Research finds 89% of female rugby players experience pain wearing boots
With the Women's Rugby World Cup coming to England in just over two weeks' time IDA Sports, a footwear brand designed for female athletes, called out what it describes as the 'iniquity' of boot design that leaves women not only lacking comfort when playing but exposed to a heightened risk of injury.
After scanning nearly 1,000 feet, of amateurs and players from across Premiership Women's Rugby, and surveying a further 330, IDA Sports found that comfort was the driving factor behind a player's boot choice, but one that was rarely met. While 78% said comfort was a top priority, nearly nine in 10 spoke of discomfort.
'The findings of our many years of research and development … illustrate the inequities that women athletes face when it comes to footwear,' said Laura Youngson, co-founder and chief executive of IDA Sports.
'We hope that the findings of this study will not only draw attention to the impactful data, but push more brands to invest in women athletes as we have proudly done over the last seven years.'
Some 45% of players surveyed said they specifically experienced pain under the first metatarsal bone, above their big toe. This is conventionally the location for a stud on a boot intended for a man.
Youngson has said that female players will often file down the stud under the toe to reduce the pressure on the bone and IDA Sports adopted a different template for the studs on its female-centred boots.
Sports scientists have also drawn attention to the risk of injury from studs not adapted specifically for women. Women's feet and arches are shaped differently to men and women also run in a different way. Studs under the metatarsal can risk injuring the bone, but also possibly increase the chance of damaging ligaments.
Dr Matt Whalan, a consultant to Fifa on female health in football and a principal partner at Figtree Physiotherapy, explained these risks to the Guardian in a 2020 interview. 'The simplest thing to do is to look at the contact with the ground and the step/pivot/twist,' he said.
'There's maybe a 10-kilo weight difference between male and female footballers and we're going to put them in a same boot, that has the same traction, the same stiffness and that needs the same muscle capacity to control the traction that that boot will give.
'If you've got a stud that is 15mm long and you're leaning really hard and having to change direction but you're 10 kilos lighter, do you need studs that long to get the same sort of traction? When you're getting a lot of traction that you don't need then that's when you start to put things at risk.'
Guardian
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Research finds 89% of female rugby players experience pain wearing boots
Wearing boots designed for men causes discomfort for a majority of female rugby players, according to new research which finds as many as 89% of athletes experience pain from wearing shoes not built for women's feet. With the Women's Rugby World Cup coming to England in just over two weeks' time IDA Sports, a footwear brand designed for female athletes, called out what it describes as the 'iniquity' of boot design that leaves women not only lacking comfort when playing but exposed to a heightened risk of injury. After scanning nearly 1,000 feet, of amateurs and players from across Premiership Women's Rugby, and surveying a further 330, IDA Sports found that comfort was the driving factor behind a player's boot choice, but one that was rarely met. While 78% said comfort was a top priority, nearly nine in 10 spoke of discomfort. 'The findings of our many years of research and development … illustrate the inequities that women athletes face when it comes to footwear,' said Laura Youngson, co-founder and chief executive of IDA Sports. 'We hope that the findings of this study will not only draw attention to the impactful data, but push more brands to invest in women athletes as we have proudly done over the last seven years.' Some 45% of players surveyed said they specifically experienced pain under the first metatarsal bone, above their big toe. This is conventionally the location for a stud on a boot intended for a man. Youngson has said that female players will often file down the stud under the toe to reduce the pressure on the bone and IDA Sports adopted a different template for the studs on its female-centred boots. Sports scientists have also drawn attention to the risk of injury from studs not adapted specifically for women. Women's feet and arches are shaped differently to men and women also run in a different way. Studs under the metatarsal can risk injuring the bone, but also possibly increase the chance of damaging ligaments. Dr Matt Whalan, a consultant to Fifa on female health in football and a principal partner at Figtree Physiotherapy, explained these risks to the Guardian in a 2020 interview. 'The simplest thing to do is to look at the contact with the ground and the step/pivot/twist,' he said. 'There's maybe a 10-kilo weight difference between male and female footballers and we're going to put them in a same boot, that has the same traction, the same stiffness and that needs the same muscle capacity to control the traction that that boot will give. 'If you've got a stud that is 15mm long and you're leaning really hard and having to change direction but you're 10 kilos lighter, do you need studs that long to get the same sort of traction? When you're getting a lot of traction that you don't need then that's when you start to put things at risk.' Guardian
Irish Independent
2 days ago
- Irish Independent
Irish soccer players invited to join group ‘owed billions' over contract and transfer rules
League of Ireland players and Irish players who took part in professional soccer in the UK and EU have been invited to join a 'potentially billion-dollar' class action claim against Fifa and possibly other soccer associations.
RTÉ News
5 days ago
- RTÉ News
EU ruling enables challenge of CAS outcomes by national courts
National courts must be allowed to conduct in-depth reviews of arbitral awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to ensure they are compliant with EU law, the European Court of Justice has ruled. The ruling comes after RFC Seraing were banned from registering new players and also fined by soccer's governing body FIFA in 2015 when the Belgian club signed agreements with a company that transferred part of the economic rights to players. FIFA ruled their deal with a Maltese company Doyen Sports as a breach because third parties are not allowed to hold economic rights to players, with the sanctions being upheld by the CAS - sport's top court - as well as the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. However, Seraing brought the case before Belgian courts to challenge the compatibility of FIFA's rules with EU law. Although CAS awards are considered final and cannot be relitigated, the Belgian court approached the Court of Justice, which said such a scope is contrary to EU law. "It is essential that recourse to arbitration does not undermine the rights and freedoms that the fundamental rules of EU law guarantee athletes, clubs and, more broadly, any other person practising a professional sport or pursuing an economic activity linked to that sport," it said. "On those grounds, the Court of Justice rules today that the national courts or tribunals must be empowered to carry out... an in-depth judicial review as to whether arbitral awards made by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (the CAS) are consistent with EU public policy." The Court of Justice found that in Seraing's case, FIFA made the club go to CAS to settle the dispute, rather than letting the club choose how to resolve it - a setup common in resolving sports-related disputes. "The Court rules that, in order to ensure effective judicial protection for athletes, clubs and other individuals who might be affected as a result of pursuing a sports-related economic activity within the European Union, the awards made by the CAS must be amenable to effective judicial review," it added. The ruling effectively undermines the absolute finality of CAS decisions, especially when such decisions are based on arbitration clauses imposed unilaterally by sports bodies. Jean-Louis Dupont and Martin Hissel, the sports lawyers representing the club, welcomed the judgment. "It is clear that the particularly severe disciplinary sanctions imposed on RFC Seraing by FIFA, and upheld by the CAS, were the result of a procedure that was completely unlawful under EU law," they said in a statement. "The serious damage caused must now be fully compensated... the CJEU has put an end to the procedural deception by which international sports federations attempted to evade the genuine application of EU law by imposing compulsory arbitration outside the EU." Apart from receiving a two-year transfer ban from FIFA, the Belgian second-tier club were also fined 150,000 Swiss francs (€161,058) in 2015. The Court of Justice also said that any country's laws that treat such CAS awards as immune from further scrutiny are incompatible with EU law. "The Court adds that a national court or tribunal is required to disapply of its own motion any national legislation or rules of a sports association that would hinder such effective judicial protection as regards individuals," it said. Currently, all CAS awards are subject to review by the Swiss Federal Tribunal (SFT), Switzerland's highest court of law, with an average of 6% of decisions being appealed each year. CAS acknowledged that the Court of Justice's judgement determined that reviewing of CAS awards should be "limited to EU public policy only". "CAS resolves sporting disputes worldwide and already applies EU law when required," it said in a statement. "Whilst the vast majority of cases before CAS concern contractual and disciplinary issues not governed by EU law, matters related to EU competition law can already be challenged before EU state courts following a previous CJEU judgement." That judgement relates to when the Court of Justice ruled that the International Skating Union's arbitration rules may conflict with EU competition law. The decision had challenged the ISU's athlete ineligibility rules. In 2015, a German court allowed a lawsuit by five-time Olympic champion Claudia Pechstein seeking damages from the ISU over a doping ban to be heard. A civil court allowed the case to be heard after CAS ruled against it.
