Cash Isa limits set to be left untouched at next week's Mansion House speech
Speculation had been mounting that plans to cut the annual tax-free cash Isa allowance could be announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's Mansion House speech on July 15.
But the PA news agency understands that Ms Reeves will instead focus on new plans to provide consumers with the information and support they need to invest.
The Government is expected to continue talking to industry members and others about the options for reform, with a broad consensus that the UK's savings and investment culture needs to be encouraged.
Harriet Guevara, chief savings officer at Nottingham Building Society, said: 'This is positive news for savers and for lenders.
'We've consistently made the case, alongside others across the mutual and building society sector, for maintaining the full allowance, and welcome any decision to consult further with industry rather than rush through damaging reform that would disincentivise saving.
'Cash Isas remain a vital tool for millions to build financial resilience over time, particularly in the current economic climate.
'Our data shows more than half of our fixed Isa customers used the full £20,000 allowance last year, rising to 65% among those who save in-branch, underlining just how important this option is to those trying to get ahead financially.'
Some building societies reported seeing a jump in cash Isa applications last week, as speculation intensified over the future of the allowance.
Mutuals also warned that mortgages could become more costly and harder to access if the cash Isa limit was cut, with retail deposits being needed to fund mortgage lending.
The Government has been looking at how to help put more money in people's pockets. Earning stronger returns on savings by encouraging investing could be one way to do this, although the value of investments can go down as well as up.
The aim of a potential cut in the cash Isa allowance could have encouraged more investment in stocks and shares, some parts of the industry argued.
But some savings providers also argued that any cut to the cash Isa may simply encourage savers to park their money in taxable savings accounts, rather than the stock market.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recently outlined plans to reduce the 'advice gap' with proposals to enable firms to offer a new type of help called 'targeted support' and make suggestions to groups of consumers with common characteristics.
Sarah Coles, head of personal finance, Hargreaves Lansdown, said that 'rushing into a change' would have been 'a real blow for savers and may not get more people to invest anyway'.
She said: 'Changing the boundary on advice and guidance will be truly transformational. Once companies can offer targeted support to their clients, it will help more people build their understanding and confidence, so they choose to branch out into investment because they know it's right for them – rather than feeling pushed into it to retain their Isa allowance.'
Ms Coles added: 'There is a real opportunity to simplify choice and open up investment opportunities. Dropping the 'stocks and shares' language and updating the Isa to call it an investment Isa would help overcome needless confusion.'
A Treasury spokesperson said: 'Our ambition is to ensure people's hard-earned savings are delivering the best returns and driving more investment into the UK economy.'
Matthew Carter, head of savings and mortgages at Coventry Building Society, said: 'Slashing the cash Isa allowance would be all stick and no carrot.
'It would raise the tax bill for savers, penalising them for doing the responsible thing, and nudge them toward taking greater risk with their money in stocks and shares.
'The ambition to encourage more investment in UK equities is a good one.
'But taking extra risk with the hope of greater longer-term reward isn't always the appropriate choice.
'Many people, especially those already in retirement or saving for a house deposit, don't need or want the uncertainty of the stock market.'
Jason Hollands, managing director of Bestinvest by Evelyn Partners, the online investment platform, said: 'Cutting the cash Isa allowance now when saving rates remain relatively high and the meagre annual personal savings allowance has remained frozen since inception, would have amounted to little more than a tax grab.'
Victor Trokoudes, chief executive and founder of Isa provider Plum, said: 'The FCA's recent announcement about 'targeted support' has massive potential to give people the guidance and information they need to make more informed financial decisions that are best for their circumstances.'
Cecilia Mourain, chief homebuying and savings officer at Moneybox, said: 'Cash Isas aren't a blocker to investing – they're a gateway.
'Saving and investing go hand in hand, and both are crucial to achieving financial goals at every stage of life.'
Alex Sitaras, head of savings at Skipton Building Society, said: 'We back the goal of getting more people to invest, absolutely. But not at the expense of those who rely on low-risk, flexible savings. Cash Isas work. Undermining them doesn't.
'What we'd like to see now is a Government-backed, industry-led campaign focused on education, awareness, and better financial decision-making.'
Tom Selby, director of public policy at AJ Bell, said: 'Allowing more time for consulting industry is a sensible move, as is the focus on encouraging savers to invest using improved financial guidance through 'targeted support'.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
10 minutes ago
- The Sun
Keir Starmer paves way for tax hikes this autumn putting damper on interest rate cut
SIR Keir Starmer has paved the way for tax hikes this autumn — putting a damper on today's expected interest rate cut. The Prime Minister failed to explicitly rule out increases to income tax or National Insurance in the Budget to plug a multi-billion-pound black hole. His refusal to reaffirm manifesto commitments comes as experts warn an eye-watering £50billion is needed just to maintain Chancellor Rachel Reeves ' £9.9billion financial buffer. Speaking on a visit to Milton Keynes, Sir Keir said: 'In the autumn, we'll get the full forecast and obviously set out our Budget. 'The focus will be on living standards, so that we will build on what we've done in the first year of this government. 'We've stabilised the economy. "That means interest rates have been cut now four times. "For anybody on a mortgage, that makes a huge difference on a monthly basis to how much they pay.' No10 tried to play down the comments, saying the Government remains committed to its manifesto by not raising taxes on working people. But the National Institute of Economic and Social Research has said the Chancellor is likely to be forced into raising taxes and cutting spending just to meet the massive shortfall. Despite the economic gloom, homeowners are set to receive a boost from the Bank of England today. Experts predict bank chiefs will cut i nterest rates by 0.25 per cent, even though inflation is stubbornly high and growth weak. Raising taxes will kill off growth, Reeves warned as she pledges to rip up business red tape 1 TOWN HALL CASH ALERT ONE in four English town halls will lose money under Labour's shake-up to council funding, experts warn. Areas like inner London face risking cash to go to services, while the East Midlands and Yorkshire are set for the biggest cash windfalls. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, said changes will 'sting' for councils set to lose out. Labour's changes, still being consulted on, are due to come into effect next year.
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rate fillip for dismal housing: Reeves must ring the changes to get Britain building, says ALEX BRUMMER
During the run-up to the July 2024 election, economic journalists were invited along for an informal chat with the future Chancellor Rachel Reeves. She argued that growth would be a priority for a Labour government and a key part of the programme would be to get Britain building again. The UK has been poor at delivering infrastructure and in the past housing targets have been hard to meet. Tearing up planning rules was always going to be difficult because of Britain's long history of Nimbyism. More than a year into power, and with reforms to planning rules falling into place, brisk progress was to be expected. But the S&P report from UK construction managers for July doesn't offer optimism. It shows the steepest fall in activity since May 2020. The biggest drop came from residential, putting the Government's target of building 1.5m homes in this Parliament in jeopardy. Construction firms cited site delays, fewer new orders and weak consumer confidence as factors. We shouldn't be surprised. Interest rates have proved sticky despite four decreases since Labour took office. The Bank of England is expected to offer a quarter of a percentage point reduction to 4 per cent today. Bad tax policy has played a part. Employment costs are up because of the employers' National Insurance Contributions rise. And the abolition of tax relief on stamp duty at the bottom rung of the ladder makes the aspiration to be part of a property-owning democracy harder. To add to the woes of those seeking a construction revolution, former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has joined the Nimbys – he objects to Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner giving permission to four councils to build over allotments. That's bad for working people, for homegrown produce and the nation's health. Another unforced error. America first The fascinating aspect of commodity trader and miner Glencore's decision to stick with a London listing is its reasoning. Moving to New York, the favoured option, involved 'significant costs'. Its chief executive Gary Nagle might also have pointed out that, with some rare exceptions such as smart chip maker Arm and building group CRH, American investors have not greeted the British arrivals with hosannas. Nagle also rued the fact that there was no certainty that £36billion Glencore would be granted entry to the S&P 500 because of coolness to foreigners. The loss of Glencore would have been serious for London, with its strong history of hosting natural resources companies. BHP retreated to Sydney and if activists had their way Rio Tinto might have done the same. Glencore would have been a less significant departure than AstraZeneca or Shell, both of which have flirted with the idea. Not all is green on the other side of the Atlantic, where AstraZeneca is vowing to invest £37billion. Overnight, the US health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr halted production of mRNA vaccines on a whim. Indeed, Astra's first-to-market Covid jab was slow to be approved in the US, where 'America first' vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna were preferred. It is not just US President Donald Trump and the Republicans who willingly bash overseas investors. President Barack Obama humiliated oil giant BP over the Deepwater Horizon explosion in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 – leading to tens of billions of pounds of losses for UK investors. Glencore's vote of confidence in Britain might be seen by cynics as a distraction from a disappointing performance in the first half. The miner is responding with a pledge to cut $1billion in costs. Never underestimate the odds of it roaring back on robust trading operations. Oven ready It was predictable that supermarket Morrisons would have to jettison assets to pay down the debt it acquired when it fell under the private ownership of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice in 2023. That is unlikely to be enough in a highly competitive grocery market. Prices are generally higher than at rivals and it may require a fresh look at costly specialist counters and whether the vertical model, from farm to customer, is sustainable. That would be a pity.
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Dispute over a major port contract threatens Haiti's fragile political stability
The leader of Haiti's transitional presidential council claimed Wednesday that one of its communications employees was threatened and forced to publish a press release about a key contract involving the country's biggest port and two well-known members of its elite. The incident has deepened infighting within the council and further strained relations between Haiti's government and its private sector as a wealthy businessman prepares to take over the council's presidency on Thursday. Fritz Alphonse Jean, the council's current president, said in a statement that the Aug. 4 press release was published without his approval and despite his objections. He also said he was informed about pressure exerted by unidentified council members to dismiss another communications official who 'had refused to publish the note without his authorization.' Jean said a judge would determine whether to grant a 27-year lease to Caribbean Port Services instead of nine years as originally planned. 'Without this opinion, suspicions of corruption could further tarnish the (council's) credibility,' he said. Jean also demanded that Prime Minister Alix Didier Fils-Aimé provide the council with explanations previously requested regarding the lease of the Port-au-Prince International Port, located in an area long controlled by powerful gangs. The press release that Jean condemned states the council met with Philippe Coles, president of Caribbean Port Services, and Edouard Baussan, a wealthy businessman with strong ties to Haiti's most powerful politicians. The release claimed that the 'fruitful discussions, conducted in complete transparency,' found that 'all necessary clarifications have been provided' and that the contract between the government and the company is legal. Caribbean Port Services is a private maritime logistics company that operates the international port in partnership with Haiti's Port Authority. It handles about 80% of the port's cargo container volume, according to its website. On Thursday, Jean will step down as council president as part of a rotation. He recently told The Associated Press that starting on Aug. 7, Haiti's two executive branches will be controlled by its private sector. Bocchit Edmond, a former ambassador to the U.S., said a businessman taking leadership of the council is an opportunity for the private sector to prove itself. He also condemned Jean's statement on Wednesday. 'I'm against the public bashing of the private sector,' he said. 'It's not a good thing at all for the country, for its political stability.' However, Jean said that some private sector members 'were active operators of the chaos in which Haiti is currently engulfed.' Some of Haiti's wealthy elites and powerful politicians have long been accused of financing and arming dozens of gangs, which the United Nations has noted in its reports. Gangs now control 90% of the capital, Port-au-Prince, and continue to launch attacks in a bid to control more territory. Jean's announcement comes less than a week after U.S. officials announced they were aware of 'reported bribery attempts' aimed at destabilizing Haiti. In remarks to the AP, Jean called it 'a desperate and trivial effort to attract the sympathy of American congressmen and women, and the U.S. administration.' The council was created following the resignation of former Prime Minister Ariel Henry after gangs launched a series of attacks last year against critical government infrastructure. It is tasked with holding elections by February 2026. ___
