Man whose hearing loss was not diagnosed or treated for 10 years sues the HSE
A man whose hearing loss was not fully diagnosed or treated for ten years as a child has settled a High Court action against the HSE for €800,000.
Padraig Byrne, who has Down Syndrome, only got his first hearing assessment when he was 17 months old, but while a hearing loss was recorded it was claimed ,it was not adequately recognised or followed up until he was five years of age.
Advertisement
His counsel Hugh O'Keeffe SC, instructed by Damien Tansey Solicitors told the court that the treatment of the boy was 'wholly inadequate.' It wasn't until the boy was ten years of age that hearing aids to amplify sound were appropriately fitted and verified.
Counsel said a ten year delay was conceded in what was a very complicated case. At one stage, he said the little boy was given hearing aids ' that were clearly going to fail.'
Padraig did not have access to the full spectrum of speech sounds between birth and almost five years of age, and even then, his hearing aids were not optimized until he was ten years old, meaning that he did not have access to the speech spectrum during the optimal period for language development.
Counsel said it was their case had Padraig's hearing loss been diagnosed earlier he would have been given a chance to have a degree of independent living and the delay has had ' a discernible effect on Padraig's future independence.'.
Advertisement
The HSE, he said, conceded an earlier diagnosis may have benefitted the boy but it did not accept it had an effect on Padraig's independence.
Padraig Byrne, now aged 20 years from Co Carlow, had, through his mother June Byrne, sued the HSE.
In the proceedings, it was claimed the delay had resulted in delayed access to optimum speech and language at a time critical for the boy's development of speech and language.
The standard of audiological care that the boy received until September 2014, it was contended fell significantly below that reasonably expected, and the boy had been denied the best possible access to sound.
Advertisement
Approving the settlement Mr Justice Paul Coffey said he was satisfied that the very best had been achieved for Padraig and the offer was fair and reasonable.
Ireland
Richard Satchwell told gardaí he kept 'bits and pi...
Read More
In a separate case, a boy who the court heard suffered a likely net four-year delay in the diagnosis and treatment of his hearing loss settled his action for €310,000.
Oisin Flanagan, now aged 8 years of Portarlington, Co Offaly, had, through his mother Fiona Flanagan, sued the HSE. A breach of duty was admitted in the case.
It was claimed there was a failure to assess the boy's hearing as requiring amplification, and he was allegedly deprived of the amplification required to access the speech spectrum of sound, which at that time was critical to his speech and language .
Approving the settlement Mr Justice Coffey said it was fair and reasonable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Vapes threaten to undo gains in tackling dangers of tobacco, health leaders warn
Aggressively marketed vapes threaten to undo progress made on smoking control, according to the World Health Organization. Officials, speaking at the World Conference on Tobacco Control in Dublin, said efforts were stalling when it came to helping tobacco users to quit, campaigning in the media on the dangers, and imposing higher taxes on tobacco products. Young people were particularly vulnerable, it added. Countries should consider extending the graphic health warnings already required on cigarette packets to vapes or e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products and nicotine pouches, the WHO said. In many countries, tobacco products had become more affordable in the past decade, the report said, despite a WHO recommendation that cigarettes should be taxed at 75%. While cigarettes became less affordable in 46 countries, they became more affordable in 42 others, including 23 low or middle-income countries. In 133 countries, vapes and similar devices are now regulated in some way – up from only eight in 2007. However, 62 countries apply no regulations at all. The extent of regulation varies, with almost 90% of wealthier countries either regulating or banning sales, compared with 66% of middle-income and only 27% of poor countries. In the UK, disposable vapes were banned this month in a bid to prevent young people using them and on environmental grounds. Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO director general, said: 'Twenty years since the adoption of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, we have many successes to celebrate, but the tobacco industry continues to evolve and so must we.' The report highlights nicotine pouches and heated tobacco products, as well as vapes, as examples of new products. Dr Rüdiger Krech, the WHO's director of health promotion, said they were 'aggressively marketed in ways that undermine hard-won public health gains'. He said national regulators could not be expected to deal with an onslaught of 'thousands' of new products, which represented an attempt by tobacco companies to focus attention away from their 'major business' of traditional tobacco. He added, however, that it was 'hugely important to regulate these new products, because they are attracting children and young people to actually use nicotine, and that's with the addiction that it brings', which he said would lead to tobacco use. Data is not available for all countries, but surveys suggest about 6% of children aged 13 to 15 use e-cigarettes. The WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic focuses on six tobacco control measures and rates countries on how far they have implemented them. These include taxation, introducing smoke-free air legislation, and offering smokers help to quit. Other measures include monitoring tobacco use and prevention policies, bans on tobacco advertising and sponsorship, and warning people about the dangers via pack labels and information campaigns. Since 2007, 155 countries have implemented at least one of the six measures at 'best-practice' level, the report found, with four countries – Brazil, Mauritius, the Netherlands and Turkey – implementing the full package. However, 40 countries have no measure at best-practice level, and more than 30 countries still allow cigarettes to be sold with no mandatory health warning. It means billions of people remain unprotected from the ill effects of tobacco, which claims kills more than 7 million people a year, the report warned. Alison Cox, director of policy and advocacy at the NCD [non-communicable disease] Alliance, said: 'It's clear that there is a long way to go if we are to reduce the many unnecessary tobacco related illnesses and premature deaths still occurring globally. 'Raising taxes is one of the most effective measures that offers governments a triple win of reducing tobacco consumption, saving lives and healthcare costs, while raising much-needed revenue.'
The Independent
7 hours ago
- The Independent
Call for more taxes on smoking to make up cuts to global aid funding
Larger taxes should be placed on cigarettes around the world, experts have warned – with progress on tackling tobacco use having slowed for the first time in decades according to a new World Health Organisation (WHO) report. In the past decade the number of countries with at least one tobacco control measure in place – whether that's increased taxes, health warnings on packages, bans on advertising or smoking in public places – jumped from roughly 45 to more than 150. But of the seven such tobacco control measures recommended by the WHO, making cigarettes and other tobacco products more expensive through taxes has seen least progress. The WHO put the overall slowing of progress down to disruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic as well as challenges posed by the need to regulate a raft of new products like vapes, which the report said 'threaten[ed] to undo earlier progress made' in the more than 20 years since the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control was agreed . 'Raising prices through taxation is the most effective way to reduce tobacco use,' the WHO report said, adding that this measure had only risen from 13 per cent in 2018 to 15 per cent in 2024. Speaking at the World Conference on Tobacco Control in Dublin, WHO director general Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said: "The greatest gains have been made in developing countries where despite aggressive industry interference, governments and civil society have demonstrated that change for the better is possible. Yet, challenges remain.' 'Raising taxes on tobacco is a proven way to reduce tobacco use while generating revenues to reinvest in health." Dr Tedros added that raising taxes on cigarettes could help make up for cuts to global aid funding – particularly driven by Donald Trump and the US, but also including the UK and a number of other countries – which is expected to hit tobacco control efforts. 'And with [overseas development assistance] falling or the funding level for health falling, the taxes could be used for the gaps that are happening in many countries,' he said as he also called for more research on the health impact of new tobacco and nicotine products like vapes and smokeless tobacco. Andrew Black, who works on the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control said: 'We're facing a really challenging problem especially when it comes to securing the resources that are needed to fight tobacco'. 'What we really need to do is to encourage governments to look domestically for sources of revenue... The very obvious place to look is through tobacco taxation,' he added. A tool developed by Johns Hopkins University in the US found increasing taxes on a pack of cigarettes in Kenya by 75 per cent could raise enough money to cover more than three-quarters of the funds lost to the country through foreign aid cuts. Dr Guy Marks, president of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, said: 'The reduction in funding for global health is a huge catastrophe for many things. Actually, tobacco control is one area which should be less affected by this than most others [if governments raise tobacco taxes].' 'Why does that not happen? It does not happen, because governments are convinced that they actually gain more revenue for continuing to allow tobacco to be sold," he added. "Why is this the case? Because there are huge political and other interests in countries that support the sale of tobacco.' Global tobacco industry watchdog STOP estimated $1.8 trillion (£1.3tn) US dollars were lost worldwide to tobacco due to the costs of healthcare and lost wages from tobacco-related illness. But some major strides have been made towards controlling tobacco use around the world over the past ten years. More countries have applied graphic health warnings to cigarette packs since 2007 than any other measure, with bans on smoking in public places being the next most common new measure to be introduced. But in many cases countries applying stark health warnings to cigarette packs demand no such thing on smokeless tobacco, which the WHO said could, 'wrongly suggest that some products are harmless'. And while there has been a rise in rules or bans on e-cigarettes, also known as vapes, more than 60 countries have no restrictions on sales of vapes at all. Hazel Cheeseman, the chief executive of UK public health charity Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), said the progress was 'heartening' but that there was much left to be done. 'Tobacco taxes are one of the most effective ways to reduce smoking and can also raise revenue to support health systems. With 134 countries yet to make progress in this area this is an area of significantly untapped potential,' she said. 'Ending the harms from tobacco takes time and I hope the UK government will continue to provide assistance to other countries for the long term helping to secure a planet where no one dies from tobacco related illness.'
BreakingNews.ie
10 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Checklist on safe surgery practice not found in any medical records of 15 patients at Tipperary Hospital
A checklist to ensure HSE policy on safe surgery is followed was not found in any healthcare records of a random sample of 15 patients who had procedures at Tipperary University Hospital in Clonmel, Co Tipperary last year, according to an internal audit. A report by HSE auditors on emergency, elective and day procedures at Tipperary University Hospital (TippUH) concluded that it could only provide limited assurance about the adequacy and effectiveness of the governance, risk management and internal control system in the hospital in relation to safe surgery. Advertisement HSE auditors had carried out a retrospective random sample on the healthcare records of 15 patients out of a total of 96 who underwent surgery or an endoscopy at TippUH over a seven-day period in July 2024. The audit was designed to check that planned surgery was clearly documented and consent was obtained and recorded for each procedure. Although TippUH had amalgamated aspects of the checklist based on the HSE's National Policy and Procedure for Safe Surgery into its care plans, the report found the actual checklist was not present in any medical records reviewed in relation to a random sample of 15 procedures carried out at the hospital. It said there was a risk that variances between the hospital's care plans and the official checklist 'may result in sub-optimal implementation' of the HSE's policy on safe surgery 'with potential adverse consequences for patients.' Advertisement Among questions on the checklist which were not included in the hospital's care plan were ones asking if the procedure had been confirmed with a parent or guardian in the case of children and if prophylactic antibiotics were required. Others related to checking a healthcare record number matched the number on the patient's wristband and if protocols were in place if the patient suffered unexpected blood loss. The audit found that TippUH included some questions that were completed after an anaesthetic or block was administered which should have been carried out beforehand under the HSE checklist. It also revealed that the hospital did not document in medical records if a site-specific marking on a patient had been checked in the case of two patients. Advertisement HSE auditors found that TippUH was unable to provide records about the number of medical staff who had completed a mandatory course on safe surgery. They also concluded that recommended pre-surgery briefings among medical staff at TIppUH resembled 'nursing huddles' as opposed to multidisciplinary briefings. Noting that not all members of the theatre team were present at such meetings, the report said non-attendance of key members could result in critical information not being transferred which could result in potential harm to patients. HSE auditors issued a total of four recommendations including that all components of the HSE's checklist for safe surgery be incorporated into the relevant care plans at TippUH or alternatively that the checklist be adopted as a standalone document by the hospital. The report noted that TippUH management had agreed to the implementation of all the recommendations.
