Camden Council to fight trans colours legal challenge
'Supporting the LGTBQ+ community'
Ms Olubanjo, who is a member of the Christian Peoples Alliance party, said she had sent a pre-action letter to the council and unless the road crossings were removed or repainted she would begin judicial review proceedings.A judicial review would decide if the council followed the correct legal procedures and acted within its powers.Camden Council said it had received the letter and it "entirely rejects" its arguments.A council spokesperson said: "Camden is 'no place for hate' and we have a strong and continuing history of respect and support for everyone in our borough. "We fight discrimination in all its forms and this includes being an ally to our trans residents."The coloured road crossings - the white, pink and blue stripes are representative of the trans community - were first installed in 2021 to mark Transgender Awareness Week.At the time the council said the installation of a painted crossing using the flag of the transgender community was "an important step in supporting the LGBTQ+ community within our public realm".
'Contested ideology'
Ms Olubanjo argues that the crossings are breaches of equality and safety obligations and a violation of laws prohibiting political publicity by local authorities.Her case is being supported by the Christian Legal Centre. It said her legal team cited a section of the Local Government Act 1986 which prohibits councils from publishing material that appears to promote a political party or a politically controversial viewpoint.The crossing, they argue, is a form of "publication" under the Act, designed to influence public opinion on a divisive political issue.Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, said: "Not only is this crossing a matter of public safety and Christian freedom, it's about the misuse of public resources for political campaigning. "The crossing is a visual endorsement of a contested ideology, installed by a public authority in breach of its legal duties. This is not the role of local government."Public spaces should be able to be used by everyone, not to advance divisive agendas that alienate people of faith and those who hold to biological reality."
In her letter Ms Olubanjo also said the crossings were "a breach of the Public Sector Equality Duty due to known risks to disabled and neurodivergent individuals".In council documents from 2021, it said there had been "a small number of concerns raised around disability access of coloured crossings, particularly regarding those with visibility impairment".It said the Royal National Institute for the Blind (RNIB) stated it had concerns with "non-standard" crossings as they could cause confusion. The council documents state: "Officers consider that the crossing is sufficiently simple to mitigate these concerns."The RNIB told BBC London: "Ninety-three percent of blind people have some sight. Black-and-white stripe designs on pedestrian crossings offer high contrast, which is particularly important for people with low vison who need to stay on course when crossing roads."Colourful crossings won't always be recognised as a crossing point, which is a particular issue for guide dogs."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Council's bid to block hotel housing asylum seekers to be heard on Friday
A council's bid to be granted a temporary injunction blocking asylum seekers from being accommodated at a hotel is expected to be heard on Friday. Epping Forest District Council said on Tuesday that it had filed documents at the High Court requesting an interim injunction stopping migrants from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. It follows a series of protests in recent weeks outside the hotel, after an asylum seeker was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. PA news agency understands the injunction bid is due to be heard on Friday by Mr Justice Eyre at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, with the case involving the council and Somani Hotels Ltd. The council said in a statement on Tuesday that it had seen 'unprecedented levels of protest and disruption' in connection with asylum seeker accommodation. It continued that it had issued the injunction bid because of the 'clear risk of further escalating community tensions and urgency of the need for the present situation to be brought under control'. Councillors had voted unanimously last month to call on the Home Office to close the hotel, the council added. Chris Whitbread, leader of the council, said the situation 'cannot go on' but the Government 'is not listening'. He said: 'The use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers poses a clear risk of further escalating community tensions already at a high, and the risk of irreparable harm to the local community. 'This will only increase with the start of the new school year. 'In our view, placing asylum seekers in the Bell Hotel is a clear breach of planning permission. It is not in use as a hotel, and it doesn't function as a hotel. 'The establishment of a centre to accommodate asylum seekers in this particular location, in close proximity to five schools, a residential care home, and the shops and amenities of the market town of Epping, is not appropriate in planning terms.' The protests outside the hotel came after a man who was staying at the hotel, Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, was charged with sexual assault. Kebatu, who is accused of attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl, denies the charges and will stand trial this month. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, 32, has separately been charged with seven offences. At a hearing at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court on Wednesday, he denied a count of sexual assault after being alleged to have kissed a man on the neck. He indicated guilty pleas to a further two counts of common assault and four of assault by beating, with all of the offences said to have taken place at the hotel between July 25 and August 12. He was remanded in custody until a trial at the same court next month. Six men charged in relation to disorder outside the hotel will also appear in court next week.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Oil prices stable ahead of Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska
LONDON, Aug 14 (Reuters) - Oil prices were stable on Thursday as investors weighed the potential impact of the upcoming U.S.-Russia summit on Ukraine on Russian crude flows, after U.S. President Donald Trump warned of "severe consequences" for Moscow if it does not agree to peace. Brent crude futures were up 49 cents, or 0.75%, at $66.12 a barrel by 1303 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures rose 51 cents, or 0.81%, to $63.16. Both contracts hit their lowest levels in two months on Wednesday after bearish supply guidance from the U.S. government and the International Energy Agency (IEA). Trump on Wednesday threatened "severe consequences" if Russian President Vladimir Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine. The U.S. president did not specify what the consequences could be, but he has warned of economic sanctions if the meeting in Alaska on Friday proves fruitless. Trump has threatened to enact secondary tariffs on buyers of Russian crude, primarily China and India, if Russia continues its war in Ukraine. "The uncertainty of U.S.-Russia peace talks continues to add a bullish risk premium given Russian oil buyers could face more economic pressure," Rystad Energy said in a client note. "How (the) Ukraine-Russia crisis resolves and Russia flows change could bring some unexpected surprises." However, some analysts remained sceptical that Trump would take action that could significantly disrupt oil supplies. "Anything that causes oil prices to rise from policy such as secondary tariffs is almost an own goal against this administration, and the man from Moscow knows it," PVM analyst John Evans said. Expectations that the U.S. Federal Reserve will cut interest rates in September also propped up oil prices, as lower borrowing rates can spur economic growth and demand for oil. Traders overwhelmingly believe a cut will happen next month after U.S. consumer prices increased at a moderate pace in July. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he thought an aggressive half-percentage-point cut was possible given recent weak employment numbers. Oil prices were kept in check on Wednesday as crude inventories in the U.S. unexpectedly rose by 3 million barrels in the week ending August 8, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration on Wednesday.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Labour councillor who called for far-right protesters' throats to be cut was acting out of character, friend tells court
A friend of a Labour councillor who called for far-right protesters' throats to be cut claimed the language he used was 'completely out of character', a court has heard. Ricky Jones, 58, appeared at an anti-racism rally last year in the wake of rioting following the Southport murders, where he described demonstrators as 'disgusting Nazi fascists', his trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court was told. A video of Jones addressing crowds in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year, went viral on social media after the protest. Wearing a black polo top and surrounded by cheering supporters, the now-suspended councillor said: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' He also drew his finger across his throat as he spoke to the crowd. Giving evidence on Thursday, Jones's friend Kevin Courtney, a retired teacher and former joint general secretary of the National Education Union (NEU), said: 'I had not heard him say those words or anything in any way similar to that. 'I think they are wrong. I was surprised that Ricky said them... I think it is completely out of character.' Both men have campaigned for anti-racism group Stand Up To Racism and have been at rallies together before, the court heard. Mr Courtney had been at the August 7 rally in Walthamstow, had met Jones and the pair had taken a selfie together, but Mr Courtney told the court he did not hear what Jones had said and only became aware of it when he saw videos later. Asked by Hossein Zahir KC, defending, whether Jones had ever encouraged any form of violence, Mr Courtney said: 'No, it was a complete shock when I saw that video.' 'Ricky's speech was wrong, but it didn't fit at all with the mood of the gathering that we were at. The mood was words just didn't gel with that at all.' The retired teacher added: 'Ricky's words didn't fit with that (mood), therefore people didn't respond to them as anything they should do, it just didn't fit with that at all.' The August 7 demonstration had been organised in response to plans for a far-right march outside Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau, jurors were told. It followed the nationwide violent disorder that occurred last summer after the Southport murders. Before the protest, the councillor had been warned to stay away from such demonstrations by the Labour Party. Jones previously told the court he would 'have attended anyway' despite this, adding: 'It's important for us to turn up to demonstrations like this to support our communities.' The 58-year-old, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was arrested on August 8 last year and interviewed at Brixton Police Station that night. Jones, of Dartford, denies one count of encouraging violent disorder.
