Welsh Conservatives: scrapping Senedd for the birds
Some grassroots members have been publicly critical of Millar's pro-devolution stance and what they see as an implication that any candidates for next year's Senedd election have to back it. A recent article on the website Conservative Home, written under a pen name, accused Millar of declaring "war" and ended with the words "Millar must go".
Conservative Home is no random website or X account - it is the home of grassroots conservatism and is a platform the party hierarchy takes seriously.Millar accused some of his critics of "hiding behind pseudonyms", but conceded there was a "diversity of views" and he gets people's frustrations with devolution."The devolution dividend that was promised to people back in 1999, they have not seen it," he said, speaking in his constituency office in Abergele."What we have got to do is make sure that we are given the opportunity to really transform people's lives with devolution."That is why they are frustrated. If they saw that dividend, if they saw what a Welsh Conservative government could do, reducing their taxes, delivering better public services, I think that would change the dynamic."
He rejected the idea of abolishing the Senedd: "Frankly if you think you can unpick devolution in one part of the UK and leave it in place for others, like Scotland and Northern Ireland and the mayoralties in England, it's just for the birds."Millar said he was not stopping candidates from putting themselves forward, but anybody who wanted to stand should "support, represent and promote Welsh Conservative policy".
Millar also said that the pro-devolution policy had been consistent for over two decades.The Welsh Conservatives have historically struggled to turn out their vote in Senedd elections because many traditional party supporters are sceptical of devolution in the first place.A YouGov poll of 2024 voters suggested more than 60% of those who had voted Conservative in Wales supported the abolition of the Senedd.That said, the party managed its best ever Senedd result in 2021, but three years later suffered a Welsh wipe-out at the general election.
As he tries to keep a lid on grassroots anger, Millar's party is also at risk of being engulfed by the surge in support for Reform.Data from the Welsh election study suggests almost half of previous Tory voters have switched support to Nigel Farage's party.Millar insisted voters had a choice between "a proper Conservative Party" or "people masquerading in sometimes a Conservative jacket, sometimes a hard left jacket".Polls suggest Reform is a serious contender to be the biggest party next May, but Millar predicted they would "melt under any kind of reasonable scrutiny of their policies - when they do bring them forward - because they do not appear to have any".
He was also critical of Reform's decision not to appoint a Welsh leader, although neither that nor a lack of Wales-specific plans appears to be doing Reform any harm in the polls.None of the parties are likely to get close to a majority next May, but even if they do manage only 13% of the vote - as the most recent poll suggested - the Welsh Conservatives could still theoretically find themselves as part of a post-election deal.Millar said it was "in the national interest" to end 26 years of Labour-led government in Cardiff Bay and that he would "work with anybody to make sure that happens".In that scenario there might again be grumblings from within.
Some of his grassroots would be horrified by any agreement with Plaid Cymru, whose ultimate goal of Welsh independence is an existential threat to the United Kingdom, or with Reform, which is an existential threat to the Conservatives.The view of Tory party leader Kemi Badenoch could also come into play after she ruled out a "national" Westminster pact with Reform, but refused to be drawn last month on any Senedd deal.Millar will give a speech on Saturday, his first to a conference since becoming Tory Senedd leader just over five months ago.He has not got that much longer to plot a course to electoral success.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Kemi Badenoch says she does not feel Nigerian and no longer has passport
Kemi Badenoch has said she does not see herself as Nigerian and no longer has a passport for the country. The Conservative Party leader was born in the UK but grew up in Nigeria. When the country's economy collapsed in the 1990s, her parents took advantage of her British passport to get her out, sending her at the age of 16 to live with a family friend in south London to continue her education. She said she had not renewed her Nigerian passport in two decades in an interview with the Rosebud podcast. 'I have not renewed my Nigerian passport, I think, not since the early 2000s. 'I don't identify with it any more, most of my life has been in the UK and I've just never felt the need to.' She said she had to get a visa to visit the country when her father died, which she described as a 'big fandango'. 'I'm Nigerian through ancestry, by birth, despite not being born there because of my parents… but by identity I'm not really. 'I know the country very well, I have a lot of family there, and I'm very interested in what happens there. 'But home is where my now family is, and my now family is my children, it's my husband and my brother and his children, in-laws. The Conservative party is very much part of my family – my extended family, I call it,' she said. The North West Essex MP said her early experiences in Nigeria shaped her political outlook, including 'why I don't like socialism'. 'And I remember never quite feeling that I belonged there,' she added. The Tory leader said the reason she returned to the UK as a teenager was a 'a very sad one'. 'It was that my parents thought: 'There is no future for you in this country'.' She has not experienced racial prejudice in Britain 'in any meaningful form', she said. 'I knew I was going to a place where I would look different to everybody, and I didn't think that that was odd,' she said. 'What I found actually quite interesting was that people didn't treat me differently, and it's why I'm so quick to defend the UK whenever there are accusations of racism.'
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour's Civil Service proposals are unfair and misguided
That the Civil Service is in dire need of a shake-up is accepted, at this point, across much of Westminster. The frustrations are justified. The public sector is, as George Staunton found Imperial China, felt to be staffed by those who feel that 'everything is excellent' and 'proposals for improvement would be superfluous'. This agreement stretches only as far as the sense that something must change, however. The proposals on the table for reform are deeply contested, and potentially harmful. Labour's proposal to limit Civil Service internships to those from ' lower socio-economic backgrounds ' is a retrograde step which would impoverish the pool of talent available to ministers by restricting entry based on family circumstance, and would represent another blow to the idea that parents should work for their children's futures. The Government would be better advised to hark back to the Northcote-Trevelyan report, which attempted to address a Civil Service which attracted the 'unambitious', 'indolent' and 'incapable' who did not fancy 'the competition of their contemporaries', but were attracted by 'the comparative lightness of the work'. The solutions put forward included, among other things, entrance examinations open to all, merit-based promotion, and ensuring that civil servants were fully employed to the full extent of their abilities. Such an embrace of meritocracy would surely be morally and practically preferable to further clumsy attempts at social engineering.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Kamala Harris says she doesn't plan to return to ‘broken' system of US politics
Kamala Harris has said that she currently has no desire to re-enter 'the system' of American politics because it is 'broken'. On Thursday night the Democratic party's defeated presidential nominee, who replaced Joe Biden late in the 2024 campaign after he dropped his re-election bid, gave her first interview since losing the election to Donald Trump, talking to Stephen Colbert on The Late Show. After she announced she will not run for the governorship of California just a day earlier, Harris told the TV show that it was about something more 'basic' than whether she wanted to run for something else instead – with the subtext being whether she will attempt a White House run again in 2028. 'Recently I made the decision that I just – for now – I don't want to go back in the system. I think it's broken,' she said, provoking a collective groan from the studio audience. Colbert later returned to the subject, saying that her remark was harrowing. 'Well, but it's also evident, isn't it?' she said. Describing herself as a 'devout public servant', the former vice-president added: 'I always believed, that as fragile as our democracy is, our systems would be strong enough to defend our most fundamental principles. And I think right now that they're not as strong as they need to be. And for now I don't want to go back into that system.' Harris's choice of The Late Show as the channel for her first post-election defeat interview was pointed. The most-watched talkshow was cancelled last month by the CBS network, which pleaded financial stress, though the decision was widely denounced as being politically motivated. The cancellation was announced after Colbert had criticized CBS and its parent company Paramount Global for reaching a $16m settlement with Trump. The president had sued CBS News over an interview on the 60 Minutes show with Harris at the height of last year's presidential campaign, which Trump claimed had been manipulated in her favour. None of this febrile back story was mentioned by either Colbert or Harris on Thursday. But she did delivery a passionate lament for the numbers of people who she said had 'capitulated' to the aggressive second Trump administration. When Colbert invited her to say 'I told you so' after she had predicted many of Trump's most contentious moves – including Medicaid cuts, ignoring court orders, and 'massive tax cuts to the rich' – she replied: 'But Stephen, what I did not predict was the capitulation.' She went on: 'Perhaps it's naive of me … there should be many who consider themselves to be guardians of our system and our democracy who just capitulated, and I didn't see that coming.' The timing of the interview was also poignant, as she was considered to be the automatic frontrunner if she had decided to run to become the next governor of California. Her wider remarks on 'the system' help explain that decision, though they still notably left room for another possible presidential run. In the meantime, Harris has a book to sell, 107 Days, which she name-checked copiously on the Late Show in advance of its publication next month. The book, as its title suggests, relates the story of the shortest presidential run of all time. She said it would give a 'behind-the-scenes sharing' of those intense days. Whether it is to sell the book or to lay the foundations for another presidential bid remains a moot point, but Harris said she wanted to use the next period to 'travel the country and listen to people. I don't want it to be transactional, where I'm asking for their vote.' Harris admitted that it had taken her months following her defeat before she had the strength to tune into the news again. 'You know, I'm just not into self-mutilation,' she said. Instead there had been 'lots of cooking shows', her top choice being The Kitchen.
