logo
Marine heat waves are spreading around the world

Marine heat waves are spreading around the world

Boston Globe09-06-2025
Scientists define marine heat waves in different ways. But it's clear that as the planet's climate changes, the oceans are being fundamentally altered as they absorb excess heat trapped in the atmosphere from greenhouse gases, which are emitted when fossil fuels are burned.
Hotter oceans are causing drastic changes to marine life, sea levels, and weather patterns.
Advertisement
Some of the most visible casualties of ocean warming have been coral reefs. When ocean temperatures rise too much, corals can bleach and die. About 84 percent of reefs worldwide experienced bleaching-level heat stress at some point between January 2023 and March 2025, according to a recent report.
Last year, the warmest on record, sea levels rose faster than scientists expected. Research showed that most of that rise in sea levels came from ocean water expanding as it warms, which is known as thermal expansion, not from melting glaciers and ice sheets, which in past years were the biggest contributors to rising seas.
Advertisement
Excess heat in the oceans can also affect weather patterns, making hurricanes more likely to rapidly intensify and become more destructive. In the southwest Pacific, last year's ocean heat contributed to a record-breaking streak of tropical cyclones hitting the Philippines.
'If we understand how global warming is affecting extreme events, that is essential information to try to anticipate what's going on, what's next,' said Marta Marcos, a physicist at the University of the Balearic Islands in Spain.
Marcos was the lead author of a recent study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that found that climate change has been responsible for the overwhelming majority of marine heat waves in recent decades.
Some of the earliest research on mass die-offs associated with marine heat waves, before there was a name for them, came from the Mediterranean, which has been warming three to five times faster than the ocean at large. Joaquim Garrabou, a marine conservation ecologist at the Institut de Ciencies del Mar in Barcelona, Spain, started studying these events after witnessing a die-off of sponges and coral in 1999.
He and other scientists believed that with climate change, these die-offs would reoccur. 'The reality is moving even faster than what we thought,' he said. 'Having these mass mortality events is the new normal, instead of something infrequent, which it should be.'
In 2012, a marine heat wave in the Gulf of Maine highlighted the risk these events pose to fisheries. The Northern shrimp population went from an estimated 27.25 billion in 2010 to 2.8 billion two years later, according to modeling by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission.
Advertisement
'This disappearance of the shrimp was just shocking,' said Anne Richards, a retired research fisheries biologist who worked at NOAA's Northeast Fisheries Science Center at the time.
Her research pointed to a significant culprit: Longfin squid, drawn north by warmer water, were eating the shrimp.
The fishery has not yet reopened. By 2023, the Northern shrimp population was estimated to have dropped to around 200 million.
Commercial fishing has always been difficult, but now, 'climate change is taking that to another level,' said Kathy Mills, a senior scientist at the Gulf of Maine Research Institute.
Complicating matters is the fact that much of the research on marine heat waves comes from just a few countries, including Australia, the United States, China, Canada, Spain, and the United Kingdom.
'There are lots of regions around the world where monitoring isn't as good as other places, and so we don't really know what's happening,' said Dan Smale, a community ecologist at the United Kingdom's Marine Biological Association.
Eventually, parts of the ocean might enter a constant state of marine heat wave, at least by today's common definition. Some scientists see today's shorter-term spikes as practice for this future.
Alistair Hobday, a biological oceanographer at Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, has been conducting public briefings with marine heat wave forecasts months ahead of time.
People are tuning in — and responding.
The critically endangered red handfish lives off the coast of Tasmania, crawling along the seafloor on fins shaped like hands. These unusual fish have only been found within two small patches of rocky reef and sea grass meadow.
Advertisement
In late 2023, Hobday's forecast predicted potentially deadly marine heat waves. Researchers from the University of Tasmania's Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, with support from the Australian Department of Climate Change, took a drastic step. They transferred 25 red handfish to an aquarium until the temperatures fell.
Jemina Stuart-Smith, an ecologist at the University of Tasmania, described those weeks as the most stressful time of her life. 'If it all went wrong,' she said, 'you're talking about the potential extinction of an entire species.'
After three months, 18 fish were returned to the ocean. Three had died, and four were enrolled in a captive breeding program.
Scientists recognize that temporary fixes can only do so much in the face of long-term warming.
'It's kind of putting a Band-Aid on a broken leg,' said Kathryn Smith, a marine ecologist and postdoctoral researcher at the Marine Biological Association.
But those studying today's extreme events still hope their work gives people some visibility into the future of the world's oceans, Hobday said. 'Clever people, if you tell them about the future,' he said, 'can think of all kinds of things to do differently.'
This article originally appeared in
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The next ‘Big One' on the San Andreas fault might not be the earthquake we expect, researchers say
The next ‘Big One' on the San Andreas fault might not be the earthquake we expect, researchers say

Los Angeles Times

time7 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

The next ‘Big One' on the San Andreas fault might not be the earthquake we expect, researchers say

What could the next mega-earthquake on California's notorious San Andreas fault look like? Would it be a repeat of 1857, when an earthquake estimated at magnitude 7.7 to 7.9 ruptured the fault from Monterey County all the way through Los Angeles County? Would it be more akin to the great 1906 San Francisco earthquake, which began just offshore of the city and ruptured in two directions, toward Humboldt County and Santa Cruz County? Don't bet on an identical sequel. That's the implication of a study published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The report, coauthored by scientists at Caltech in Pasadena, studied a massive earthquake that ruptured in the southeast Asian country of Myanmar on March 28 — on a fault known for being eerily similar to the San Andreas. The earthquake ended up rupturing a much longer section of the fault than scientists expected, given the seismology of the region. The implications of this study are that 'earthquakes never come back exactly the same way,' Solene L. Antoine, a postdoctoral fellow at Caltech and the study's lead author, said in an interview. 'It came as a surprise that you could get such a long rupture,' said Jean-Philippe Avouac, a coauthor of the study and a professor of geology and mechanical and civil engineering at Caltech. March's Mandalay earthquake devastated Myanmar, killing at least 3,791 people and an additional 63 people in Thailand. High-rise buildings were damaged as far away as Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam and homes were damaged in the Ruili area of China. Damage was estimated at $1.9 billion, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. It was the most powerful earthquake in Myanmar in at least 79 years. The magnitude 7.7 earthquake ruptured an astonishing 317 miles of the Sagaing fault, a finding based on Antoine's analysis of satellite data showing earth movement after the quake. That's the longest seismic rupture ever documented on a continent. By comparison, California's 1906 earthquake ruptured 296 miles of the San Andreas fault; and the 1857 earthquake, 225 miles. Longer seismic ruptures have been found only on subduction megathrusts deep underneath the ocean. What's clear from the study is that while California's next 'Big One' may share some characteristics of previously documented devastating quakes, it's unlikely to be an exact replay. As the recent experience in Myanmar shows, even well-documented faults can behave in surprising ways. The next step is to develop a model simulating earthquakes over many millennia for the San Andreas fault, which the authors plan to do in the future. But the San Andreas fault 'is far more complex,' Avouac said. 'It's not going to come soon, because it's quite a heavy calculation.' Still, such simulations would provide a model of 'all possible scenarios so that we have a better view of the range of possible ruptures that could happen.' For instance, maybe the San Andreas fault will rupture in smaller, separate earthquakes, Avouac said. Or it could be a much larger earthquake — rupturing the fault not just from Monterey to Los Angeles counties, but perhaps all the way into San Bernardino, Riverside and Imperial counties, which would possibly exceed magnitude 8. Such a quake would be the largest simultaneous disaster in modern California history, with huge swaths of the state wracked by powerful seismic shaking all at once. By comparison, the 1994 Northridge earthquake's footprint was relatively constrained, severely affecting only a portion of Los Angeles County, especially the San Fernando Valley — related to its relatively smaller magnitude of 6.7. But while modeling previous activity on the San Andreas fault will provide a glimpse into the wide range of possible outcomes, it will not pinpoint precisely when the next great quake will strike. 'We can't just expect the exact same thing to happen,' Antoine said. 'It is a matter of just showing what scenarios are possible, the diversity of scenarios and seeing what are the consequences of each of those scenarios.' Sometimes, Avouac said, 'it's quiet for a long time, nothing happens ... stress is building up, the fault is locked for a long time, nothing happens, and then, boom, you have a large earthquake.' 'And then you have other periods during which you have a lot of [seismic] activity, but these earthquakes are all smaller,' Avouac said. But 'smaller' earthquakes, in the minds of researchers, are still big to the layperson. In the study's simulations, there are periods where earthquakes around magnitude 7.7 are common. In other periods, earthquakes max out at magnitude 7.5 or so, but are more frequent. The entire length of the Sagaing fault — including areas that didn't rupture in the March earthquake — is 750 miles, north to south, from the Himalayas to the Andaman Sea, and helps accommodate the northward push of the Indian tectonic plate. The fact that 317 miles of the Sagaing fault ruptured in March was surprising to scientists. Only about 170 miles had been quiet seismically for more than a century, having last ruptured in 1839. Scientists call these 'seismic gaps' — particular areas of a fault that haven't recently ruptured. Generally, scientists would've expected only this long-dormant 170-mile piece of the Sagaing fault to rupture, Avouac said, but not more recently ruptured sections. That includes a 100-mile stretch that ruptured in large earthquakes in 1929 and 1930, and a 50-mile stretch that went off in a pair of quakes in 1946 and 1956. Instead, even those fault segments ruptured in the big March earthquake. So what gives? A possible explanation is the Sagaing fault's extraordinary smoothness. 'And people have observed that when the fault is very smooth, the rupture ... tends to propagate at a velocity' so fast that it results in an 'extremely elongated rupture,' Avouac said. The study also published the results of a computer model simulation looking at how earthquakes might rupture along sections of the entire 750-mile long Sagaing fault. The code, developed by study coauthor Kyungjae Im of Caltech, suggests that over a hypothetical 1,400-year period, there would be no repeatable patterns. In other words, earthquakes didn't seem to re-occur like clockwork, rupturing the same stretch of fault in a repeatable, predictable pattern. 'There is complexity here. And this is because each time you have an earthquake, it redistributes the stress on the fault, which is going to influence the next earthquake,' Avouac said. 'There's a self-induced complexity in the process, and that leads to a bit of randomness.' There is one certainty, which is bound to disappoint anyone who shares the hope that a 'Big One' simply won't ever strike California again. 'There will be an earthquake at some point,' Antoine said. 'If there is stress building up on the fault, the fault won't hold forever.' Further research and observations are essential to refine models of future possible earthquakes, including from the Sentinel satellites, which are operated by the European Space Agency, the authors said. The other coauthors of the study are Rajani Shrestha and Chris Milliner of Caltech; Chris Rollins of Earth Sciences New Zealand; Kang Wang of the Washington-based EarthScope Consortium; and Kejie Chen of the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, China.

Attention stargazers! It's time for one of the best meteor showers of the year — the Perseids
Attention stargazers! It's time for one of the best meteor showers of the year — the Perseids

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Attention stargazers! It's time for one of the best meteor showers of the year — the Perseids

You know that summer is winding down when it's time for the Perseid meteor shower. The shower is considered one of if not the best of the year, mainly due to it being summer in the northern hemisphere, when the skies tend to be clear (unless there's smoke) and the weather is warmer. This is contrary to the Geminid meteor shower, which rivals the Perseids in terms of how many meteors can be seen per hour, but occurs in December when it tends to be cloudier and much colder. You can catch a meteor on any given night, particularly if you're outside of a city, away from light pollution. But meteor showers are special. Instead of the periodic streak against the starry sky, you can potentially see a dozen or more an hour. When to watch We get this stunning and typically reliable shower each year thanks to debris left over from Comet 109P/Swift-Tuttle, which has an orbit of 133 years and was last in the inner solar system in 1992. Every year, Earth plows through the comet's debris, which in turn enters Earth's atmosphere, burning up as beautiful streaks in the sky. Try this interactive map that shows how Earth passes through the meteor shower: Most meteor showers get their name from the constellation from which the meteors seem to originate, called the radiant. In this case the radiant is the constellation Perseus, which begins to rise in the northeast around 9 p.m. local time. But it's important to note that you don't have to look directly at the constellation. Just look up. This year, the shower runs from July 17 to Aug. 23, but it peaks on the night of Aug. 12-13. On this night, under ideal conditions — dark, cloud-free, smoke-free, clear skies — the shower could produce roughly 100 meteors per hour. However, you're unlikely to see that many or even half of them this year due to one major problem: the moon. Down but not out The moon will be roughly 84 per cent illuminated, which means it will wash out all but the brightest meteors. "This year, the moon just kills them," said Peter Brown, Canada Research Chair in Planetary Small Bodies and professor at Western University's department of physics and astronomy in London, Ont. The other issue is smoke from wildfires. "It's just like cloud. It's going to decrease the the amount of light that gets through," Brown said. "So, you know, if you have the full moon and there's still quite a bit of smoke or high cloud, you're probably only looking at a handful of meteors an hour." But the great thing about the Perseids is that they tend to produce very bright meteors and even some fireballs. As well, you can get some really good "earth grazers" — meteors that skim our atmosphere. These last longer than a typical meteor streaking across the sky. "On the 12th, and even better, on the 13th, there'll be an hour or two right after sunset where the moon either won't be there [or] it'll be low and the radiant is low, but the activity is high enough and you'll see the grazers," Brown said."You're not going to see 50 of those an hour, but you might see a handful, and they last a long time. They're super spectacular. If ever a meteor looks like fireworks, it's a grazing Perseid meteor." So, the message is, don't give up. Grab a blanket, lie down — with the moon behind you — and look up. The Perseids rarely disappoint. "Yes, the moon will be up. It'll be bright, but there'll be so many meteors and bright ones, you'll still see a pretty decent show," Brown said. WATCH | It's time for the Perseids, one of the best meteor showers of the year Solve the daily Crossword

Attention stargazers! It's time for one of the best meteor showers of the year — the Perseids
Attention stargazers! It's time for one of the best meteor showers of the year — the Perseids

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Attention stargazers! It's time for one of the best meteor showers of the year — the Perseids

You know that summer is winding down when it's time for the Perseid meteor shower. The shower is considered one of if not the best of the year, mainly due to it being summer in the northern hemisphere, when the skies tend to be clear (unless there's smoke) and the weather is warmer. This is contrary to the Geminid meteor shower, which rivals the Perseids in terms of how many meteors can be seen per hour, but occurs in December when it tends to be cloudier and much colder. You can catch a meteor on any given night, particularly if you're outside of a city, away from light pollution. But meteor showers are special. Instead of the periodic streak against the starry sky, you can potentially see a dozen or more an hour. When to watch We get this stunning and typically reliable shower each year thanks to debris left over from Comet 109P/Swift-Tuttle, which has an orbit of 133 years and was last in the inner solar system in 1992. Every year, Earth plows through the comet's debris, which in turn enters Earth's atmosphere, burning up as beautiful streaks in the sky. Try this interactive map that shows how Earth passes through the meteor shower: Most meteor showers get their name from the constellation from which the meteors seem to originate, called the radiant. In this case the radiant is the constellation Perseus, which begins to rise in the northeast around 9 p.m. local time. But it's important to note that you don't have to look directly at the constellation. Just look up. This year, the shower runs from July 17 to Aug. 23, but it peaks on the night of Aug. 12-13. On this night, under ideal conditions — dark, cloud-free, smoke-free, clear skies — the shower could produce roughly 100 meteors per hour. However, you're unlikely to see that many or even half of them this year due to one major problem: the moon. Down but not out The moon will be roughly 84 per cent illuminated, which means it will wash out all but the brightest meteors. "This year, the moon just kills them," said Peter Brown, Canada Research Chair in Planetary Small Bodies and professor at Western University's department of physics and astronomy in London, Ont. The other issue is smoke from wildfires. "It's just like cloud. It's going to decrease the the amount of light that gets through," Brown said. "So, you know, if you have the full moon and there's still quite a bit of smoke or high cloud, you're probably only looking at a handful of meteors an hour." But the great thing about the Perseids is that they tend to produce very bright meteors and even some fireballs. As well, you can get some really good "earth grazers" — meteors that skim our atmosphere. These last longer than a typical meteor streaking across the sky. "On the 12th, and even better, on the 13th, there'll be an hour or two right after sunset where the moon either won't be there [or] it'll be low and the radiant is low, but the activity is high enough and you'll see the grazers," Brown said."You're not going to see 50 of those an hour, but you might see a handful, and they last a long time. They're super spectacular. If ever a meteor looks like fireworks, it's a grazing Perseid meteor." So, the message is, don't give up. Grab a blanket, lie down — with the moon behind you — and look up. The Perseids rarely disappoint. "Yes, the moon will be up. It'll be bright, but there'll be so many meteors and bright ones, you'll still see a pretty decent show," Brown said. WATCH | It's time for the Perseids, one of the best meteor showers of the year

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store