Where do the Boston Celtics fall in the most expensive team sales in NBA history?
Where do the Boston Celtics fall in the most expensive team sales in NBA history?
Where do the Boston Celtics fall in the most expensive team sales in NBA history? The Celtics current majority owners, Wyc and Irv Grousbeck, just elected to sell their shares to a group helmed by private equity billionaire Bill Chisholm, and that is only part of the story that has been turning heads around the league since the news broke.
The bigger element of the deal is that it made the Celtics the most expensive team purchase in the history of the NBA -- and for that matter, any team in the history of any league at an estimated $6.3 billion. What's more is the eventual value of the storied ball club could rise to as high as over $7 billion by the time the two-tiered deal is done.
The folks behind the "HoopsHype" YouTube channel put together a clip detailing the most expensive team sales in league history recently, and where Boston is in that mix. Check it out below!
If you enjoy this pod, check out the "How Bout Them Celtics," "First to the Floor," "Celtics Lab," and the many other New England sports podcasts available on the CLNS Media network.
Listen to the "Celtics Lab" podcast on:
Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/3zBKQY6
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3GfUPFi
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Did beating the Boston Celtics cost coach Tom Thibodeau his job with the New York Knicks?
Did beating the Boston Celtics actually cost coach Tom Thibodeau his job with the New York Knicks? Such a point of view might sound a bit absurd at first glance, but when you take a deeper dive into the concept being floated in such a statement, there is a case to be made that this could be true. The Knicks, of course, were widely seen as underdogs to beat the then-reigning NBA champs, with the Celtics heavily favored by oddsmakers heading into their 2025 NBA Eastern Conference Semifinals second round series with Boston. But we all know how that prospect ended up turning out with the benefit of hindsight; did New York beating the Celtics raise the front office expectations to a degree that made a future with Thibs untenable? Advertisement The hosts of the eponymous CLNS Media "Bob Ryan, Jeff Goodman, and Gary Tanguay!" podcast took some time on a recent episode of their show to talk it over. Take a look at the clip embedded below to hear what they had to say! If you enjoy this pod, check out the "How Bout Them Celtics," "First to the Floor," and the many other New England sports podcasts available on the CLNS Media network: This article originally appeared on Celtics Wire: Did beating the Celtics cost Tom Thibodeau his job with the Knicks?
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Draymond recalls hilarious KD-to-Warriors mix-up after Luka trade
Draymond recalls hilarious KD-to-Warriors mix-up after Luka trade originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area The blockbuster trade that sent Luka Dončić to the Los Angeles Lakers stunned the entire NBA and sports world, but perhaps no one was as confused as Draymond Green. Advertisement However, Green's bewilderment stemmed from a reason beyond the actual trade and more from a hypothetical one. The Warriors star forward joined 'Jimmy Kimmel Live' and hilariously recalled how his confusion unraveled thanks to a little premature information from Golden State majority owner Joe Lacob. 'When it first happened, we were at a Warriors charity poker tournament,' Green remembered. 'I had just saw Joe Lacob 10 minutes before this happened. Joe gets excited. Joe goes, 'Draymond, I think we're going to get Kevin Durant. It's right there at the finish line. It's happening. We're getting Kevin Durant back.' I'm like, 'Oh, man. Here we go. Let's go.' And we talk about it. He asks if I think it'll work. I said absolutely. He leaves, he comes running back two minutes later like, 'Draymond! Draymond! I wasn't supposed to say anything. Don't say nothing to nobody.' I'm like, 'Joe, I got you. I won't say anything to anyone.' 'So we're at this tournament and I go sit down and about 15 minutes later, Steph yells, 'Draymond, you see the trade?' And I go, 'It happened?' Steph goes, 'Wait, who?' I said, 'Oh, never mind, nobody. What happened?' And he's like, 'Luka got traded.' ' Whew. Advertisement You can only imagine the emotional rollercoaster Green endured over those 20 minutes or so. First, he had to fathom the thought that Durant was returning to the Bay, where he helped bring two championships, to then — like so many others — try and wrap his head around Dončić and LeBron James teaming up, to finally realizing that Durant was, in fact, not on his way to San Francisco. What a whirlwind. 'I couldn't believe it, I thought Shams was hacked,' Green said of the Dallas Mavericks trading Dončić. 'There's videos out at the charity event of us reacting. I couldn't believe it. Superstars at 25 don't get traded. Luka's a megastar. Advertisement 'Then I thought, 'I have to be next if Luka's getting traded. It's coming for me soon.' ' To be fair to Lacob, several reports indicated that Durant's return to the Warriors was a possibility before the 15-time NBA All-Star turned down a reunion. Maybe next time, Lacob will wait for the trade to be official before spilling any premature beans. Download and follow the Dubs Talk Podcast
New York Times
44 minutes ago
- New York Times
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander won't try to ‘reinvent the wheel' but he's rewriting NBA Finals history
OKLAHOMA CITY — Go ahead and join in on the silly chant if you so please. 'Freee-throoow merrrchaaant …' the Indiana Pacers faithful will likely boom at Oklahoma City Thunder star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander when these NBA Finals relocate for Game 3 on Wednesday. Or, if history repeats itself, keep engaging in those silly online discussions about how the reigning MVP just isn't aesthetically pleasing enough to watch to warrant all the hype that surrounds him. Advertisement Those are fool's errands, to be sure. But for the vast majority of this season, in which the 26-year-old has been playing his way into the NBA annals, dazzling with his smooth style and misdirection magic while carrying this Thunder team that evened the finals with a 123-107 win in Game 2 on Sunday night, they've been happening nonetheless. Maybe the basketball-loving folks in the Hoosier State will surprise us all and break this disrespectful trend. As SGA's 34-point, eight-assist, five-rebound outing in the Thunder's revenge game reminded the masses, there's a drumbeat quality to his game that often undercuts the public's ability, or willingness, perhaps, to appreciate what he does. He gets to his spots, reads (and confuses) the defense, then makes the proper choice on whether to score or dish with an accuracy that is remarkable and unspectacular all at once. He doesn't soar through the air like Ja Morant or Anthony Edwards for the viral dunk or fill up the box score in quite the same fashion as the magnificent Nikola Jokić, but he has managed to end all of their seasons during this seven-week playoff stretch that is quietly on pace to be one of the best of all time. Not that his legion of haters has bothered to notice. Let's start with the micro. By scoring a combined 72 points in his first two NBA Finals games, Gilgeous-Alexander surpassed the great Allen Iverson (71 points) as the leader in that niche category. It's worth noting because there was some revealing criticism of his Game 1 performance, when he scored 38 points in the Thunder's jaw-dropping loss but had just three assists (while shooting 14 of 30 from the field). Everyone is fair game to scrutinize after a loss of that magnitude, and the fact that he missed his last two shots in the final 66 seconds was an understandable part of that discussion, but it's still mildly hilarious that any player could be deemed not good enough with a borderline 40-burger. Advertisement Now for the macro. Through 18 games, Gilgeous-Alexander is averaging 30.8 points, 6.8 assists, 5.6 rebounds and 1.8 steals in these playoffs. You know how many guys have ever had a postseason like that, hitting those marks (30-6-5-1.8) during a playoff run in which they played at least 16 games? TWO. And you're probably familiar with their names. Michael Jordan (four times) and LeBron James (twice). That's the list — for now. That comes, of course, after Gilgeous-Alexander led the league in scoring during the regular season while leading the Thunder to a 68-14 mark, the No. 1-ranked defense and the league's best point differential of all time. So yeah, maybe it's time to stop with all the nitpicking and give this young man his flowers. Pacers coach Rick Carlisle certainly did after Game 2. '(With) Shai, you can mark down 34 points before they even get on the plane tomorrow for the next game,' he said. 'The guy's going to score. We've got to find ways to make it as tough as possible on him.' One might say that's a different way of deeming SGA unstoppable. Yet even with Carlisle's comment, it's notable that he wasn't asked a single question about Gilgeous-Alexander's performance. He shoehorned that insight into a question about the Thunder's offensive depth. On this night, like so many that have come before it, it was as if Gilgeous-Alexander's massive part in the Thunder win was such a given that it wasn't even worth discussing. But that consistency shouldn't be taken for granted. As these last two series have shown, there's a difference between a superstar like Gilgeous-Alexander, who shows out almost every single night, and the stars like Edwards and Tyrese Haliburton, who are more of a roller-coaster experience. Haliburton's incredible game winner in Game 1 disguised that he was largely ineffective leading up to that magical moment. Three nights later, with Lu Dort and Cason Wallace making him so miserable throughout, he was MIA when it mattered most (three points, three assists in the first half) before finishing with 17 points, six assists and five turnovers. Advertisement Two games in, here's how the battle of the point guards is sizing up … SGA: 36 points, 5.5 assists, 5.5 rebounds, 3.5 steals and two turnovers per game. Haliburton: 15.5 points, 6.0 assists, 6.5 rebounds, one steal and four turnovers per game. Thunder coach Mark Daigneault is the least shocked observer of them all. 'Yeah, unsurprising at this point,' he said afterward. 'It's just kind of what he does. He just continues to progress and improve and rise to every occasion that he puts himself in and that we put ourselves in. I thought his floor game tonight was really, really in a great rhythm. I thought everyone played better individually, and I thought we played better collectively. I think that was a byproduct.' For Gilgeous-Alexander's part, the (elite) work continues from here. Whether people are going to appreciate it or not. 'I'm being myself,' he said. 'I don't think I tried to reinvent the wheel or step up to the plate with a different mindset. Just try to attack the game the right way. I think I've done a pretty good job of that so far. Now, I would trade the points for two W's, for sure. But this is where our feet are. This is where we are. You can't go back in the past. You can only make the future better. That's what I'm focused on.' It was quite fitting that SGA made that statement while wearing his customary shades, for his future is indeed so bright that it's blinding. He wore a T-shirt that featured the late, great John Lennon as well. Just imagine the possibilities that lie ahead for him and these Thunder.
