Hector Pieterson's sister calls on today's youth to find a cause
Hector Pieterson's sister Antoinette Sithole arrives at the Apartheid Museum in Johannesburg, 16 June 2025, to give a lecture on her brotherwho was shot dead by the apartheid police on 16 June 1976. Picture: Nigel Sibanda/ The Citizen
Antoinette Sithole, sister of June 1976 uprising shooting victim, schoolboy Hector Pieterson, says her generation is sad to see the behaviour of today's youth.
They take weapons to school, attack their teachers and fellow pupils, and abuse drugs on the school premises, she noted.
'To me, the meaning of Youth Day is how to tackle your own problems. As youth, you should be out there writing placards to say 'we are tired of gender-based violence'. As parents, we will support you.
'Make a bold statement. You will be supported by billions out there in the world,' she said.
Sithole said she had long ago decided to forgive the killers of her brother, Hector.
'I am on the side of those who say it's best that I don't know the person who killed my brother, because I want everything in my life to be positive,' Sithole said.
Sithole was addressing an audience that included youths from different cultural backgrounds and political activists to commemorate the 49th anniversary of the police killings of pupils protesting against Afrikaans being used as a medium of instruction in black schools.
She will be 66 on 28 June.
What are today's youth fighting for?
Another panel speaker at the event, Dr Tshepo Moloi, head of the department of history at the University of Johannesburg, related the plan to organise the 1976 uprising under the auspices of the South African Students Movement linked to the Black Consciousness Movement.
Moloi made a comparison between the youth of 1976 and today's youth, saying the former were activists while questions linger about the influence today's youth have on change.
However, a guest, Esinako Ndabeni, noted that the #FeesMustFall student activists played a significant role in bringing about change in the education system.
Remembering Hector
Sithole remembers her younger brother, Hector, as a shy but naughty little boy who once got her into trouble with train security guards.
Sithole went on the train with her brother frequently, but he would ask her not to buy their weekly train tickets to school and instead to keep the money.
They managed to get free rides a few times, but on the third day, she was caught by the security guards while trying to escape.
Hector had already escaped and was waiting for his sister, laughing and dancing. The guards accused her of teaching her brother not to pay for tickets.
Although she managed to convince the security guards to let her go, she gave her little brother a tongue lashing and vowed never to try to wangle a free train ride again.
Hector, who was close to their mother, loved kung fu movies, and his hero was Bruce Lee, whose films he would watch repeatedly every weekend.
'Hector was very humble and not talkative. I know that comrades see Hector as a struggle hero, but I don't share that view.
'To me he was just my brother. He shouldn't have been there in the first place.
'He was in the wrong place at the wrong time when he was shot by the police,' Sithole said.
Still taught in Afrikaans
She said the 1976 generation opposed Afrikaans because it was the language of the oppressor.
'We hated Afrikaans because the owner of that language was our oppressor. We felt we were oppressed by the Afrikaners. Now we have to be instructed in their language. No way,' she said.
On the 49th anniversary of the 1976 uprising in which scores of pupils were killed by police and hundreds injured, Sithole said it was shocking that pupils today still have to pass Afrikaans to proceed to the next grade.
She believed the language should have been taken out of the syllabus by the democratic government and replaced with a language from other African countries.
'We thought our education would be the best after all that happened.
'But I am not a politician, it's not for me to tell them what to do,' she said.
Sithole, who was 16 and doing form 3 (now grade 10) at Phefeni Senior Secondary in Orlando when the 1976 student uprisings occurred, related how she found her 13-year-old brother on the other side of the pavement while police were shooting.
He came to her side, but when the police fired more shots, the boy disappeared in the crowd and they were separated.
Later she saw student Mbuyisa Makhubo, then 18, carrying her limp brother's body running past her.
She followed him and asked who he was and where he was taking her brother, but Makhubo kept running and put Hector in a journalist's car.
They took him to the clinic, but he was already dead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
‘No different to an EFF rally or Joy of Jazz' – iPhupho L'ka Biko leader after National Dialogue performance
iPhupho L'ka Biko's Ngqaqu doesn't see a difference between the national dialogue and Codesa in the 1990s. Music collective iPhupho L'ka Biko performed on the first day of the National Dialogue at Unisa, despite some critics labelling the dialogue as a PR exercise. 'It was not a difficult decision to make because as iPhupho, we've always made it clear that wherever black people are, we shall be found there,' band founder and leader Nhlanhla Ngqaqu told The Citizen. 'Ultimately [we want] to have a united Africa and an Africa that is completely liberated. That's our end-goal.' On Friday, President Cyril Ramaphosa officially opened the first convention that will lead to the rollout of the National Dialogue to communities. ALSO READ: 'They will find themselves like the PAC': Ramaphosa takes aim at National Dialogue boycotters Another gig for iPhupho 'If we are to choose our gigs based on principles, based on values, ethics, ideology… we would then find ourselves not performing anywhere. So, performing at the National Dialogue is no different to performing at the EFF rally or at the Standard Bank Joy of Jazz,' said Ngqaqu. In 2023, iPhupho L'ka Biko was one of the performers at the EFF's 10th anniversary at the FNB Stadium. He said the band draws the line where there is victimisation of black lives. 'We'd never take a gig, for example, that says Africans are foreigners in our own continent,' shared Ngqaqu. 'We'd never take that stance to go support Operation Dudula, for example. Anything that is anti-black, we wouldn't support to that extent.' ALSO READ: 'It was a black story rather than a political one'- iPhupho L'ka Biko on performing at EFF rally National Dialogue criticism Some political parties, civil society organisations and high-profile foundations chose to boycott the first National Dialogue convention. Former president Thabo Mbeki was the first to float the idea of a National Dialogue; however, before it started, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation pulled out. Other foundations that opted not to be involved include the FW de Klerk Foundation, Kgalema Motlanthe Foundation, Steve Biko Foundation, and Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation. The DA, FF Plus, ActionSA and uMkhonto weSizwe Party are some of the political parties that didn't participate. 'What I found interesting with this entire criticism, if you listen to most politicians when they're responding to this thing, in their disgruntlement or disappointment, at the core of this issue is money, the budget,' said Ngqaqu. 'For other entities to withdraw, most of the civil society groups they withdraw because the budget was cut. A lot of the noise is not a question of principle or the importance, but it's about who is it serving.' 'Where are these people when we're addressing issues of quality education, this year funny enough is 10 years of Fees Must Fall,' Ngqaqu noted. The first song that iPhupho performed was Sixole Kanjani, a song that speaks to the murder of Chris Hani and Mgcineni 'Mambush' Noki and late mineworkers who were shot by police in Marikana. M A R I K A N A nithi sixole kanjani?#marikanamassacre#OurNationOurDialogue …malifezeke… iPhupho L'ka Biko — iPhupho L'ka Biko (@IphuphoLikaBiko) August 16, 2025 'Essentially, we played that song to say that if we're gonna have a dialogue and a genuine one, we can never forget the slain of Marikana and we cannot forget the likes of Chris Hani. We also did uThixo Ukhona, which is also still consistent with our ethos as a band in how we are rooted in spirituality and consciousness. 'We have so much hope in black people… Despite the flaws that our government has, we still have faith. So it was not a difficult decision to make.' ALSO READ: iPhupho L'ka Biko: Unshackling alcohol's grip on society through Amanzi Sessions No 'practical commitment' Ngqaqu also said he doesn't see a difference between the national dialogue and the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (Codesa) in the 1990s. 'It has no practical commitment or outcome. For me it would be more effective if whatever the public has raised, it should be implemented and must be binding. So now at this stage, it's just a conversation, I don't see any practical commitment,' he said. Making an example of an area like Bram Fischer, where there have been issues of electricity for several years, he said the government should first address those issues before engaging in dialogues. 'There is nothing to be spoken about that. You must just give people electricity, give people water… there is a lot of work to be done,' Ngqaqu noted. 'If we are to have a dialogue, it should begin after a substantial work has been done. A dialogue should be had when black people have dignified living conditions. What dialogue are you gonna have with a person that is hungry?' asked the musician.
Daily Maverick
2 days ago
- Daily Maverick
SA's gas gamble with Trump — what is love, and why does it cost $1bn?
In the latest episode of Politically Aweh, the drama goes global. Comedians KG Mokgadi and Zoë Human unpack the stormy South Africa-US relationship, from awkward Oval Office encounters to high-stakes trade talks, and ask whether our leaders are safeguarding the nation's economic future or serving it up to Big Oil on a shiny silver platter. This month, the US slapped a 30% tariff on South African exports, a move some estimate could threaten up to 100,000 jobs. It's the latest blow in an already fractious relationship and a sign that President Cyril Ramaphosa's first attempt at a trade deal with Donald Trump's administration has failed. As South Africa's negotiators scramble to table an even 'more ambitious' deal in hopes of reversing the tariffs, Politically Aweh questions whether bowing to Trump's demands – including a proposed $1-billion-a-year liquefied natural gas (LNG) purchase for a decade – is really in the country's best interests. After all, didn't Ramaphosa promise during his February State of the Nation address that 'we will not be bullied'? The episode rewinds to trace the relationship from its 'strained situationship' under President Joe Biden to Trump's personal fixation with South Africa and his recycling of far-right talking points about land reform. It examines the May 2025 White House meeting where Ramaphosa sought to reset ties, offering LNG purchases in exchange for duty-free quotas on steel, aluminium and car parts, and continued access to the US car market. Talks collapsed, and tariffs came into force on 7 August – but insiders say the deal is still on the table. The big question: Will South Africa sell out its climate commitments to appease Trump and his fossil fuel industry allies? For answers, KG speaks to political economist Professor Patrick Bond (University of Johannesburg) and puts the question directly to Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Dion George. A full podcast interview with the minister will be released by Politically Aweh next week. DM
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
As a nation we have descended into a vulture nation scenario amid a lack of planning
Dr Pali Lehohla is a Professor of Practice at the University of Johannesburg, among other hats. Image: Supplied Why is the 15th of August - a chaotic and shambolic moment in South Africa - so impactful? It ran for two days, two days ago – the National Convention that launched the National Dialogue. To sketch the background that led to this very moment it was during the last Cabinet Lekgotla that President Thabo Mbeki presided over in July 2008. On the agenda was the discussion of South Africa's scenarios, the second in the series from the first launched as Memories of the Future: South African Scenarios to 2014: Welcome to Foresight For Development. The first scenarios had four possible outcomes: Dudisanang, Sgud S' Nais, Skedonk and Shosholoza. By all counts by 2007, South Africa was on a Shosholoza Scenario of high hope, high economic growth, declining unemployment with annual number of the employed growing by an additional 500 000 entrants. The then President of the Republic, Thabo Mbeki, at his 2007 Sona would say. 'I feel emboldened to appropriate for our people the promise contained in the Book of the Prophet Isaiah, when God said: For you shall go out with joy. And be led out in peace. The mountains and the hills Shall break forth into singing before you. And all the trees of the field shall clap their hands. Instead of the thorn shall come up the cypress tree. And instead of the brier shall come up the myrtle tree.' Five years from the first scenarios and six months post-Polokwane Conference, the July Cabinet Lekgotla of the Third Administration under President Mbeki, three months from resigning as the President of the country, considered the next set of scenarios contained in a document titled, South Africa Scenarios 2025: The future we chose. The scenarios had three sub-optimal outcome scenarios titled Not Yet Uhuru, Nkalakatha and Muvhango. The Muvhango scenario was the ugliest outcome in this competition of the ugly. And 17 years from that fateful 2008 Cabinet Lekgotla the ugliest scenario contestant won the competition. But not only that, but in the language of Indlulamithi Scenarios the Vulture Nation Scenario a worst case outcome from the Gwara-Gwara Plus nation is the backdrop from the national dialogue. The Muvhango outcome had an instructive omen, 'Despite an initial resurgence of the economy, and positive world conditions, the Government battles to govern well.' This was an understatement given what led to a National Convention launch that was plagued by serious challenges which first saw the Legacy Foundations pull out of it, the shambolic start and the frank disappointment expressed by society on the record of government performance. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading What were the specific characteristics of Muvhango. Four outcomes define the Muvhango scenario. The first is Bang Goes the Boom: In this scenario outcome, the slipstream of the 2009 elections and a successful 2010 World Cup, the economy boomed, and the growth rate breached 5.5%. But the euphoria was short-lived, as poor planning and coordination, exacerbated by political in-fighting, started taking their toll on the economy. The second is Politician vs Politician: In this scenario outcome service delivery suffered, and corruption increased, as animosity among politicians reached startling new levels. Efficiency levels declined, as measured by unqualified audits, proportion of budgets spent and citizen satisfaction surveys. The third is The Champ Slips Up: This scenario outcome is marked by the economy, after a few good years, was on the skids. Foreign multinationals and private equity funds began cherry-picking key South African assets. South Africa's proportion of continental GDP declined to such an extent, that by 2025, the country lost its unrivalled pre-eminence on the continent. The last scenario outcome is The Brink of a New Era characterised by Standing at the edge of a cliff, a new ANC went back to the nation, humbly, and demonstrated signs of a revival of idealism. President Mbeki was the architect of Scenario Planning in government. Sadly, what followed his departure from office never became part of instruments of reflection. Little wonder why we are where we are today. For if these became the guardrail of subsequent administration, perhaps the country would not have walked into the Muvhango Scenario with its blind eyes and deaf ears wide open. Perhaps the ruling party would have recognized and advised itself of the Brink of a New Era, and confronted the arrogance of incumbency, which hitherto has caused the so called legacy foundations to leave the stage on the eve of the convening of the national dialogue. There is every reason to realize that the convening of the Legacy Foundations was primarily informed by the 2025 The Future we Chose Scenarios and in that respect the foundations had a deeper understanding on why a national dialogue was necessary based on the inbuilt capability of using scenarios as a guide to leading and managing public affairs. For, the architect of the two only scenarios government ever produced as guard rails of governance were under Mbeki's craftmanship. Subsequent presidents either did not know or ignored scenarios as a crucial sensory arsenal in the management of public affairs. Scenarios are not just instruments but define responsible leadership as defined by Morena Mohlomi (1723-1813) who said, 'a responsible leader pursues peaceful and productive alliances, accommodates stakeholders, and uses new instruments of power to create intergenerational value'. Perhaps the National Dialogue should visit Ngoliloe in what was Lesotho before the present day Free State was created by the British cum Afrikaner colonisers and seek wisdom from the departed spirit of Morena Mohlomi on the subject of responsible leadership which the Future we Chose Scenarios suggest under the outcome of the Brink of a New Dawn. As Albie Sachs said we have succeeded in winning over the sovereign land mass called South Africa, but asks the question, have we the society we wished for. The answer is no we don't. The United Nations Committee of Experts on Public Administration place scenario building competence and modelling capability as a core attribute for managing public affairs. The evidence is that South Africa is not only malnourished of these critical vitamins, but it has also instead chosen to reject them as fundamental pillars for responsible leadership. The consequences are bitter according to the recently released scenarios of Indlulamithi. Not only we have been a Gwara-Gwara Plus nation, but we are successfully accelerating into a vulture nation. Dr Pali Lehohla is a Professor of Practice at the University of Johannesburg, a Research Associate at Oxford University, a board member of Institute for Economic Justice at Wits and a distinguished Alumni of the University of Ghana. He is the former Statistician-General of South Africa. *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL. BUSINESS REPORT
