Is Canada-U.S. trade ‘progress' possible in 2 weeks? Ontario rep says ‘yes'
David Paterson said he's hopeful that further progress in reducing those tariffs can be made by the time Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney are face-to-face at the G7 Leader's Summit in Alberta in two weeks.
Asked by Mercedes Stephenson during an interview that aired Sunday on The West Block if he's getting the sense from Republican lawmakers that the White House is open to such a quick timeline, Paterson said, 'Yes.'
'You have a choice of either engaging — and that's what we do in Washington — and trying to make progress, or sit back and wait for some kind of perfect deal, and I think that could take a long time,' he said.
Story continues below advertisement
'We are now in a world where the formal trade agreements that we like to count on as being enforceable is now turning much more into a world where countries have to protect themselves.'
Trade negotiations have continued despite a whiplash week that saw a U.S. court briefly block the emergency orders used to justify many of Trump's tariffs on Canada and most of America's trading partners.
2:00
U.S. appeals court spares Trump's tariffs — for now
After a U.S. appeals court stayed the U.S. Court of International Trade's ruling as it reviews the Trump administration's challenge, Paterson said the world remains 'in much of the same position.'
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The ruling did not affect tariffs on the steel, aluminum and auto sectors that have hit Ontario particularly hard.
'Many people have hoped that we would see the courts intervene on tariffs, many have hoped that the Congress would step up, but hope is not a strategy,' Paterson said.
Story continues below advertisement
'You need to keep on focusing on the things that are impacting your economy.'
Paterson says the bilateral talks with the U.S. on lowering tariffs can be separate from the broader renegotiation of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement on free trade (CUSMA) set to begin next year.
In the short term, however, he says Canada needs to secure its position as a key trading partner as other nations jockey for their own deals.
'Right now there's one game that is available for people, and you have Japan, South Korea, the United Kingdom, the European Union, Vietnam — all these are in Washington trying to do bilateral deals to improve their trade situation,' he said.
The United Kingdom has already secured a framework trade agreement with the U.S. that Paterson says serves as both an example of what Canada could achieve for itself and an incentive to get a deal done that ensures its 'relative competitive advantage.'
'Suddenly we find ourselves in a situation where a vehicle from the United Kingdom now has a lower tariff coming into the United States than a Chevrolet made in Ontario. That doesn't make any sense,' he said. 'That's one of the discussion points that we have.
'We need to make more progress. We, as the signers of the CUSMA agreement, surely should have the best access to the United States market than everyone.'
Story continues below advertisement
1:49
Carney meets with U.S. delegation in Ottawa
Paterson said part of the mission he and others have undertaken is to educate the Trump administration on the important role Canada plays as one of the largest trading partners for the U.S. A majority of U.S. states do more trade with Canada than any other nation.
'You may hear the president say, 'I don't need your cars, I don't need your natural resources.' The truth is they do, and we know they do and they know they do,' Paterson said. 'So that makes for a really good set-up for us in terms of being able to make progress.'
While Trump has continued with that dismissive rhetoric, Paterson said talks have gone very well with Republican lawmakers he hopes can make the case to the president and the administration.
'We've probably talked to 100 Republican senators and members (of the U.S. House of Representatives) over the last year — I certainly have not had a bad meeting with any of them. They love Canada,' he said.
Story continues below advertisement
'But they are giving the president, who won the election, the time to be able to take forward this agenda that he's doing. They're not pushing back on that in any meaningful way.'
Paterson pointed to last week's trip to Ottawa by a delegation of U.S. senators, led by Republican Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, as the most recent public example of American officials recognizing Canada's importance.
'A big thing that they understand and that we remind them is, 'We're your biggest supplier and we're your biggest customer. So put us first in line and in your own self-interest, let's get these tariffs down and start getting some certainty into the economy,' he said.
'That is a message that I think is really resonating in Congress and is really resonating increasingly even with people in the White House.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
11 minutes ago
- CBC
Horse racing ends in Surrey as city reclaims Fraser Downs land for redevelopment
New Fraser Downs is one of two horse racing tracks in B.C. and only racetrack for standardbred horses Horse racing at Fraser Downs in Surrey, B.C. has come to an end after nearly 50 years, as the city moves to redevelop the land for housing and other public amenities. Great Canadian Entertainment, which owns and operates the track, said Friday the closure takes effect immediately though the adjacent Elements Casino Surrey will remain open. The decision follows notice from the City of Surrey, which owns the Cloverdale Fairgrounds where the racetrack is located, that it is terminating the lease. Mayor Brenda Locke says the land, which occupies about five hectares of the Fairgrounds, will be folded into the city's broader redevelopment plans for Cloverdale Fairgrounds, which include new housing, a $3 billion hospital, public spaces, cultural facilities and expanded recreation amenities. Image | Harness racing Caption: Standardbred horses are trained and participate in harness racing at the Fraser Downs racetrack in Surrey. The track opened in 1976, under the name Cloverdale Raceway before being rebranded as Fraser Downs in 1996. (Harness Racing B.C./Facebook) Open image in new tab "Our city is growing rapidly toward one million residents," she said in a statement to CBC News. "Ending the lease with Fraser Downs allows us to begin critical planning to revitalize the Cloverdale Fairgrounds and Town Centre…this is a city-building decision about using public land for the greatest public good." The Fraser Downs is one of two horse racing tracks in B.C., and the only racetrack for standardbred horses. It opened in 1976 as Cloverdale Raceway and was rebranded in 1996. "We respect the long history of horse racing in Surrey and the people connected to it," Locke said. "We carefully weighed those impacts against the city-wide benefits of revitalization." The announcement comes months after Great Canadian Entertainment ordered the stables closed to address a longstanding rat infestation at the site. Horse owners and trainers said the facility was unique in Metro Vancouver and critical for housing and training animals ahead of the fall racing season. At the time, Harness Racing B.C. said the closure would affect about 218 members, including up to 100 people employed during racing season. The organization launched a legal challenge against the closure but lost after the B.C. Supreme Court ruled in May that the temporary closure to address the infestation did not constitute "irreparable harm" to the industry. No horses have been stabled at Fraser Downs since late May.
Toronto Star
40 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Trump's aggressive push to take over DC policing may be a template for an approach in other cities
WASHINGTON (AP) — The left sees President Donald Trump's attempted takeover of Washington law enforcement as part of a multifront march to autocracy — 'vindictive authoritarian rule,' as one activist put it — and as an extraordinary thing to do in rather ordinary times on the streets of the capital. To the right, it's a bold move to fracture the crust of Democratic urban bureaucracy and make D.C. a better place to live. Where that debate settles — if it ever does — may determine whether Washington, a symbol for America in all its granite glory, history, achievement, inequality and dysfunction, becomes a model under the imprint of Trump for how cities are policed, cleaned up and run, or ruined.
Winnipeg Free Press
40 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump's aggressive push to take over DC policing may be a template for an approach in other cities
WASHINGTON (AP) — The left sees President Donald Trump's attempted takeover of Washington law enforcement as part of a multifront march to autocracy — 'vindictive authoritarian rule,' as one activist put it — and as an extraordinary thing to do in rather ordinary times on the streets of the capital. To the right, it's a bold move to fracture the crust of Democratic urban bureaucracy and make D.C. a better place to live. Where that debate settles — if it ever does — may determine whether Washington, a symbol for America in all its granite glory, history, achievement, inequality and dysfunction, becomes a model under the imprint of Trump for how cities are policed, cleaned up and run, or ruined. Under the name of his Making D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force, Trump put some 800 National Guard troops on Washington streets this past week, declaring at the outset, 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals.' Grunge was also on his mind. 'If our capital is dirty, our whole country is dirty, and they don't respect us.' He then upped the stakes by declaring federal control of the district's police department and naming an emergency chief. That set off alarms and prompted local officials to sue to stop the effort. 'I have never seen a single government action that would cause a greater threat to law and order than this dangerous directive,' Police Chief Pamela Smith said. On Friday, the Trump administration partially retreated from its effort to seize control of the Metropolitan Police Department when a judge, skeptical that the president had the authority to do what he tried to do, urged both sides to reach a compromise, which they did — at least for now. Trump's Justice Department agreed to leave Smith in control, while still intending to instruct her department on law enforcement practices. In a new memo, Attorney General Pam Bondi directed the force to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. In this heavily Democratic city, local officials and many citizens did not like the National Guard deployment. At the same time, they acknowledged the Republican president had the right to order it because of the federal government's unique powers in the district. But Trump's attempt to seize formal control of the police department, for the first time since D.C. gained a partial measure of autonomy in the Home Rule Act of 1973, was their red line. When the feds stepped in For sure, there have been times when the U.S. military has been deployed to American streets, but almost always in the face of a riot or a calamitous event like the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Trump's use of force was born of an emergency that he saw and city officials — and many others — did not. A stranger to nuance, Trump has used the language of emergency to justify much of what he's done: his deportations of foreigners, his tariffs, his short-term deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles, and now his aggressive intervention into Washington policing. Washington does have crime and endemic homelessness, like every city in the country. But there was nothing like an urban fire that the masses thought needed to be quelled. Violent crime is down, as it is in many U.S. cities. Washington is also a city about which most Americans feel ownership — or at least that they have a stake. More than 25 million of them visited in 2024, a record year, plus over 2 million people from abroad. It's where middle schoolers on field trips get to see what they learn about in class — and perhaps to dance to pop tunes with the man with the music player so often in front of the White House. Washington is part federal theme park, with its historic buildings and museums, and part downtown, where restaurants and lobbyists outnumber any corporate presence. Neighborhoods range from the places where Jeff Bezos set a record for a home purchase price to destitute streets in economically depressed areas that are also magnets for drugs and crime. In 1968, the capital was a city on fire with riots. Twenty years later, a murder spree and crack epidemic fed the sense of a place out of control. But over the last 30 years, the city's population and its collective wealth have swelled. A cooked-up emergency? Against that backdrop, Philadelphia's top prosecutor, District Attorney Larry Krasner, a Democrat, assailed Trump's moves in Washington. 'You're talking about an emergency, really?' Krasner said, as if speaking with the president. 'Or is it that you're talking about an emergency because you want to pretend everything is an emergency so that you can roll tanks?' In Washington, a coalition of activists called Not Above the Law denounced what they saw as just the latest step by Trump to seize levers of power he has no business grasping. 'The onslaught of lawlessness and autocratic activities has escalated,' said Lisa Gilbert, co-chair of the group and co-president of Public Citizen. 'The last two weeks should have crystallized for all Americans that Donald Trump will not stop until democracy is replaced by vindictive authoritarian rule.' Fifty miles northeast, in the nearest major city, Baltimore's Democratic mayor criticized what he saw as Trump's effort to distract the public from economic pain and 'America's falling standing in the world.' 'Every mayor and police chief in America works with our local federal agents to do great work — to go after gun traffickers, to go after violent organizations,' Brandon Scott said. 'How is taking them off of that job, sending them out to just patrol the street, making our country safer?' But the leader of the D.C. Police Union, Gregg Pemberton, endorsed Trump's intervention — while saying it should not become permanent. 'We stand with the president in recognizing that Washington, D.C., cannot continue on this trajectory,' Pemberton said. From his vantage point, 'Crime is out of control, and our officers are stretched beyond their limits.' The Home Rule Act lets a president invoke certain emergency powers over the police department for 30 days, after which Congress must decide whether to extend the period. Trump's attempt to use that provision stirred interest among some Republicans in Congress in giving him an even freer hand. Among them, Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee drafted a resolution that would eliminate the time limit on federal control. This, he told Fox News Digital, would 'give the president all the time and authority he needs to crush lawlessness, restore order, and reclaim our capital once and for all.' Which raises a question that Trump has robustly hinted at and others are wondering, too: If there is success in the district — at least, success in the president's eyes — what might that mean for other American cities he thinks need to be fixed? Where does — where could — the federal government go next? ___ Associated Press writer Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, contributed to this report.
