
Ahead of Trump's visit, the Fed is in a crisis communications battle with the White House
The central bank, under intense scrutiny from President Donald Trump and his allies, is quietly trying to mitigate any potentially inaccurate claims and attacks stemming from Trump's upcoming Thursday afternoon tour of the Fed's renovation site at its headquarters facing the National Mall.
The White House has seized on the Fed's $2.5 billion construction project as a potential legal opening to oust Chair Jerome Powell, whom Trump has lambasted for months because the central bank has not lowered interest rates at all this year. The timing of the tour — amid mounting scrutiny over the president's past relationship with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein — may be a public relations maneuver of its own, designed to distract from the growing political scandal. Trump is set to join some of his top advisers to visit the Fed as he continues to publicly tear into Powell on social media.
But the Fed made a strategic play by hosting a tour for a handful of media outlets beforehand. It shows that the Fed is now embroiled in a crisis communications strategy battle with the White House.
'The Fed laid the groundwork behind the scenes with the media, and that's exactly its longstanding playbook,' said Anne Marie Malecha, chief executive of Dezenhall Resources, a reputation and crisis management firm. 'You're not going to see the Fed take to Truth Social or engage with influencers, so I think this is as far out on a limb as we're going to see an institution like the Fed go.'
The Fed declined to comment.
Notes from reporters who attended the morning tour detailed a noisy, active construction site with scaffolding, cement mixers and construction machines throughout. The notes said the Marriner S. Eccles building, one of the two being refurbished, now has some new upgrades for security purposes.
That includes blast-resistant windows and shear walls, which are big drivers of the building's cost, according to Fed staff during the tour. These upgrades are meant to abide by the Department of Homeland Security's highest level of security for federal buildings.
The account from reporters also noted that seating on the rooftop of the Eccles building was nixed in order to avoid the appearance of being an amenity, even though it would not have been expensive to include it, according to Fed staff.
Staff also noted during the tour that tariffs and higher costs for materials were big reasons for the cost overruns compared to estimates from 2018 and 2019. The project is expected to be finished by the fall of 2027, with a DC-based workforce of about 3,000 moving in through March 2028.
Despite the Fed's attempts at being transparent about the project, administration officials have still harshly criticized the Fed for it, and may continue to do so after the tour. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described Trump's public gripes with Powell as 'working the refs' — a phrase in sports used when a player loudly protests a referee's call to force him to reconsider.
Trump's attacks on Powell are nothing new: He levied the same gripes about the Fed chief — his own pick to helm the central bank — during his first term in office, too. But the attacks on Powell have grown in recent weeks, and Republicans have latched onto what was once a routine — albeit expensive — construction project for the Fed.
The Fed renovation may be a convenient foil for Trump as the administration is dealing with its own crisis communications battle, some communications experts say. The Justice Department's handling of the so-called Epstein files has spurred outrage, even among some of Trump's die-hard supporters. CNN this week unveiled newly uncovered archived video footage and photos shedding more light on Trump's past relationship with Epstein.
'This administration is highly skilled at moving lawmakers, the media and the public to pay attention to issues and to take up causes that are beneficial to them. It's a 'look over there instead of here' strategy,' Malecha said.
'Whiplash is often an effective strategy,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump debanking order will have limited impact on crypto, experts say
Last week, US President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing bank regulators to rescind guidance that could lead to 'politicised or unlawful debanking.' Crypto businesses, and even some prominent conservatives — including the president himself — have alleged they were denied or lost access to bank accounts at the behest of politically-motivated, Biden-era regulators. But last week's executive order, entitled, 'Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans,' won't do much for crypto businesses that fear they've been locked out of the traditional financial system, according to experts who spoke to DL News. That's because the order does little to root out 'reputation risk.' The term refers to regulators' ability to dissuade banks from engaging supposedly controversial customers, such as pornographers, firearms manufacturers, payday lenders, and crypto companies. Critics of the practice say that banks should only consider objective criteria, such as a customer's financial risk, when deciding whether to offer someone a checking account. Guidance documents and manuals 'This is going to make people happy who have been asking for it, but it's not clear how much good it's going to do them,' Dru Stevenson, a professor at South Texas College of Law Houston, told DL News. The executive order directs bank regulators to remove the use of reputation risk 'or equivalent concepts' that could result in 'politicized or unlawful debanking' from their 'guidance documents, manuals, and other materials.' But it isn't clear that examples of debanking were motivated by politics, according to Stevenson. 'It's not clear to me that they couldn't still allow for reputational risk that would apply to, say, an AI company, because that's not exactly a political issue or something that's unlawful,' he said. And reputation risk can have a downstream effect on banks' profits. 'If you have risk averse investors at one of the gigantic pension funds, or mutual funds, and they find out that Wachovia has gone gung ho about crypto, that might be a reason for them to switch to a more conservative bank,' Stevenson said. Moreover, banks were always free to ignore guidance documents and manuals according to Stevenson. As such, removing references to reputation risk from such documents will likely have little practical effect. 'If you're an agency, you can't go into court and say, 'This person violated our guidance document,'' he said. 'You have to show that they violated the statute or that they violated a codified regulation that went through notice and comment rulemaking.' Management reports Julie Hill, the dean of the University of Wyoming's law school, noted that Trump-appointed bank regulators have already said they will stop using reputation risk. While the regulators have new leadership, they are largely staffed by the same people who served under the Biden administration, Hill added. And reputation risk isn't the only tool regulators can use to pressure banks to reject certain customers. Anti-money laundering laws are one reason banks often reject customers, according to Hill. 'The vast, vast majority of suspicious activity reports don't lead to any sort of follow up, let alone any sort of enforcement,' she told DL News. Moreover, banks are not allowed to tell customers that their account was flagged for suspicious activity. 'We have a situation where banks had to file one or more SARs, and they decided it's just not worth it, we should debank, because we don't want our regulators upset with us, and it's getting expensive to file all these SARs.' Another tool at regulators' disposal: management reports. 'If a regulator suggests to a bank, 'We think this is risky, maybe you want to stop doing it' [but] it's not really that risky, banks might do it anyway,' Hill said, 'because their management rating will get downgraded and then that impacts all sorts of things, including their capital requirements.' Those ratings are also secret, according to Hill. 'Anytime you see a really broad authority with very little limit, and then also a lot of secrecy or lack of transparency about how regulators or banks implement that, you're likely to set up claims for debanking,' she said. Banks' responsibility The executive order also directs the regulators to identify financial institutions that had any 'past or current, formal or informal, policies or practices that require, encourage, or otherwise influence … politicized or unlawful debanking.' Finding examples of politically-motivated debanking could be straightforward if the orders came from federal regulators, according to Hill. 'It's a much harder thing if what you think happened is the banks, for whatever reason, just decided to debank people for political reasons, unconnected with risk or profit or whatever,' she said. 'There's a real question about how we think regulators are going to figure that out and whether we think there's any duty on the bank to voluntarily disclose it.' Whatever the effect of the executive order, both professors agreed that a new administration could reinstate the use of reputation risk unilaterally. 'It kind of highlights how unsticky changes made by the executive branch are when it comes to discretionary enforcement,' Hill said. 'This is one of those things that can change from administration to administration.' Stevenson agreed. 'If we ever get to have other presidents, the next president can just do another executive order and put it all back, like, overnight,' Stevenson said. Aleks Gilbert is DL News' New York-based DeFi correspondent. You can contact him at aleks@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Breaking: S&P, Nasdaq Hit Records as Tech Stocks Ignite Rally
Aug 13 - Wall Street stayed in rally mode Wednesday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average jumping 292 points (+0.7%) and both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite climbing 0.2% to fresh record highs. Optimism is running high as traders see a 99% chance of a Federal Reserve rate cut in September, helped by cooler-than-expected inflation data earlier this week. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with AMD. Tech was the star of the session, with Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) surging over 6% and Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) adding about 1%. The communication services and technology sectors both hit record levels, with Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), Electronic Arts (EA), and Live Nation (NYSE:LYV) notching new highs alongside Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) and Lam Research (LRCX). Earnings season remains a driver, with upbeat commentary on corporate resilience despite summer headwinds. Meanwhile, AvalonBay Communities (AVB) gained after a Morgan Stanley upgrade, and Capri Holdings (NYSE:CPRI) jumped on a bullish call from JPMorgan. In deal news, Hanesbrands (NYSE:HBI) slipped after agreeing to be acquired by Gildan Activewear (NYSE:GIL) for $6 per share. The next catalysts: Thursday's producer price index report and the Fed's Jackson Hole meeting later this month. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fed can wait to adjust policy because job market is near full employment, Bostic says
(Reuters) -Atlanta Federal Reserve President Raphael Bostic on Wednesday said a U.S. job market holding near full employment offers the central bank the "luxury" of being able to avoid rushing to make any policy adjustments. The Fed should avoid policy volatility that can be troublesome to the public, Bostic said at an event in Alabama, adding that his "predisposition is to try not to do that" and to wait for "a little more clarity on where things are going." "Now I feel we have the luxury to do that today because the labor market has been pretty much at full employment," Bostic said. "Our maximum employment mandate is not at risk in the same way that the inflation mandate is," he said. That said, the recent employment report for July, which showed far fewer jobs created last month than expected and a historically large downward revision in job growth in the previous two months, could change the conversation. If the job market is substantially weaker than previously thought, "then maybe the risks are more in balance and we should be thinking about our ability to be patient is much less than it was before," Bostic said. "To me, that's the question we're going to try to have an answer for." Getting a better understanding of the health of the job market is "really our task for the next five weeks or so" ahead of the Fed's September 16-17 policy meeting, he added. Investors in recent days have come to fully price in the likelihood that the Fed next month will cut its benchmark overnight interest rate from the current 4.25%-4.50% range, where it has been since last December. Asked about the effects of tariffs on the outlook for inflation and Fed policy, Bostic said the textbook case argues that the levies cause a one-time price increase that the U.S. central bank should not respond to. But what's different with the tariffs that President Donald Trump is imposing is that they are broader and higher than expected and also have a larger policy goal of reorienting global supply chains. "You're going to see fundamental changes if this is successful, and if that's the case, then there's no reason you should expect that the post-tariff trajectory (for inflation) will look like the pre-tariff one," Bostic said. "It is actually a different economy." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data