
Govt to bring bills for removal of PM, Union minister, CM held on serious criminal charges
These bills are the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill 2025; the Constitution (One Hundred And Thirtieth Amendment) Bill 2025; and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill 2025.
New Delhi, Aug 19 (PTI) The government is planning to introduce three bills in Parliament on Wednesday for the removal of a prime minister, a Union minister, a chief minister or a minister of a state or Union Territory when arrested or detained on serious criminal charges.
According to the statement of objects and reasons of the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill 2025, there is no provision under the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 (20 of 1963) for the removal of the chief minister or a minister arrested and detained in custody on account of serious criminal charges.
Hence, there is a need to amend section 45 of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963, to provide a legal framework for the removal of a chief minister or a minister in such cases. The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives.
The objectives of the Constitution (One Hundred And Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025, say there is no provision under the Constitution for the removal of a minister who is arrested and detained in custody on account of serious criminal charges.
Hence, there is a need to amend Articles 75, 164 and 239AA of the Constitution, for providing a legal framework for the removal of the prime minister or a minister in the Union Council of Ministers and the chief minister or a minister in the Council of Ministers of States and the National Capital Territory of Delhi in such cases. The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives.
The objectives of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025, say there is no provision under the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 (34 of 2019) for the removal of the chief minister or a minister arrested and detained in custody on account of serious criminal charges.
Hence, there is a need to amend section 54 of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, to provide a legal framework for the removal of the Chief Minister or a Minister in such cases. The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives. PTI ACB SKL NSD NSD
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
a minute ago
- Mint
Parliament Monsoon Session LIVE: Lok Sabha adjourned till 5pm, ‘Criminal' MP removal Bills referred to JPC amid uproar
Parliament Monsoon Session Live: Union Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday moved three Bills in Lok Sabha including one that seeks to remove the PM, CMs and other ministers from their posts if they face allegations of committing serious crimes. The three Bills include The Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment Bill), 2025; The Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025; and The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025. The Lok Sabha was in a deadlock and got adjourned multiple times amid chaos and resistance from the Opposition, who threw torn copies of the Bill towards Amit Shah. The Lok Sabha has been adjourned till 5 pm. Follow along for Live Updates on the Parliament Monsoon Session When Congress leader KC Venugopal raised the issue of Amit Shah's arrest while he was the home minister of Gujarat and asked about his claim of morality in politics, the senior BJP leader countered, saying he had resigned on moral grounds before his arrest and joined the government only after being discharged by the court. Lok Sabha adjourned till 5 pm after Bill referred to Parliament Joint Committee. Amit Shah said the Bills will be sent to the Joint Committee of Parliament, where members of both Houses, including those from the Opposition, would get an opportunity to give their suggestions. As soon as the bill was tabled, the Opposition members began protests and trooped into the well, raising slogans, as some of them tore copies of the Bills in front of Shah. Opposition MPs, including AIMIM's Asaduddin Owaisi and Congress' Manish Tewari and K C Venugopal, spoke against the introduction, terming the proposed law against the Constitution and federalism. Union Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday moved three Bills in Lok Sabha for the removal of prime minister, chief ministers, and ministers arrested on serious criminal charges for 30 days, drawing fierce protests from the Opposition.


The Hindu
a minute ago
- The Hindu
Owaisi submits notice opposing three bills that enable removal of PM, CMs and other elected representatives
Hyderabad parliamentarian Asaduddin Owaisi on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) opposed the introduction of the three bills in the Lok Sabha that enable the removal of Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, Union Ministers and Ministers in States and Union Territories who are arrested and detained on serious criminal charges. Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Owaisi said that he has given notice to oppose the introduction of The Constitution (130th Amendment) Bill, 2025, The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025 and The Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025. The All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) president said that his opposition was on the grounds that the amendments would give executive agencies wide, sweeping powers which would enable them to become judge, jury and executioner. Any Chief Minister or minister would be detained on mere suspicion, and baseless allegations. Pointing to two scenarios, Mr. Owaisi said that it is only after the Prime Minster and Chief Minister, who are heads of government, recommend removal that ministers can be removed, or if the Council of Ministers lose confidence. 'They want to turn the country into a police state. This is the quintessential 1933 moment which saw the formation of the Gestapo [in Nazi Germany],' Mr. Owaisi told The Hindu even as he drew attention to the gravity of the situation. He pointed out that the move would deal a massive body-blow to democracy and federalism He emphasised that it was not arrest, but mere detention for a period of 30 days would lead to the removal of the ministers. He said that political leaders such as N. Chandrababu Naidu, Hemant Soren and Arvind Kejriwal were in jail for extended periods of time. He pointed out that sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including Section 152, and Section 4 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act could be invoked arbitrarily for detention or arrest. 'I am opposing the very introduction of these Bills,' he said. The Hyderabad MP said that the move would force elected representatives, who are accountable to the public, to be accountable to executive agencies which report to the Union government, such as the Central Bureau of Investigation, and Enforcement Directorate, as it would leave them to their mercy. The All India Services officers are under the Department of Personnel and Training, a concern of the Centre.


Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Naidu and Nitish are reportedly most fearful': Sanjay Raut links 'tainted PMs-CMs bills' to key NDA allies; alleges bid to stop exit
NEW DELHI: Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut on Wednesday claimed that the Centre introduced the new bills in Parliament to check Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar and Andhra Pradesh chief minister Chandrababu Naidu from withdrawing support to the NDA government. In a social media post on X, Raut said Nitish and Naidu are reportedly most fearful of the new bills, which provide for the removal of a prime minister, Union minister, chief minister or state/UT minister if they are arrested or kept in custody on serious criminal charges for 30 consecutive days. "Modi-Shah introduce a bill in Parliament to arrest and sack CMs and ministers. Naidu and Nitish are reportedly most fearful," Raut said. "Modi govt worries they might withdraw support!" he added. This comes after Amit Shah tabled three bills in the Lok Sabha amid heavy opposition protests and sloganeering. The bills were referred to a Joint Committee of Parliament consisting of 21 members of the Lok Sabha, to be nominated by the Speaker, and 10 members of the Rajya Sabha, to be nominated by the Deputy Chairman. Several opposition MPs opposed the bills amid loud sloganeering, prompting Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to adjourn the House till 3 pm. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Find your car's value online in minutes. Spinny Click Here Undo Opposing the bills, AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi said: "I stand to oppose the introduction of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill 2025, the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill 2025, and the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill 2025. This violates the principle of separation of powers and undermines the right of the people to elect a government. It gives executive agencies a free hand to act as judge and executioner based on flimsy allegations and suspicions. " Congress MP KC Venugopal and Shah engaged in a verbal spat over the issue of 'morality' in politics. Venugopal said: "This bill is meant to sabotage the basic principles of the Constitution. BJP members are saying that this bill is to bring morality into politics. Can I ask the Home Minister a question? When he was the Home Minister of Gujarat, he was arrested — did he uphold morality at that time?" Replying to Venugopal, Shah said that false allegations had been made against him: "Before I was arrested, I resigned on moral grounds, and until I was declared innocent by the court, I did not accept any constitutional position."