New hedge must be planted before old one removed, farmers told
Under road safety, an unacceptable level of risk must be identified by the Local Authority, the National Roads Authority, or the Gardaí before a hedge can be removed (for example, if a laneway is too narrow for modern machinery or commercial vehicles).
Under farm safety issues, a hedgerow in a field with a gradient in excess of 15% in arable land or 20% in grassland, as flagged on the BISS map layer, can be demonstrated to cause an unacceptable risk (for example, if a farmer wants to plough for first-time tillage, necessitating turning on a steep hill).
Since 2009, hedgerows have been designated as landscape features, and beneficiaries of CAP payments (such as BISS) are obliged to retain them, according to a recent update by Mícheál Kelly, scheme support specialist with Teagasc.
Farmers have heard a lot recently about GAEC 2, but it is GAEC 8 that deals with retention and maintenance of non-productive features such as hedges, and other areas to improve biodiversity on farms. GAEC refers to Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition in the terms and conditions for EU farm income support.
Hedgerows are vital for biodiversity, providing essential habitats and travel corridors for numerous species, while also supporting a rich array of plant and animal life.
A hedge means a line of shrubs and/or trees, maintained to form a barrier for controlling animals or marking land boundaries. It can vary from a dense barrier to individual trees. A gappy hedge, with at least 20% of hedgerow species (including briars, gorse etc.) dispersed along its length, is still considered a hedgerow.
Briars on an earthen bank are also protected landscape features. Many earthen banks on their own are recorded as national monuments, and as such are designated landscape features, afforded the same protection as hedgerows.
Even where hedgerow removal is permitted under exceptional circumstances, there are conditions attached. The work cannot be done between March 1 and August 31.
And the original landscape feature must be replaced, prior to its removal, by twice the length to be removed. This must be like-for-like: only a hedge can replace a hedge. So if 10m of hedgerow is to be removed, 20m of hedgerow must be planted in the same vicinity before the removal work can commence.
The replacement hedgerow cannot be funded under an agri-environment measure such as ACRES or the Eco-Scheme. It must consist of traditional local species and cannot include amenity species such as laurel or conifers.
New hedgerows should ideally connect with existing hedgerows or woodlands. A hedgerow or line of trees planted in front of or alongside another hedgerow, planting a line of trees, or planting a grove of trees does not fulfil the replacement requirement. Planting within the curtilage of a dwelling house is not permitted.
In designated areas (Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area, or National Heritage Area), prior approval from the National Parks and Wildlife Service is required for any hedgerow removal.
As field boundaries, hedgerows are also protected by Environmental Impact Assessment regulations (even if there is no BISS application). Therefore, landowners must apply for screening if they wish to remove any field boundary over 500m in length, or if removal of any field boundary would result in the creation of a field over five hectares in size, whichever is the lesser. These thresholds refer to the cumulative total over any five-year period.
EIA assessment is also required wherever proposed works are to be carried out within (or may affect) a proposed NHA or a nature reserve, or wherever proposed works may have a significant effect on the environment.
Read More
Impunity for environmental crimes sees our hills burn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
2 days ago
- The Journal
Silent vigil held outside Justice Department following assault of Indian man in Tallaght
OVER 100 MEMBERS of the Indian community in Ireland held a silent vigil outside the Department of Justice this afternoon after an Indian man was assaulted in Tallaght last weekend. Last Saturday evening, a man in his 40s was assaulted by a group of youths in the Parkhill Road area of Kilnamanagh in south-west Dublin after being falsely accused of inappropriate behaviour. The man was stripped of his pants and underwear by the gang during the vicious attack. Gardaí have appealed to anyone who may have witnessed the assault to come forward. People Before Profit's Paul Murphy said the assault appeared to be the latest in a 'series of recent racially motivated attacks by a gang' in the area. 'The racist groups and individuals who spread their hate bear a heavy responsibility for this and for racist attacks elsewhere' said Murphy. 'Their lies and hate create the atmosphere in which these attacks take place.' This afternoon at 3pm, Friends of India, Ireland held a 40-minute silent vigil in front of the Department of Justice in solidarity with the victim of the recent violent attack in Tallaght. The organisers said it was also a 'collective call for justice, unity, and action against hate crimes'. Labour TD Ciarán Ahern was at the silent vigil and said 'proud to stand in solidarity with members of our Indian community'. Advertisement He added: 'We will not stand for this. We will not allow our communities to become places of fear and hate.' Proud to stand in solidarity with members of our Indian community today🇮🇪🇮🇳 An Indian man was viciously attacked in Tallaght in an appalling unprovoked racist attack last weekend We will not stand for this. We will not allow our communities to become places of fear & hate❤️ — Ciarán Ahern TD (@ciaranahern) July 25, 2025 Speaking to RTÉ at the vigil, Shashank Chakerwart said last weekend's assault 'isn't an isolated incident'. 'As a community, it is important for us to come together and simply protect the dignity of that human being who was stripped naked, who had to walk around the street. You don't want that on Irish streets,' he said. 'It most certainly isn't an isolated incident, because so many migrant communities have been impacted by these violent teenage gangs,' he added. An anti-racism demonstration was also held in Tallaght this evening at 6.30pm in response to last weekend's attack. Anti-racism demonstration in Tallaght this evening People Before Profit People Before Profit Speaking ahead of this demonstration, People Before Profit Councillor for Tallaght South Kay Keane remarked that the area is in 'shock since we learned of the appalling attack'. 'We will not stand by and let this go unchallenged, so Tallaght is coming together to reject the attackers and their hate,' Keane added. Fellow People Before Profit Councillor Darragh Adelaide added: 'The racist groups who spread their hate bear responsibility for this and for other racist attacks. 'It's the far right's lies and hate that create the atmosphere in which these attacks take place. 'They bear a very heavy responsibility for what happened on Saturday and in other racially motivated attacks'. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Independent
17-07-2025
- Irish Independent
Election fraudster works for Healy-Rae family firm, Minister told
A man in Kerry avoided a conviction for election fraud after he cast a vote in the local elections in June 2024 using a polling card, not in his name. Gardaí did not make enquiries as to who asked him to vote and who gave him the polling card. This polling card was registered to an address in Killarney and had been in a tractor along with several others and that one was 'missing' from the vehicle, a court was told. Fine Gael Senator Mike Kennelly said the case was 'worrying' as he outlined further details under privilege in the Seanad to a minister. "We had voter impersonation at Kenmare polling station at the local and European elections in June 2024 caught on CCTV. A Caherciveen man pleaded guilty but avoided a conviction for electoral fraud after he used a polling card, not in his name, that went missing from a vehicle,' he told Minister Christopher O'Sullivan. "It is even more extraordinary to learn, as every dog and divil in Kerry knows, that the defendant works for the Healy-Rae Plant Hire company. He was cited in court as a farmer and contractor, but his employer, the Healy-Rae firm, was unusually not identified, even though he has worked for them for years. "I called for a thorough investigation into the facts of the incident last week and we still need clarity about how this was quietly hushed up. It has made a mockery of our democracy. "There have been no answers as to how this man got the polling card before he drove 40 miles from his home to vote in another town. He did not acquire it himself, the court was told. So who exactly gave it to him? The electors of Kerry and indeed the rest of the country need to know,' he said. The Healy-Rae Plant Hire firm is run by the family of Kerry Independent TD Danny Healy-Rae. Healy-Rae Plant Hire is a third generation family business established by the late Jackie Healy-Rae TD and his brother Dan in 1956. Jackie's son Danny, now a TD, and his wife Eileen were the second generation to operate the business. ADVERTISEMENT Today, Healy-Rae Plant Hire is operated by Danny's sons, brothers Johnny and Dan Healy-Rae. Johnny Healy-Rae is a councillor for the Kenmare area. Danny is a brother of Junior Minister and Kerry TD Micheal Healy-Rae. The Junior Agriculture Minister's councillor son and ministerial press adviser, Jackie Healy-Rae Junior, was contacted to see if the minister had any comment to make on the matter. 'Healy-Rae Plant Hire is not us. Healy-Rae Plant Hire is Johnny and Danny. But I don't know the accuracy of what was said. We'd have to look into it,' the minister's spokesman said. Earlier this month, Kenmare District Court was told that no enquires were made by gardaí regarding the involvement of others parties with Sgt Chris Manton saying the man had not been questioned in this regard. David Moriarty (29) of Kilmackerin, Cahersiveen, came before the court on July 4 charged with 'fraudulently putting in a ballot box a paper other than a ballot paper you were authorised by law to put in' contrary to section 138 of the Election Act. The court had previously accepted jurisdiction allowing for the case to be heard at the District Court. Judge David Waters described it as a very 'serious' matter on several occasions during the hearing. He also queried several times the involvement of other person/s in the incident. Sgt Chris Manton told the court that at the local elections on June 7, 2024 the presiding officer received a report that a male had voted using a polling card belong to another person. CCTV was obtained and Mr Moriarty was identified. Mr Moriarty who was represented by solicitor Brendan Ahern said his client accepted the offence and had pleaded guilty at an early stage. He said he did not wish to lessen the crime but he said it was only one vote therefore it did not effect the election. Judge Waters said it was serious matter and he queried as to where Mr Moriarty obtained the polling card. "He was given by somebody and asked to vote for that candidate and he did so,' explained Mr Ahern who said he not want to reveal the name in court but he said he had provided it to gardaí. However, it later emerged the name of that person was 'unknown' and that Mr Moriarty had never been questioned about this incident and never asked about the involvement of anyone else. Sgt Manton said the polling card was taken from another person without their knowledge. Mr Ahern said it was not Mr Moriarty who took the card. Mr Ahern said his client was at a 'low ebb' at the time after a long-term relationship broke up and this 'clouded his judgement' . The court heard he is a famer and a machine driver in full-time employment. Judge Waters said mitigating factors outlined might be suitable for a public order offence but not for this. Mr Ahern said his client was not politically affiliated and was not doing this to try and get anyone elected but he conceded 'he did what he did'. "He hasn't had a full night's sleep since,' said Mr Ahern adding that it has caused him stress and anxiety. Mr Ahern said he had found it difficult to advise Mr Moriarty given the unique case and said he had advised him to bring €500 to court but he wasn't sure for what end. He said the Kerry man believed he may be going to prison for it before he came to court. Judge Waters said he would be going to prison if he had contested the case and was found guilty. He said if Mr Moriarty had previous conviction, particularly for any crime involved dishonesty, this too would have been a factor and that the only question would have been whether or not to suspend a jail sentence. However, the court was told he had no previous offences and he had pleaded guilty. Judge Waters again queried the involvement of other parties in this case. He said he agreed that the case could be heard in district court after he queried whether it was wide-spread but had heard it was only one vote. However, he said this concern was that 'other parties may be involved and may be more guilty.' He said he said others or another individual decided to do this and a 'vulnerable person was urged to do it' Sgt Manton said who else was involved was 'unknown' Judge Waters said that if Mr Moriarty 'is going to conspire to shield a person' he would take a certain view. Mr Ahern said Mr Moriarty was not questioned about the incident so he was never asked who the other parties may be. Sgt Manton conceded that this was the case saying he had not been questioned. "He was never given the opportunity to name the person/s,' said Judge Waters. Sgt Manton said a file had been sent to the DPP regarding the polling card which had been registered to an address in Killarney and that the father of the person to whom the polling card belonged had this card and others in a tractor on his land and this card was 'missing'. The person, who the polling card belonged to had not been to Kenmare, the court was told. Mr Ahern said his client would co-operate with any future investigation but does not want to name names now. Judge Waters said he was in the mind to adjourn the case to October for more money to be brought to court. Mr Ahern asked for the case to be left stand for a short while. He said Mr Moriarty would provide another €500 and a total of €1,000 was put before the court which Judge Waters directed be paid to Little Blue Heroes charity. He said it was with 'some reservation' he would not give Mr Moriarty a conviction for the offence as he said there was a certain element to it. Sgt Manton said there was a certain 'patsy' element associated with it.
RTÉ News
16-07-2025
- RTÉ News
What do proposed CAP changes mean for Irish farmers?
EU financial supports for farmers could be radically overhauled under a draft proposal from the European Commission. a single National and Regional Partnerships fund from the start of the next EU budgetary cycle in 2028. Here we look at what the changes will mean to Irish and other EU farmers. What is the Common Agricultural Policy? The policy was introduced in 1962 and sought to provide affordable food and a fair standard of living for farmers in the then-European Economic Community. Its main aims are to support farmer incomes, ensure food security, protect the environment and rural development across the European Union. It is a significant part of the EU budget, amounting to nearly €400bn, which is around one-third of the entire budget. There are around 7 million beneficiaries of CAP payments across the EU. How do Irish farmers benefit from CAP? Irish farmers receive around €2 billion annually in CAP payments to help support the rural economy and food production, with around 120,000 farmers receiving payments. Farmers receive funding through CAP in different ways, including direct payments and through specific projects with environmental or production goals that offer financial rewards for achieving them. Projects under Ireland's CAP Strategic Plan include the Agri-Climate Rural Environment Scheme (ACRES) and the LEADER Programme, which funds enterprise development. ACRES has a fund of €1.5 billion to help address biodiversity decline on farms, focusing on things like planting new hedgerows, native trees, and protecting watercourses. Over 50,000 farmers signed up for the scheme since it began in 2023. CAP payments are seen as crucial for the Irish agriculture sector as they help ensure family-run farms are viable. So what are the proposed changes? The proposal would mean CAP would no longer be a stand-alone fund within the EU budget from 2028 and would instead be merged with EU cohesion, migration and infrastructure funding. This could result in certain funding for agriculture within the EU budget no longer being ringfenced and see financial supports funnelled away from farming and into other areas. The draft Commission document proposes to guarantee "coherence by integrating the CAP interventions from the current two-funds structure under one single umbrella". The proposal suggests member states would have more power to reallocate funding "based on their specific needs rather than uniform allocations". The Commission says the funding merger will create "stronger synergies between policies". It says it will create a more flexible, crisis-responsive budget that better reflects the EU's shared priorities and reduce bureaucracy. Under the current system, CAP funding is divided into two pillars, direct payments to farmers and projects for rural development. However, the draft Commission document proposes to guarantee "coherence by integrating the CAP interventions from the current two-funds structure under one single umbrella". The proposal suggests member states would have more power to reallocate funding "based on their specific needs rather than uniform allocations". The Commission's plans also recommend CAP funding "should be focused on active farmers", meaning supports would be "targeted towards farmers who exercise agriculture as a principal activity". In addition, the proposals would increase supports for younger farmers significantly, with funding for the costs of establishing a new farm potentially rising from €100,000 to €300,000. What has been the reaction in Ireland? "Very concerning" is how the Irish Farmers' Association described the draft proposals. IFA President Francie Gorman said the Commission is "downgrading the importance of the CAP" and said it is being turned into an environmental and social policy. He described CAP as the cornerstone of the Irish agriculture sector. The group that represents dairy farmers is warning that the changes could "have an immediate inflationary effect on food prices". ICMSA President Denis Drennan said: "Any merging of the CAP pillars as a pretext towards further reduction in already inadequate direct payments to farmer primary-producers will have an immediate inflationary effect on the costs of food." "It's utterly bizarre – in light of the anxiety being cause by rising food prices – for the Commission to consider cutting the very payments to farmers that were at least going some small way to preventing the full cost of food production being borne by consumers," he added. While Minister for Agriculture Martin Heydon said that the proposals are "just the beginning of a protracted process". Mr Heydon said member states will start the process of agreeing on a "general approach" to the proposals and will take part in "line-by-line negotiations" with the EU Parliament and the EU Commission. He said his priority during the process will be to "ensure that the legislation finally agreed reflects Ireland's concerns, and provides certainty and stability for farmers".
