A top Green Beret influencer says he exaggerated his war story. The US military is investigating, and vets see a deeper problem.
The award in question, a Bronze Star, was instead bestowed for commendable work performance, and not specifically courage during combat, a seemingly minor yet significant distinction for service members.
The revelation has sparked backlash among veterans amid concerns that the damage of such exaggerations potentially goes beyond an overstated military service record. Kennedy has legions of online followers, and his ties to leading political circles have made him an increasingly influential figure.
As veterans increasingly build personal brands on combat credibility, Kennedy's controversy highlights a deeper cultural rift, with tension between the trust society puts in vets, especially elite special operators, and the gray areas of self-promotion.
While outright stolen valor has become much rarer than it once was, embellishments and inflated service claims have become more common in the influencer era, raising questions about accountability, authenticity, and the public's willingness to scrutinize military figures.
Kennedy, a senior Green Beret with the Maryland National Guard, released a statement on social media Tuesday night in which he said that he "unintentionally misstated aspects" of his military service, that he "implied directly or indirectly" that he was awarded a Bronze Star with Valor.
"I never received that honor, and I deeply regret ever suggesting otherwise," he said.
"I will no longer speak about my service in a way that elevates me beyond what I actually did," the statement continued. "From now on, my words will be guided by truth, humility, and respect."
A Bronze Star can be bestowed upon US troops for "merit" during wartime operations, not only battlefield "valor." Such merit could, for example, also be provided to support personnel or combat troops for noteworthy service absent heroics. The award with "valor" is usually considered much weightier than the meritorious version, which was commonly bestowed to troops throughout the wars.
I want to take full and unequivocal responsibility for a serious mistake.
Over the years, I made public statements and gave interviews in which I unintentionally misstated aspects of my military service. Most notably, I implied directly or indirectly that I had been awarded the…
— Tim Kennedy (@TimKennedyMMA) July 9, 2025
Kennedy has previously pushed back against other veterans' pointed criticisms regarding his service record, saying "it's totally hypocritical and intellectually dishonest to be pretending that you're on the moral high ground and then misrepresenting facts, lying, paraphrasing, and then taking things out of context." Kennedy said that such scrutiny of his record likely generated lucrative traffic for podcasts critical of him.
A copy of Kennedy's Bronze Star award citation provided to Business Insider Wednesday morning, weeks after BI submitted a public records request seeking Kennedy's award documents, reflects that the award was bestowed for "unmatched competence and sound judgement" for planning and executing combat operations in Iraq in 2006.
"The Maryland National Guard takes these matters seriously," said unit spokesman Maj. Benjamin Hughes in a statement to BI Thursday morning. "Integrity is a core value of our organization, so an investigation is currently underway to review the facts surrounding these public misstatements."
BI reached out to three companies associated with Kennedy, as well as his emails and social media accounts, seeking comment but did not receive a response. A personal phone number for Kennedy was not immediately available.
"Vet Bro" influence
Kennedy's statement on his service record comes as he has experienced a seemingly meteoric rise within the inner circles of Washington's elite. Over the past few months, he has appeared in the Oval Office and been seen hobnobbing with political leaders, including VA Secretary Dan Driscoll, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, FBI Director Kash Patel, and other Beltway heavyweights.
He is a top figure in today's "Vet Bro" culture, a post- Global War on Terror network of veterans, predominantly white, male special operators, which emerged around a decade ago. As the wars started to wind down and social media took over, many vets found the platforms to be a profitable way to promote businesses, memoirs, and podcasts.
Some Vet Bros, a term which some veterans find unfair, often see the world through the lens of their experiences in the military and promote things like gun culture, the protective "sheepdog" mentality, and immature or raunchy humor. That sometimes comes with service-related embellishment.
"A big problem right now is that the average veteran doesn't feel heard," said Chris Jachimiec, a veteran suicide prevention consultant and retired Air Force veteran who hopes to see service more normalized to the point where people don't feel compelled to embellish it.
Some veterans are "reluctant to tell their normal story," he said. "It's like, 'Yeah, I fixed aircraft for 20 years.'" It's a mundane but critical job, even if it lacks the appeal of special operations.
Such misrepresentations can fuel the widening civil-military divide, the physical and experiential chasm between troops and regular Americans whose understanding of the armed forces is on the decline. Hollywood depictions of military service are often confined to the actions of special operators, ignoring other forms of service. Embellishment from high-profile vets may reinforce unrealistic narratives of service.
Kennedy's proclamations of battlefield heroism have embroiled the online veteran community for months. As wars abroad have wound down, blatant stolen valor, in which someone may fabricate a career or misrepresent their own heroism, as Kennedy indicated he did, is less commonly seen, compared to more common discreet embellishments that would only be easily apparent to a trained eye. But for both, the impact of such misstatements can run deep, leading many veterans to fight them aggressively.
Accountability
"If veterans don't hold veterans accountable, then we absolutely will lose the respect that honestly we've fought really hard to earn," Brent Tucker, a former Army Delta Force soldier and podcast host, told Business Insider. Tucker's podcast has previously come under fire by other vets for criticizing Kennedy's claims.
Ideally, vets, especially special operators, would never need to be questioned, Tucker said. But with thousands, sometimes millions, of followers and money from influencing and entrepreneurship at stake, skepticism is warranted.
Kennedy is affiliated with multiple companies, including one that offers Tim Kennedy action figures for $50. Another, "Apogee Strong," appears to be a franchise of homeschooling operations currently caught up in a lawsuit for intellectual property theft.
Attempts to reach the attorney defending Kennedy's school program were unsuccessful.
The instant credibility often afforded to famous vets of the "all-volunteer force" has become a thorny topic, leading to a problematic pedestal and sometimes not-entirely-merited access to levers of influence and power.
Relying on military service isn't just routine for influencers, but also for prospective lawmakers running for office, said Katherine Kuzminski, director of studies at the Center for a New American Security. Touting a service record shows voters that a candidate has a service-oriented mindset.
Political news outlet NOTUS investigated the Bronze Star paperwork for Florida Rep. Cory Mills, citing soldiers named in his documents who did not recall him being part of the "extraordinary heroism" that earned him the award. Former vice presidential candidate Tim Walz, Democratic senator Richard Blumenthal, and other veteran politicians have also faced other criticisms related to misleading statements.
"It says, like, 'Hey, I know what it means to serve, I have a skill set, I've done something rare, and you should trust me," said Kuzminski, an expert on US military veterans and society. She added that such sentiments often have plenty of truth.
But in an era of dwindling pools of people with any military affiliation, there's often an incorrect assumption among Americans that veterans, perhaps particularly those with numerous social media followers, are qualified for everything. Such assumptions, she said, may include dissuading civilians from questioning vets at all.
"It shouldn't mask the responsibility to dig a level deeper," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
5 hours ago
- Politico
Trump's top brass turnover hits HHS
With help from Robert King Driving the Day YOU'RE FIRED! Since taking office, President Donald Trump has brusquely removed a number of top officials from their positions across departments who didn't align politically with his administration. That upheaval has included a string of high-profile firings across the nation's health agencies. The pattern of dismissals highlights the growing tension between science and politics as Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. implements his Make America Healthy Again agenda and reshapes federal policy on disease prevention, food and vaccines. Most recently, the FDA's top vaccine regulator, Vinay Prasad, was given the boot after just three months on the job. The president ordered his removal this week, overriding Kennedy and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, who opposed the move. Background: Earlier this month, close Trump ally Laura Loomer began attacking Prasad, writing on her website that he was a 'progressive leftist saboteur undermining President Trump's FDA.' Other conservative voices, like former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) and The Wall Street Journal editorial board, piled onto the criticism of Prasad and his approach to rare disease therapies under the FDA's purview — a concern that Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) raised with the White House on Monday, a day before Prasad was fired. Prasad's predecessor, Dr. Peter Marks, was also unceremoniously pushed out of the position four months ago, after leading the FDA's vaccine division for more than eight years. In March, Marks abruptly resigned from his post as the FDA's top vaccine regulator under pressure from Kennedy after his team concluded they needed a fresh start as part of a broader HHS reorganization. The ouster came as Marks had grown increasingly concerned by Kennedy's attitude toward vaccines and was particularly at odds with the secretary over his tepid response to the Texas measles outbreak. 'If Peter Marks does not want to get behind restoring science to its golden standard and promoting radical transparency, then he has no place at FDA under the strong leadership of Secretary Kennedy,' an HHS spokesperson told POLITICO in a statement at the time. Zooming out: And there's also been upheaval among Trump's nominees for top positions at HHS. The White House abruptly scrapped former Florida Rep. David Weldon's nomination to lead the CDC in March, just hours before his confirmation hearing, after determining he didn't have the support to win confirmation on the Senate floor. Some Senate Republicans had expressed concerns about Weldon's fringe views on vaccines. Trump also withdrew his first nominee for surgeon general, Dr. Janette Nesheiwat, in May, a day before her scheduled Senate confirmation hearing. The decision came after reports that Nesheiwat, an urgent care doctor and former Fox News contributor, obfuscated facts about her medical education. At the time, Loomer seized on the controversy and encouraged Trump to pick someone else. Hours after pulling Nesheiwat's nomination, Trump tapped wellness influencer Casey Means to serve as surgeon general. Means, the sister of top Kennedy adviser Calley Means, is still awaiting confirmation. WELCOME TO FRIDAY PULSE. President Donald Trump gave drugmakers an ultimatum yesterday: Lower your prices or face unknown consequences. Send your tips, scoops and feedback to khooper@ and sgardner@ and follow along @kelhoops and @sophie_gardnerj. MORNING MONEY: CAPITAL RISK — POLITICO's flagship financial newsletter has a new Friday edition built for the economic era we're living in: one shaped by political volatility, disruption and a wave of policy decisions with sector-wide consequences. Each week, Morning Money: Capital Risk brings sharp reporting and analysis on how political risk is moving markets and how investors are adapting. Want to know how health care regulation, tariffs, or court rulings could ripple through the economy? Start here. Eye on Insurers STRONG EARNINGS FOR TWO KEY PLAYERS — Major health insurers Aetna and Cigna both reported strong financial results for the second quarter of 2025 on Thursday, despite the rising medical cost trends plaguing other major insurers this year. At CVS Health's Aetna, which shook up its leadership last year after it struggled to control costs with more members seeking medical care, has seen continual improvements in cost savings throughout 2025, executives said during an earnings call Thursday. Making improvements at Aetna 'has been a top priority' the company executed by enhancing its operations through technology and reducing 'friction for our members and health care professionals,' said David Joyner, CEO of CVS Health. He pointed to changes Aetna made to its prior approval requirements — bundling prior authorizations for certain services like maternity care. 'We're starting to see the results of these efforts, delivering better experiences while also allowing us to better navigate this elevated utilization environment,' he said. At Cigna, executives reaffirmed their 2025 guidance on Thursday. Its pharmacy business, Evernorth Health Services, drove a spike in revenue in the second quarter, even as its insurance segment's revenue declined. Cigna's cost trends were elevated in the second quarter but still in line with its expectations, said Cigna President and COO Brian Evanko during an earnings call. Key context: Other key players in the health insurance space, including Centene, Molina Healthcare and UnitedHealth Group, have slashed their yearly guidance over the past few months, citing rising medical costs across Medicaid, Obamacare and Medicare Advantage. At the Agencies CMS FINALIZES HOSPITAL PAY BUMP — The Trump administration finalized on Thursday a $5 billion increase in payments to hospitals for inpatient care, Robert reports. The pay bump from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services takes effect in the next federal fiscal year that begins in October. It also includes a $2 billion bump in payments to hospitals with a high amount of charity care. Vaccines COVID VACCINE CONFUSION — Most Americans don't expect to get a Covid-19 vaccine this fall, according to a KFF Tracking Poll on Health Information and Trust published today. Nearly 60 percent of adults said they likely wouldn't get the shot, while 40 percent said they would 'definitely' or 'probably' get it — mostly older adults (55 percent) and Democrats (70 percent). Among Republicans, 59 percent said they would 'definitely not' get the vaccine. Most adults who plan to get the shot said they're concerned about the vaccine's availability and whether their insurance will cover it. Why it matters: The findings come after Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime vaccine skeptic, announced in May that the government would no longer recommend Covid vaccines for healthy pregnant people and children. The move has sparked pushback from public health experts and doctors — including some who sued Kennedy — arguing the move violated longstanding norms governing U.S. immunization policy. The agency ultimately didn't pull the recommendation from the CDC vaccine panel's childhood schedule and instead downgraded it to 'shared decisionmaking' — a differentiation that doctor groups say has made it harder for providers to counsel patients and for practices to assess insurance coverage. Kennedy and other top HHS officials have said there isn't sufficient data to show that healthy children and healthy pregnant women benefited from Covid vaccination. In June, Kennedy fired all 17 members of the CDC's independent vaccine panel and replaced them with several vaccine skeptics. The panel recommends vaccines that insurers are then largely obligated to cover with no cost-sharing under the Affordable Care Act. More findings: About half of parents with children under 18 said they don't know whether federal agencies recommend healthy children get the Covid vaccine this fall, according to the KFF poll. About 20 percent of adults said Kennedy's vaccine policy changes are making people safer, while 36 percent said they're making people less safe. The remainder said they don't know enough to say (31 percent) or that Kennedy's changes won't make a difference (13 percent). The national poll was conducted from July 8 to 14 online and by telephone among 1,283 U.S. adults. In the States KRATOM WARS — Federal health officials' push to schedule a controversial herbal supplement as a controlled substance has revived efforts among California lawmakers to regulate the product, called kratom, POLITICO's Rachel Bluth reports. Earlier this week, HHS took initial steps toward classifying a derivative of kratom, 7-hydroxymitragynine, as a controlled substance after seeing a rise in overdoses and emergency-room visits linked to products containing 7-OH. The designation would place restrictions on the substance's production, distribution and possession. Washington's efforts to assert control have spurred California Assemblymember Jasmeet Bains to revisit her earlier attempt to regulate kratom in the state, which stalled partly because of competing messaging lawmakers received from makers of products that use leaves of the kratom plant and those using newer, more potent derivatives. Key context: The faction of the industry making natural leaf-based products, which previously had been the target of suspicion from drug enforcement and public health officials, is seizing on the opportunity to make the case that natural leaf products should be legitimized through regulations and 7-OH cordoned off as a separate, more dangerous product. Proponents of the products say they can be a substitute for opioid pain relievers. The 7-OH manufacturers, meanwhile, dispute claims that their products are opioids or resemble heroin. They see themselves as offering newer, better products that entice customers and leave legacy brands behind. WHAT WE'RE READING POLITICO's Carmen Paun reports on the Senate Appropriations Committee's approval of a 2026 funding bill for HHS. The Associated Press' Mike Stobbe reports on the fall in U.S. childhood vaccination rates last year as the share of children with exemptions rose to an all-time high. BioPharma Dive's Delilah Alvarado reports on Moderna laying off 10 percent of its workforce as part of an effort to cut expenses amid slowing vaccine sales.


The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
‘Make America Healthy Again' is winning young voters — Democrats should worry
Could RFK Jr. prove to be the Trump administration's secret weapon? Recent polling shows Americans trust Republicans over Democrats on nearly every major issue confronting our country: the economy, immigration, foreign policy and inflation. The two areas where Democrats hold the upper hand is health care and vaccines. RFK Jr. has a shot of undermining that advantage, especially with young voters. Although the Health and Human Services secretary has been relentlessly blasted by the liberal media for being 'anti-vaccine' (which Kennedy denies), a great many Americans like Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again agenda and agree that corporate interests are helping to make Americans sick and overly reliant on pharmaceuticals. A poll conducted by NBC News last month (in which Trump earned only a 45 percent job approval) showed that a majority of the country (51 percent) liked what RFK is doing, whereas only 48 percent disapproved. Interestingly, when asked who was to blame for America's chronic health problems, including obesity and heart disease, a plurality of respondents blamed the food industry. Much of RFK's agenda makes sense. A New York Times author last fall set out to debunk five of Kennedy's main claims about the nation's health, but ended up supporting three of them. For example, she concluded that 'many public health and nutrition experts agree' with his assertion that 'Ultraprocessed foods are driving the obesity epidemic, and they should be removed from school lunches.' On the subject of food dyes, which the HHS secretary says 'cause cancer, and ADHD in children,' she wrote, 'some small clinical trials have suggested that certain synthetic food dyes may increase hyperactivity in children.' 'Many experts agree,' she continued, 'it wouldn't hurt to avoid them.' How about his suggestion 'that consuming too many added sugars, especially from high fructose corn syrup, contributes to childhood obesity and cardiovascular disease?' Answer: 'Correct.' RFK Jr. is shaking up the food industry. In April, the Food and Drug Administration announced it would move to eliminate several petroleum-based dyes, which Kennedy claims can cause cancer and ADHD in kids, by the end of next year. Already, a large number of top brands, including General Mills, Kraft Heinz, Nestlé, Hershey, J.M. Smucker, McCormick, Pepsico and Sam's Club, have taken steps to replace the artificial dyes used in candy, ice cream and other products with natural ingredients, despite the costs of doing so. The changes are likely to be popular, despite the less alluring colors of mint chip ice cream or Froot Loops. In Canada and Europe, foods colored with artificial dyes are required to carry a warning label. Consequently, manufacturers generally use natural products instead. Call me crazy, but the fact that so many food companies are making the switch, despite the expense and possibility of lost sales, suggests they know something they're not publicizing about these dyes and that Kennedy is on the right track. In May, Kennedy and his 'Make America Healthy Again' commission targeted ultra-processed foods in a 69-page report. Ultraprocessed foods, which make up 70-plus percent of Americans' diet, are made with manufactured rather than natural ingredients and formulated to encourage people to eat more, which adds to our obesity problems. A study last year of the dietary habits of nearly 10 million people published in the British Medical Journal revealed that exposure to ultra-processed food 'was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.' In particular, the study linked ultraprocessed foods to increased incidents of some 30 health conditions, including obesity, diabetes, heart disease, certain cancers and mental health disorders. Is Kennedy right to take them on? Absolutely. The wonder is that no one has investigated the industry before this. It is actually not a puzzle. According to Open Secrets, agribusiness PACs donated nearly $31 million to politicians last year, while food sales and processing firms threw in another $3 million. Moreover, the food industry spilled $16 million on lobbying. That buys a lot of protection. Meanwhile, RFK Jr.'s concerns over widely prescribed vaccines has been harshly criticized by the medical establishment. The left has accused him of downplaying a measles outbreak in Texas, and talking up cures rather than advocating for increased vaccinations. But Kennedy has acknowledged that public trust in U.S. vaccine mandates and indeed in our health industries need to be rebuilt. He is right. That has led to a complete overhaul of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, citing 'persistent conflicts of interest' among members of the former board which, he wrote in a recent op-ed, 'has never recommended against a vaccine — even those later withdrawn for safety reasons.' Having new, independent researchers take a fresh look at Americans' vaccine regimen should be welcomed. Kennedy's willingness to gore sacred cows and ask tough questions make him popular with young people, and is likely contributing to Republican gains with young male and female Gen-Zers. A recent Fox News interviewer asked a young influencer why young voters are 'flocking to MAHA.' Lexi Vrachalus answered that she and others were alarmed by the rise chronic diseases in their peers — diseases that are preventable with diet and lifestyle choices. Asked about her focus on the gut, she explained, 'if we eat bad, we are going to feel bad mentally and physically, so I think it's crucial that we fuel our bodies with real, whole, single ingredient, unprocessed foods.' In May, The New York Times published a piece about 'The Rise of the 'Crunchy Teen' Wellness Influencer' writing, 'High schoolers are appealing to other health-conscious kids online, sometimes by expressing views in line with the 'Make America Healthy Again' movement.' The skeptical Times writer found plenty of reason to find the trend concerning, as teens may, for instance, over-emphasize one diet component or another. But Democrats should find the trend concerning as well, especially as Kennedy's MAHA program continues to win over young voters.


UPI
18 hours ago
- UPI
FBI Detroit continues Jimmy Hoffa search after 50 years
The FBI resumed the search on June 18, 2013, for the body of Jimmy Hoffa, right, pictured here in this 1961 photo. File Photo by UPI July 31 (UPI) -- Former Teamsters Union President Jimmy Hoffa disappeared 50 years ago at age 62, but the FBI's Detroit Field Office continues seeking information for its ongoing investigation. The FBI investigates missing persons cases that might involve violations of federal law, such as kidnapping, organized crime and other criminal acts. "As the 50th anniversary of Mr. Hoffa's disappearance approaches, the FBI remains steadfast in its commitment to pursuing all credible leads," said Cheyvoryea Gibson, special agent in charge of the FBI Detroit Field Office, in a news release on Thursday. Anyone with information relating to the Hoffa case is encouraged to contact the FBI by calling 800-CALL-FBI or by submitting an online tip. Hoffa's conflict with Robert Kennedy While Hoffa was president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, he clashed with then-Attorney General Robert Kennedy, who for many years investigated the union's and Hoffa's alleged corruption and ties to organized crime. Several high-profile hearings elevated the general public's awareness of Hoffa, as well as Kennedy, who was assassinated while seeking the Democratic Party's nomination for president on June 6, 1968. Kennedy's investigations contributed to Hoffa eventually being convicted of bribing a grand jury member, along with a separate conviction for fraud, and going to federal prison in 1967. There is no known connection between Kennedy's assassin, Sirhan Sirhan, and Hoffa, the Teamsters or organized crime. Sirhan said he carried out the assassination due to Kennedy's support of Israel. Hoffa tried to regain union control Hoffa was last seen on July 30, 1975, at the Macchus Red Fox restaurant at 6676 Telegraph Road in the Detroit-area suburb of Bloomfield, Mich. He allegedly was there to meet with two organized crime leaders during his effort to regain control of the Teamsters Union. Self-admitted mob hitman Charles Allen in 1982 claimed Hoffa had assigned him to kill then-Teamsters Union President Frank Fitzsimmons. Allen claimed Hoffa told him to shoot and kill Fitzsimmons outside the Teamsters Union headquarters in Washington, D.C. He also claimed Hoffa ordered him to kill East Coast trucking leader Tony Provenzano and others who blocked Hoffa's path back to power within the Teamsters. Fitzsimmons was a highly placed Teamsters official while Hoffa was the union's president from 1957 to 1971. Fitzsimmons became the union's president when Hoffa was sentenced to federal prison in 1967 for jury tampering. Fitzsimmons also allegedly was more willing than Hoffa to continue loaning money from the Teamsters' Central States Pension Fund to those who were affiliated with organized crime. Such loans allegedly helped the mob to build and control several casinos in Las Vegas for many years. Effort to regain Teamsters presidency Hoffa's plan to kill Fitzsimmons unraveled when Hoffa's foster son, Chuckie O'Brien, warned Provenzano after a fallout, Allen claimed. O'Brien said Hoffa initially supported O'Brien's desire to seek election to a Teamsters post with its Detroit local, but Hoffa changed his mind. President Richard Nixon commuted Hoffa's sentence in 1971 with the condition that Hoffa cease his involvement in union activities. Hoffa reneged on the agreement and sought to regain his former office and oust Fitzsimmons, who was less popular among union members. Organized crime figures were concerned about Hoffa and viewed Fitzsimmons as someone they could control, so they ordered Hoffa's demise, Allen said. Allen claimed Provenzano and New Jersey mobster Salvatore Briguglio had Hoffa killed and his body disposed of by grinding it into small pieces and distributing the remains in a Florida swamp. Fitzsimmons died of cancer in 1981, and Briguglio was killed in an execution-style hit in New York City on March 21, 1978. Continued interest in disappearance Hoffa's disappearance has led to movies about his life and death, several documentaries and continued media interest. Many tips over the years have suggested Hoffa's body was buried under Giants Stadium in New Jersey, beneath several Detroit-area driveways and under a freeway overpass. Occasional tips have caused the FBI to investigate several homes and other locations, but none have turned up any additional evidence leading to the discovery of Hoffa's remains. At least two major motion pictures have been filmed about Hoffa and his disappearance. Actor Jack Nicholson portrayed Hoffa in a 1992 film titled "Hoffa," which details the union leader's organizing activities with the Teamsters and his eventual death and disappearance. Filmmaker Martin Scorsese in 2019 released "The Irishman," which attributes Hoffa's death to alleged mob hitman Frank Sheeran, who is played by Robert De Niro. Al Pacino played Hoffa, and Joe Pesci and Harvey Keitel played significant supporting roles in that film. "The Irishman" received 10 Academy Award nominations in 2020, including best picture, best director and best supporting actor for Pacino and Pesci, but the film did not win any Oscars.