legal challenge on Tuesday comes just days after Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed the legislation, which would make Texas the largest state in the country to impose such a requirement. In the lawsuit, the Christian and Muslim faith leaders argue that the law would subject nearly six million students across Texas's 9,100 public schools to 'religious mandates, every single school day'. 'This is wholly inconsistent with the fundamental religious-freedom principles … upon which our nation was founded,' said the lawsuit. It further noted that children who attend public schools in Texas 'follow various faiths and religions, or do not practice any religion at all'. The US Constitution protects the right to practice — or not practice — a religion without interference from the government. Meanwhile, the concept of the 'separation of church and state' has long been seen as a bedrock principle in US law. While it is not directly referred to in the US Constitution, its roots have been traced back to the US colonial period. Thomas Jefferson, the country's third president, used the phrase to discuss the Constitution's Establishment Clause, which prohibits the government from making laws 'respecting an establishment of religion'. The concept has also been upheld by several Supreme Court rulings. Still, a handful of conservative-led states have sought to pass laws mixing public education with elements from the Christian religion. In 2024, Louisiana became the first state in the US to mandate displaying of the Ten Commandments in public schools. Last week, a federal appeals court blocked the requirement. Arkansas also passed a similar law in April, which several groups say they plan to challenge. Proponents of those kinds of laws argue that the Ten Commandments have historical significance beyond their religious context and are foundational to US society. A sponsor of the Texas bill, Candy Noble, said the requirement to show the Ten Commandments concerns 'what is historically important to our nation educationally and judicially'. In Biblical narrative, the Ten Commandments were scrolled on two stone tablets and given to Moses by God on Mount Sinai. Moses was then given the instruction to spread the teaching. The commandments include rules such as 'Thou shall not kill' and 'Thou shall not steal', as well as prohibitions against other gods, taking 'the Lord's name in vain' and not honouring the Sabbath day. The Texas law requires public schools to display a poster or framed copy of an English version of the commandments, which should be no smaller than 16 by 20 inches or 41 by 51 centimetres. Translations and interpretations, however, vary across denominations, faiths and languages and may differ in homes and houses of worship. Several other groups have also vowed to challenge the law. They include the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and the Freedom From Religion Foundation. In a statement in May, the groups said the law 'is religiously coercive and interferes with families' right to direct children's religious education'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store