UK Spending Review 2025 delivers 'mixed bag'
'Much to welcome, but long-term sustainability remains unresolved for many public services,' Mapley said in response to the UK government's Spending Review announced on 11 June 2025.
Mapley noted that while additional funding for the NHS and defence was confirmed, many unprotected areas received little relief.
'For frontline services, significant pressures and concerns around long-term stability are likely to endure,' he said.
Local government was highlighted as a sector set to benefit from a longer-term funding settlement.
However, Mapley expressed reservations, stating: 'Serious concerns remain about the sector's overall sustainability.'
He said that key challenges including funding gap for social care remain unaddressed.
On the NHS, Mapley acknowledged the positive impact of increased investment but cautioned that 'the demands on these resources will be immense.'
He emphasised that delivering transformation through technology and modernisation would be crucial for the NHS to achieve sustainability and support the forthcoming ten-year health plan.
Mapley concluded by noting the complexity of the review, saying, 'Crunching the Spending Review numbers, and considering the multiple documents released alongside the review, may reveal a clearer picture. CIPFA looks forward to considering the details over the coming days and weeks.'
Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced an additional £29bn per year for the NHS in England, alongside increased funding for defence and housing, as part of the government's spending plans extending to the end of the decade.
Reeves also pledged further investment in artificial intelligence and transport projects. However, the review brought tighter budgets for some departments, with the Foreign Office and environment department facing constraints on day-to-day spending.
"UK Spending Review 2025 delivers 'mixed bag'" was originally created and published by The Accountant, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Friday night's anti-migrant protests in Norwich were peaceful - but anger is bubbling
Outside the Best Western Brook Hotel in Norwich around 300 anti-migrant protesters sang along to Sweet Caroline, Neil Diamond's song about good times never feeling so good, but that wasn't their message for the migrants living inside the hotel. In a town where average rents have increased faster than the rest of England, and hospital waiting times are some of the worst in the country, many who turned out complained about the cost of housing asylum seekers. Stuart, a businessman holding a giant St George's flag, said: "I see my company paying north of a hundred thousand pounds a year in tax and the money is not going back into our system, back into our NHS, when it takes two million pounds a year to keep one hotel open." In a theme that we've seen in protests across the country, residents also spoke of their fears for women and girls. Protester Karen Williams said: "I have seen with my own eyes school children being hassled from illegal males from this hotel. Being followed, asked for their phone numbers." A man who didn't want to be named added: "That hotel could be full of terrorists. We don't know where they're from, they're undocumented males, all of a certain age. We've been invaded." Many wore T-shirts with slogans saying they were not far-right. Although a large portion of the crowd cheered when the name Tommy Robinson was hailed from the stage. The day had been dubbed "Abolish Asylum Day" with a call to action for protesters to come out across the country. Here, around 80 counter protesters also arrived on the scene and police used their vans and two lines of officers to create a green zone in the car park to separate the opposing groups. The hotel curtains were closed but no doubt the migrants inside could hear as on one side, a group determined to get rid of them, chanted, "whose streets, our streets", and sang Rule Britannia, while the other side's chants assured them: "Refugees are welcome here." Counter protester Stuart said: "It's unfair that these people are going to be intimidated like that and I want to show that not everybody in the UK thinks this way." Hayley, holding a banner which read, "save our kids from fascists", said: "I live in this area, and I see these people every day and they do nothing wrong whatsoever. "They genuinely are very sweet people who don't deserve what's happening." Another counter protester, Cate, said: "They [migrants] are not who they are made out to be." "I would trust them any day - far more than I would those people," she added, nodding towards the anti-migrant protesters. Read more: Organisers on both sides said they came in peace, and peaceful it was. But there is a bubbling anger. The Brook Hotel was taken over by the Home Office nearly three years ago and protests here, that only began this summer, are seeing their numbers grow.
Forbes
3 days ago
- Forbes
The New Startup Category VCs Are Excited About
We are on the cusp of a profound demographic shift. In 1950, there were only 14,000 centenarians. Today, it's nearly 750,000. By 2054, this figure is projected to reach almost four million. Living to 100 is swiftly becoming the new normal. Healthcare systems aren't ready for this demographic tsunami. They were built for a different era, when life expectancy was much, much lower. (This is why, incidentally, older age care isn't covered by the NHS remit - the founders of the health service simply didn't believe there was a great enough need). We're entering a new era. One that necessitates a completely fresh approach to health, wellbeing and longevity. And the solutions that can step in to solve this challenge are getting VCs excited. We're calling this new startup vertical - where deep-tech, healthcare and AI meet - 'bio-infrastructure'. Whilst recent years have brought a range of new therapies and smart gadgets aimed at helping us live healthier lives, these innovations won't help us cope with the upcoming demographic challenges at scale without a fundamental overhaul of the underlying systems in which they operate. Markets across the world need new infrastructure that allows for a seamless interplay of data, tooling, physical equipment, and health delivery. Think predictive AI that can optimise clinical trials by matching drugs to the right patient cohorts based on genetics. Or cloud platforms that allow scientists to run experiments without needing their own physical labs. Bio-infrastructure startups are stepping up to fix these foundations and make them fit for the future. Founders in this space are building at the intersection of healthcare, deep-tech, infrastructure, and artificial intelligence. Looking not just at software, but how it interacts with the physical elements of healthcare: the labs, clinics, servers, factories, and workforce that make systems like the NHS function. These companies don't fit into traditional boxes like "drug developer" or "software business"; they are collectively building the layer of intelligence that will power the health system of tomorrow. VCs like me are paying increasing attention to this space, especially the startups building across these five bioinfrastructure pillars. There is a huge space to build a category defining company that can boost lab productivity by leveraging agentic AI and advanced automation. My prediction here is that labs will become increasingly sophisticated and autonomous, accelerating R&D and empowering nations with limited resources to build their own biotech capabilities. The next generation of pharma giants could come from this group; companies that start with a technical or process advantage and use it to build their own drug pipelines. Companies like Micrographia Bio (an Ada Ventures portfolio company) and Benchling are some of the exciting first movers already breaking through in this space. The clinical trial process is stuck in the past. But modern software can change that. I'm excited about companies that are using predictive analytics to match drug trials to the right cohorts, shorten recruitment times, and fine-tune supply chains. The ultimate goal? The "n-of-1" clinical trial, where treatment is personalised based on an individual's unique genetic and disease dynamics. I believe that the next blockbuster therapy will come to market because of operational innovation like this, powered by startups like (an Ada portfolio company) or Owkin. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragility of global medical supply chains - making it clear that strategic autonomy in biotechnology is a national imperative. As a VC, I'm looking to invest in platforms that empower domestic biomanufacturing capabilities. That might be cloud biology platforms that democratise access to compute, or specialised facilities for producing cell and gene therapies. BitBio and Nuclera are great examples of this type of bio-manufacturing innovation in action. The VC bet here is that, just as cloud democratised access to computing power, bio-manufacturing infrastructure will democratise access to life-saving therapeutics. Never the sexiest area, but regulation-focused startups have a huge part to play in the bioinfrastructure revolution. My eyes are currently peeled for tools that use agentic AI to standardise regulatory filings and API-first companies that embed privacy, security, and consent compliance directly into devices and care delivery. Companies that simplify or automate regulatory burdens such as FDA submissions and HIPAA compliance - like Keragon, Freshpaint or healthverity - can allow biotech companies to focus on discovery instead of paperwork. I predict that the next wave of digital health platforms will make regulation and compliance almost invisible. Healthcare can't scale without people, but the way we find, train, and retain workers is broken. We need more platforms that can bring the speed of the gig economy to healthcare while upholding the highest standards of verification and onboarding. At Ada, we're backing credentialing platforms, marketplaces that match healthcare workers with flexible shifts, and AI copilots that reduce cognitive load for nurses and caregivers. Existing examples of leaders in this field include Cera, Axuall and Ambience. The bet is simple: the next billion-dollar workforce platform won't be for coders - it'll be for caregivers. The bio-infrastructure bets we make now will define this new age of longer lifespans, and it's exciting to see so many founders already taking on the challenges of tomorrow. With age comes wisdom, and if we're living to 100, we have a lot to look forward to. But for VCs like me, the wisest choice right now is to back the startups making healthcare systems more proactive, preventative, and fair – for everyone.
CNBC
3 days ago
- CNBC
The UK government won't admit it, but tax rises are coming — and there are no good options
The U.K. government is loathe to admit it, but economists say it's highly likely that the Treasury will have to hike taxes in the fall if it is to bung a black hole in the public finances that it has effectively created for itself. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) is the latest economic think tank to warn that taxes would have to rise later this year if British Chancellor Rachel Reeves is to meet her self-imposed "fiscal rules." These rules target both a balanced or budget surplus by the end of the decade — with the so-called "stability rule" requiring that day-to-day spending is funded by tax revenues rather than borrowing — and that debt, as a proportion of GDP, should be falling by the end of this parliament (in 2029-30), aka the "investment rule." "The Government is not on track to meet its 'stability rule', with our forecast suggesting a current deficit of £41.2 billion in the fiscal year 2029-30," NIESR said in an economic outlook released Wednesday. "Substantial adjustments in the Autumn Budget will be needed if the Chancellor is to remain compliant with her fiscal rules," it added in the report. With the government having fixed its spending plans for the next couple of years in its recent Spending Review, "the only lever available is to raise taxation in a moderate but sustained way," the think tank said in the report titled "the Chancellor's Trilemma." The 'trilemma' refers to the bind Reeves finds herself in thanks to her own fiscal rules, tax and spending commitments made over the last year and the Labour Party's manifesto promise to not raise taxes on "working people." "Simply put, the Chancellor cannot simultaneously meet her fiscal rules, fulfil spending commitments, and uphold manifesto promises to avoid tax rises for working people. At least one of these will need to be dropped – she faces an impossible trilemma," NIESR said. It's worth noting that NIESR's forecast for the budget deficit could be even higher, at around £51.1 billion, if Reeves wants to keep around £9.9 billion's worth of fiscal "headroom" that the Treasury had planned for, but which has been slowly eroded after U-turns on welfare reforms and winter fuel payment cuts for pensioners. "For the Chancellor to really shift the dial and build a reasonably sized buffer against her fiscal rules, she will have to look at either raising VAT or raising income taxes. VAT is the least distortionary tax but is also the most regressive. So, rises in income tax rates are likely to be the best answer, as we have previously argued," NIESR said, but added that there were few palatable options for the chancellor. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was asked about the NIESR report on Wednesday, and the suggestion that tax rises would be necessary, but said he did "not recognise" the figures. Nonetheless, he declined to rule out hiking VAT, income tax and corporation tax in the fall, Sky News reported. "Some of the figures that are being put out are not figures that I recognise, but the budget won't be until later in the year, and that's why we'll have the forecast then and we'll set out our plans," he said. NIESR said Chancellor Reeves faces "unenviable decisions" for the Autumn Budget, when she will unveil taxation and spending plans for the year ahead. "Unfortunately, the most politically acceptable choices for tax increases would either raise very little revenue or would have large distortionary effects, or both," the think tank said, suggesting some measures — such as extending income tax thresholds — would "particularly affect poorer households." Other measures, such as cutting the current £20,000 tax-free cash ISA allowance, or increasing the rate of capital gains tax, could disincentivize saving, the think tank warned. The government could also reverse cuts to employees' national insurance contributions (NICs) but "while this would generate significant revenue over the parliamentary term," it would again breach the manifesto pledge not to raise taxes on working people, and could have strong "distortionary effects via discouraging job creation and so would likely increase unemployment." When Reeves announced her government budget last fall, she unveiled a £70 billion boost to public spending to be funded by higher borrowing and £40 billion in tax rises, which mostly hit British businesses. At the time, she insisted it was a one-off move, telling lawmakers that "we're not going to be coming back with more tax increases, or indeed more borrowing." Reeves could potentially adjust corporation tax rates and allowances which could also raise significant tax revenues, but this would run contrary to her previous pledge to cap corporation tax at 25% for the lifetime of the parliament. It would also likely have a negative effect on business confidence, which has already taken a hit after a hike to employer NICs that took effect in April.
