logo
Two accused in Parliament security breach case granted bail

Two accused in Parliament security breach case granted bail

Scroll.in15 hours ago
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday granted bail to two persons accused in the 2023 Parliament security breach case, Bar and Bench reported.
A bench of Justices Subramonium Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar allowed petitions filed by Neelam Azad and Mahesh Kumawat for bail in the case, which was reserved on May 21, Live Law reported.
The bail was subject to Azad and Kumawat furnishing a bail bond of Rs 50,000 each and two sureties. The two were also barred from holding press conferences or giving interviews, and posting anything on social media about the incident.
The matter pertained to two men, Sagar Sharma and Manoranjan D, jumping into the Lok Sabha chamber from the visitors' gallery and opening gas canisters on December 13, 2023.
Outside Parliament, Azad and a man – Amol Dhanraj Shinde – had opened smoke canisters and shouted 'stop dictatorship' slogans. All four were arrested in connection with the breach.
A day later, the police arrested Lalit Jha, allegedly the mastermind behind the incident, and Kumawat, a co-accused.
The police charged all six under provisions of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act.
Azad moved the High Court in September 2024 against a city court denying her bail, while Kumawat also filed an appeal in November against the rejection of his bail petition, the Hindustan Times reported.
During earlier proceedings, Azad and Kumawat told the court that the police had wrongly invoked the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act against them, adding that their alleged actions did not construe an act of terrorism.
Azad said that her conduct did not amount to an act of terror as she had entered the premises using a valid pass and without weapons, the Hindustan Times reported. Kumawat said that his intention was to draw attention towards certain issues having democratic and political importance.
However, the police argued that the breach coincided with the anniversary of the 2001 Parliament attack, which was enough to prove that the intention of those accused in the matter was likely to strike terror or threaten the security of the country.
On December 13, 2001, terrorists entered the Parliament complex and began shooting with AK-47 rifles. The attack had left nine persons dead.
The police also submitted that those accused in the case wanted to bring back 'haunted memories' of the 2001 attack to the 'majestic' new Parliament building, Live Law reported.
The bench, however, asked whether an offence under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act could be made out against those accused. It added that if using smoke canisters were a terrorist act, then every Holi and Indian Premier League match would also attract such provisions, Live Law reported.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Express View on Karnataka's draft bill on fake news: Don't make it law
Express View on Karnataka's draft bill on fake news: Don't make it law

Indian Express

time10 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Express View on Karnataka's draft bill on fake news: Don't make it law

Several elements go into making legislation 'bad in law': Vague provisions and definitions that invite misuse; arrogation of power to government authorities without necessary checks and guardrails; difficulties of enforcement or possibilities of selective enforcement and, most importantly, legitimate concerns about infringement on fundamental rights and violation of due process. The Karnataka Mis-Information and Fake News (Prohibition) Bill fulfils these criteria, and more. It constitutes an 'Authority' — headed by the state Information & Broadcasting Minister and made up mostly of lawmakers and officials selected by the government — that is all but certain to act as a censor. It is a bill of bad faith — it enables an exercise of arbitrary power under the garb of rooting out falsehood. It is an overzealous government addressing a complex issue through the bluntest of instruments. India has approximately 700 million smartphone users, and Karnataka is among the states with the highest internet penetration. Can the proposed Authority mine and analyse the vast amounts of data on social media while ensuring that no citizen's right to free speech is violated? More importantly, even if it could, should it? 'Fake news' is defined by the Bill as false or inaccurate reporting, editing that distorts facts and purely fabricated content. Misinformation is 'knowingly' or 'recklessly' spreading falsehoods, with exceptions for religious sermons, satire, and 'artistic expression'. Evidently, the government of Karnataka, not satisfied with setting itself up as the arbiter of Truth, seeks to define Art as well. It also wishes to prosecute what it deems as going against 'feminism' and 'Sanatan Dharma'. The Bill compounds the sin of loosely worded and vague provisions with harsh punishment: Offenders face fines up to Rs 10 lakh, seven years' imprisonment or both. It flies in the face of the letter and spirit of the Supreme Court's judgment in the Shreya Singhal (2013) case and the Bombay High Court verdict on the Centre's IT Rules in 2024, both of which warned against the dangers of ill-defined legal provisions encroaching on free speech. India already has laws on defamation and for protecting 'hurt sentiments', which are often weaponised by governments to curb fundamental freedoms. Karnataka's capital is a hub of innovation, and of a start-up culture that has the potential to propel the state's and the country's economy forward. The government must recognise that innovation and censorship do not go together. Fifty years after the Emergency, the lesson on the dangers of state excess and overreach should have been internalised by Congress governments, including in Karnataka. As Justice Gautam Patel noted in the Bombay HC's 2024 verdict, 'Every attempt to whittle down a fundamental right must be resisted root and branch.' Misinformation and fake news are indeed problems of the present and future. Addressing them requires digital literacy, which involves going to schools to ensure that the next generation is equipped to sift fact from falsehood. Such programmes require finesse, time and the right intent. Not a draconian law — the Bill needs to be binned.

Punjab's land pooling policy and its criticism
Punjab's land pooling policy and its criticism

Indian Express

time10 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Punjab's land pooling policy and its criticism

A land pooling policy, meant to acquire more than 40,000 acres of farmland for housing purposes, has triggered protests in Punjab. Here's why. The Land Pooling Policy, 2025 is a flagship initiative of the Punjab government with the stated aim of promoting 'planned urban development'. Unlike in traditional land acquisition, where the state simply acquires land for compensation, the pooling initiative is meant to be voluntary. The policy seeks to check the proliferation of illegal colonies and arrest haphazard urban growth, while ensuring landowners remain stakeholders in development, Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann has said. For every 1 acre of land pooled, landowners will get a 1,000 sq yard residential plot and a 200 sq yard commercial plot (1 acre= 4,840 sq yards). In the case of larger contributions, for every 9 acres of pooled land the landowners will get 3 acres of developed land, suitable for group housing. For 50 acres pooled, they will get 30 acres of developed land. The policy is currently being rolled out in 27 cities across Punjab, in districts such as Ludhiana (24,000 acres targeted), Mohali (6,000 acres), Amritsar (4,464 acres), Jalandhar, Patiala, Bathinda, and Sangrur. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government in Punjab is looking to generate roughly Rs 20,000 to 25,000 crore from the land pooling. With state elections set to take place by March 2027, the government has roughly a year-and-a-half to rule before the model code of conduct kicks in. Forcible land acquisition is a long process susceptible to arduous legal wrangling. The government anticipates that the voluntary pooling route will cut short the time for land acquisition while simultaneously helping generate funds for the cash-strapped state, sources said. These funds, sources indicate, might be used to finance the AAP government's ambitious pre-poll promise of paying a monthly sum of Rs 1,000 to all women in the state. Experts, however, argue that the policy needlessly diverts fertile agricultural land for urban use. 'By diverting almost 40,000 acres from agriculture to cities, we will lose almost 1.50 lakh tons of paddy production. Unfortunately, in most parts, the land is fertile,' one expert told The Indian Express. Punjab BJP Chief Sunil Jakhar has called this a 'ponzi scheme,' and accused the government of exploiting farmers with false promises. SAD President Sukhbir Singh Badal has announced statewide protests against the move, calling it a 'land-grabbing scheme' designed to raise Rs 10,000 crore through bribes and benefit private developers. Critics say that the policy, based on the Punjab Regional Town Planning and Development Act, 1995, lacks the safeguards for compensation and resettlement provided under the Central Land Acquisition Act of 2013.

Centre Plans GST Revision: GST on cigarettes, luxury cars may rise
Centre Plans GST Revision: GST on cigarettes, luxury cars may rise

Hans India

time11 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Centre Plans GST Revision: GST on cigarettes, luxury cars may rise

New Delhi: Cigarettes, carbonated drinks, and high-end cars are among items that may become more expensive if a proposal to replace the expiring compensation cess - in the Goods and Services Tax system - with cesses on health and clean energy, targeting tobacco products and automobiles, is passed. The Health Cess will apply to 'sin goods' - referring to products usually taxed at higher rates due to their perceived negative impact on society - and others in the higher 28 per cent GST bracket. The Clean Energy Cess will target more expensive cars and coal, and is seen as aligning with the Narendra Modi government's overall push to renewable or non-polluting energy sources. Sources said the Group of Ministers is already close to an agreement on these two new levies, particularly since most states are expected to accept continuing to tax goods seen as unhealthy or harmful. Experts, though, believe swapping one cess for two may not be as easy as that, because the GST law does not allow for a new levy, which could require a constitutional amendment to become law. The core issue is identifying the beneficiary of the proposed new cesses. Compensation Cess Compensation cess is an additional tax on select goods and services over and above the GST. It was introduced in 2017 - concurrent with the enactment of the Goods and Services Tax Act - as a way to 'provide compensation to States for loss of revenue' from implementation of the law. But should the Centre collect and keep the new cesses it for itself, the states might object to the loss of revenue, especially since they were promised equal shares in GST revenue to give up their rights. A new revenue-sharing mechanism will have to be worked out, sources said. Compensation cess was to be valid for five years only. It expired in June 2022 but was extended till March 2026 to allow states to repay loans taken to meet pandemic-era compensation shortfalls. Relief for middle class Meanwhile, sources also said talks are also ongoing over reducing the number of GST slabs, possibly by abolishing the 12 per cent slab. If passed, this will mean some products taxed at that 12 per cent will fall into the lower tax bracket - i.e., five per cent. Others will be pushed into the higher 18 per cent bracket. The government believes, source said, products like toothpaste in the 12 per cent category are staples for the middle class and economically weaker sections and could be taxed at lower rates. Sources said this is expected to increase the burden on the central government by up to Rs 50,000 crore. The centre, though, is prepared to absorb the initial impact and expects the deficit to reduce long-term because of an anticipated boost in consumption. Essentially the centre believes lower prices mean higher sales, and this will result in a tax base and increased GST collection.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store