
Gas prices climb in EU for first time since 2022? Who pays more?
The EU is feeling the bite of energy prices going up again.
Gas reached its highest cost on record in the second half of 2024, Eurostat reports.
The average rate is now €12.33 per 100 kWh, up from €11.04 in the first half of last year.
It is also the first time that prices in the EU are climbing up, following the 2022 energy crisis.
However, unlike three years ago, when the war in Ukraine and the cut in Russian gas imports (from 45% in 2021 to a projected 13% in 2025) sent prices soaring, this time, taxes are mainly responsible for the spike.
"The increase is largely driven by raised taxes in many EU countries, as earlier alleviation measures were scaled back.", says Eurostat.
Considering both EU and extra-EU countries, price differences are huge.
They range from €18.93 per 100 kWh in Sweden and €16.71 in the Netherlands, to €1.73 in Georgia, €2.13 in Turkey, €3.15 in Hungary, €4.56 in Croatia, €4.92 in Serbia, €5.13 in Bosnia-Herzegovina and €5.41 in Romania.
None of the countries with the cheapest gas prices - excluding Croatia and Romania - cut Russian gas supplies.
The picture is slightly different when actual purchasing power is taken into account.
In the EU, Portugal and Italy are actually the countries paying the most for natural gas.
Croatia and Romania could cut reliance on Russia while keeping prices low thanks to long-term and ambitious energy strategies.
Croatia's crucial liquefied natural gas terminal on Krk became operational in 2021 and the country now plans to ramp up gas production by 82% in the next three years.
Romania is one of the most energy-independent countries in the EU, and is planning to go completely autonomous, gas-wise.
Pivotal to it is its Neptune Deep offshore project. It's expected to become operational in 2027 and is aiming to double Romanian gas production.
"Europe must become a refuge," French President Emmanuel Macron said last week, as he pledged to invest an 'additional' €100 million to help his country attract foreign scientists — in particular from the US.
The "Choose France for Science" scheme came in response to the Trump administration's slashing of research funding in the US.
But despite Macron's big and bold invitation to American scientists, French scientists and researchers more generally say they themselves are being worn down by government cuts.
In a joint statement issued last Monday, a collection of education institutions and research unions claimed Macron's policies since 2017 had "considerably weakened higher education and research in France".
In February, the government slashed the 2025 budget for higher education and research by €1 billion, and a further €493 million in cuts was announced in April. This has had a direct knock-on effect on the work and working conditions of researchers across a range of fields.
"70% of university buildings in France are in a state of disrepair, while researchers in France are working on extremely tight budgets and the majority of institutions are in the red," Virginie Saint-James, Secretary General of Sup' Recherche UNSA, a union for academic researchers, told Euronews.
"We are very keen to welcome individuals who have been labelled "scientific refugees", but that does not mean the situation is perfect here," she added.
France's Aix-Marseille University has unlocked its own funds to welcome top-level researchers, with the institution announcing a €15 million programme to host US scientists over the next three years.
Under the scheme, a select number of scientists are to be paid a salary of €250,000 each per year, with a €500,000 to €600,000 budget to complete their research.
Saint-James told Euronews that the contrast with what domestic researchers are facing is stark.
"These announcements are very surprising and bear no resemblance to what researchers earn in France, when you think that the average gross salary of a teacher-researcher in France is €63,000 per year," she said.
"There are huge double standards. Some researchers in France have to cancel train tickets for thesis juries because their lab doesn't have any money."
Others are concerned that Macron and Europe are focused on welcoming scientists, but not valuing the importance of work conducted by researchers in other fields.
"The discussion has revolved around attracting researchers from strategic sectors which conceal clear economic motivations", said Boris Gralak, general secretary of the National Union of Scientific Research.
"The focus has been on getting scientists over those who work in the field of AI and climate change, but in reality the Trump administration's cuts are occurring across the board in research, also affecting gender studies for example. So why is nobody talking about bringing these professionals over?"
Meanwhile, a number of young French scientists are growing increasingly disenchanted with the sector because of poor working conditions.
This was the case for 32-year old Elise Bordet, who had always dreamt of pursuing a career in science. She holds a PhD in immunology.
"'Your salary as a researcher will be pocket money, it's good that your boyfriend earns a good living' — that's what my PhD supervisor said to me," recalled Bordet on LinkedIn recently.
The struggles of finding work led Bordet to leave science altogether and set up her own business.
She told Euronews that many other young scientists feel the same.
"On average you are expected to accept short-term research contracts for around 10 years before landing a full-time contract," she explained. "In my field of research, I would be aiming to be paid €1,800 per month after a decade of work."
On top of this, Bordet remains sceptical that conditions in French laboratories can really live up to what many US scientists are used to.
"France is behind on the US, in many labs we use complicated and lengthy old-fashioned techniques to cut down on costs and are still working on very old software in many places," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
'Simply apocalyptic' and 'too risky': Papers react to Gaza aid distribution deaths
With the press focused on news of the ongoing war between Israel and Iran, the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip is deteriorating. The New York Times reports that seeking aid has gotten "just too risky" for some Gazans. "I'll never try again" reads the headline, quoting a Palestinian man who says he saw many dead and injured people while trying to get aid. He tried to get supplies twice and didn't manage to get anything both times, the paper reports. According to The New York Times, more than 70 Palestinians were killed on Monday and Tuesday while trying to reach aid distribution points. Left-wing French daily Le Monde headlines with "In Gaza, humiliation and death to get food". The paper says that dozens of people die every day while trying to reach aid. The paper then talks about a video filmed on June 11 of starving Gazans on their feet for hours, waiting for the start of the aid distribution. When it finally begins, Le Monde describes an image of a "wild, desperate stampede". An Israeli activist interviewed by the paper describes the video as "simply apocalyptic", saying that "this is the hell we've created in Gaza". Finally, the British daily The Guardian has an editorial on what it calls "Gaza's engineered famine". "Stop arming the slaughter – or lose the rule of law", writes the paper. It says that while Palestinians starve, Western governments "defend Israel and dismantle the very rules they claim to uphold". We turn next to Kosovo, where it's been 26 years after the massacre carried out by Serbs in Pristina during the 1998-1999 war. Balkan Insight reports in collaboration with the BIRN (Balkan Investigative Reporting Network) that the trial over the Pristina massacre finally started on Monday. The analysis says it's still unclear whether justice is being served. Many of the defendants didn't show up in court and are being tried in absentia because they are out of reach to the Kosovo authorities. The paper says there is almost no judicial cooperation with the Serbian legal authorities. Pristina Insight reports that one Serb has since been found guilty of wartime rape of an ethnic Albanian woman. He has been sentenced to 15 years in jail. The trial was held behind closed doors to protect the victim's identity. The paper says that few wartime rape survivors in Kosovo have spoken out about what they went through because of the social stigma around sexual abuse that remains hard to break. In Brazil, actions threatening the Amazon contradict President Lula's environmental promises. The Conversation writes about Brazil's "bill of devastation" that's pushing the Amazon towards a tipping point in terms of temperature and longer dry seasons. The bill has Lula's implicit approval, despite his climate ambitions. The bill is said to relieve "low-impact projects" of unnecessary bureaucracy. But the paper says it will allow the state to attract investment by loosening environmental restrictions. Another project is putting the river in danger. French left-wing L'Humanité reports that Brazil is auctioning off oil and gas concessions "to the delight of the oil and gas industry". The concessions will be around the mouth of the Amazon River. Environmentalists believe that Brazil's credibility on climate issues has been seriously damaged and thatLula is betting on oil and gas expansion to stimulate economic growth. Finally, Brad Pitt has been working on a new film with a straightforward title: F1: The Movie. The Telegraph calls it Pitt's new 'spectacular racing drama' that's like "Barbie for Dads". Pitt's pre-premiere fashion is also dividing the papers The Times calls it "Brad's midlife crisis wardrobe" and according to Harper's Bazaar, he has unleashed his "inner fashion guy" with his latest outfits – velvet blue vest, an all-yellow fit and a tie-dye ensemble.


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Iran conflict to derail EU review of Israeli Association agreement
The EU is unlikely to suspend its association agreement with Israel in the context of its current conflict with Iran, sources familiar with the issue have told Euronews. Last month a majority of the EU foreign ministers backed a Dutch proposal to review the bloc's ties with Israel over its actions in Gaza. The EU's diplomatic corps, the External Action Service (EEAS), has been reviewing the bloc's wide-ranging trade and cooperation agreement with Israel over its military offensive in Gaza and the West Bank as well as its blocking of food, fuel, water and basic medical supplies to the besieged population. The report was initiated to establish whether Israel violated its human rights obligations under Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, a broad-ranging pact that defines the trading and diplomatic relations between both sides. On Monday, EU foreign ministers will debate the review, with several EU diplomatic sources saying it expected to find Israel in breach of the provisions. But two sources familiar with the issue told Euronews that member states will not respond by suspending in all, or even part the agreement with Israel due to its war with Iran. Some countries remain keen to push for a suspension. 'We can safely assume what the review will say; if it's going to be in any way credible it'll say Israel is in breach of Article 2,' an EU diplomat from a country which supported the review told Euronews, adding: 'The main matter of business is getting a ceasefire in Gaza – and whatever we decide to do, it should be aimed at getting at that.' But a momentum of pressure recently applied to Israel has now slowed due to the war with Iran, the two sources said. 'The pendulum has swing back to [support for] Israel." 'It's unlikely the EU will suspend EU-Israel agreement due to Iran Israel war,' one of the sources said. The position of Germany in the negotiations is also critical to the discussions as a decision to suspend part of the agreement under qualified majority voting will require the weight of Germany. Last month German chancellor Friedrich Merz shifted the support of Germany - traditionally a stalwart ally of Israel - behind the decision to review the Association Agreement, saying he no longer understood the Israeli army's goal in Gaza. 'To harm the civilian population in such a way… can no longer be justified as a fight against terrorism,' Merz said at the time. However, Merz has strongly supported Israel in the context of the current strikes on Iran saying at the G7 on Tuesday that 'Israel is doing the dirty work for the rest of us'. 'The strikes on Iran should be additional pressure on Israel to suspend the association agreement,' Martin Konecki, who heads the European Middle East Project, told Euronews. 'But now it could create the opposite, it will literally be reduced and it brings the attention away from Gaza,' he said. EU's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has reiterated EU calls for a diplomatic resolution to the Israel-Iran war. And again called on all sides to 'abide by international law, and de-escalate the situation'. 'We will not lose sight of what is happening in Gaza... we again call for immediate full aid access, ceasefire, and the release of hostages,' she added. Israel rejected the EU decision to review the bloc's trade and cooperation pact with the country over its intensified offensive in Gaza. "We completely reject the direction taken in the statement, which reflects a total misunderstanding of the complex reality Israel is facing," Marmorstein wrote on X,' Israeli foreign ministry spokesperson Oren Marmorstein said at the time of the decision. The EU's so-called Equal Treatment directive — aimed at extending protection against discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief, disability, age, or sexual orientation — has reached a dead end, several EU officials told Euronews. First proposed by the European Commission in 2008, the anti-discrimination bill has remained stalled in the European Council, despite progress in the European Parliament. The Council, which represents the 27 EU member states, has been unable to reach a consensus for years. In February, the EU executive removed the proposal from its work programme for 2025, arguing that it was blocked and "further progress was unlikely". The draft bill was added to those to be withdrawn within six months, prompting the Polish presidency of the Council to try to reach an agreement under time pressure, but to no avail. 'While a very large majority of delegations has long supported the Directive, [...], certain others have expressed concerns and requested clarifications as relating to the perceived lack of legal certainty, the division of competences and compliance with the principle of subsidiarity, and the impact of the proposal, in particular in terms of potential financial implications,' reads a Council document seen by Euronews, sent by the presidency to member states on 6 June. According to an impact assessment by the European Parliament Research Service (EPRS), around three-quarters of EU citizens would potentially benefit from the directive's protection, while implementation costs would remain 'within acceptable limits'. However, three member states — Czechia, Germany, and Italy — still oppose the draft compromise text, which requires unanimous support from all 27 countries before negotiations can begin with the Parliament and the Commission to finalise the bill. 'In the absence of any additional drafting suggestions from the Member States with outstanding concerns, the Presidency has not been able to propose a new compromise text,' reads another leaked document from the same date, also seen by Euronews. The Equal Treatment directive is expected to be discussed during a meeting of EU ministers responsible for social policy on Thursday. They will hold a policy debate on whether a compromise is within reach and whether there is a need for an alternative proposal. The six-month Polish presidency of the Council ends later this month, and while the Danish presidency will try to continue working on the file from July, several EU officials claim that reaching an agreement remains very 'unlikely'. An EU diplomat described the pursuit of a compromise as 'thorny', pointing to the Commission's continued interest in withdrawing the proposal — a move some member states also support. Instead, the Commission plans to focus on non-legislative initiatives in 2025, such as the already unveiled roadmap on women's rights and the forthcoming strategies on LGBTIQ rights and anti-racism — a shift that has drawn criticism from NGOs and civil society organisations. 'Roadmaps are not laws; they are political statements with no enforceable protections,' argued Julie Pascoët, policy manager at the European Network Against Racism (ENAR). 'For these strategies to be effective, the EU must use them to highlight the urgent need for stronger legislation and concrete action,' Pascoët added. The 2008 anti-discrimination bill aimed to close critical protection gaps in areas such as social protection (including social security and healthcare), education, and access to goods and services, including housing. 'Whilst it is extremely disappointing that the Commission goes along with the global political trend against equality policies, the unacceptable fact is that a small group of countries, led by Germany, have been blocking the adoption of this directive for 17 years,' Alejandro Moledo, deputy director at the European Disability Forum, told Euronews. According to the latest EU survey, more than half of respondents said there is widespread discrimination in their country on the basis of being Roma (65%), skin colour (61%), ethnic origin (60%), gender identity (being transgender – 57%), or sexual orientation (54%).


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Video. Russian strike hits Odesa, killing one and injuring 17
Odesa Governor Oleh Kiper said the attack damaged residential buildings in the city's historic centre and struck both a nursery and an inclusive education centre. Among the injured were a pregnant woman and a 17-year-old girl. The attack follows a deadly night in Kyiv, where at least 14 people were killed and nearly 100 injured as missiles and drones hit the capital. Russia has stepped up its aerial assaults in recent weeks, following a Ukrainian operation that targeted Russian air bases. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said peace talks have seen little movement, aside from a planned prisoner exchange.