Xi sends condolences to Modi and Charles over crash
Xi sends condolences to Modi and Charles over crash
Narendra Modi visits the sole crash survivor Vishwash Kumar Ramesh at a hospital in Ahmedabad. Photo: AFP
Relatives try and console each other at a mortuary in Ahmedabad. Photo: AFP
President Xi Jinping on Friday extended condolences to Indian President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the heavy casualties caused by the crash of an Air India flight.
He also sent a message of condolences to Britain's King Charles III over the heavy British death toll.
Xi's condolences came as rescue teams with sniffer dogs combed the crash site of the London-bound passenger jet that ploughed into a residential area of India's Ahmedabad city on Thursday, killing at least 265 people on board and on the ground.
The airline said there were 169 Indian passengers, 53 British, seven Portuguese and a Canadian on board the flight bound for London's Gatwick airport, as well as 12 crew members.
Only one person aboard the Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner – carrying 242 passengers and crew – miraculously survived the fiery crash, which left the tailpiece of the aircraft jutting out of the second floor of a hostel for medical staff from a nearby hospital.
The nose and front wheel landed on a canteen building where students were having lunch, witnesses said.
Deputy Commissioner of Police Kanan Desai said 265 bodies had so far been counted – suggesting at least 24 people died on the ground – but the toll may rise as more body parts are recovered.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who on Friday visited the devastated neighbourhood where Air India flight 171 went down, earlier described the crash as "heartbreaking beyond words".
In an unrelated development, an Air India flight from Phuket to New Delhi received an onboard bomb threat on Friday and made an emergency landing on the island, airport authorities said.
All 156 passengers on flight AI 379 had been escorted from the plane, in line with emergency plans, an Airports of Thailand official said.
The aircraft took off from Phuket airport bound for the Indian capital at 9.30am but made a wide loop around the Andaman Sea and landed back on the southern Thai island, according to flight tracker Flightradar24. (Xinhua/AFP/Reuters)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
3 hours ago
- RTHK
Israel targets Iran's military capabilities
Israel targets Iran's military capabilities Iran hit back with a barrage of ballistic missiles that lit up the sky over key Israeli cities. Photo: AFP Israel targeted Iran's air defences and missile launchers on Saturday as it pressed its bid to dismantle its arch-foe's military capabilities, after a night of mutual attacks. Israel's massive strikes on Iran, which it calls an existential threat, have hit nuclear and military facilities, killed top commanders and dozens of civilians, and sought to destroy the country's defence capabilities. Iran has hit back with volleys of missiles that lit up the night sky over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, killing three people and wounding dozens. Following decades of enmity and conflict by proxy, it is the first time that Israel and Iran have traded fire with such intensity, with fears of a prolonged conflict engulfing the region. Israel began striking Iran early on Friday in an operation it has dubbed "Rising Lion", and has since killed several top Iranian generals, including senior leaders of the Revolutionary Guards' air arm. On Saturday, Israel's military said it was striking dozens of missile launchers in Iran after announcing it had targeted air defences with a wave of strikes in the Tehran area. Two senior Iranian generals have been killed in Israeli strikes, Iranian state television reported on Saturday, as Israel kept up its assault. Iran's ambassador to the United Nations said on Friday that 78 people had been killed and 320 wounded in the first wave of strikes by Israel. Iran called on its citizens to unite in defence of the country as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged them to rise up against their government. Air raid sirens and explosions rang out across Israel through the night, with many residents holed up in bomb shelters until home defence commanders stood down alerts. (AFP)
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Canada's Sikhs, outraged by Modi G7 invitation, plan to protest
Members of Canada's Sikh community who were warned by police that the`ir lives were at risk and allege the Indian government is responsible for the threat are incensed by Ottawa's invitation to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 summit in Alberta. Advertisement Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney invited Modi, although India is not a member of the group of seven economies, to attend the summit that starts on Sunday as a guest. It will be Modi's first visit to Canada in a decade and a diplomatic test for Carney, a political neophyte. Canada's relationship with India has been tense since former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2023 accused India's government of involvement in the June 18, 2023, murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Sikh separatist leader in Canada. Modi's government has denied involvement in Nijjar's killing and has accused Canada of providing a safe haven for Sikh separatists. ''Outrage' is the kind of term that I've heard from people,' Sikh activist Moninder Singh, a friend of Nijjar, said of the invitation. He and other Sikh leaders plan to hold a protest in Ottawa on Saturday. Carney, locked in a trade war with the United States, is trying to shore up alliances elsewhere and diversify Canada's exports. Carney told reporters he invited India due to its importance in global supply chains. Mourners carry the casket of Sikh community leader and temple president Hardeep Singh Nijjar, in Surrey, British Columbia, June 25, 2023. Photo: AP India's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in a Thursday press briefing that a meeting between Modi and Carney 'will offer an important opportunity for them to exchange views on bilateral and global issues and explore pathways to set or reset the relationship.' Sikhs face threats
Asia Times
10 hours ago
- Asia Times
The silence of icons in hours of need
Two articles–one from The Caravan, the other from The Atlantic–circle around a deceptively simple yet thought-provoking question: Can a global icon, someone capable of shaping the public thought of hundreds of millions, if not billions, of people, afford to remain silent during times of political and moral crisis? Take Sachin Tendulkar, cricket's eternal deity and arguably one of India's most venerated public figures. In a searing 2021 piece titled 'Establishment Man: The Moral Timidity of Sachin Tendulkar,' journalist Vaibhav Vats conducted a quiet evisceration. Yes, Tendulkar is humble. Yes, he's famously self-effacing. But Vats doesn't let those qualities mask the deeper absence at the heart of Tendulkar's public life: a glaring moral void. At a time when India was being battered by the second wave of Covid-19 pandemic and its Prime Minister Narendra Modi was aggressively advancing an exclusionary Citizenship Amendment Act, Tendulkar–idol to a billion–offered no comment, no concern, no gesture of civic responsibility. Vats recounts a moment of almost surreal dissonance: as nationwide protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act gripped India, with mass demonstrations, police crackdowns, constitutional questions burning in the public square, Tendulkar took to X (formerly Twitter) to share his preferred chutney ratio for vada pav. 'Red chutney, very little green chutney & some imli chutney,' he wrote, as if utterly insulated from the country's moral convulsions. The Caravan did not mince words. It describes Tendulkar as a man curiously unaware of his own symbolic gravity. He occupies perhaps the highest pedestal in Indian public life, and yet appears incapable–or unwilling–to grasp the ethical responsibility that comes with such cultural elevation. His misreading of his own stature, the piece argues, is precisely why he retreats into the trivial when the moment demands conviction. Even more damning is the article's assertion that Tendulkar embodies the 'worst traits of the Indian middle class' – a trifecta of moral indifference, democratic apathy, and intellectual hollowness. He is a mirror, the piece suggests, not of who we aspire to be, but who we have become: more comfortable with consumer comfort than civic courage. Fast forward to this week's Atlantic piece, titled bluntly, 'Where Is Barack Obama?' writer Mark Leibovich asks a similar question, this time of the man who once embodied hope and change. Yes, Obama did his time–eight grueling years as the leader of the free world. Yes, he's earned the right to decompress, to cash in, to hover above the fray. But as Donald Trump barrels the whole world towards an unchartered territory during his second term–threatening to dismantle democratic institutions and global stability–Obama's detachment does feel a bit irresponsible. Leibovich, in The Atlantic, cuts through the nostalgia surrounding Obama with surgical precision: it would be one thing if Obama had slipped into quiet retirement–taken up oil painting, perhaps, like George W Bush. But that's not what's happened. Obama remains firmly in the public eye, only now his presence radiates curated ease–movies or book recommendations over X and beachside photoshoots–while much of the country and the whole world spirals into democratic anxiety. What makes Obama's absence more than a symbolic lapse, Leibovich argues, is the profound contradiction it exposes. His career was built on the rhetoric of engagement–grassroots activism, community organizing, civic renewal. In 2008, the entire ethos of his campaign was not 'I will save you' but 'We are the ones we've been waiting for.' That message, once electric, now rings hollow in the vacuum of his detachment. His conspicuous silence as Trump mounts a vengeful return and democratic norms buckle under pressure is a betrayal of the very premise on which Obama built his political identity. Leibovich calls it what it is: a dereliction. A man who once inspired millions to believe in the power of collective action now seems content to watch the civic unraveling from the comfort of a higher plane, buffered by wealth, acclaim and a curated brand of chill. The two articles have essentially pointed out that even though both Tendulkar and Obama represent vastly different cultures, different histories and different spheres of influence, the 'apparent moral failure' they share is unmistakable. When the world cries out for moral imagination, for voices that might still command trust and clarity, they evidently retreat. And in doing so, they remind us that silence is rarely neutral. In moments of crisis, it speaks volumes. Yet the underlying question posed by both articles is the same–and it grows more urgent by the day: What is the moral obligation that comes with influence? When someone holds the power to shape public opinion at scale, to steer collective attention and imagination, what does he owe the world in moments of crisis? Is there a duty to speak out? To take a stand? Must influence always be tethered to conscience? Or can the privileged few retreat into apolitical comfort, shrugging off the burden of moral clarity as someone else's job? Faisal Mahmud is the Minister (Press) of the Bangladesh High Commission in New Delhi .
