logo
Experts warn of local extinction of wolves in Pakistan without urgent conservation

Experts warn of local extinction of wolves in Pakistan without urgent conservation

Express Tribune27-02-2025
Listen to article
As Pakistan has witnessed a dramatic decline in its wolf populations over the past few decades, experts warn that without immediate conservation measures, the already endangered species may face local extinction in the near future.
The populations of both the Indian wolf and the Tibetan wolf in Pakistan are dwindling at an alarming rate, with only a few hundred individuals remaining in the country.
Human-induced factors such as habitat destruction, retaliatory killings, and diminishing prey populations are the primary causes of this decline, according to Rab Nawaz, a senior official at WWF-Pakistan.
'Pakistan has a rich diversity of wildlife, but many of its species, including wolves, are endangered and face the threat of local extinction,' Nawaz told Anadolu.
In recent years, he added, human-induced pressures have intensified the decline of the wolf population in Pakistan, while significant gaps in ecological knowledge and population distribution further hinder conservation efforts.
'The Indian wolf, in particular, is recognized as endangered in Pakistan, but key knowledge gaps regarding its population status and distribution make conservation efforts difficult,' he said.
Recent genetic studies have revealed that Indian wolves are among the most evolutionarily distinct wolf populations, found only in India and Pakistan.
Saeed-ul-Islam, a wildlife expert, agrees with Nawaz and emphasizes that the Indian wolf population is declining at a much faster rate than the Tibetan wolf, putting its survival at serious risk.
The Tibetan wolf – also known as the Chinese wolf, Mongolian wolf, Korean wolf, Steppes wolf, or Woolly wolf – has a relatively stable population due to the nature of its habitat and less human encroachment, he explained.
Believed to be a subspecies of the gray wolf, the Tibetan wolf is found in parts of central China, southwestern Russia, Manchuria, Tibet, and the Himalayan regions of India, Nepal, and Bhutan.
The species is already classified as 'vulnerable' due to its low population and is included in the Red List of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), a global body focused on nature conservation.
Urgent need for conservation measures
Experts cite retaliatory killings, habitat loss, and growing human population as the primary factors behind the decline of the Indian wolf, which is found in the plains of southern Sindh, southwestern Balochistan, and northeastern Punjab provinces.
'Human-wildlife conflict is the biggest factor, followed by population growth and habitat destruction, which threaten the Indian wolf with local extinction,' said Islam.
Additionally, he pointed out that the prey base for the Indian wolf has drastically declined due to rapid deforestation and an increasing human footprint in recent decades.
In contrast, the Tibetan wolf is found in the mountains of northern Gilgit-Baltistan, the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, and the disputed Kashmir region, where it has relatively stable habitats, better prey availability, and lower human interaction.
'But still, their population is vulnerable,' he cautioned.
According to Islam, the Indian wolf population in Pakistan is likely no more than a few hundred, although no official population assessment has been conducted.
'If serious conservation efforts are not undertaken immediately, we may lose the Indian wolf forever in the coming years,' he warned.
He emphasized the urgent need for population assessments, identification of population clusters, establishment of sanctuaries, and habitat restoration to conserve the remaining Indian wolf population.
'All of this cannot happen without a proper population assessment and identifying key habitat areas,' he said, acknowledging that the issue has not been given the necessary attention by either the government or wildlife organizations.
Mohammad Kabir, who heads the Wildlife Ecology Lab at the University of Haripur in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, stressed that wolves kill a large number of livestock, which is a major factor in human-wildlife conflict.
'To mitigate conflict, conservation management programs should include livestock insurance, vaccination, and awareness campaigns,' Kabir told Anadolu.
Such measures, he explained, would help reduce livestock mortality due to disease and prevent retaliatory killings of wolves by farmers who suffer economic losses.
Role of wolves in ecosystem balance
Pakistan holds over 23,000 square kilometers (8,880 square miles) of suitable wolf habitat, spread across remote and inaccessible areas that are connected by natural corridors, according to Kabir.
Sharifuddin Baloch, the chief conservator of Balochistan's Wildlife Department, said the government has declared several national parks and game reserves as protected areas for the Indian wolf in an effort to conserve its population.
'The Indian wolf has already been designated as a protected species in Balochistan and the rest of Pakistan. However, conservation efforts have not yielded the desired results due to continued retaliatory killings, climate change, and the wolves' own predatory behavior,' Baloch explained.
'Conservation efforts have produced satisfactory results in protected areas, but they have been largely ineffective in other regions due to ongoing human-wildlife conflict,' he added.
One of the primary reasons behind this conflict, he noted, is the way wolves hunt livestock.
'They attack in packs and kill multiple animals at a time, unlike other carnivores that target only a single or a couple of animals for food. This makes them the number one enemy of farmers and shepherds,' Baloch said.
Livestock is a primary source of livelihood in rural Pakistan, particularly in Balochistan, where retaliatory killings of wolves are common.
'The vast patrolling areas of wolves also make it difficult to protect them from human encounters and other dangers,' he added.
Kabir, the wildlife researcher, emphasized the critical role of wolves in regulating prey populations and maintaining ecosystem balance.
'Wolves are among the least studied carnivores in Pakistan and have been largely ignored in research and conservation programs. As top predators in their habitats, they regulate the population of other prey species,' he said.
'Their absence would lead to an unchecked increase in prey populations, causing overgrazing, habitat degradation, resource competition, and ultimately the collapse of prey populations,' he warned.
A decline in wolf populations, he added, could also lead to an increase in smaller predators, further disrupting the ecological balance.
'As predators, wolves help control the spread of disease by targeting sick, old, and weak prey animals. Without them, disease could spread more rapidly among prey populations,' he noted.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sesame project targets 5,000-tonne exports
Sesame project targets 5,000-tonne exports

Express Tribune

time2 days ago

  • Express Tribune

Sesame project targets 5,000-tonne exports

Listen to article On August 11, a delegation from the Silk Road Biohealth Agriculture Industry Alliance of Northwest A&F University (NWAFU) visited the Biohealth Sesame Order Demonstration Farm in Sahiwal, Punjab. The farm operates under the China-Pakistan Biohealth Agriculture (BHA) Overseas Technology Demonstration Park. Built jointly by China Machinery Engineering Corporation (CMEC), NWAFU, and Pakistan's Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, the project introduced high-quality Chinese sesame varieties and advanced production technologies. "Through experiments, we identified varieties suited to Pakistan and developed technical standards for bio-healthy sesame production," said project leader Professor Zhang Lixin. Pakistani students trained at NWAFU, including Dr Ammar, now serve as core technical personnel. Harvested sesame undergoes initial processing at CMEC plants, with testing in a joint lab. Qualified products are exported to China for use in food, pharmaceuticals, and industry. The project has set up 12 standardised farms covering 500 acres, working with over 120 farmers under a contract farming model. Last year's first contracted crop exported about 3,500 tonnes to China. By 2025, exports are expected to reach 5,000 tonnes, creating over 500 long-term local jobs. The farm aims to expand to 50,000 acres, producing around 23,000 tonnes, over 5% of Pakistan's sesame area. Pakistan currently grows sesame on about 1 million acres, producing 350,000–450,000 tonnes annually, though weather causes fluctuations. Torrential rains last year cut output to 310,000 tonnes. Zhang noted that wider adoption of advanced technology could push yields in good years above 500,000 tonnes. Local sesame varieties mostly come from the TS and TH series. Of 10 experimental varieties tested, four exceeded yields of 130 kg per mu (0.165 acres), with the highest at 230 kg. These results, from internal trials, require larger-scale testing. Rainfall, sunlight, and fertilisation all strongly affect yields, making seasonal adaptation and weather-based measures vital. Future plans include online seminars, farm visits, and training programmes, covering flood-resistant varieties, special fertilisers, biopesticides, drone spraying, mechanised harvesting, and smart farm management. "The bio-health industry chain model linking enterprises, universities, and farms will help bio-health agriculture continues to prosper and develop in Pakistan," Zhang said.

China uses 5G, AI ‘robot antelope' for wildlife monitoring
China uses 5G, AI ‘robot antelope' for wildlife monitoring

Express Tribune

time3 days ago

  • Express Tribune

China uses 5G, AI ‘robot antelope' for wildlife monitoring

Listen to article A lifelike 'robot antelope' is roaming Tibet's Hoh Xil plateau as part of China's expanding surveillance network, state media footage shows. With doe-like eyes and thick brown fur, the 5G- and AI-enabled device closely resembles the endangered Tibetan antelope while scanning the area with its sensors, according to Xinhua. Developed by Xinhua, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Hangzhou-based DEEP Robotics, it uses real-time monitoring to track the migration, feeding and mating habits of the species. Read: China's robo-athletes ready for world China has offered its robotics industry tens of billions in subsidies and recently hosted the 2025 World Robot Conference. 5G services reached Tibet in 2019 and, by 2022, the region had one million users. A base station built in Gogmo in late 2023 extended coverage to every district, state media reported. Beyond monitoring wildlife, the infrastructure supports AI applications including drones, telemedicine and 'smart' yak herding. Read more: China urges consensus on AI development Beijing has invested heavily in Tibet, integrating the region into its Belt and Road Initiative and strengthening trade links with Central Asia, while also increasing surveillance and expanding its digital presence towards neighbouring India. A July report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies documented cases of China using local telecom networks to monitor dissidents in Nepal and engage in cyber theft.

The race to rule AI
The race to rule AI

Express Tribune

time5 days ago

  • Express Tribune

The race to rule AI

In the 1960s, at the height of the Cold War, the world watched as the United States and the Soviet Union competed in the 'space race.' As both hurled rockets, satellites, and spacecraft into the upper atmosphere, each launch showcased more than technological prowess. The race to the moon became a test of geopolitical will, a symbol of which superpower would define the future. When Neil Armstrong planted the American flag on the lunar surface, the 'giant leap' he reflected on was not just for humanity, but a step that cemented the technology-powered hegemony the United States would enjoy for decades. Today, against the backdrop of another great-power rivalry, a similar contest is unfolding. The stage this time is not just the vacuum of space, but the invisible architecture of algorithms and the chips that power them. Artificial intelligence is the new frontier, and once again, two superpowers are vying for dominance. But unlike the space race, this competition is not bound by the heavens. It reaches into every industry, every household, and every corner of human life. The stakes are no longer whose flag hangs on the moon but who controls the digital nervous system of the planet. AI is no longer a distant promise. It is here, transforming economies, redefining power, and reshaping societies. Yet as the technology accelerates, so too does the contest over who sets its rules and who benefits from its capabilities. At the heart of this struggle stand two competing visions — one put forward by the United States, the other by China — that reveal not only differing strategic priorities but also fundamentally divergent philosophies on how the next world order is to be structured. Last month, the White House released America's AI Action Plan, a document that frames AI development as a high-stakes race in which 'whoever has the largest AI ecosystem will set global AI standards and reap broad economic and military benefits.' The language is blunt: the US must 'achieve and maintain unquestioned and unchallenged global technological dominance.' This is not simply about innovation; it is about securing and entrenching American power. To that end, the American plan rests on three pillars: accelerating AI innovation, building American AI infrastructure and leading in international AI diplomacy and security, with the last pillar designed explicitly to 'counter Chinese influence in international governance bodies.' The plan promotes an 'AI alliance' composed of the US and select partners, to which Washington will export its full AI technology stack: hardware, models, software, applications and standards. Crucially, this comes with a defensive edge: stringent export controls to prevent 'foreign adversaries' from accessing advanced computing, enhanced location-verification of chips and coordinated global enforcement to keep high-end AI resources out of the hands of rivals. In other words, Washington's AI diplomacy is about building a gated community, one in which entry is granted on US terms. The US openly links this to national security, implying that AI superiority must be preserved not as a shared global asset but as a strategic advantage for America and its allies. Beijing, by contrast, has spent the past two years articulating a vision for AI governance that is overtly multilateral and inclusive, with an emphasis on participation from the Global South. Premier Li Qiang, speaking at the 2025 World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) held in Shanghai from July 26 to 28, called AI 'an international public good that benefits humanity.' He stressed that 'only by working together can we fully realise the potential of AI while ensuring its safe, reliable, controllable, and equitable development.' Li underscored the urgency of creating a truly global framework for governance, stating, 'there is an urgent need to foster further consensus on how to strike a balance between development and security.' He warned that without broad cooperation, AI risks becoming 'an exclusive game for a few countries and companies.' China's Action Plan on Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence frames AI as a tool for 'serving the people, respecting sovereignty, fairness and inclusiveness, and open cooperation.' The plan advocates reducing technical barriers, promoting technology transfer, and developing open-source communities to foster a diverse and accessible innovation ecosystem. It goes further by explicitly committing to support 'countries, especially those in the Global South' in building their AI capabilities in line with their own national conditions. The most concrete manifestation of this philosophy is China's proposal for a global AI cooperation organisation. The body would aim to align governance rules, technical standards, and development strategies, while respecting policy differences between nations. Beijing presents this not as an ideological bloc but as a pragmatic platform: a means for countries to undertake joint technical research, share open-source technologies, and strengthen their own AI innovation ecosystems. As Li explained, 'China is willing to share its AI development experience and technological products to help countries around the world — especially those in the Global South — to strengthen their capacity building.' He further proposed 'greater cooperation on innovation to achieve more groundbreaking results,' pledging that China 'will be more open in sharing open-source technology and products.' The Global South is central to this vision. Chinese officials position the cooperation body as a way to bridge the 'digital and intelligence divide,' ensuring developing nations benefit equally from AI's economic and social potential. For countries outside the US orbit, many already drawn into China's Belt and Road networks, this is an attractive proposition: access to AI technologies, capacity-building support and a seat at the governance table without having to choose sides in a zero-sum competition. This is not to say China's approach is entirely altruistic. Extending AI cooperation deepens Beijing's global influence, especially in regions where Western technology and capital have been limited or conditional. By positioning itself as the champion of multilateralism, China counters the US narrative that it should be isolated from key technological flows. In effect, China's inclusive rhetoric also functions as strategic outreach to counter Washington's exclusionary alliance-building. Still, the differences in tone and substance between the two plans are striking. The US blueprint treats AI as a high ground to be seized and defended. The Chinese plan treats it as a commons to be cultivated. These divergent philosophies carry profound implications for the structure of the emerging AI order. If Washington's approach prevails, the world could see the consolidation of closed technology blocs: one led by the US and populated by its security partners, another orbiting around China and those willing to defy American export controls. Innovation might accelerate within each bloc, but the gaps between them — in capabilities, standards, and access — would widen. The very idea of global governance would fragment into parallel systems, mirroring Cold War-era divides. If Beijing's approach gains traction, there could be greater cross-border sharing of AI resources, especially between advanced economies and the developing world. This could help narrow the AI divide and create more interoperable global standards, though it would also require trust in China's commitment to openness and in its own governance norms. Given that China's domestic AI environment is subject to extensive state oversight and censorship, some countries may remain cautious about whether its version of 'openness' aligns with their values. For the Global South, the stakes are especially high. Under the US plan, access to cutting-edge AI may be contingent on political alignment, limiting the ability of non-aligned nations to leverage AI for their own development. Under the Chinese plan, access might be easier, but the terms could be shaped by Beijing's strategic priorities and its own vision for digital sovereignty. The choice facing much of the world, then, is not simply between 'free' and 'restricted' AI, but between different models of technological interdependence: one based on selective exclusivity, the other on conditional inclusivity. Both are political, both are strategic and both will shape how AI transforms the global economy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store