Student loan borrowers will have fewer repayment options under GOP megabill
Among numerous provisions aimed at reducing federal spending and increasing tax revenue, the bill lays out some major changes for federal student loan borrowers.
Most of the changes to student borrowing, such as lower limits on graduate loans, won't impact borrowers who are out of school and currently in repayment. But those taking out loans next summer and after, as well as an estimated 8 million borrowers awaiting further action on the Saving on a Valuable Education income-driven repayment plan, can expect fewer repayment options if the House passes the bill as is.
The change to repayment plans could be one of the most impactful provisions of the bill for current and future federal student loan borrowers.
Two years to choose from two plans
The Senate's bill narrows the number of repayment options currently available to federal student loan borrowers down to just two plans: a standard repayment plan and a new income-driven plan known as the Repayment Assistance Plan. Borrowers on any of the currently existing repayment plans, except the SAVE plan, will be able to keep their plans and monthly payments the same.
Borrowers whose loans are dispersed on or after July 1, 2026 and those currently enrolled in the SAVE plan — who are in an administrative forbearance since federal courts blocked the plan from going into effect in July 2024 — will have only the two repayment plan options.
Borrowers on the SAVE plan would likely have to choose another plan anyway if federal courts retain the temporary injunction against it. Under the Republicans' legislation, those borrowers will have between July 2026 and July 2028 to choose a new plan. After July 1, 2028, borrowers will automatically be moved into the income-based repayment plan.
The new standard plan will give borrowers a fixed monthly payment to have their loans paid off between 10 and 25 years, depending on the size of their loans. The current standard plan has a loan term of 10 years, regardless of the amount borrowed.
The Repayment Assistance Plan will calculate monthly payments as between 1% and 10% of a borrower's discretionary income, down from the current offerings that set payments at 10%, 15% or 20% of a borrower's income.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Morning Bid: Trade optimism gives way to caution over US jobs
A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Stella Qiu It's been a pretty muted session in Asia and rightly so, given the high stakes in U.S. payrolls data due later in the day that could make or break the case for a July rate cut and spur big moves in Treasuries and foreign exchange markets. Investors in Asia did not seem to share the optimism on trade that pushed Wall Street to record high closes overnight, after President Donald Trump said the U.S. had reached a trade agreement with Vietnam. Details remain unclear. The market showed no significant reaction to the latest developments on Trump's "big, beautiful bill" on tax cuts. Republicans in the House of Representatives on Wednesday moved closer toward advancing the package, apparently overcoming objections by a handful of party hardliners who had raised concerns about cost. Trump said the U.S. will impose a 20% tariff on all imports from Vietnam which, while lower than the 46% tariff that had been threatened, is still much higher than previous rates. It was unclear how a 40% duty on all trans-shipments through Vietnam, aimed at products largely made in China and then labelled "Made in Vietnam", could be implemented. Vietnamese shares (.VNI), opens new tab were up a modest 0.5%, although that was the highest since April 2022. Vietnam's dong currency dipped to a record low of 26,218 per dollar. Other countries in Asia are complaining that talks with the U.S. are proving difficult, in part because it was not clear what the White House wanted. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said on Thursday he could not say if tariff negotiations could conclude by next Tuesday, while Japan has invoked national interests as talks with the U.S. struggled. Wall Street futures are 0.1% firmer, while EUROSTOXX 50 futures were up 0.2%. Looking ahead, the main risk event for markets will be U.S. payrolls figures due later in the day. Stakes are high after a private sector payrolls report surprised with the first fall in more than two years. Analysts are forecasting a rise of 110,000 jobs in June with the jobless rate ticking up to 4.3%. Given market pricing of just a 25% probability for a July Fed rate cut, a weak report could shift the dial big-time, sending Treasuries rallying and the dollar lower. Sterling was flat at $1.3633. It slid 0.8% overnight on investor anxiety over Britain's finances after the government's reversal on welfare reforms, which also caused gilt yields to jump. Key developments that could influence markets on Thursday: -- U.S. nonfarm payrolls report for June -- U.S initial and continuing jobless claims, ISM services PMI -- U.K. S&P Global services, composite PMIs -- ECB releases its June minutes
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Will Trump's tax bill help or hurt you? It may depend on your income
"It's still higher-income households that are the winners, especially those who are alive today," said Kent Smetters, faculty director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model. The analysis also found the Senate's version of the tax bill, which narrowly passed on July 1, would lead to higher deficits and slower economic growth compared to its counterpart from the House. The bill heads to the House for final approval. Trump has asked for a final version on his desk and ready for signature by July 4, but acknowledged the deadline may be "very hard to do" as some House Republicans voice frustrations with changes made in the Senate. Trump's big tax bill is a win. It could also be a big problem for GOP What's different under the Senate version of the tax bill? The legislation, dubbed the "One, Big Beautiful Bill" by Trump, would make the 2017 tax cuts from Trump's first term permanent, increase the child tax credit and introduce other tax cuts, including no taxes on tips or overtime wages. To help pay for the cuts, the government would reduce spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps, and make cuts to Medicaid, a program that provides health insurance to more than 71 million low-income Americans. The version in the Senate has some key differences from the House bill, including: Permanent tax breaks for corporations that allow businesses to deduct the full cost of qualifying investments and research projects immediately, rather than over a number of years. In the House's bill, these tax breaks were in effect from 2025 to 2029. Permanently enhancing the standard deduction, adding $750 for single filers, $1,125 for heads of households and $1,500 for married couples starting in 2025. There was a temporary adjustment in the House's version that added $1,000 for single filers, $1,500 for heads of households and $2,000 for couples from 2025 to 2028. Permanently raising the child tax credit to $2,200 starting in 2026, compared to a temporary increase to $2,500 through 2028 in the House bill. "The Senate one makes things more permanent," Smetters told USA TODAY. "On the one hand, we don't have to revisit the same politics in four years. On the other hand, there's a fiscal cost associated with that. That means more debt and more burdens inherited by future generations." More Americans would also lose Medicaid under the Senate's version, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, with an estimated 11.8 million people uninsured by 2034, compared to previous estimates of 10.9 million people under the House's proposal. 5 takeaways: Trump asserts dominance with 'big, beautiful bill' Senate passage Impact on future generations Various analyses suggest Trump's tax bill would reward higher-earning Americans more than their lower-earning counterparts. A June analysis of the House bill by the Congressional Budget Office, for instance, found resources for the poorest would decrease by about $1,600 per year under the legislation, largely due to cuts to Medicaid and food aid - which would be more aggressive under the Senate bill. Meanwhile, the wealthiest would gain about $12,000 on average. Another June report from the Yale Budget Lab suggests the bottom fifth of earners would lose about $560 per year while the top 20% would gain $6,000. But all future generations, no matter their income, would experience lifetime losses, according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model. High-income households are set to lose $5,700 under the Senate's bill, while low-income households would lose $22,000. The report points to a reduced social security net and lower wages as the main drivers. Under the House bill, the Penn Wharton Budget Model projected lifetime losses ranging from $500 for high-income households to $15,800 for low-income households. "The future generations, they're going to be worse off. It doesn't matter where on the income bracket they fall," Smetters said. "Ultimately, someone has to pay for (the tax bill), and we're basically passing it on to the next generation." Slower economic growth While the House version showed a 0.4% gain in GDP by year 10, according to the Budget Model's previous analysis, the Senate's version would yield a 0.3% loss. After 30 years, GDP would drop 4.6% under the Senate bill compared to a 1.5% drop under the House version. Higher deficits Primary deficits are projected to increase $3.1 trillion over the next decade through the Senate's tax bill, compared to roughly $2.7 trillion under the House bill, according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model. Other reports have also found a higher debt load under the Senate bill. The Congressional Budget Office projects it would add $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, $800 billion more than the House's bill. And a July report from the Yale Budget Lab says the Senate's bill would add $3 trillion to the debt by 2034, compared to an estimated $2.4 trillion under the House bill. How much do lower-income Americans stand to lose? According to the most recent Penn Wharton Budget Model analysis, the lowest-earning households stand to lose after-tax-and-transfer income in both the short- and long-run, while higher earners would see gains under the Senate bill. Those earning less than $18,000 would lose $235 on average in 2027 and $1,380 by 2033. Those earning between $18,000 and $52,999 would lose $75 in 2027 and $1,625 by 2033. Those earning between $53,000 and $95,999 would gain $1,350 in 2027 but lose $130 by 2033. Those earning between $96,000 and $178,999 would gain $3,880 in 2027 and $2,825 by 2033. Those earning between $179,000 and $271,999 would gain $6,615 in 2027 and $4,985 by 2033. Those earning between $272,000 and $400,999 would gain $9,360 in 2027 and $7,670 by 2033. Those earning between $401,000 and $1,019,999 would gain $20,605 in 2027 and $18,645 by 2033. Those earning between $1,020,000 and $4,450,999 would gain $36,020 in 2027 and $29,430 by 2033. Those with an income above $4,451,000 would gain $290,485 in 2027 and $82,255 by 2033. Smetters said figures may be slightly adjusted as more information on specific amendments becomes available.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
How did the Senate change the GOP tax and spend bill?
Here are some of the changes the Senate made to the bill: Not making it easier to ignore court rulings Senate Republicans removed a provision in the House version of the bill that would have restricted judges' ability to hold people accountable for violating court orders. In recent months some judges have considered contempt rulings against the Trump administration for ignoring court orders that restricted the administration's actions. The legislation would bar judges from enforcing such contempt rulings if they didn't first order a bond, which is commonly set at zero or not ordered in cases when people are claiming the government did something unconstitutional. Democrats say it's an attempt to limit the power of the courts, while Republicans say it was an incentive to stop frivolous lawsuits by requiring plaintiffs to pay in. Who is eligible for the child tax credit? The Senate version allows mixed-status immigration status families to quality for the child tax credit for American citizen children. Currently, children with Social Security numbers, the vast majority of whom are American citizens or legal permanent residents, are eligible for the Child Tax Credit, even if their parents lack Social Security numbers, according to the Center for Migration Studies. The Senate version, requires at least one parent to have a Social Security number to qualify. The House version required both parents to have valid Social Security numbers to qualify, which would have kept millions of children from getting the benefit. The Center for Migration Studies estimated this would have impacted 4.5 million citizen and legal permanent resident children. A ban on regulating AI Senate Republicans stripped out a provision in the House bill that would have blocked states from creating new regulations to shape how artificial intelligence is used or developed for the next 10 years. It would have also blocked dozens of states from enforcing AI regulations and oversight structures already in place. There is now no federal AI regulation to take the place of state policies, which are likely to vary across the country. Tax-free gym memberships Senators removed a portion of the bill qualifying sports and fitness expenses as qualified medical care, which would have allowed people to pay for them tax-free through a Health Savings Account. The benefit, worth $500 for an individual or $1,000 per couple, could not have been used at "a private club" owned by members, or a facility that offers golf, hunting, sailing or riding facilities. The health and fitness part of the business also couldn't be "incidental to its overall function and purpose." Purple Heart benefits Senators also removed a provision that would have created a new income tax credit for some people who earned a Purple Heart - the decoration for service members who were wounded or killed in action. Purple Heart recipients who lost a portion of their Social Security disability benefits because they got a job could have also gotten a higher Earned Income Tax Credit to make up those lost Social Security benefits. Pell grants The Senate also pulled out a change to the Pell Grant program, which provides federal aid to low-income students to attend colleges and universities. Right now, students are considered full time and qualify for the maximum amount of aid if they take 12 credits a semester. The House version of the bill would have changed that to 15 credits a semester, which the National College Attainment Network estimated would result in a nearly $1,500 cut in benefits for students who can't increase their courseload because of work or caretaking responsibilities. The Senate left the 12-credit requirement intact.
