logo
What do proposed CAP changes mean for Irish farmers?

What do proposed CAP changes mean for Irish farmers?

RTÉ News​16-07-2025
EU financial supports for farmers could be radically overhauled under a draft proposal from the European Commission.
a single National and Regional Partnerships fund from the start of the next EU budgetary cycle in 2028.
Here we look at what the changes will mean to Irish and other EU farmers.
What is the Common Agricultural Policy?
The policy was introduced in 1962 and sought to provide affordable food and a fair standard of living for farmers in the then-European Economic Community.
Its main aims are to support farmer incomes, ensure food security, protect the environment and rural development across the European Union.
It is a significant part of the EU budget, amounting to nearly €400bn, which is around one-third of the entire budget.
There are around 7 million beneficiaries of CAP payments across the EU.
How do Irish farmers benefit from CAP?
Irish farmers receive around €2 billion annually in CAP payments to help support the rural economy and food production, with around 120,000 farmers receiving payments.
Farmers receive funding through CAP in different ways, including direct payments and through specific projects with environmental or production goals that offer financial rewards for achieving them.
Projects under Ireland's CAP Strategic Plan include the Agri-Climate Rural Environment Scheme (ACRES) and the LEADER Programme, which funds enterprise development.
ACRES has a fund of €1.5 billion to help address biodiversity decline on farms, focusing on things like planting new hedgerows, native trees, and protecting watercourses.
Over 50,000 farmers signed up for the scheme since it began in 2023.
CAP payments are seen as crucial for the Irish agriculture sector as they help ensure family-run farms are viable.
So what are the proposed changes?
The proposal would mean CAP would no longer be a stand-alone fund within the EU budget from 2028 and would instead be merged with EU cohesion, migration and infrastructure funding.
This could result in certain funding for agriculture within the EU budget no longer being ringfenced and see financial supports funnelled away from farming and into other areas.
The draft Commission document proposes to guarantee "coherence by integrating the CAP interventions from the current two-funds structure under one single umbrella".
The proposal suggests member states would have more power to reallocate funding "based on their specific needs rather than uniform allocations".
The Commission says the funding merger will create "stronger synergies between policies".
It says it will create a more flexible, crisis-responsive budget that better reflects the EU's shared priorities and reduce bureaucracy.
Under the current system, CAP funding is divided into two pillars, direct payments to farmers and projects for rural development.
However, the draft Commission document proposes to guarantee "coherence by integrating the CAP interventions from the current two-funds structure under one single umbrella".
The proposal suggests member states would have more power to reallocate funding "based on their specific needs rather than uniform allocations".
The Commission's plans also recommend CAP funding "should be focused on active farmers", meaning supports would be "targeted towards farmers who exercise agriculture as a principal activity".
In addition, the proposals would increase supports for younger farmers significantly, with funding for the costs of establishing a new farm potentially rising from €100,000 to €300,000.
What has been the reaction in Ireland?
"Very concerning" is how the Irish Farmers' Association described the draft proposals.
IFA President Francie Gorman said the Commission is "downgrading the importance of the CAP" and said it is being turned into an environmental and social policy.
He described CAP as the cornerstone of the Irish agriculture sector.
The group that represents dairy farmers is warning that the changes could "have an immediate inflationary effect on food prices".
ICMSA President Denis Drennan said: "Any merging of the CAP pillars as a pretext towards further reduction in already inadequate direct payments to farmer primary-producers will have an immediate inflationary effect on the costs of food."
"It's utterly bizarre – in light of the anxiety being cause by rising food prices – for the Commission to consider cutting the very payments to farmers that were at least going some small way to preventing the full cost of food production being borne by consumers," he added.
While Minister for Agriculture Martin Heydon said that the proposals are "just the beginning of a protracted process".
Mr Heydon said member states will start the process of agreeing on a "general approach" to the proposals and will take part in "line-by-line negotiations" with the EU Parliament and the EU Commission.
He said his priority during the process will be to "ensure that the legislation finally agreed reflects Ireland's concerns, and provides certainty and stability for farmers".
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man called 'dog' by boss awarded €8,000 in unpaid wages at WRC
Man called 'dog' by boss awarded €8,000 in unpaid wages at WRC

RTÉ News​

time4 minutes ago

  • RTÉ News​

Man called 'dog' by boss awarded €8,000 in unpaid wages at WRC

A worker who said his ex-boss slashed his rostered hours down to just one day a week and got "abusive" with him at a meeting has won nearly €8,000 in unpaid wages and compensation. Craig O'Brien told the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) that businessman Zemari Jalilzad "berated" him in front of multiple colleagues at a meeting last September when he objected to the cut in hours, telling him: "Who are you? You are nothing, you are a dog." The company then failed to send him his wages for the month of September on payday the following week, he said The employment tribunal has found Mr Jalilzad's wholesaling company, Jalilzad Electronics Ltd, in breach of the Payment of Wages Act 1991 and the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 on foot of complaints by Mr O'Brien, in a decision published today. After nobody representing the company dialled in for scheduled hearings by videoconference in May and July this year, the WRC heard the complaints in the absence of the respondent. Mr O'Brien, who was represented by David Lane of McGroddy Brennan Solicitors in the case, had "many years' experience in the retail and wholesale trade", in particular with household products, toys and seasonal stock, the tribunal noted. The complainant told the tribunal he met Mr Jalilzad when the businessman came to buy up stock during the liquidation of his former employer. Mr Jalilzad had asked him at that stage to join him in establishing his business, he said. Employer 'upset' and 'losing faith' He prepared sales forecasts and a business plan, which Mr Jalilzad agreed to finance, he said. He then travelled to China on behalf of Mr Jalilzad to visit manufacturers of Halloween-related products with a view to supplying these to the Irish retail trade, he said. In May 2024, he joined the company as general manager, on a salary of €50,000 per annum, he said. He proceeded to set up a showroom in Dundalk for retailers to see stock, hired a website administrator, prepared a list of suppliers, and managed to pre-sell stock worth €150,000 to shops, he said. Mr O'Brien said it became clear that "things wouldn't work out" as Mr Jalilzad "insisted" on using a different supplier and "refused to budge" on this. The complainant said the said the product range, price and quality from this supplier "wasn't what customers wanted" and "not what he built the [sales] forecast around". However, Mr Jalilzad "refused to pay deposits to the factories" and the stock Mr O'Brien had pre-sold was never delivered, leaving him to explain matters to the customers, the complainant said. Mr O'Brien said his employer was "upset" about the failing sales figures and customers were "losing faith". He was "constantly on the road trying to fix problems" in July and August 2024 arising from "communications issues with order picking", he said. He told the tribunal he wrote to his employer outlining the problems with the business on 15 September last year, also expressing concerns about the company's finances. The complainant alleged that when he raised a concern on 25 September that the website administrator hadn't been paid, Mr Jalilzad "shouted abuse" at him over the phone. 'You are nothing, you are a dog' On 30 September, Mr O'Brien said he met with the website administrator, Mr Jalilzad, an associate named Imam Jalil, and the businessman's brother in an attempt to "resolve" matters. He said there was a "cool start" to the meeting before Mr Jalilzad "became abusive" and told him that with immediate effect he was "only required to work one day a week". Mr O'Brien said he challenged Mr Jalilzad's right to change his terms of employment "without discussion", upon which Mr Jalilzad "berated" him and said: "Who are you? You are nothing, you are a dog." The businessman sent him a letter later that day cutting his working week from five days to one day a week as a "temporary change". Mr O'Brien's payslip for September arrived on 1 October, recording gross wages of €4,166.66, but "no money was transferred", Mr O'Brien told the WRC. When he wrote looking for the wages, Mr Jalil replied by email stating: "Please let us know if you are available to work one day a week," the tribunal was told. Mr O'Brien said he heard nothing from the firm about what duties he was to perform. Wages 'unlawfully deducted' Mr O'Brien said his employment ended on 31 October when it "became clear" the managing director wasn't going to pay his wages or have "any contact" with him. In her decision, adjudicator Catherine Byrne said it was "entirely unacceptable" that the company had failed to consult Mr O'Brien about the cut to his hours and decided on it without his agreement, the company was not in breach of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994 in that regard. She also found there was "no requirement" for pay in lieu of notice in circumstances where the complainant – who had just six months' service at the time - considered himself to have been "constructively dismissed" due to his employer's conduct. However, Ms Byrne ruled that the company was nevertheless liable for Mr O'Brien's wages for both September and October 2024, and ordered it to pay him €3,078.86 in tax-free compensation for both months, based on the net value of his full-time wages for the period. The wages had been "unlawfully deducted" in breach of the Payment of Wages Act 1991, she ruled. She also found Mr O'Brien had been deprived of eight days' accrued annual leave in breach of the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997, awarding him a further €1,731.60 in compensation.

Danone fails to appeal Yoplait's High Court injunction in low fat yoghurt row
Danone fails to appeal Yoplait's High Court injunction in low fat yoghurt row

Irish Examiner

time4 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Danone fails to appeal Yoplait's High Court injunction in low fat yoghurt row

A row over low fat yoghurt between two multimillion global companies has come before the Irish courts. In the latest round, the Court of Appeal has upheld an injunction granted three months ago to Yoplait Ireland Ltd and ordered that the Irish subsidiary of Danone be restrained from passing off certain Skyr products on the Irish market as those of Yoplait pending the determination of the proceedings. Yoplait Ireland Ltd is suing Nutricia Ireland Ltd, the Irish subsidiary of Danone, over allegedly "passing off" the product. At issue are certain Skyr yoghurts which are made using a traditional Icelandic recipe and are low in fat and high in protein. Yoplait has previously claimed that the "get up", or packaging, of the Danone Skyr "Icelandic style" yoghurt is so similar to the Yoplait "Skyr" product that consumers are likely to be confused when shopping. It claims Danone is piggybacking on the goodwill it has built up to sell its product and is allegedly engaging in an unfair competitive tactic in doing so. Nutricia Ireland had appealed a decision by the High Court last May granting the injunction restraining Danone. Court of Appeal ruling Giving the judgement of the Court of Appeal, Ms Justice Niamh Hyland said she rejected the appeal of Danone and upheld the High Court decision to grant an injunction to Yoplait, but in modified terms. 'I am conscious that Danone is being denied entry to a market, that on its case it is fully entitled to enter. If it transpires that it is correct, competition will have been stifled,' the judge said. She said in the circumstances there was an obligation upon Yoplait to expedite the trial of the action and to make an application to the judge in charge of the Commercial Court list on the matter. Ms Justice Hyland said Danone had failed to establish material error in the High Court judge's conclusion that the relevant customer was one shopping in Ireland for Skyr yoghurt rather than one shopping for white strained yoghurts, as Danone contended. The judge further rejected Danone's argument that the trial judge erred in only considering the position on the parties on the Irish market and not their activities in other markets and she also rejected Danone's argument that Yoplait delayed in bringing the proceedings. However, Ms Justice Hyland ruled that the injunction order by the High Court which restrained Danone not just from passing off the goods, the subject of the proceedings, but from placing on the market confusingly similar Skyr products was 'likely to bring about an injustice'. The judge upheld Danone's appeal in that regard and modified the order to restrain Danone from passing off their Skyr products as those of Yoplait's Skyr's products, pending the hearing of the case. Case background Setting out the background to the case, Ms Justice Hyland said Yoplait Ireland had launched its Skyr product in September 2022 which it sold in packaging featuring a blue and white colour scheme with mountain imagery. She said last year Yoplait updated its it logo packaging but retained the overall get up. Yoplait, she said, asserts that its Skyr products are the leading offering in the Irish market with over 430,000 of the 850g pots sold last year. Nutricia Ireland, she said, first launched Skyr products - including yoghurt with blue and white packaging - in France in 2018 with redesigned packaging introduced to Belgium and Italy last year and an intention to launch into the Irish market in May of this year. Yoplait wrote to Danone last March stating that Danone's Skyr products were confusingly similar to their own and seeking undertaking from Danone not to launch the products in Ireland. Danone declined to provide such undertaking and disputed the claim of passing off and asserted that its packaging is consistent with its established branding and trademark.

‘We're keen to transport' – Aid trucks for Gaza paid for by Ireland left sitting in warehouse for over 5 months
‘We're keen to transport' – Aid trucks for Gaza paid for by Ireland left sitting in warehouse for over 5 months

The Irish Sun

time34 minutes ago

  • The Irish Sun

‘We're keen to transport' – Aid trucks for Gaza paid for by Ireland left sitting in warehouse for over 5 months

DELIVERY HALT 'We're keen to transport' – Aid trucks for Gaza paid for by Ireland left sitting in warehouse for over 5 months IRISH consignments of humanitarian aid for Gaza have been sitting in a warehouse for over five months due to restrictions imposed by Israel. The two consignments, consisting of tents, blankets, household items and non-perishable food, were halted from travelling into Gaza in March. Advertisement 3 The government announced an additional €2 million in funding for the World Food Programme, last week Credit: EPA 3 Four Irish trucks have been sitting in a warehouse outside of Jordan since March Credit: Getty Images stock photo They have since sat immobile in a warehouse in Jordan. The four trucks, paid for by Ireland, were dispatched in February and were due for immediate distribution. The trucks, however, were halted when Israel blocked the entry of all humanitarian aid into Gaza in early March. Speaking to RTE, a spokesperson for the Department of Foreign said they are "keen" to transport the supplies to Gaza "as soon as possible". Advertisement They said: "It was tents, blankets, household items and non-perishable food. It's all in a warehouse in Jordan at the moment, "Obviously, we're keen to transport it as soon as possible, but have been unable to do so due to the restrictions on aid into Gaza." The spokesperson added that Tanaiste Simon Harris had consistently called on Israel to lift restrictions and allow aid in. The majority of Irish aid to Gaza so far has been delivered through initiatives with the UN. Advertisement Last week, the government announced an additional €2 million in funding for the World Food Programme. The Programme, which helps people in need, managed to deliver 4,000 tonnes of food to people in Gaza last week. Israel to fully occupy Gaza City in 'five step plan' to finally destroy Hamas, free hostages, and end bloody war Speaking on the announcement, the Tanaiste said: "Deliberately denying food to people, including babies, in Gaza is beyond comprehension. "Children are starving in what is a catastrophic situation on the ground. Advertisement "In recent days, I've asked my officials to examine how best Ireland can play a part in helping. "This emergency package of funding being announced today will support the World Food Programme to get food to people who urgently need it." He explained that while the recent delivery of 4,000 tonnes of food represented life-saving work, the WFP estimate that 62,000 tonnes of food aid is needed per month in Gaza. He added: "Once again, we call on Israel to remove the many restrictions and delays on transport into and within Gaza. This is the only feasible way to avert famine in Gaza." Advertisement CHILDREN EVACUATED Meanwhile, the Department of Health has confirmed that Ireland will provide medical evacuations for 18 more children from Gaza to Irish hospitals. A dozen children have already been to Ireland along with their carers. These evacuations are part of a World Health Organisation program which Ireland has signed up to. The next group is expected to fly in from Egypt in early autumn. Advertisement In a statement, the Department of Health said: "Ireland has to date provided medical evacuation for 12 paediatric patients out of a commitment of 30 patients. "Twenty-three carers and family members have been evacuated along with these WHO patients" They added: "Medical evacuation will be provided for up to a further 18 WHO paediatric patients, their parents or carers and eligible immediate family members." 3 The shipment was halted when Israel blocked the entry of all humanitarian aid into Gaza in early March Credit: Getty Images stock photo

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store