
China's military will need structural change to fend off drone threats: experts
military analysts have called for structural changes within the People's Liberation Army to counter the growing threat of
drone attacks.
Advertisement
Writing in the PLA Daily, the experts said it was highly likely that the Chinese military would establish specialised counter-drone combat units capable of 'rapid responses' to unmanned threats while addressing the inefficiencies of multitasked traditional units.
Drones have played an increasingly crucial role in recent regional conflicts, including the war in Ukraine, the India-Pakistan conflict, and the recent strikes between Israel and Iran.
The article, published by the military mouthpiece on Thursday, suggests that Beijing has taken note of a US plan to deter any PLA aggression across the Taiwan Strait by deploying thousands of unmanned systems in what it calls
a 'hellscape' strategy.
According to the article, the establishment of dedicated counter-drone units is viewed as a 'long-term' goal, while current structural adjustments are expected to focus on integrating counter-drone capabilities into existing combat units.
Advertisement
For example, the writers suggested that electronic warfare units could be upgraded to become intelligent counter-unmanned units capable of AI-driven analysis and mobile jamming.
The PLA's structural shift towards counter-drone capabilities dates back to as early as 2016, when Chinese state media reported the formation of a specialised PLA Air Force unit tasked with detecting and neutralising small uncrewed aircraft.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong's necessary step forward on same-sex partnerships
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at letters@ or filling in this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification Two years after the Court of Final Appeal's landmark ruling, the government has finally unveiled its proposal to recognise same-sex partnerships. While this represents a welcome, though cautious, step forward, it falls short of the comprehensive equality envisioned by the court. The proposal's limitations are glaring. It grants only a narrow set of rights, such as the right to make medical decisions. Most puzzling is the requirement that couples must have registered their union overseas. This stipulation is both arbitrary and counterproductive. The government has already laid out specific criteria for recognition; adding a foreign registration requirement serves no real purpose, except to invite further legal disputes. Despite these shortcomings, the proposal is a necessary first step. Yet it has already drawn criticism from conservative lawmakers, who said it would threaten traditional family values. Such claims are misleading. The government is not introducing same-sex marriage, but establishing a separate partnership registry in compliance with the court's ruling. This is about fulfilling a legal obligation, not redefining marriage. Since decriminalising homosexuality, Hong Kong has made meaningful strides towards greater inclusion. At its heart, this issue is about fairness. Regardless of the ongoing debate over specific rights, the principle is clear: same-sex couples deserve legal protection of their human dignity. It is time for both the government and society to meet that responsibility.


South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Li Qiang urges Brics collective action against backdrop of Trump tariff threats
'As the leading bloc of the Global South, Brics countries should … strive to be a pioneering force in advancing the reform of global governance,' Li said in a speech during a plenary session at the 17th Brics summit on Sunday. The premier said member states should uphold independence, show a sense of responsibility and take greater action to build consensus and pool their strengths, the premier said. Li said Brics nations must also stand firm in upholding justice while preserving global peace and stability, championing the peaceful settlement of disputes through solutions that consider the unique aspects of each issue and address underlying causes. 01:33 Following US-Vietnam agreement, China says it opposes deals that hurt its interests Following US-Vietnam agreement, China says it opposes deals that hurt its interests Widely perceived as a direct challenge to the Western-led world order, Li called for improving global governance amid a countdown to the end of a temporary tariff truce with the US, which runs out on Wednesday.


South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Australia's Albanese to address Darwin Port sale on China visit
When Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese arrives in China next week for his second official visit, he will have more than the typical diplomatic niceties to discuss with President Xi Jinping. Advertisement A major task on Albanese's agenda, besides routine topics like trade, will be to explain his country's stance on Chinese investment – in particular, addressing the controversy over the ownership and potential government-influenced sale of the Darwin the Post has learned from sources with knowledge of the matter. This will make for a difficult conversation, analysts said, as Beijing has been on high alert to future divestments following US action over Chinese-owned ports at the Panama Canal. Albanese will arrive in Beijing around July 15, one source said, as a 'friendly gesture' to keep relations on a positive track. Another source said the prime minister will attend the China International Supply Chain Expo , an event held in the country's capital annually since 2023. This year's edition will run from July 16 to July 20. Advertisement Australia's Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet said Albanese's international engagements will be announced in 'the usual way' in reply to a request for comment.