Amazon cloud computing results fail to impress, shares dive
AWS reported a 17.5 per cent increase in revenue to US$30.9 billion (S$40.1 billion), edging past expectations of US$30.77 billion.
Bengaluru - Amazon.com on July 31 forecast third-quarter sales above market estimates, but failed to live up to lofty expectations for its Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud computing unit after rivals handily beat Wall Street forecasts.
Shares plunged by more than 7 per cent after-hours.
Both Google-parent Alphabet and Microsoft posted big cloud computing revenue gains this month.
AWS profit margins also contracted. Amazon said they were 32.9 per cent in the second quarter, down from 39.5 per cent in this year's first quarter and 35.5 per cent a year ago. The second-quarter margin results were at their lowest level since the final quarter of 2023.
AWS represents a small part of Amazon's total revenue, but it is a key driver of profits, typically accounting for about 60 per cent of Amazon's overall operating income.
AWS reported a 17.5 per cent increase in revenue to US$30.9 billion (S$40.1 billion), edging past expectations of US$30.77 billion. By comparison, sales for Microsoft's Azure rose 39 per cent and Google Cloud gained 32 per cent.
Amazon expects total net sales to be between US$174 billion and US$179.5 billion in the third quarter, compared with analysts' average estimate of US$173.08 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. The range for operating income in the current quarter was also light. Amazon forecast between US$15.5 billion and US$20.5 billion, compared with expectations of US$19.45 billion.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
World Trump's global trade policy faces test, hours from tariff deadline
Singapore 'For one last time, let's go home': Tears, laughs as last scheduled Jetstar Asia flight touches down
Singapore Over half of job applications by retrenched Jetstar Asia staff led to offers or interviews: CEO
Singapore No entry: ICA to bar high-risk, undesirable travellers from boarding S'pore-bound ships, flights
Business More new homes are coming up in northern Singapore
Opinion The other struggle drug addicts face: Being labelled weak, not sick
Singapore Luxury cars, watches seized during anti-vice raids; 28 arrested
Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family'
Both Microsoft and Alphabet cited massive demand for their cloud computing services to boost their already huge capital spending, but also noted they still faced capacity constraints that limited their ability to meet demand.
While Amazon has poured billions of dollars into AI infrastructure, analysts have said the lack of a strong AI model from AWS is causing concerns that the company could be trailing rivals in AI development.
The largest tech companies have been boosting capital expenditures to add more data centre capacity, particularly for artificial intelligence software deployment and development. Amazon said it expected second-half spending roughly the same as its second quarter total of US$31.4 billion, suggesting it would spend around US$118 billion for the full year. Analysts had projected about US$100 billion.
On July 30, Microsoft said it would spend a record US$30 billion in the current quarter. Google-parent Alphabet raised its spending forecast by US$10 billion to US$85 billion for the year.
Amazon posted online store sales of US$61.5 billion, an 11 per cent gain. Advertising sales, a fast-growing segment for Amazon, were up 23 per cent to US$15.7 billion.
Investors have been watching Amazon's e-commerce unit for any signs that tariff-related uncertainty has dashed consumer confidence. US data showed consumer spending rose moderately in June.
CEO Andy Jassy, in a call with analysts, addressed concerns about the impacts of tariffs on Amazon's core retail business.
'Through the first half of the year, we haven't yet seen diminishing demand nor prices meaningfully appreciating,' he said on a call with analysts. 'We also have such diversity of sellers in our marketplace, over two million sellers in total, with differing strategies of whether to pass on higher costs to consumers.'
He added: 'We just don't know what's going to happen moving forward. It's hard to know where the tariffs are going to settle, particularly in China.'
Analysts had said Amazon's focus on low prices, quick delivery and its many product categories helped cement its position as the No. 1 e-commerce retailer for US consumers, giving it an edge over rivals.
Amazon has said it was pushing suppliers to pull forward inventories to ensure supply and keep prices as low as possible. Still, prices for goods made in China and sold on Amazon.com have been rising faster than overall inflation, Reuters reported last month.
Amazon has been trimming jobs, including at its AWS, books, devices and podcasting units. Headcount fell by 14,000 workers from this year's first quarter, bringing the total to 1.46 million, the first decline since the beginning of 2024. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
35 minutes ago
- CNA
Google agrees to curb power use for AI data centers to ease strain on US grid when demand surges
NEW YORK, August 4 :Google has signed agreements with two U.S. electric utilities to reduce its AI data center power consumption during times of surging demand on the grid, the company said on Monday, as energy-intensive AI use outpaces power supplies. Utilities in the country have been inundated with requests for electricity for Big Tech's AI data centers, with demand eclipsing total available power supplies in some areas. That power crunch has led to concerns about spiking bills for everyday homes and business and blackouts. It has also complicated the technology industry's expansion of AI, which requires massive amounts of electricity - fast. Google's agreements with Indiana Michigan Power and Tennessee Power Authority would involve scaling back power use at the technology giant's data centers when called upon by the electric utilities to free up space on the grid. They are the first formal agreements by Google in demand-response programs with utilities to temporarily curtail its machine learning workloads, a subset of artificial intelligence. "It allows large electricity loads like data centers to be interconnected more quickly, helps reduce the need to build new transmission and power plants, and helps grid operators more effectively and efficiently manage power grids," Google said in a blog post. Demand-response programs have typically been used by other energy-intensive industries like heavy manufacturing or cryptocurrency mining. In exchange, the businesses generally receive payments or reduced power bills. The programs involving AI activity in data centers is generally new, and details of the commercial arrangements between Google and the utilities were not clear. While demand-response agreements apply only to a small portion of demand on the grid, the arrangements might become more common as U.S. electricity supply tightens.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Tesla approves share award worth US$29 billion to CEO Elon Musk
[AUSTIN] Tesla has granted CEO Elon Musk shares worth about US$29 billion, in a new pay deal aimed at keeping the billionaire entrepreneur at the helm during a crucial pivot from its struggling core auto business to robotaxis and humanoid robots. The company described the grant of the 96 million new shares as a first step, 'good faith' payment to honor Musk's more than US$50 billion pay package from 2018 that was struck down by a Delaware court last year. A longer-term CEO compensation plan will be put to a vote at its annual investor meeting on Nov 6. The Delaware ruling had cited flaws in the board's approval process and unfairness to investors. Musk kicked off an appeal against the order in March, claiming a lower court judge made multiple legal errors in rescinding the record compensation. The world's most valuable automaker is at a turning point, with Musk, its largest shareholder with a 13 per cent stake, positioning it more as an AI and robotics company amid falling sales in its mainstay auto business and a slump in its share price. The share award is designed to gradually boost Musk's voting power, something he and shareholders have consistently insisted was key to keeping him focused on Tesla's mission, said a special committee Tesla formed earlier this year to consider Musk's compensation. It consists of chair Robyn Denholm and independent director Kathleen Wilson-Thompson. 'While we recognise Elon's business ventures, interests and other potential demands on his time and attention are extensive and wide-ranging... we are confident this award will incentivise Elon to remain at Tesla,' the committee said in Monday's (Aug 4) filing. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The new shares vest only if Musk remains in a key executive role through 2027. They also have a five-year holding period, except to cover tax payments or the purchase price of US$23.34 per share, which is equal to the exercise price of the 2018 award. If the Delaware courts fully reinstate the 2018 CEO Performance Award, the new interim grant will either be forfeited or offset and there will be no 'double dip,' according to the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 'This is simply a repackaged version of what was done years ago and was ruled improper by a judge,' said Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. 'It renders the Delaware court decision effectively meaningless,' said Elson, who had filed amicus briefs supporting the Delaware Court's decision to void Musk's 2018 award. Auto business struggles Gary Black, a longtime Tesla investor who sold his position recently, said on X the award should be viewed 'very favourably' for the company as it aligns Musk's incentives with the shareholders and removes uncertainty about him leaving. Tesla shares rose more than 2 per cent in premarket trading. They have gained almost 2,000 per cent in the past decade, far outperforming the around 200 per cent increase in the benchmark S&P 500 index. But the stock has come under pressure this year, losing about a quarter of its value as Tesla grapples with a sales decline wrought by its aging vehicle line-up, tough competition and Musk's political stances that have alienated some buyers. The challenges have been worsened by US government cuts in support for EVs. Musk said at a post-earnings call last month the waning subsidies could lead to a 'few rough quarters' before a wave of revenue from self-driving software and services begins late next year. Analysts expect Tesla to post another annual sales decline in 2025 after its first one last year. S&P Global Mobility data shared exclusively with Reuters showed on Monday that Tesla's brand loyalty had plunged since Musk endorsed US President Donald Trump last summer. The world's most powerful person and its richest had a falling out earlier this year. And Musk has raised fears about whether he will be able to devote enough time and attention to Tesla after he locked horns with Trump by forming a new political party. The company also faces a long regulatory road to its robotaxi bet. It started a small trial of its robotaxis in Austin, Texas, June with about a dozen Model Y SUVs. But it lacks permits to offer the service in California, where it last week launched a ride-hailing service in the San Francisco Bay Area without indicating whether it would be using self-driving vehicles that power its Austin operations. REUTERS
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Brexit's parallels with Trump tariffs tell a tale
In figuring out why the US tariff shock has not sent the economy or financial world into a tailspin, Britain's exit from the European Union trade bloc provides something of a playbook – and without a particularly happy ending. Aside from vast differences in economic scale and global reach, the two episodes bear some comparison in how they upended years of deeply integrated free trade and possibly in how business, the economy at large and financial markets reacted. The 2016 Brexit referendum and US President Donald Trump's tariffs this year were each widely billed as economic shocks that would send the financial world into paroxysms. They did not, at least not at the outset. To be sure, both were followed by dramatic downward lurches in the two countries' respective currencies. But to some extent, sterling's steep drop after the referendum vote and the US dollar's plunge on Trump's tariff plan this year helped offset some of the wider impact – at least on stock markets that are loaded with global firms with outsized foreign revenue. More broadly, however, the difficulty in isolating their immediate net impact means no 'big bang' economic crisis unfolds to prove critics right – even if their enduring legacy turns out to be a slow burn of economic potential and lost output, often obscured by multiple other crosswinds. Slow burn In Britain's case, the seismic effects of the Covid-19 pandemic distorted any attempt to easily assess Brexit when it actually happened. Tortuous negotiations with the EU meant the UK's departure eventually occurred on the eve of the health crisis in 2020, and the new trade rules did not come into force until a year later. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up But in the four years between the referendum surprise and the pandemic, the UK economy never entered a recession nor recorded a negative quarterly gross domestic product print – confounding pro-EU supporters at the time and bolstering the Brexit lobby. Emerging from the twin hits, however, the economy has almost flatlined since. FTSE 100 stocks, helped by the weaker pound, kept pace with the S&P 500 and world indexes for about a year after the referendum before chronic underperformance set in. Since 2018, the UK market has lagged MSCI's all-country index by some 35 per cent. What is more, it has taken more than eight years for the pound's effective exchange rate to recover its pre-referendum levels. Few mainstream economists now doubt that Brexit has taken a serious toll on the UK economy – even if blame for that gets sprayed in multiple directions – and oceans of ink have been spilled trying to disentangle the precise impacts. One academic study by a number of Bank of England economists earlier this year concluded that uncertainty following the referendum resulted in little change in goods exports and imports before the exit was finalised. But after the new rules hit, UK imports fell 3 per cent and overall exports fell 6.4 per cent, largely because of the 13 per cent hit in exports to the EU. While this slump seems relatively modest compared to the official forecasts of the longer-term hit, the pain has been borne disproportionately by small businesses. Additionally, these findings exclude the Brexit hit to services and London's finance sector, which registered a much bigger economic dent. And the cumulative damage to London and the service sector over the next 10 years continues to worry the city. 'Lighting a fire' The US tariff story is of a completely different order, of course, as it will reverberate across the world economy. But there are some parallels, not least in certain aspects of the market reactions and the initial resilience. Economists estimate that the tariffs could lop anywhere from 0.5 per cent to 1 per cent off US GDP over time. That is a US$150 billion to US$300 billion hit which, though painful, would not be an instant crisis for an economy that is growing at a roughly 2 per cent annualised rate, where imported goods represent just 11 per cent of GDP, and where tech and artificial intelligence trends are generating considerable tailwinds. But as former White House economic adviser Jason Furman pointed out in a New York Times essay last week, the tariff damage is likely not a one-off hit. The loss of 0.5 per cent of GDP, he argued, is 'the equivalent of every household in America taking around US$1,000 and lighting it on fire – then doing it again every year. Forever.' In the end, the main point of the British comparison is to show how extreme partisan arguments on the pros or cons of such giant economic policy changes do not necessarily get resolved cleanly in adaptive, hardy and hyper-complex modern economies. The upshot is there is rarely a big crash to prove a point. And that in itself is unnerving if politically-motivated policies then appear workable on the surface and resist instant pushback – only to act as a drain on the economy over a protracted period. Many observers reasonably argue that sovereign democratic politics should always trump economic conventions and even directions. But do people eventually notice when it goes wrong? The latest YouGov opinion poll shows 56 per cent of Britons now think it was wrong to leave the EU – some nine years after their narrow vote to leave. The jury on Trump's tariffs is still out. REUTERS
