logo
How Trinamool Congress keeps a tight grip on colleges in West Bengal

How Trinamool Congress keeps a tight grip on colleges in West Bengal

Indian Express20-07-2025
The alleged rape of a student at a law college in Kolkata last month brought into focus a well-known West Bengal secret: Trinamool Congress (TMC) leaders' control of colleges in the state, largely through their governing bodies (GBs).
In his latest visit to the state, which goes to the polls next year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi Friday raised 'the state of the education sector' in Bengal, specifically the school jobs scam. 'What is happening in West Bengal is worrying. Be it primary education or higher education, the situation is the same everywhere. Thousands of teachers have lost their jobs because of grassroots corruption … Trinamool has put both the present and future of Bengal in crisis,' he said at a rally in Durgapur in Paschim Bardhaman district.
The Indian Express looked at several colleges in and around Kolkata, some of which are affiliated to the University of Calcutta (CU), where TMC leaders wield influence in the governing bodies. Following the case of alleged rape at the law college, it emerged that the main accused, Monojit Mishra, is a member of the TMC's student wing Trinamool Chhatra Parishad and was appointed a 'casual' clerical staffer after he graduated. A TMC MLA heads the college's governing body. Some MLAs and ministers, in fact, are the governing body presidents of multiple colleges. To questions about how this affects academic and administrative freedom in these institutions, the TMC points out that the appointments are well within the rules.
The West Bengal Universities and Colleges (Administration and Regulation) Act, 2017, which sets out the rules on governing bodies, says in Article 5(3) that their tenure will be 'determined by the State Government from time to time'. As a result, many of these GBs have remained unchanged for over half a decade, with the government routinely extending their tenure every six months. The structure of these 10-member bodies is also such that it allows the government to stack them with people whom it either directly nominates or those who are closely linked to the TMC.
Only four elected members make it to the governing bodies — three teachers and one non-teaching staff representative — and often, they too have links to the ruling party. Since student union elections have not been held in colleges for the past several years, the post of student representative continues to remain vacant.
Some TMC leaders and the college governing bodies they are presidents of are:
The Indian Express reached out to all of them but received no response. 'Principals are now sandwiched between politics and college administration. There is no freedom to work,' said a college principal who refused to be identified.
A recurring complaint among principals is the lack of change in the governing bodies. 'The GB in my college was last officially formed in 2018. Every six months, the government sends an extension order,' said Dr Satya Upadhyay, principal of Calcutta Girls' College.
However, he added, that despite TMC MP Haque heading the college governing body, he didn't face any pressure. 'We sometimes have differences of opinion, but we end up finding a solution. You cannot take politics out of campuses,' Upadhyay said.
Last month, after the principal of Kolkata's Rani Birla Girls' College, Srabanti Bhatacharya, initiated the election of teaching and non-teaching staff representatives to the GB — which has been unchanged for seven years — a government nominee dropped in a day before voting was to take place. The election was subsequently cancelled, with Bhattacharya hospitalised on complaint of acute chest discomfort. In a letter, the faculty and other staff members alleged that the government nominee had put pressure on the principal to halt the election.
'Those who don't listen to orders face consequences. Many principals have been suspended because of differences. For instance, it happened in Purulia Raghunathpur College because the principal didn't listen to the GB,' claimed former All Bengal Principals' Council president and retired AJC Bose College principal Purna Chandra Maity.
Alleged political interference in colleges also extends beyond GB appointments, with instances of former leaders and general secretaries of TMCP getting appointed to non-teaching positions. In one instance, a powerful TMCP leader became the head clerk at Ashutosh College and a former general secretary was appointed the college accountant, said a source. This shows an 'urgent need for comprehensive reforms to restore academic autonomy and ensure transparent, democratic governance in colleges', said a college principal, who did not wish to be identified.
Another feature of the political limbo on college campuses is the absence of regular student union elections. 'Non-functional student unions give the TMCP all the advantage,' said a CU official. 'College authorities also treat the TMCP unit as the students' union. Every college used to have a separate fund for these unions, and that now goes to the outfit.'
Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha state president Indranil Khan alleged that 'over-politicisation of campuses' by the TMC had 'ruined the academic atmosphere'. 'Such people control colleges, admissions, and examinations. They would never nominate a fair academic to the governing body, as then they will not be able to rig elections,' he said.
CPI(M) student wing SFI's All India Joint Secretary Dipsita Dhar accused the TMC of running a monopoly in colleges. 'The whole idea of having a governing body without a student in it is antithetical to internal democracy. Sadly, in Bengal, colleges have turned into a source of income for the Trinamool nexus,' she said.
The institutional control of universities and educational institutions, however, is not exclusive to the TMC years. It was a source of consternation for the middle classes during the three-decade Left rule, too. In Economic and Political Weekly in June 2011, economist Pranab Bardhan, analysing the fall of the CPI(M), mentioned its all-pervasive control of institutions, including colleges and universities, and the damage it caused. 'The appointments and promotions in colleges and universities, directly orchestrated from the party office in Alimuddin Street and screened for party loyalty, decimated Bengal's long-enjoyed advantage in academic, intellectual and professional pursuits,' he wrote.
TMCP state president Trinankur Bhattacharya defended the extended term of the general bodies, saying it was within the rules. 'I do not understand the problem if the GB president is a political person and is efficient. For example, Dr Shashi Panja is so efficient. Also, not all college GBs are in the party's control,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Migration, religion, language: Bengal's new political churn
Migration, religion, language: Bengal's new political churn

Hindustan Times

time23 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Migration, religion, language: Bengal's new political churn

A lot of working-class settlements across Indian cities – including the national capital Delhi and its suburbs of Noida and Gurugram, Mumbai and others in states where the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is in power – have seen special drives to detect what the Indian state believes are illegal Bangladeshi migrants. At the receiving end of the drive are thousands of poor, blue-collar Bengali speaking Muslims. Whether or not they are illegal Bangladeshis in India is something which is difficult to ascertain. Even the authorities have been able to flag only a miniscule proportion of these people as illegal Bangladeshis. But that's cold comfort; the chilling effect and inconvenience this drive has unleashed on Bengali speaking Muslims in these cities has affected a lot more people. To be sure, poor Bengali Muslims are not the only kind of underclass to have faced police harassment in India. There are a lot of examples, from evictions in large cities to the police siding with perpetrators of caste violence in villages, where the poor are more likely to suffer at the hands of the law-and-order machinery. However, in many such cases, the poor are also able to fight back by political mobilisation. More often than not, it is by cutting deals with politicians (in return for votes) than direct agitational recourse. This is roughly what political scientist Partha Chaterjee has termed as 'political society' where the poor, even though they are in violation of some laws, are able to preserve their interests by leveraging their votes. The current crackdown against so-called Bangladeshis (read Bengali Muslims), however, is different. The recourse to 'political society' insurance in the place where the crackdown is taking place is not really an option. The BJP is not interested in votes of Bengali Muslims or Muslims generally. In fact, the BJP being in power is something which is always despite rather than because of the Muslim vote. The 'political society' which is sympathetic to the cause of these people – the anti-BJP political spectrum in West Bengal – does not have jurisdiction in this matter. The ruling Trinamool Congress, which is the overwhelming recipient of Muslim votes in the state of West Bengal, has been extremely vocal on the targeting of Bengali speaking Muslims which is currently underway. But the best Mamata Banerjee and her government can offer these people is a right to stay safely in the state of West Bengal. The irony is, these people would have never left if their home state – assuming most of them are from West Bengal and not Bangladesh – had the kind of economic opportunities which have attracted them to more prosperous, growing and therefore income generating cities outside West Bengal. Also Read: Bengal migrant worker alleges torture by Haryana police; minister visits him The helplessness involved here is particularly damning for Mamata Banerjee. The BJP has polled almost 40% of the vote share in the past three Lok Sabha and assembly elections held in West Bengal since the 2019 Lok Sabha one. The Trinamool Congress, however, has managed to win each of these elections with a greater vote share than the BJP. Given the fact that almost 30% (it was 27% in 2011 census) of West Bengal's population is Muslim and assuming that they do not vote for the BJP, one can deduce that the BJP already has the support of the majority of Hindus in the state of West Bengal. The only reason it cannot defeat the Trinamool is the latter's support among Muslims. In fact, the rise in Trinamool's footprint in Muslim-dominated regions of north Bengal – it has come at the cost of the Congress and the CPI (M) in the post-2014 period – suggests that there has been a Muslim consolidation behind the Trinamool with the BJP's rise in the state of West Bengal (more on this later). While Muslim support in West Bengal is crucial for Banerjee's and her party's survival in the state, she can do precious little to prevent their harassment in BJP-ruled states where these Muslim migrants go in search of better income opportunities. If this asymmetry continues, Mamata's political capital among the Bengali Muslims is bound to diminish although the chances of Muslims deserting her or her party are still pretty low. There is nothing more demoralizing for a politician than not being able to do something for their core voter base facing persecution. Two more questions need to be asked before concluding this column. What does this persecution mean for India's larger political economy? Free migration for the underclass has been the biggest engine of (relative) upward mobility in post-reform India. It is the most effective engine of trickle-down growth in India's small pockets of opulence where high-income middle-class settlements employ many blue-collar workers either directly (domestic helps etc.) or indirectly (myriad forms of manual labour). This is also a process which has largely been caste and religion agnostic so far. Adding a linguistic and religious caveat to these opportunities introduces an in-built inequality in this engine which did not exist earlier. Also read: Caught between identity, survival: Tale of a Gurugram exodus Bengal has always had a high share of Muslims in the population and Bengali Muslims have been migrating for a long time in India. What explains this new zeal to stereotype (if not outright persecution) them now? Until 2019, which is when the BJP became a close number two in the state, Muslims were part of both sides of the political aisle in the state and were divided along the fault line of the so-called 'party-society' than the typical secular-communal binary in most Indian states. What is happening in Bengal today is bringing it closer to an Assam kind of polity. The BJP already has an edge among Hindus in Bengal and is trying hard to take it beyond a critical threshold by portraying the Muslim as a foreigner. When a state has a 70%-30% population divide between the majority and minority community and the balance is more equal in large parts of the state (if one were to exclude parts like the tribal majority districts of West Bengal bordering Jharkhand and Odisha) then a communal divide in politics can be an extremely dangerous and even destabilising force. For all its failures and inadequacies, the CPI (M) which ruled the state from 1977-2011, the early years of which saw a far more unstable refugee/migration problem in West Bengal, was successful in preventing communalism in the state's politics. Political competition, as well as political violence in the state, was religion agnostic. While a status-quo-ante in terms of return of the religion agnostic 'party-society' model is extremely unlikely in West Bengal, business as usual will be increasingly tested in the days to come because of the fundamental asymmetry facing the Bengali Muslims and their party of choice. To see the ongoing 'anti-Bangladeshi' drives in BJP ruled states without this larger perspective will be missing the woods for the trees. Roshan Kishore, HT's Data and Political Economy Editor, writes a weekly column on the state of the country's economy and its political fall out, and vice-versa

Malegaon blast verdict: Victims' kin to challenge acquittal of Pragya Thakur, others in High Court
Malegaon blast verdict: Victims' kin to challenge acquittal of Pragya Thakur, others in High Court

Hindustan Times

time23 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Malegaon blast verdict: Victims' kin to challenge acquittal of Pragya Thakur, others in High Court

Advocate Shahid Nadeem, representing the victim families of the 2008 Malegaon blast, said on Thursday that he will challenge the acquittal of the seven accused in the High Court soon. Mumbai's Special NIA court acquitted all seven accused of being involved in the 2008 Malegaon blasts, with the court saying that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond a reasonable doubt. (Bhushan Koyande/HT Photo) "We will file an appeal independently," the advocate told ANI. | Follow LIVE Updates on the Malegaon Blast Verdict here An NIA special court on Thursday acquitted all 7 accused, including former MP Sadhvi Pragya, Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhankar Dhar Dwivedi (Shankaracharya) and Sameer Kulkarni. The people were acquitted of all charges under the UAPA, Arms Act and others. "It is sad that we were waiting for the judgment for 17 years. But this is not the victim's fault that the acquittal happened; they just suffered. The victims had come from Malegaon to show their wounds, the court gave the benefit of the doubt because the agency had failed, the ATS and government failed. The victims have no role in this," the lawyer said. Talking about the verdict, the lawyer said that the court has agreed that a blast happened, and has awarded compensation for the same. "The court said that the funds were not used for bomb blast, but it has agreed that the bomb blast happened, the other side had said that the blast had not happened only," he added. Earlier on Thursday, Mumbai's Special NIA court acquitted all seven accused of being involved in the 2008 Malegaon blasts, with the court saying that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond a reasonable doubt. The NIA court has also ordered the Maharashtra government to award ₹2 lakh compensation to the families of the victims and ₹50,000 compensation to the injured. A total of 7 people were accused, including former MP Sadhvi Pragya, Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhankar Dhar Dwivedi (Shankaracharya) and Sameer Kulkarni have been acquitted. The court had examined 323 prosecution witnesses and 8 defence witnesses before pronouncing the verdict. The 7 people have been acquitted of all charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Arms act and all other charges. "Prosecution proved that a blast occurred in Malegaon but failed to prove that bomb was placed in that motorcycle," Judge Abhay Lohati said. On September 29 2008, six people were killed and 95 others injured when an explosive device strapped to a motorcycle detonated near a mosque in Malegaon City's Bhikku Chowk. Originally, 11 people were accused in the case; however, the court ultimately framed charges against 7, including former MP Sadhvi Pragya. (ANI)

Who Is Pragya Singh Thakur, Former MP Acquitted In The 2008 Malegaon Blast Case?
Who Is Pragya Singh Thakur, Former MP Acquitted In The 2008 Malegaon Blast Case?

News18

time32 minutes ago

  • News18

Who Is Pragya Singh Thakur, Former MP Acquitted In The 2008 Malegaon Blast Case?

Accused in the Malegaon blast, jailed for nearly a decade, and now acquitted, Sadhvi Pragya's story is steeped in ideology, controversy, and courtroom drama Nearly 17 years after a deadly blast rocked Malegaon, a communally sensitive town in Maharashtra, a special NIA court on Thursday acquitted all seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur. The case, which involved charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and various sections of the IPC, had become a lightning rod for debates around 'saffron terror," political narratives, and the credibility of India's investigative agencies. But who is Pragya Thakur, the controversial figure who rose from the fringes of Hindutva activism to national political prominence, and whose life was dramatically altered by the Malegaon case? Arrested In 2008, Acquitted In 2025 Pragya Singh Thakur, also known as Sadhvi Pragya, was the first person arrested by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) in connection with the Malegaon blast that killed six people and injured about 100 on September 29, 2008. The explosion occurred on a busy street in Malegaon's Bhikku Chowk and was allegedly caused by an explosive device strapped to a golden-coloured LML Freedom motorcycle. The ATS claimed the motorcycle belonged to Thakur and that she had attended conspiracy meetings where she agreed to provide personnel to carry out the attack. Investigators alleged she introduced wanted accused Ramchandra Kalsangra alias Ramji and Sandeep Dange to other co-accused just months before the bombing. The NIA, which took over the case later, initially supported these charges before eventually giving her a clean chit in 2015, a stance the court did not accept. Despite spending nearly nine years in jail, Thakur maintained that she was falsely implicated, framed by the then Congress-led government, and subjected to custodial torture. A Political Ascent Amid Controversy Thakur joined the BJP in 2019 and was fielded from Bhopal in the Lok Sabha elections that year. In a high-profile contest, she defeated Congress veteran Digvijaya Singh by over 3.65 lakh votes, making her debut in Parliament. Her candidacy was a bold political move by the BJP and stirred nationwide debate, especially given that she was out on bail in a terrorism case. Despite the baggage, she emerged as one of the most recognisable faces of the party's hardline Hindutva plank. Early Life And Hindutva Roots A native of Madhya Pradesh's Bhind district, Pragya Thakur was drawn to Hindu nationalist ideology early in life. Her father, Chandrapal Singh Thakur, was an active RSS worker. She became associated with the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) during her college years and later adopted the life of a 'sadhvi," taking the name Swami Purna Chetananand Giri. Before her arrest in 2008, she had already been active in right-wing religious and political circles and had campaigned for the BJP in Madhya Pradesh. A Life Marked By Legal Ordeal Thakur's time in prison was marked by health complications. While lodged in Mumbai's Byculla Jail, she repeatedly complained of poor health and claimed she was suffering from cancer. Despite her ailments, her bail pleas were rejected multiple times until she was finally granted bail in 2017 on medical grounds. In court, she claimed the ATS had illegally detained and tortured her. 'I was living a sage's life, but I was made an accused, and no one stood by us," she said emotionally during her final statement. 'This ruined my whole life." Breaking down in court, she added: 'I have endured years of humiliation… Despite being innocent, I was branded with the stigma of guilt. Today marks a victory for the saffron flag, a victory for Hindutva. The false narrative of 'saffron terrorism' has finally been disproven." No Ticket In 2024 Despite her prominence, the BJP denied Pragya Thakur a ticket for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. She was among several sitting MPs dropped by the party as part of a strategy to counter incumbency and introduce new faces. Her exclusion also came after a string of public controversies that embarrassed the party leadership. Known For Provocations Thakur's political career has been riddled with incendiary remarks. In 2019, she sparked outrage by calling Mahatma Gandhi's assassin Nathuram Godse a 'patriot." Even Prime Minister Narendra Modi publicly distanced himself from her comments, saying he would 'never be able to forgive her from [his] heart." Thakur later apologised in Parliament, saying her remarks were misinterpreted and expressing regret. In another instance, she claimed that Hemant Karkare, the 26/11 martyr and ATS chief who had arrested her, died because she had 'cursed" him. Karkare was killed during the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks by Pakistani gunmen. The Verdict And Aftermath On July 31, 2025, the NIA court acquitted all seven accused in the Malegaon case—Pragya Thakur, Lt Col Prasad Purohit, Major (Retd) Ramesh Upadhyay, Sudhakar Chaturvedi, Sudhankar Dhar Dwivedi (Shankaracharya), Ajay Rahirkar, and Sameer Kulkarni. Judge Abhay Lahoti said the prosecution could not prove that the bomb was placed on the motorcycle registered in Thakur's name, nor could it establish the larger conspiracy alleged. The court also noted discrepancies in medical records and ordered the Maharashtra government to pay Rs 2 lakh to the families of each victim and Rs 50,000 to the injured. Thakur called the verdict a vindication, not just of herself, but of the ideology she represents. 'They defamed Bhagwa through a conspiracy. Today, Bhagwa has won, and Hindutva has won," she said outside the court. About the Author News Desk The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : malegaon blast case Pragya Singh Thakur view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 31, 2025, 13:46 IST News india Who Is Pragya Singh Thakur, Former MP Acquitted In The 2008 Malegaon Blast Case? Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store