AI not running UK's nuclear defence, insists Ministry of Defence insists
Cartlidge, who holds the position of Shadow Secretary of State for Defence and was formerly the Minister of State for Defence Procurement under Rishi Sunak's administration, expressed scepticism during a defence committee hearing about the UK armed forces' readiness to integrate AI comprehensively.
"Are we yet at the stage where we can say, in every aspect of the Ministry of Defence, we're at the highest level of AI preparedness? No," he reportedly admitted in March 2024.
Addressing the MP's subsequent concerns, Defence Minister Luke Pollard assured that "delivery of defence capabilities enabled by artificial intelligence (AI) will be ambitious, safe and responsible."
The UK boasts an approximate nuclear stockpile of some 250 warheads, reports the Express.
Pollard, who represents Plymouth Sutton and Devonport for the Labour Party, further indicated that assessments continue to "identify, understand, and mitigate against risks of applying AI for sensitive defence affairs."
He emphasised that the routine operations of nuclear deterrence adhere to "conducted in accordance with the highest standards and controls."
In response to Cartlidge, Pollard provided further assurance that any action regarding the UK's nuclear arsenal would have human approval.
"Regardless of any potential application of artificial intelligence in our strategic systems, we will ensure human political control of our nuclear weapons is maintained at all times," he clarified.
The Ministry of Defence has pledged to retain human oversight over nuclear weapons, despite the rising developments in AI technology. This is in keeping with their policy to make certain that decisions concerning nuclear force are always subject to direct political command.
Pollard declined to provide specifics on integrating AI into the nuclear sphere, arguing that revealing such details "would prejudice the capability, security and effectiveness of the Armed Forces."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
27 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
GPT-5 vs Claude Code : AI Battle Royale Creative Edge vs Precision
What happens when two AI titans square off in the ever-evolving world of code generation and application design? The competition between GPT-5 and Claude Code—particularly its Sonnet and Opus variants, has sparked a heated debate among developers and designers alike. While GPT-5 is celebrated for its technical precision and reliability, Claude Code's creative flair and intuitive design capabilities have carved out a loyal following. But which tool truly delivers when it comes to balancing creativity, functionality, and engineering rigor? The answer isn't as straightforward as you might think, and the stakes are higher than ever for those relying on these tools to shape the future of digital innovation. In this exploration, Matt Maher unpack the unique strengths and limitations of GPT-5 and Claude Code, diving into their ability to handle tasks like interpreting PRDs, generating maintainable code, and crafting visually stunning designs. Along the way, you'll discover how each tool approaches challenges like instruction adherence, modularity, and translating screenshots into functional outputs. Whether you're a developer seeking precision or a designer chasing innovation, this comparison will help you navigate the nuances of these AI powerhouses. After all, the choice between them isn't just about features, it's about finding the right fit for your vision. GPT-5 vs Claude Code Creativity and Reliability: Striking the Right Balance The first impression of these models often highlights their distinct strengths. Sonnet consistently delivers outputs that are both creative and visually engaging, making it an excellent choice for tasks where design aesthetics are paramount. However, its tendency to overlook critical details may necessitate additional refinement to meet precise requirements. GPT-5, on the other hand, has made notable advancements in reliability, producing accurate and dependable initial drafts that require fewer adjustments. Meanwhile, Opus excels in generating detailed application pages, but minor errors or inconsistencies can occasionally arise, requiring iterative corrections. If your project prioritizes creativity and visual appeal, Sonnet is likely to stand out. However, for those seeking a reliable and balanced starting point, GPT-5 is closing the gap and offers a dependable alternative. Instruction Adherence: Precision or Intuition? The ability of these models to follow instructions depends significantly on the clarity and structure of the provided prompts. GPT-5 performs exceptionally well when given explicit, detailed guidance, making sure it adheres closely to specified requirements. In contrast, Sonnet and Opus demonstrate a more intuitive approach, often making creative decisions that align with the broader context of the input. While this can lead to innovative results, it may also result in deviations from strict instructions. Across all models, errors in initial outputs are not uncommon, underscoring the importance of iterative refinement. If your project demands precision and strict adherence to instructions, GPT-5 is a strong contender. However, for tasks that benefit from creative interpretation and flexibility, Sonnet and Opus may better suit your needs. Can GPT-5 Keep Up with Claude Code? Watch this video on YouTube. Enhance your knowledge on ChatGPT 5 by exploring a selection of articles and guides on the subject. Code Quality and Maintainability: Engineering Standards Matter The quality of generated code is a critical factor in evaluating these tools. Opus stands out for its clean, modular architecture, which emphasizes breaking code into isolated, testable components. This approach simplifies debugging and assists future updates. GPT-5 also demonstrates strong engineering practices, adhering to established naming conventions and maintaining a clear separation of concerns. While Sonnet is capable of producing clean code, it occasionally struggles with maintaining modularity, which can complicate long-term maintenance. For projects that prioritize clean, maintainable code, Opus leads the way, with GPT-5 offering a close alternative for engineering-focused tasks. Sonnet, while creative, may require additional oversight to ensure maintainability. Design and UI Implementation: Aesthetic Appeal vs. Practical Functionality When it comes to user interface (UI) design, Sonnet excels in delivering visually appealing and functional outputs that align closely with design expectations. Its ability to create polished and engaging designs makes it a preferred choice for visually driven projects. Opus, while innovative, introduces features such as auto-progressing carousels but occasionally lacks consistency in design elements. GPT-5, though improving in this area, often leans toward functional, database-like layouts, which may lack the stylistic nuances required for certain projects. For projects emphasizing visual aesthetics and design innovation, Sonnet is the most reliable option. However, if your focus is on practical, engineering-oriented designs, GPT-5 provides a more functional solution. Using PRDs and Screenshots: Text and Visual Inputs The use of detailed PRDs and screenshots significantly enhances the performance of all three models. Sonnet and Opus excel at interpreting visual design requirements, effectively translating screenshots into functional designs. Their ability to adapt to visual inputs makes them particularly valuable for projects involving UI or UX design. GPT-5, while excelling with text-based engineering instructions, sometimes struggles with visual design elements, often requiring additional iterations to refine outputs. If your project involves translating visual references into code, Sonnet and Opus are better equipped for the task. Conversely, GPT-5 shines when working with text-based specifications that demand technical precision and clarity. Key Insights for Choosing the Right Tool Several important takeaways emerge from this comparison: Providing clear, detailed, and incremental prompts significantly improves the performance of all models. GPT-5 excels in engineering-focused tasks, particularly when explicit guidance is provided. Sonnet and Opus are more intuitive and creative, making them ideal for design-oriented projects but requiring refinement for technical precision. Iterative testing and refinement are essential to achieving optimal results, regardless of the model used. Tailoring Your Approach for Maximum Impact The choice between GPT-5 and Claude Code ultimately depends on the specific demands of your project. GPT-5 is best suited for engineering-focused tasks that require explicit instructions and technical accuracy. In contrast, Claude Code, particularly its Sonnet and Opus variants, excels in creative and design-oriented tasks, offering intuitive adaptability to visual and stylistic requirements. By understanding the unique strengths and limitations of each model, you can tailor your approach to maximize their potential. Whether your priority is engineering rigor or creative flexibility, these tools provide powerful capabilities that, when used effectively, can enhance your application design and code generation workflows. With the right strategy, you can use these AI models to meet your project goals efficiently and effectively. Media Credit: Matt Maher Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Suranne Jones details 'rambunctious' experience shadowing Keir Starmer for thriller role
Suranne Jones has opened up about her 'rambunctious' experience shadowing Keir Starmer for her new Netflix thriller and detailed one fiery moment in particular Suranne Jones has opened up about her 'rambunctious' experience shadowing Keir Starmer for her new Netflix thriller. The former Coronation Street actress, 46, is now starring as fictional Prime Minister Abigail Dalton in Hostage, and follows the events that unfold after her character attends a summit with the French president Vivienne Toussaint (Julie Delpy) and her husband is kidnapped. As part of her research for the role, Suranne took a trip to Downing Street and ventured into the House of Commons, where she managed to catch a heated moment with the real-life Prime Minister. Speaking on Wednesday's edition of This Morning, she told hosts Sian Welby and Craig Doyle: "I did go to the House of Commons. It was great because when we then built our set, I'd been in the actual place. We did see Keir Starmer having a...[debate] it was quite rambunctious." The actress noted her disbelief at watching it all take place in front of her as she added: "There was a lot of shouting in there. You don't believe it til you see it!" The UK has only seen two female Prime Ministers in its time, with the late Margaret Thatcher having served a leader of the Conservative party from 1979 until 1990. In October 2022, Liz Truss became the shortest-serving Prime Minister in the country's history having managed to survive just 50 days in office. Suranne noted the lack of females in such a role of power but approached the role with a 'fresh' perspective, which she believes was necessary when taking into account the current political climate. She said: "We haven't got a lot of women to look at, have we? But that's another great thing. What I did and women in power, I wanted Abigail to be a fresh set of eyes, and the political landscape as it is, we needed that as it is." However, Suranne, who has carved out a stellar career in drama since leaving her role as Karen McDonald on ITV's flagship soap more than two decades ago, recently admitted she wouldn't want to take on the top job at number 10 in real life, mainly because of the amount of 'baggage' her new alter-ego has to carry round. She said: "A woman, before she's even put on her very high, hurty shoes, she has a lot of baggage and a lot of things that she is carrying: the way she looks, the way she dresses, the way she's been educated. "All of those things. How she behaves with her family or her background, everything, before she starts to go out into the world and getting judged for it. "Obviously, I'm well known. People recognise me. I try to keep a private element to my life, but then I do want to show support of the charities I work for and all of that stuff, and the community theatre that I like to give elevation to, so I drew on a lot of that stuff. But I wouldn't want to be a prime minister." She continued: "The early name for the show was The Choice and I think that's the thing, the choice of wanting a job like that, the choice of your family or your country. "It blows my mind, I can't even imagine... obviously, I had to because I play the prime minister, so I did have to imagine. But these big, big choices, they're huge and so it's just making people think." The five-part political thriller witnesses Dalton being blackmailed following her husband's kidnapping whilst he's working overseas, with the captors threatening his murder unless she steps down from office.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
OpenAI eyes world's largest valuation for private company in stock sale talks
The maker of ChatGPT is on the cusp of becoming the world's most valuable private company. OpenAI is in talks to sell $6bn in shares, which would boost its valuation to $500bn, according to multiple reports. The artificial intelligence startup's stock would be sold to investors by current and former employees. OpenAI has seen exponential growth over the past year. Investors, including Microsoft and SoftBank, have poured at least $40bn into the startup, giving it a valuation of $300bn as of March. Last October, it was valued at $157bn. If OpenAI achieves a $500bn valuation, it would surpass Elon Musk's SpaceX, which currently holds the title of world's most valuable privately held company, at $350bn. The reported cohort of investors now eyeing OpenAI's share sale include three firms that have already invested: SoftBank, Dragoneer Investment Group and Thrive Capital. According to Bloomberg, the talks are in early stages and the numbers could change. OpenAI declined to comment. OpenAI leads a crowded and competitive race, with the world's most powerful companies battling to beat out one another on AI. Meta, Google, Amazon and Microsoft have all been spending enormous sums on AI development – hiring engineers and building data centers. The four companies have spent a combined $155bn on AI development in 2025 alone. Although artificial intelligence has improved since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, OpenAI received a lukewarm reception at the debut of its latest version of the AI that underpins its chatbot, GPT-5, earlier this month. Users said the new AI model's writing was worse and that it lacked the personality of previous iterations. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has said his company is pursuing 'artificial general intelligence', or an AI that can outdo a human at most tasks, but at the recent launch, he said GPT-5 was 'generally intelligent', but was not yet able to 'continuously learn'. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion AI companies have also been increasingly scrutinized by regulators for chatbots that create harmful conversations and manipulate users.
