Budget 2025 the ‘buy your ticket to Australia' Budget
Don't get me wrong, as a business leader, the ability to deduct a bit of extra tax on new asset purchases is welcome and it might accelerate some investments. But it's not going to move the needle. Even Treasury predicts it will only add 1% of GDP over the next 20 years. That's 0.05% of GDP a year. Literally a rounding error for Statistics New Zealand.
That's it? An extra 0.05% of GDP, a Waipawa's worth of economic output a year. That's the big plan we've been told to expect?
Mark me down as unimpressed.
Meanwhile, unemployment is taking a huge toll on our young people: 10.9% unemployment among 20-24-year-olds, 23.9% for 15-19-year-olds in the latest figures. Not because they're lazy and 'on the PlayStation' as Nicola Willis puts it. But because there aren't enough jobs.
Youth unemployment didn't spike by 50% in the past year and a half because young people suddenly got lazy, eh? It's because the economy has lost over 30,000 jobs in that time, and the youngsters (along with Māori and Pasifika) always get the short end of the stick when there's not enough jobs to go around.
Hassling young people who are stuck on the dole because there's no jobs won't suddenly get them into work. Forcing 19-year-olds who have lost their job to ask their parents to support them and cutting their dole off regardless of whether their parents do or not is just mean.
And if they do get a job? Well, better hope it's not in a female-dominated industry, eh? Because pay equity is out the window. $13b of payouts to underpaid workers, $300 a week – gone.
Oh, and your KiwiSaver contribution is going up, and Treasury expects the added employer contribution will ultimately come out of workers' pay, too. But the Government contribution, that's getting cut in half, which will mean tens of thousands less in your nest-egg when you retire.
Maybe rangatahi should get some more education, so they can get a higher-paying job? Ah, but tertiary tuition funding is being cut in the Budget, and fees are going up.
What about somewhere to live? Good luck. Money is being pulled out of house building and First Home loan assistance, and going into paying landlords in Auckland to convert their rentals over to social housing.
I don't buy this dumping on the younger generation that seems to be so popular with this Government and certain commentators. They're not lazy or spoiled. They're no worse than we were and, in many ways, they're better – smart, inquisitive, and healthily sceptical. The latest Budget predicts slower growth and rising youth unemployment. Photo / Marty Melville
But, I tell you what, they've got it harder than most of us had it. The Kiwi Dream that we used to all have a decent shot at achieving – a home of your own, a decent job paying enough for good quality of life – must seem light years away to today's 20-year-olds. Not a goal, just a joke.
If you're a young person, you've got to be asking yourself – 'what am I staying here for?'
Not for low wages and lack of an economic vision.
Not for the crumbling infrastructure and the underfunded health system.
Not for a Government that cares so little about the climate you'll have to live in that it's planning to invest in natural gas drilling.
No wonder our young people are leaving this country in record numbers. After this Budget, the planes to Aussie are going to be chocka with our country's future, seeking a better chance across the sea.
I'm all for international travel and OEs. I mean, I'm on my middle-age OE right now. But if my kids and my young whānau go overseas, I want them to go because they have built a great foundation in Aotearoa and, now, they want to see the rest of the world. And I want them to want to come back home after their travels.
I don't want them to leave because the Government has as good as packed their bags for them and told them there's no hope for them here if they stay.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
13 hours ago
- Scoop
What Happens If My Partner Dies Without A Will?
, Money Correspondent Got questions? RNZ is launching a new podcast, No Stupid Questions with Susan Edmunds, next month. We'd love to hear more of your questions about money and the economy. You can send through written questions, like these ones, but - even better - you can drop us a voice memo to our email questions@ What is the situation with joint property and joint bank accounts, when someone dies without a will? I have been living with my partner since the late 1980s. Our house, main bank accounts and one car are in both names. Our latest car - bought last year from joint bank accounts - could only be registered in his name, due to changes in NZTA rules. I have a separate bank account in my name, which has a small amount of inherited money. He also has a separate bank account with some money from his family and a few shares in his name, which were acquired through his work. Many years ago, I was told that if either of us died, then any assets in joint names would go to the surviving partner. We have not made wills, have no children, my parents have both died and his father has died, but recently, I saw that if someone has a spouse or partner, and parents, but no children, the spouse received the personal effects, $155,000 and two-thirds of what is left. The deceased person's parents get the remaining third. That means, if I die first, all I have goes to him, which is what I want, but if my partner dies before me, does his remaining parent inherit a third of our house (meaning I will need to sell it, as I do not have funds to buy her out in my 60s), plus a third of our two cars, a third of our joint bank account money, and a third of his KiwiSaver, private superannuation, bank accounts, insurance payouts and shares in his name? His mother is in residential care with dementia and already has enough funds to cover her care for decades. I am worried I may become homeless. What is the situation with joint property and joint bank accounts, when someone dies? As a starting point, it might be re-assuring to note that assets that you hold in a joint name would pass to you, so if you own your house jointly, it would be yours, if your partner died. I went to Public Trust principal trustee Michelle Pope for more detail to answer the rest of your question. She said, when someone died, their estate would be distributed according to the Administration Act. "In the writer's case, if they die first without a will, their entire estate would pass to their partner, as they have no children or surviving parents," she said. "Assets held in joint names, listed by the writer as the house, main bank accounts and a car, will automatically pass to the surviving partner. However, it's important to confirm whether the property is legally owned jointly or in equal/unequal shares. "If it's jointly owned, it will pass by survivorship. If not, the deceased's share will need to be administered as part of their estate, which can add complexity. "If the writer's partner dies first without a will and has a surviving parent, Section 77(3) of the Administration Act 1969 applies. In this scenario, the writer would receive all personal chattels (including the car solely owned by the partner), a prescribed amount of $155,000 plus interest and two-thirds of the remaining estate. "The surviving parent would receive the remaining one-third of the estate. For clarity, the assets owned solely by the partner would appear to be a bank account, some shares, KiwiSaver, private superannuation and insurance. "Given the house is owned jointly, the writer can expect that the house will pass to them by what's called 'survivorship' in legal language and will not form part of their partner's estate. "It goes without saying that I'd encourage the writer and their partner to create wills. A will that clearly outlines their wishes can help remove any uncertainty when a person dies and can make the estate administration process a lot easier for loved ones." Having separated earlier this year, I chose to move out of the family home where my ex still resides. She is paying the mortgage, refuses to pay the house insurance or rates etc. the roof is leaking and she refuses to agree to making repairs, the ceiling is now ruined and mouldy. Though she has indicated she wishes to buy me out, she has not shared any form of offer or plan. She now refuses to engage in any form of correspondence at all. My questions - how do I go about necessary repairs to the house and how do I get her to move out, so that the house can be sold? Online research seems to point to tenancy/landlord situations which don't apply in this case. Is it actually just time for a lawyer to sort this out? Yes, I think the best - and really only - way to deal with this is to go to a lawyer as soon as possible. Can you please answer some questions about the way supermarkets operate. If I deliberately deceive customers, it's called deception. If I deliberately load, unload prices to make you think you are getting a better deal when you are not, this is manipulation to enhance your profit. Surely both of the above are profiteering and fraudulent. Supermarkets - and all retailers - have rules they have to comply with, when it comes to discounting, and it is illegal for businesses to mislead shoppers about prices. You can complain to the Commerce Commission, if you think someone has got it wrong. There is a lot of focus on supermarket pricing at the moment and Consumer NZ has been vocal about the current regime not being effective enough. It is calling for tougher penalties and infringement notice powers.
Scoop
13 hours ago
- Scoop
Ngāti Kahungunu Slams The Government's Decision To Push On With Marine Legislation
Ngāti Kahungunu, who have the country's second largest coastline from Paritū, north of the Māhia peninsula to Tūrakirae on the southern Wairarapa coast, have slammed the government's decision to push on with new legislation to make it harder for Māori to get customary marine title. Ngāti Kahungunu Chair, Bayden Barber, speaking from the World Expo in Osaka Japan says, 'We are a moana iwi. Our people have lived along our coast for centuries. Our ancestors had names like Tiakitai, Te Hapuku and Te Moananui because of the intimate relationship they had with the ocean. I am appalled by the Ministers' decision to push on with changes to the Takutai Moana legislation that make it harder for us to get customary title. Again, we see this government undermining the rights of Māori.' Earlier in the week, the Minister for Treaty Negotiations Paul Goldsmith, said that the government intended to pass the Marine and Coastal Area (MACA) Bill by the end of October, effectively ignoring a Supreme Court ruling saying that Māori do have customary marine and coastal rights and that these changes were not consistent with the intent of the Takutai Moana Bill passed in 2010. Barber adds, 'The legislation, as it currently stands, still sets a high bar for Māori to prove customary title, but at least we can test it through the Courts. These intended amendments to the Bill will make it near impossible for us win in court.' He continues, 'I have spoken to a few of the iwi leaders that are here in Osaka as part of the Te Aratini kaupapa. We need to send a strong collective message to this government, that this behaviour is unacceptable. It saddens me that we are still fighting the same fight 21 years on from the hīkoi for the Foreshore and Seabed.' Ngāti Kahungunu has a population of 95,741, the third largest iwi in Aotearoa and has 96 marae and over 400 hapū.
Newsroom
19 hours ago
- Newsroom
The secret diary of .. Don Brash
MONDAY There has been very poor television reception recently at the Golden Showers Retirement Village. I spent a good 20 minutes banging the sides of it and fiddling with dials, but still no picture. Or sound. When I plugged it in, it felt quite hot. 'Donald,' said the matron, a kindly Māori, 'why are you hitting the microwave?' 'I am merely wishing to watch the six o'clock news as read by Dougal Stevenson,' I said. She said it was only 1pm, and that I had visitors in the day room. She walked me there and I enjoyed the touch of her hand on my arm. The Māori are a sensual people. Young people from the Campaign Company were waiting for me. I recognised Jordan Williams. He has the kind of face that would never work in politics. There is something absolutely venal about it. But he has a first-class mind, and the proof was there to see in the billboard he unveiled in the latest Hobson's Pledge campaign against Māori wards. It showed a Māori woman, and the words, 'My mana doesn't need a mandate – vote no to Māori wards.' I said, 'This is very good. Well done. Who is she?' 'Just someone from a photo stock agency.' 'And is this your sister?', I asked, of the young woman with him. 'No, this is Ani O'Brien,' he said. The sun poured through the windows. I thought back to the days when I so very nearly led the National Party to victory at the polls in 2005. New Zealand was on the precipice of great change, of a profound new direction. But it was not to be, and now we live in very dark days indeed. TUESDAY There is something terribly wrong with the radio set at the retirement village. I set it to National Radio for Morning Report but someone must have changed the dial, because I kept hearing the announcers speaking in Māori. 'No, no,' I shouted. 'I don't want to hear this. Speak English!' 'Donald,' said the matron, 'time for lunch'. 'I don't want any of that hāngī you people eat,' I said. 'Its potato hash with spinach, poached eggs, and truffle emulsion.' Her hand felt so warm and smooth on my arm. I sat down at the dining table but an orderly said I had an urgent call from the Campaign Company. WEDNESDAY Busy all day withdrawing the Hobson's Pledge billboard because the Māori woman in it had not given her permission. Such a palaver. The irony is we would have had no trouble finding a Māori to front the campaign. Many Māori are against the Māori wards, just as there are many Māori who are against the use of Māori on radio programmes, in passports, and in government departments. I do miss Winston. THURSDAY Excellent interview about the Hobson's Pledge storm in a teacup with Sean Plunket from Morning Report, although for some reason he kept referring to something called The Platform. I have always respected Sean. He is one of the best Morning Report presenters, although I also have a lot of respect for Mike Hosking, and I do miss Lindsay Perigo. FRIDAY A very fine grilled salmon fillet for lunch today with buckwheat noodles, edamame beans and miso hollandaise. Afterwards I thought to trim the front lawns but couldn't get the mower to work. 'Donald,' said the matron, 'why are you pulling on the curtain rods?' The look she gave me was pure desire. Women have always found me attractive. It has been my cross to bear. But I allowed her to lead me away, and I remarked on her native beauty. 'You are very dark for a Māori,' I said. 'I'm Sri Lankan,' she said. The sun poured through the windows. I thought back to 2005. So close. I was so close.
