AI not running UK's nuclear defence, insists Ministry of Defence insists
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has outlined how it utilises artificial intelligence in the UK's nuclear endeavours, following a query by James Cartlidge, Conservative MP for South Suffolk. In a written inquiry, Cartlidge requested details on whether AI contributes to policy-making related to the nation's nuclear capabilities.
Cartlidge, who holds the position of Shadow Secretary of State for Defence and was formerly the Minister of State for Defence Procurement under Rishi Sunak's administration, expressed scepticism during a defence committee hearing about the UK armed forces' readiness to integrate AI comprehensively.
"Are we yet at the stage where we can say, in every aspect of the Ministry of Defence, we're at the highest level of AI preparedness? No," he reportedly admitted in March 2024.
Addressing the MP's subsequent concerns, Defence Minister Luke Pollard assured that "delivery of defence capabilities enabled by artificial intelligence (AI) will be ambitious, safe and responsible."
The UK boasts an approximate nuclear stockpile of some 250 warheads, reports the Express.
Pollard, who represents Plymouth Sutton and Devonport for the Labour Party, further indicated that assessments continue to "identify, understand, and mitigate against risks of applying AI for sensitive defence affairs."
He emphasised that the routine operations of nuclear deterrence adhere to "conducted in accordance with the highest standards and controls."
In response to Cartlidge, Pollard provided further assurance that any action regarding the UK's nuclear arsenal would have human approval.
"Regardless of any potential application of artificial intelligence in our strategic systems, we will ensure human political control of our nuclear weapons is maintained at all times," he clarified.
The Ministry of Defence has pledged to retain human oversight over nuclear weapons, despite the rising developments in AI technology. This is in keeping with their policy to make certain that decisions concerning nuclear force are always subject to direct political command.
Pollard declined to provide specifics on integrating AI into the nuclear sphere, arguing that revealing such details "would prejudice the capability, security and effectiveness of the Armed Forces."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
14 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Child sexual abuse victim criticises ‘smug' Badenoch over grooming inquiry
A victim of child sexual abuse has hit out at 'smug' Kemi Badenoch as he accused the Conservative leader of politicising the grooming gangs scandal. Liberal Democrat MP Josh Babarinde said he was 'really let down and disgusted' by Mrs Badenoch's party political response to the national inquiry. Labour's Dan Aldridge also spoke of his experience of 'sexual and psychological abuse' as a result of grooming, during the Home Secretary's statement in the Commons. The MP for Weston-super-Mare said he 'found it galling' to listen to Tory and Reform MPs 'who never once lifted a finger'. Mrs Badenoch earlier said it was left to the Conservatives to 'force' action on grooming gangs 'time and time again'. The Opposition leader said: 'They accused those of us demanding justice for the victims of this scandal as and I quote 'jumping on a far right bandwagon', a claim the Prime Minister's official spokesman restated this weekend, shameful. It has been left to Conservatives time and time again to force this issue.' She added: 'We went further than those recommendations. It was the Conservatives who established the grooming gangs taskforce, which supported police forces to make 807 arrests for group-based child sexual exploitation last year. So don't tell me we did nothing. 'There are legitimate concerns about institutions investigating themselves, especially as some of the most egregious cases of institutional failure occurred in Labour-controlled authorities. They can moan as much as they like but the people out there believe that is why nothing has happened yet.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said Baroness Casey's report 'sets out a timeline of failure from 2009 to 2025'. She added: 'Repeated reports and recommendations that were not acted on, on child protection, on police investigations, on ethnicity data, on data sharing, on support for victims. 'For 14 of those 16 years, her party was in government, including years when she was the minister for children and families, then the minister for equalities, covering race and ethnicity issues and violence against women and girls, and I did not hear her raise any of these issues until January of this year.' Speaking of his own experiences of abuse, Mr Babarinde said 'the horror, the trauma, the guilt never leaves you'. The MP for Eastbourne said: 'As a survivor of child sexual abuse myself, I stand in solidarity with the many victims and survivors that the system has failed over many, many years. 'And I can say that the horror, the trauma, the guilt never leaves you, and I so hope that every survivor who is identified here receives the mental health support and otherwise they deserve to rebuild their lives. 'Survivors have witnessed very many promises, 20 recommendations, and the call of 'never again', time and again. What will the Home Secretary do and how will she reassure them that this won't be another one of those examples?' He continued: 'I am really let down and disgusted that the leader of the Opposition began her remarks with a party political assault on her opponents like this. Victims and survivors deserve more than a smug 'I told you so', diatribe. Victims and survivors deserve action.' In her reply, Ms Cooper said his speaking out would help other victims and confirmed the Government wants to extend therapy available for victims. Later in the session, Mr Aldridge said: 'I want to pay tribute to victims, survivors and campaigners. I am 40 years old, and it has taken me to be 40 to be able to talk about some of the abuse that happened when I was a child. 'As one of the countless victims living with the impacts of grooming, sexual and psychological abuse, I found it galling to watch Tory and Reform members who never once lifted a finger.' In response to groans from the Opposition benches, he added: 'No, you didn't. You didn't.' Mr Aldridge accused opposition parties of 'appointing themselves as defenders of abuse for political gain', adding: 'Does the minister agree with me that neither history nor the British people will be kind to the sickening political opportunism we have seen from the parties opposite?' Ms Cooper thanked Mr Aldridge for 'speaking out about his experiences, because to speak out as a victim of child abuse in this way is immensely difficult, and I think everyone should listen to what victims and survivors have to say'. She added: 'He is right that this should be something that everyone can agree on, because it's about the protection of children, it's about the tackling of serious crime, and I would hope that is something that all of us can do with respect and together.' Elsewhere in the session, Naz Shah, Labour MP for Bradford West, said blaming 'entire communities' does 'nothing to protect innocent victims'. She said: 'British Muslims stand on the side of victims and support the full force of the law against all perpetrators of abuse. 'But would the Home Secretary agree with me that those that display selected outrage or fan the flames to blame entire communities do nothing to protect innocent victims or further the cause of victims?' In her reply, Ms Cooper said 'the horror at crimes committed against children and particularly against young girls' is 'shared right across communities'.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
SNP take control of Dumfries and Galloway council from Tories
Councillors attended a special full meeting of the council in Dumfries on Monday and were due to vote on the leadership of Tory councillor Gail MacGregor, who has led the council since 2023. SNP members on the local authority had called the vote of no confidence on June 3 in a bid to remove the Tory leadership. They were supported by councillors from Scottish Labour, Democratic Alliance and one independent. MacGregor announced her intention to stand down in a note to officials on Monday morning ahead of the crunch vote. The SNP's slate to take over the administration passed with 16 votes in favour of the motion after winning the backing of five independents. READ MORE: UK must 'constrain Israel' after attacks on Iran, John Swinney says SNP group leader Stephen Thompson is now the council leader and deputy convener of the local authority, with Katie Hagmann serving as convener and deputy leader. All 11 SNP councillors have senior positions on the local authority's various committees following the vote. A bid to install former Tory councillor, now independent, Ian Carruthers as leader with SNP councillor Thompson as deputy, failed after only gathering 10 votes. A total of 16 councillors abstained, most of the remaining Tory councillors and eight Labour councillors. Writing on Facebook, Dumfries and Galloway SNP councillors group confirmed they had taken over the administration. "Tories out: Following a special meeting, the SNP have successfully won a vote to run Dumfries and Galloway Council and deliver on our progressive SNP budget and priorities," they said. "We're committed to delivering for the people of our region." Hagmann (below right) served as interim chair during the meeting while the vote took place. (Image: Dumfries and Galloway Council) New council leader Thompson said: 'This is a moment of opportunity for Dumfries and Galloway. We are grateful for the support from across the chamber that has allowed a new, more inclusive administration to form one that puts the people of our region first. "The previous Conservative leadership no longer commanded the confidence of the Council, and the time has come for change. 'Our focus will be on openness, accountability, and ensuring that every decision we make delivers real benefits for our communities, whether in our towns, villages, or rural areas. "The SNP is committed to working constructively with all parties to address the challenges we face and to seize the opportunities ahead.' He added that the party will prioritise local economic development, tackle the cost-of-living crisis, invest in public services, and strengthen the region's voice within Scotland. 'This administration will work differently," Thompson added. "We will listen, we will act, and we will always put the needs of Dumfries and Galloway first. We call on all councillors, regardless of political affiliation, to join us in delivering progress for the people we are elected to serve.' Thompson served as co-leader in 2022-23 in a "rainbow coalition" with Labour councillors, which had support from independents and LibDems. The power-sharing agreement was dissolved after the Labour co-leader stood down, allowing the Tories to take over. Hagmann said: 'What our communities need most is a steady hand – one that ensures consistent delivery of quality education and social care, fosters a thriving local economy, addresses the pressures of the ongoing cost-of-living crisis and improves vital infrastructure like our roads. 'Guided by the core values of our council, I'm committed to working alongside all elected members to protect our region's future, support our residents, strengthen our communities and ensure we remain a council that listens and responds. READ MORE: Ignore 'hysteria' around Loch Lomond Flamingo Land, says developer 'Our administration will be built on cooperation – working constructively with all political groups to continue the implementation of our ambitious Council Plan. 'With eight years' experience as a local councillor and drawing on my experience over the past three years as COSLA Resources Spokesperson, I'm ready to build consensus and find common ground to deliver real progress for the people of Dumfries and Galloway.' SNP councillor Tracey Little will serve as Dumfries provost. The crunch vote was called after seven Tory councillors quit the party on June 2 over a row over the direction of the administration, which was left with only nine members. The SNP became the largest group with 11 councillors. Councillors Andrew Giusti, Chrissie Hill, David Inglis and Richard Marsh formed a new group called Novantae, which appears to be named after an Iron Age people who lived in southwestern Scotland and were recorded in Ptolemy's Geography. Carruthers, Karen Carruthers and Andrew Wood formed a separate independent group. In a note to council officials, MacGregor said with 'the heaviest of hearts' she had decided to quit. 'It has been an absolute privilege to serve the people of Dumfries and Galloway as Leader of the Council for the past 26 months,' she said. 'During this time I have always tried to lead with a collaborative approach, and I will always do so for the good of the people we serve and the services we provide.'
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Primary school pupils using screens for tests is ‘normalising' use, Tories claim
Shadow education secretary Laura Trott said the Government was instilling screen usage for children as young as four, as the Government came under pressure to ban smartphones in schools. Ms Trott said the policy was supported by teachers, health professionals and parents. She said: 'Every day we have new evidence of the harm screens are doing. So why is the Education Secretary (Bridget Phillipson) ignoring this, and still pressing ahead with screen-based assessments for children as young as four from September? 'Does she accept that this is normalising screen time for young people, which is the opposite of what we should be doing?' Education minister Stephen Morgan said: 'Is this all she can go on? Frankly, after 14 years, they broke the education system. As I said, there's guidance already in place for schools, the majority of schools already have a ban in place on mobile phone use.' Earlier in the Commons, Mr Morgan had told MPs mobile phones had 'no place' in schools. He said Government guidance said schools should ban the use of smartphones during the school day. However ,he said it was up to schools to use their powers to take them off pupils. Shadow education secretary Laura Trott claimed the Government was normalising screen time for young children (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Conservative MPs raised the links between mobile phone usage and violent behaviour, as well as schools with bans having better grades on average. Conservative MP Sarah Bool (South Northamptonshire) said: 'Schools with smartphone bans were rated higher by Ofsted, and their students achieved better GCSE results. So all the evidence shows the benefit of banning smartphones in schools. 'But the Government is simply issuing non-statutory guidance and passing the buck. So does the minister not understand the evidence, need more evidence, or do you not trust the Government to be able to implement a ban on smartphones in schools?' Meanwhile, John Lamont (Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk) said: 'Mobile phones in classrooms are linked to disruptive and violent behaviour. So does the minister agree with me that mobile phones should be banned in all schools, so the children are focused on their education and not glued to Instagram and TikTok?' While in government, the then Conservative education secretary, Gillian Keegan, sent guidance to schools that told headteachers they could ban mobile phones during the school day. However, this was short of an out-and-out ban. Since their election defeat last year, the Conservatives have pushed for Labour to introduce a full ban. In March, it tried to amend Labour's flagship education policy to legally prohibit smartphone usage. A Government spokesperson said the existing guidance meant about 97% of schools restrict mobile phone use in some way. Studies are unclear on the impact of a smartphone ban. One by the University of Birmingham, published in the Lancet earlier this year, suggested there was no link. Replying to Ms Bool, Mr Morgan said: 'I'll take no lectures from the benches opposite on this. When in government, they exclaimed the same guidance meant a consistent approach across all schools. So you have to ask, were they wrong then, are they wrong now?'
