Idaho Murders Suspect Bryan Kohberger's Case Takes New Turn As Prosecutors Mull Calling His Family To Testify
Bryan Kohberger could potentially face testimony from his own family members in his upcoming murder trial.
The 30-year-old is currently accused of a quadruple homicide involving University of Idaho students Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin at their off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho.
Bryan Kohberger's lawyers had asked for his family to be granted priority seating at the trial, but the prosecutors argued against it in a recent filing.
Earlier this month, Kohberger's legal team requested that the judge in his murder case grant his family priority seating at his upcoming trial.
However, prosecutors have now partially denied that request and have also asked the judge to bar any potential witnesses in Kohberger's family from attending the trial before providing their testimony.
"The State may call member(s) of the Kohberger family to testify at trial," Deputy Latah County Prosecutor Ashley Jennings wrote in a court filing to Judge Steven Hippler, per the New York Post.
She added, "Prior to start of the trial, the State anticipates it will motion the Court, or the Court will on its own accord, generally exclude testifying witnesses from the courtroom so that they cannot hear other witnesses' testimony."
Elsewhere in the filing, Jennings argued that the accused family doesn't have the same legal rights as the victims.
"Defendant requests that members of his family be granted the same rights as the victim's families," Jennings continued. "However, the 'immediate families of homicide victims' have constitutional and statutory rights to attend pursuant to [the] Idaho Constitution…There is no comparable constitutional or statutory provisions affording a defendant's family these same rights."
Jennings also shut down Kohberger's lawyers' claims that not giving his family priority seating would violate his Sixth Amendment rights.
"The Defendant has a constitutional and statutory right to a 'public trial,' but that does not extend to Defendant's choosing whom sits in the courtroom," the prosecutor included in her filing.
A key piece of evidence in the upcoming trial is the knife sheath, with Kohberger's DNA found at the murder scene.
His attorneys had tried to get the knife sheath thrown out by arguing for a Franks hearing, which Hippler shut down.
More recently, they requested to bring in defense experts to testify against the prosecution's theories about Kohberger's Amazon shopping history, where it is presumed he bought the knife used to commit the murders.
The testimony was aimed at persuading the judge to exclude Kohberger's Amazon shopping records and "click activity" from jurors.
However, just like the Franks hearing, Hippler ruled against the request from Kohberger's lawyers.
"The information Defense seeks to convey can be presented by declarations," Hippler wrote in an order, per Fox News. "Counsel may have the witnesses available by video streaming during the hearing and, should the Court determine it is necessary to hear from the witness, the Court may allow such testimony by video live-stream."
Despite the ruling, it is likely that Kohberger's legal team would once again introduce the discovery of the unidentified genetic materials during his trial.
Sources had earlier claimed it might help the team "muddy the waters" and create reasonable doubt in the jury's minds.
"That evidence could be any variety of things: It could be something, or it could be a lot of things that are nothing," criminal defense attorney Edwina Elcox said of the newly discovered DNAs. "There's at least something to be made of it, and it's better than having nothing as a defense."
However, Elcox admitted that it wasn't strong enough to win Kohberger's innocence as his DNA on the knife sheath is too "critical" to the case.
"That's the thing that squarely puts [Kohberger] there," the female attorney said about the knife sheath. "The magnitude of that evidence to the state's case is critical and cannot be understated."
Kohberger's trial is scheduled for August this year and will take place in Boise, Idaho. Initially, it was set to be held in Moscow, Idaho, where the murders occurred, but his defense successfully argued for a change of venue by citing concerns over the possibility of an unfair trial.
The proceedings will first focus on determining whether the 30-year-old is guilty of the four charges of first-degree murder and one count of burglary.
If convicted, a separate phase will be held to decide whether he should receive the death penalty, as murder charges carry the death penalty in the state.
With the possibility of a two-phase trial, the case is expected to extend until November. Jury selection is set to begin in late July once all pretrial motions have been addressed.
For now, Kohberger has pleaded not guilty and remains in custody without bail as he awaits trial.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Amazon Flex delivery driver has car stolen while dropping off packages in North Austin
The Brief An Amazon Flex delivery driver said her car was stolen while she was dropping off packages The thief is now using the woman's EBT card that was left inside the car Amazon responded to the incident AUSTIN, Texas - An Amazon Flex delivery driver said her car was stolen while she was dropping off packages. Local perspective Stephanie Board was delivering packages for Amazon early Sunday morning. "I took the route that was from 3:15 a.m all the way until like seven o'clock, and I was almost done, so I was excited when I was on my route because I was like, ok, it's about 6:30-ish, I'm almost done. So here I am just determined to get it done and get back to my kids," delivery driver Stephanie Board said. She said she pulled up to a home in the Quail Creek Neighborhood in North Austin, her car was still running. "I'm just thinking, you know, I'm going to hop in and out real quickly," Board said. Board said she grabbed the package out of her car, walked to the front door, dropped it off, and scanned it. When she turned around, Board said, "I look up and I see a guy that I've never seen before. He hops out of a Mercedes, I think it was, and he gets into the driver's side of my car." Board said she tried to stop the man. "I kind of try to get in front of him to stop him from taking the vehicle, but he still goes around and leaves in the vehicle," Board said. She said it felt like a movie. "Panicking, nervous, just disbelief and distraught that something like this was happening," Board said. Apparently, her car had all of her personal items inside, including her credit, debit, and social security cards. "I see that they are currently using my EBT card. They were at the local Sam's that was out south, and it looks like they were at some supermarkets here in the East Austin area, so they're all over Austin, so you might want to just be mindful," Board said. Board and her son have a message to whoever is behind this. "Just do the right thing and return the car because you've taken away from a mother that's trying to support her kids and have a survival for them and stable living," Board said. "I would just like for the person to just give us our car," Board's son, Demarion Ewing said. What they're saying Amazon spokesperson Steve Kelly released a statement on the incident: "Our team has reached out to Ms. Board to offer support and assistance relating to this unfortunate incident. Safety is our top priority, which is why we continue to innovate and invest in comprehensive safety measures that help keep Amazon Flex delivery partners and the communities they serve safe. In addition to contacting law enforcement, Amazon's 24/7 Emergency Assistance Helpline stands ready to provide support to delivery partners if unexpected situations arise." Amazon does provide various forms of assistance when situations arise, including filing insurance claims to help drivers and pay for missed delivery blocks. The Source Information from interviews conducted by FOX 7 Austin's Meredith Aldis
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kate Beckinsale Sues Film Producers After Injury On Set
Kate Beckinsale has launched a lawsuit against the producers of "Canary Black," accusing them of gross negligence and battery after suffering a serious knee injury on set. The "Serendipity" star claims she was pushed to work under hazardous conditions that ignored her health, safety, and repeated warnings. Her legal team says the injury was not only foreseeable but also preventable. In an amended complaint filed on May 21 in Los Angeles Superior Court, Beckinsale accused "Canary Black" producers, including Anton Entertainment and John Zois, of exposing her to "dangerous and unsafe conditions." According to court documents obtained by Entertainment Weekly, Beckinsale and her team flagged issues such as grueling 15-hour workdays, a lack of medical personnel, and inadequate stunt preparation. "Ms. Beckinsale and her team repeatedly raised red flags regarding unsafe conditions on and off set to Defendants, including long, dangerous set days, often lasting fifteen hours, inadequate equipment and medical personnel to help manage the high physical workload and recover from the exertion off set, and failure to adequately inform Ms. Beckinsale of what stunts she was expected to perform until often the moment she had to perform it," the filing stated. Despite the warnings, the lawsuit claims producers continued to prioritize profits over safety. Beckinsale alleged, "The producers continued to recklessly and intentionally forge ahead with unsafe filming conditions, forgoing safety to maintain profit margins, and in the process, put Ms. Beckinsale in harm's way." Kate Beckinsale initially filed anonymously in December, but the new complaint includes damning communications. Her agent, Shani Rosenzweig, emailed Zois in frustration, writing, "No one is actually taking real action to put a plan in place to fix this situation so it never happens again… [Ms. Beckinsale] keeps showing up to set for her call time and everyone around her has been made aware it's going to be a 15 hour [or more] day except for her." Rosenzweig didn't mince words, adding, "If you're trying to kill a person, you're doing a great job." Zois reportedly replied, "I don't know what else to say other than you're right," acknowledging the production schedule was "unsustainable" and promising changes. However, according to Beckinsale's legal team, nothing changed. She was allegedly pressured to work long days and perform dangerous stunts without proper training or safety precautions. The actress suffered a complex meniscus tear in her left knee in December 2022, requiring surgery and a production shutdown. Before she returned, her surgeon instructed her to avoid "running, jumping, harness suspension, squatting, or kicking." However, those orders were allegedly ignored. Beckinsale's complaint states she was coerced into doing "unsafe action sequences," leading to further injury. Her legal team argued that this ongoing disregard for her health caused severe emotional distress and physical harm. Kate Beckinsale's legal complaint is not the first time she has spoken out about issues she faced on set. After Blake Lively accused Justin Baldoni of harassment and online defamation, Beckinsale praised her for speaking up in a now-deleted Instagram video. In the deeply personal video, Beckinsale shared disturbing details about the abuse and mistreatment she has endured while working in the film industry. The actress recalled being insulted for calling out a male co-star who was "drunk every day" and caused hours of delays. She said, per The Blast, "He was going through something. I have sympathy for that, but I was waiting, as was the crew, for six hours a day for him to learn his lines. It means I'm not getting to see my daughter in the evenings the whole movie." Beckinsale added, "The studio's response was to give me a bike so I could ride around the studio lot while I was waiting. And then, of course, I was called a c-nt and a b-tch. During a take, I was called a 'stupid b-tch.'" She also revealed that on two different productions, she was subjected to such extreme diet and exercise routines that she "lost my periods altogether." The actress revealed that a male co-star once injured her during a fight scene, leading to MRIs. Yet when she raised concerns, she claimed she "was gaslit and made to feel like I was the problem and blamed and left out of cast dinners." Even more shocking, she shared, "I was forced by a publicist to film the day after I had a miscarriage. I said, 'I can't. I'm bleeding. I don't want to go and change my clothes in front of people I don't know and do a photoshoot. I'm bleeding out a miscarriage.'" Beckinsale continued, "She was like, 'You'll have to, or you'll be sued.'"

Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's lawyers ask judge to release him from custody pending trial
Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Salvadoran man illegally deported to his native country in March and returned to the U.S. last week to face human trafficking charges, say the Trump administration is compounding his mistreatment by trying to keep him in jail while awaiting trial. 'Mr. Abrego Garcia asks the Court for what he has been denied the past several months — due process,' his lawyers, four appointed public defenders, argued in a20-page filing to a federal magistrate judge in Nashville, Tennessee, where Abrego Garcia was secretly indicted last month ahead of his return. U.S. Magistrate Judge Sarah Holmes has set a hearing for Friday on whether Abrego Garcia should be detained as he awaits trial. However, even if she opts against detention in the criminal case, Abrego Garcia will likely be put in immigration custody and his prospects for release there are uncertain. Holmes has given both sides a deadline of noon local time Thursday to indicate whether they plan to call witnesses at the hearing. However, defense attorneys argue in the new filing that the crimes Abrego Garcia was charged with don't permit pretrial detention in most circumstances. Prosecutors allege that Abrego Garcia worked for at least nine years as a driver for an immigrant-smuggling operation and that he was transporting undocumented immigrants in 2022 when he was stopped by Tennessee Highway Patrol on I-40 with 'nine Hispanic males packed into' his vehicle. That incident, captured on officers' body-worn video cameras, involved just a few of the thousands of undocumented immigrants Abrego Garcia ferried across the country, prosecutors contend. Abrego Garcia currently faces two federal felony charges for transporting undocumented immigrants and conspiring with others to do so. But prosecutors have accused him in court papers of being a member of the MS-13 gang and engaging in a 'myriad of illegal conduct,' including claiming involvement in the murder of a rival gang member's mother and of soliciting child pornography. The submission from Abrego Garcia's lawyers is his first attempt to rebut the criminal allegations against him. The attorneys used the filing to poke holes in the government's legal arguments while making few factual claims that could complicate his future defense in the case. Abrego Garcia 'obviously denies the government's baseless gang-affiliation allegations,' his attorneys said, while not grappling with the murder and child pornography claims prosecutors have floated but not charged. The defense attorneys argue that Abrego Garcia is not a danger to the public and poses no risk of fleeing rather than facing the charges against him, the two bases upon which prosecutors are seeking to keep him incarcerated. 'Mr. Abrego Garcia must be released,' they say. Abrego Garcia entered the United States in 2012 and sought asylum in 2019, after he was detained and faced deportation proceedings. Though his claim was denied, an immigration judge agreed to bar immigration officials from sending him back to El Salvador because of the potential that he might be targeted for violence by a local gang. But in March, amid President Donald Trump's mass deportation effort, Abrego Garcia was whisked onto an airplane and sent to El Salvador without warning, violating the 2019 order, which remains in effect. Despite the error, which the Trump administration repeatedly acknowledged in court, Trump and his aides resisted court orders to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return. They disparaged him as a criminal gang member and mocked legal efforts aimed at securing his return. Trump and El Salvador's president, Nayib Bukele, discussed the issue publicly in the Oval Office and rejected suggestions that they return Abrego Garcia to the United States. That changed last week after the criminal case was made public. Bukele said he had no qualms returning Abrego Garcia, given the charges against him. In the meantime, Abrego Garcia became emblematic of Trump's haphazard race to fulfill his mass deportation promise, marked by repeated court rulings that found him to be violating due process rights and several other admissions of erroneous deportations. That publicity, Abrego Garcia's lawyers say, suggests he may have an even stronger case against deportation to El Salvador when the criminal matter is resolved — even if he's convicted.