US judge says China's Huawei must face criminal case for racketeering, other charges
BANGKOK: A U.S. judge has ruled that China's
Huawei Technologies
, a leading telecoms equipment company, must face
criminal charges
in a wide reaching case alleging it stole technology and engaged in
racketeering
, wire and bank fraud and other crimes.
U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly on Tuesday rejected
Huawei
's request to dismiss the allegations in a 16-count federal indictment against the company, saying in a 52-page ruling that its arguments were premature.
The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The U.S. accuses Huawei and some of its subsidiaries of plotting to steal U.S.
trade secrets
, installing surveillance equipment that enabled Iran to spy on protesters during 2009 anti-government demonstrations in Iran, and of doing business in North Korea despite U.S. sanctions there.
During President Donald Trump's first term in office, his administration raised national security concerns and began lobbying Western allies against including Huawei in their wireless, high-speed networks.
In its January 2019 indictment, the Justice Department accused Huawei of using a Hong Kong shell company called Skycom to sell equipment to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions and charged its chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, with fraud by misleading the HSBC bank about the company's business dealings in Iran.
Meng, the daughter of Huawei's founder, was arrested in Canada in late 2018 on a U.S. extradition request but released in September 2021 in a high-stakes prisoner swap that freed two Canadians held by China and allowed her to return home.
Chinese officials have accused the U.S. government of "economic bullying" and of improperly using national security as a pretext for "oppressing Chinese companies." In their motion to dismiss the broad criminal case, among other arguments Huawei's lawyers contended that the U.S. allegations were too vague and some were "impermissibly extraterritorial," and do not involve domestic wire and bank fraud.
The biggest maker of network gear, Huawei struggled to hold onto its market share under sanctions that have blocked its access to most U.S. processor chips and other technology. The limits led it to ramp up its own development of computer chips and other advanced technologies.
The company also shifted its focus to the Chinese market and to network technology for hospitals, factories and other industrial customers and other products that would not be affected by U.S. sanctions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
The $100-a-week super habit that could save Aussie business owners from a $500,000 retirement shock
A retirement crisis may be brewing under Australia's economic radar, and it's not among the unemployed, but among the self-employed. A new survey commissioned by AMP Bank has found that close to half of Australia's smallest business owners, including sole traders and micro-businesses, are not regularly contributing to their superannuation, potentially setting themselves up for financial insecurity in retirement. In a national poll of 2,000 small business operators, 55 per cent reported that they make regular super contributions, meaning that 45 per cent do not. That's a significant shortfall, especially considering that most salaried workers in Australia benefit from the mandatory Superannuation Guarantee, now set at 12 per cent. Also Read: Chinese threat or American pressure? What really fueled Australia's 1.3 billion missile purchase But super contributions remain optional for the country's 2.2 million self-employed workers, including tradespeople, creatives, consultants, and other gig economy participants. Live Events And many are choosing to forgo them, often to keep their businesses afloat. 'It's understandable that many small business owners prioritise reinvesting in their business, which can mean super contributions fall by the wayside', said John Arnott, Director at AMP Bank GO on X. The long-term cost of short-term focus The financial trade-off might seem minor in the short run, but the long-term implications are staggering. AMP Bank's modelling shows that contributing just $100 a week to super starting at age 30, assuming a 6 per cent return, could yield over $500,000 by retirement at age 65. That means skipping those small contributions now could result in a half-million-dollar shortfall later in life, a costly oversight for anyone banking on a comfortable retirement. Also Read: Why Australia is taking only 280 people a year from Tuvalu, even as one third want to flee Who's falling behind? The research revealed apparent disparities across industries and regions. Solopreneurs and businesses with four or fewer employees were among the least likely to contribute to super, with just 50–55 per cent making regular payments. Owners of younger firms (1–3 years old) and those located in rural areas were also among the least engaged with super savings. Meanwhile, small business owners in financial services showed the highest contribution rates (71 per cent ), while those in creative fields, already prone to income instability, had the lowest, at just 46 per cent. A system not built for freelancers and sole traders? The issue isn't just financial, it's also structural. Australia's superannuation system was designed mainly with full-time employees in mind, not the growing population of freelancers and sole traders. Flexibility may be a feature of self-employment, but it's also a flaw in this case. Unlike employees, the self-employed don't have an employer automatically paying super on their behalf. And unless they make a conscious effort to pay themselves, and their future, first, they may reach retirement with little or nothing saved. Also Read: Mysterious interstellar object enters solar system; the largest, fastest, and only the third ever recorded What can small business owners do now? Arnott urged small business owners to balance short-term survival and long-term planning. 'Even small, regular contributions can have a massive impact thanks to the power of compounding,' he said. He also recommended practical strategies for boosting super savings. These include setting up automatic contributions through your banking app or accounting software, making lump sum contributions during periods of healthy cash flow, using government incentives such as co-contributions or tax deductions, and seeking support from your super fund, accountant, or other small business owners.
Economic Times
41 minutes ago
- Economic Times
'China will do everthing to cripple India': Economic expert warns Delhi as Foxconn removes Chinese staff from iPhone plants
China pulls out trained workforce 'India seen as a flailing adversary' Live Events You Might Also Like: Foxconn asks hundreds of Chinese engineers, technicians to return home from iPhone factories in India: Report — suryakane (@suryakane) Supply chain concerns remain Message to multinationals Investor points to policy weaknesses China blocks tech talent migration to rival manufacturing hubs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel China's move to withdraw over 300 engineers from Foxconn 's iPhone manufacturing facilities in India has raised concerns over its impact on Apple 's production plans and India's manufacturing goals. The engineers, who were working at Tamil Nadu and Karnataka plants, played a key role in preparing for the next-generation iPhone recall of Chinese technicians is expected to disrupt ongoing training and delay the rollout of high-end manufacturing processes. Foxconn had heavily depended on these experts to guide local teams. While the company is now trying to fill the gap with Taiwanese and Vietnamese specialists and is training Indian workers, operations may still slow investor Surya Kanegaonkar, commenting on the development, said this was part of China's strategy to maintain dominance in Asia.'This comes as no surprise,' Kanegaonkar wrote on X. 'India is seen as a flailing adversary, struggling to get off the ground.'He said the exit of Chinese engineers should be viewed as a calculated attempt to block the transfer of technical know-how and hinder India's growth in electronics warned that India's reliance on Chinese supply chains remains a serious risk. He said the country still depends on China for machine tools, rare earth materials, and electronic components.'India attempting to industrialise while being entirely dependent on Chinese machine tools, rare earths and electronics components is absurd. Every part of the supply chain should have been studied and fixed yesterday,' he action is likely a part of a broader push to discourage companies from moving manufacturing out of China. Verbal orders to stop export of machines, talent, and components have also been reported. The message to multinationals is clear, relocating operations to India may come at a cost. India now manufactures nearly 20% of all iPhones. Apple plans to source a majority of its U.S.-bound iPhones from India by 2026. However, such moves by China could slow that also criticized Indian policymakers for not preparing adequately for such situations.'Lack of foresight and will to reform from within continue to hobble New Delhi's plans… Endless diplomacy comes to nought in the face of an adversary's leverage and hard power,' he said.'Being shown one's place as a state dependent on the largesse of friends and foes alike should warrant introspection and urgent reform,' he exodus comes as a major disruption to Apple's India expansion strategy, particularly as Foxconn constructs a new iPhone assembly facility in the region. While product quality may remain unaffected, assembly line efficiency could suffer during the critical ramp-up period for next-generation iPhone officials have quietly pressured regulatory agencies and local governments to restrict technology transfers and skilled labor exports to India and Southeast Asia, Bloomberg News reported. This coordinated effort aims to prevent Chinese companies from relocating manufacturing capabilities to competing nations amid escalating US-China trade tensions. The strategy extends beyond personnel, encompassing specialised equipment and technical know-how essential for high-tech manufacturing. China's actions come as countries like India and Vietnam aggressively court global technology companies seeking to diversify their supply chains away from Chinese dependence.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
42 minutes ago
- First Post
From shaky to robust, 6 months of Donald Trump's second presidency revive his business fortunes
President Donald Trump has profited from the presidency like no one else in American history as the difference between the personal and the professional has ceased to exist. Nearly two-thirds of his $11 billion net worth has come from cryptocurrency ventures in past six months alone. read more US President Donald Trump (left) and US First Lady Melania Trump (right) applaud as they watch the Army 250th Anniversary Parade from the Ellipse in Washington DC on June 14, 2025. (Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP) US President Donald Trump's net worth is almost impossible to accurately estimate because of a complex web that money travels through in his sprawling family and business ventures. But one thing is as clear as day: he has profited from the presidency like no one else in American history. Consider this: In 2023, Forbes estimated Trump's net worth to be $2.5 billion. In March 2025, it rose to $5.1 billion and it rose to $5.2 billion by July. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Since 2023, Trump has floated his own cryptocurrency, invested in cryptocurrency ventures, and launched a range of merchandise that brings him and his family money. While Forbes has shown that his net worth more than doubled between late 2023 early 2025 as he first secured the Republican presidential nomination and then won the election, independent analyses have shown that his real net worth would be much more. Trump's total net worth from cryptocurrencies (as much as $7.1 billion), stocks, bonds, and cash (at least $2.2 billion), and real estate and other business holdings (at least $1.3 billion), and fees and royalties (at least $631 million in 2024) is around $11.23 billion, according to The New York Times. No line between personal and the professional The line between the personal and professional has ceased to exist as Trump's children and friends cut deals by using his name and he secures plush deals for himself from foreign governments, such as the luxury aeroplane from Qatar that's essentially a personal gift to him — not to the US government. Trump has also sold seats for private dinners for millions after assuming the office. There are direct conflicts of interest. For example, cryptocurrency industry figures who have attended such dinners by paying him and his family millions have sought deregulation of industry. There are already signs that they are getting their way. One such guest, Chinese billionaire Justin Sun, paid Trump more than $40 million to become one of the largest holders of his $TRUMP cryptocurrency. He was accused by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2023 of fraud, but the case against him has been put on hold under the Trump administration — an apparent instance of a quid pro quo. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Amazon owner Jeff Bezos has announced a film on First Lady Melania Trump that will reportedly pay her as much as $28 million. Trump is also getting a $200 million-worth luxury aeroplane from Qatar. Notably, it is not planned to be a government-to-government deal. The Trump administration plans to donate the aeroplane to the Trump presidential library after the completion of the term which would make it Trump's private property. In simple words, Trump would receive a luxury plane from Qatar as president and then transfer it to him for his personal use as a private citizen. Does public even care about corruption? Trump's brazen use of the presidency for personal enrichment has led many to ask a basic question: does public even care about ethics and corruption? When Hillary Clinton was First Lady, a scandal broke out when it emerged that her investment of $1,000 in 1980s had made her $100,000. Compare that to the money that Melania is making off her husband's name: $28 million. Yet there is barely any outrage. The Trump family is also selling $500,000 membership of a private club in Washington DC, but, again there is barely any outrage. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Either the general public never cared about this or the public did care about it but no longer does, according to Paul Rosenzweig, a senior counsel to Ken Starr's investigation of former President Bill Clinton, and later served in the George W Bush administration. Rosenzweig told The Times that he believes the answer is that '80 per cent, the public never cared' and '20 per cent, we are overwhelmed and exhausted'. 'Outrage hasn't died. It was always just a figment of elite imagination,' said Rosenzweig. As Trump has two other co-equal branches of the government in his pocket as well, the Congress and the Judiciary, there is little scope of his and his family's profiteering facing any scrutiny. Some Democrats are hopeful they could generate public backlash. 'It is unlikely he is going to be held accountable through traditional means. There are going to be no special counsels; there's going to be no DOJ [Department of Justice] action. And so it's really just about public mobilization and politics. If Republicans keep paying a price for the corruption by losing special elections throughout the next year, maybe that causes them to rethink their complicity,' Senate Chris Murphy told The Times. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
