logo
How the SNP wrecked Scottish education

How the SNP wrecked Scottish education

Spectator18-06-2025
A small but not insignificant morsel of data on the state of education after 18 years of the SNP running Scotland. New figures show the gap between the poorest and wealthiest school leavers has widened to a five-year high. In the least deprived areas, just 3 per cent of school leavers fail to go to a 'positive destination', the Scottish Government's term for higher or further education, training, employment or voluntary work. Yet in the most deprived areas, areas like the former Lanarkshire industrial town from which I'm writing this, more than one in ten children leave school to what is euphemistically called 'other destinations', i.e. unemployment.
Scottish Labour's education spokeswoman Pam Duncan-Glancy accuses the SNP of 'leaving Scotland's most disadvantaged pupils behind'. It's hard to disagree. Education used to be all the rage at Holyrood, the subject of speeches and pledges and reports and, most of all, photo ops. In 2015, early in her first ministership, Nicola Sturgeon – remember her? – gave a grand speech declaring that her defining priority would be closing the attainment gap between poor children and those from affluent families. These days Sturgeon tours the country chatting literature with minor celebs and touting her own forthcoming memoirs, but her legacy remains.
And what a legacy it is. The attainment gap she undertook to close is widening. Children from the poorest parts of Scotland are 23 per cent less likely than those in the richest areas to leave school with at least one National 5, the Scottish equivalent of the GCSE. At Higher level (comparable to the A-Level), the gap is 38 per cent. Just 57 per cent leave school with a Higher and one in seven leave before even getting to that level. In reading, there is an 88-point performance gap between the richest and poorest children; in science, it's 92 points; in maths, 98.
While the most deprived children bear the brunt of the Scottish education slump, no one escapes unharmed. Data from Pisa, an international study of school performance, shows that, almost two decades after the SNP came to power at Holyrood, test scores in science have fallen by 32 points and in maths by 35 points. Reading is the soaraway success story, with a drop of a mere six points in test performance. Children in Scottish schools are behind their English counterparts in all three disciplines. Little wonder the Institute for Fiscal Studies says 'something, somewhere is going wrong in Scottish education'.
It's something, somewhere, all at once. Subject choice has narrowed under the SNP's Curriculum for Excellence. More than 40 per cent of pupils are persistently absent from Scottish high schools. A survey by teaching union NASUWT found 44 per cent of respondents north of the border suffered physical abuse or violence at the hands of their pupils last year. There were more than 40,000 violent incidents in local authority schools in 2024 and since the pandemic there has been a 76 per cent increase in offensive weapons in the classroom, with Police Scotland recording 194 cases in the past three years. Even in the most conducive education environment, learning can be very difficult for some pupils. In a culture of chaos, it can become impossible.
Back in 2015, when Nicola Sturgeon gave her landmark speech on closing the educational attainment gap, she said:
Let me be clear: I want to be judged on this. If you are not, as first minister, prepared to put your neck on the line on the education of our young people then what are you prepared to. It really matters.
It does matter, but did it ever really matter to Sturgeon? A decade on, the balance of the evidence confirms that outcomes in Scottish education declined on her watch and that children from the poorest families shouldered the worst of it. Schools have been struggling to recover ever since Sturgeon made haste for the exit and a media career. As she offers election night punditry, tours theatres and playhouses with her novelist pals, and chips in the odd book review, it is difficult to discern where or when she put her neck on the line. Perhaps its high brass content made things difficult.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Self-doubt was my ‘secret superpower', Sturgeon says
Self-doubt was my ‘secret superpower', Sturgeon says

South Wales Argus

time2 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Self-doubt was my ‘secret superpower', Sturgeon says

Excerpts from the former first minister of Scotland's new memoir, Frankly, were published by The Times this week, ahead of the book's release on Thursday. The pieces discuss some of the hardest moments of her life and career, as well as conflicted feelings over motherhood and sexuality. In an interview with The Sunday Times, Ms Sturgeon described herself as a 'public introvert', telling the paper: 'I am somebody who can come alive on a stage in front of thousands of people, but put me at a dinner table with four people and I will struggle much, much more.' When asked about the theme of self-doubt running throughout her memoir, she said: 'I spent the earlier part of my life thinking it was a great handicap. I actually came to think it was my secret superpower. 'It definitely drives you on. You work harder. So I wouldn't change it. I don't know that I'd have got as far in politics without it, actually.' The interview also touched on the importance of emotional intelligence for politicians, with Ms Sturgeon telling the paper: 'I think politics sucks it out of people. I also think people with very low emotional intelligence are probably disproportionately attracted to the status. 'I guess it kind of sits with narcissism. I've come across them all my life in politics, people who exude this kind of superiority complex.' Elsewhere, Ms Sturgeon said she was excited about the next chapter in her life. 'I feel happier than I've possibly ever felt,' she told The Sunday Times. 'A future where I can go anywhere, live anywhere I want, form new relationships. I can meet new people, I can do new things, I can find out what it is I want to do with the rest of my life.' In a fresh excerpt from her memoir, Ms Sturgeon claimed Alex Salmond, her predecessor as first minister, may have leaked details about an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct against him. And in an extract published on Friday, Ms Sturgeon discussed her arrest in 2023, describing it as 'mental torture'. Ms Sturgeon served as Scottish first minister between 2014 and 2023.

NHS to spend more on US drugs as Britain bows to Trump
NHS to spend more on US drugs as Britain bows to Trump

Telegraph

time3 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

NHS to spend more on US drugs as Britain bows to Trump

Ministers are preparing to boost NHS spending on US drugs in a race to avoid a future tariff hit from Donald Trump. The Government told drugmakers last week that it would agree to boost spending on medicines to comparable levels with the US. The promise to increase the GDP share allocated to medicines is understood to have been made as part of talks with drug bosses over the NHS drugs spending cap. It follows demands from the US president that other countries stop 'freeloading' on American innovation and pay more for its medicines. In the US-UK trade agreement, signed earlier this year, ministers said the NHS would review drug pricing to take into account the 'concerns of the president'. The UK's expenditure on new innovative medicines currently stands at just 0.28pc of GDP, around a third of America's proportionate spending of 0.78pc of its GDP. Even in Europe, the UK lags other countries, with Germany spending 0.4pc of its GDP and Italy spending 0.5pc. Ministers are understood to have offered to take steps to get the UK level closer to the US proportion. However, sources said the Government did not provide details on timing or concrete actions as to how the NHS would increase medicine spending. One insider claimed the proposal was 'a lot of jam and a lot of tomorrows'. The offer comes weeks after the US president told the world's biggest drugmakers that they needed to lower prices for Americans, suggesting they pay for this by charging higher fees abroad. In a letter sent to the bosses of 17 pharmaceutical companies, Mr Trump demanded they 'negotiate harder with foreign freeloading nations' for their medicines, suggesting he would use tariffs to push through higher prices if countries resisted. Earlier this year, the Telegraph revealed that the White House was already pressing for the NHS to spend more on American drugs. US officials are particularly concerned by an arrangement that allows the NHS to spend less on medicines than other countries by forcing drugmakers to pay rebates. The UK's voluntary scheme for branded medicines pricing, access and growth (known as VPAG) makes sure that the NHS does not overpay for medicines. It does this by requiring pharmaceutical companies to pay sales rebates back to the NHS if its medicine bill rises faster than expected, essentially keeping a cap on drug costs. Earlier this year, the Department of Health launched a review of the scheme under pressure from Mr Trump and the pharmaceutical industry. Since then, ministers have been in negotiations with drug companies over how much the NHS should be able to claw back in rebates. Drug company chiefs are expected to vote on whether to accept the latest offer next week. The offer follows years where drug bosses have called for the UK to spend more on medicines. Albert Bourla, the chief executive of US drug giant Pfizer, said in June: 'We represent in the UK 0.3pc of their GDP per capita. That's how much they spend on medicine. So yes, they can increase prices.' He said countries were other countries were 'free-riding' on the US. A government spokesman said: 'The VPAG review is one of many ways in which we are taking decisive action to unlock innovation and drive investment in the UK's world-class pharmaceutical sector including the Life Sciences Sector Plan. 'We will make sure the next game changers in medicine are developed here in Britain, for the benefit of our health at home and abroad. 'We continue to work closely with industry, including Associated of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, on the VPAG review and the outcome will be announced in due course.' The Government previously argued it would 'only ever sign trade agreements that align with the UK's national interests and to suggest otherwise would be misleading'.

Is a gambling tax the answer to scrap two-child benefit cap?
Is a gambling tax the answer to scrap two-child benefit cap?

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Is a gambling tax the answer to scrap two-child benefit cap?

'I grew up in a town more than fifty years ago where I saw poverty first-hand. It was a mining town, it was a linoleum town but jobs were being lost and poverty was there. I never thought I would see that kind of poverty again but I am seeing it again.' The former chancellor pointed to Delaware, where online gambling taxes are far higher than in Britain. 'It would cost three billion to take half a million children out of poverty by scrapping the two-child benefit cap, which would be the quickest way and the most cost-effective way of getting children out of poverty…Three billion could be raised by fair taxation of the gambling industry. 'By taxing the gambling industry, this would be the first step in raising money without breaking the fiscal rules or any manifesto commitment.' According to reports, the reforms currently being considered by the Chancellor would not impact physical bookies or any bets made in-person except promotional 'free' bets. Some prominent voices have been more sceptical, however. The former SNP MP for Inverclyde, Ronnie Cowan, has long campaigned on the dangers of gambling. He took to social media to criticise the ex-PM: 'Brown and Blair turned the gambling industry into the Wild West by allowing it to self govern. 'Brown wanted super casinos. He doesn't understand the damage that can be caused by gambling and using them as a cash cow for any government is immoral…Bigger profits [equal] more damage.' In an open letter, The Herald wrote the cap "punishes children for circumstances entirely beyond their control and entrenches hardship across generations". It adds: "We believe the removal of the two-child limit would be one of the single most effective measures your government could take to reduce child poverty swiftly and significantly." The campaign also urged First Minister John Swinney to increase the Scottish Child Payment to £40 per week, per child. The Scottish Government does not currently hold powers to raise taxes on gambling. However, speaking to the BBC on Thursday about Gordon Brown's proposal, First Minister John Swinney said: 'I think there's merit in that idea because as we all know gambling can lead to significant negative effects in our society which can exacerbate poverty. (Image: PA Media) 'So therefore there is a reasonable and legitimate argument to raise revenue from such an approach as long as it's reinvested properly.' Researchers believe the abolition of the two-child cap is one of the clearest paths to reducing child poverty. The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) said: 'There is consensus across the policy community that investment in removing the two-child limit is the most cost-effective way to reduce the headline rate of poverty.' The institute is also backing the proposal to raise taxes on gambling, arguing for 'targeted tax rises on profitable parts of the gambling industry – especially online casinos, slot machines, and high-stakes betting – where harms are concentrated and revenues have soared.' However, the Tax Policy Associates think tank recently released a report claiming that: 'The IPPR's calculation is 'static' – it simply multiplies current gambling profits by the new rates. The IPPR justifies this with illustrative calculations showing gambling companies worsening their odds to maintain their profits. 'If the IPPR are wrong, and the tax can't be passed on, then the revenues raised would be much less than £3bn – potentially half.' If the two-child cap were to be scrapped, it would also certainly save the Scottish Government money. The Scottish Fiscal Commission forecasts that mitigating the cap is set to cost the Scottish Government £11 million in 2025/6 and up to £155 million in 2026/7. If Westminster scrapped the cap, this would free up money for the Scottish Government, who are currently facing a £5 billion black hole in their finances.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store